Re: Print card -- inconsistent results -- clarification

2008-06-23 Thread Timothy Miller

Thanks Bill and Jacque.

I keep thinking I have isolated it, then it turns out I haven't.

I'll chip away at it for as long as necessary. If I ever really,  
really isolate it. Maybe I can solve it. If I figure it out, I'll  
check back in.


Cheers,


Tim


On Jun 21, 2008, at 6:40 AM, william humphrey wrote:




What is it?



Magic.
Why not try (using original stack) generating an output from your  
data to a
substack and a new card in that substack and see if that prints ok?  
I do all

my printing that way anyway to get more control.

Bill
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Print card -- inconsistent results -- clarification

2008-06-21 Thread william humphrey


 What is it?


Magic.
Why not try (using original stack) generating an output from your data to a
substack and a new card in that substack and see if that prints ok? I do all
my printing that way anyway to get more control.

Bill
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Print card -- inconsistent results -- clarification

2008-06-19 Thread Timothy Miller

It's me, the OP, posting a clarification.

I've isolated the issue more precisely.

As far as I can tell, on stacks where the HCstack property is true,  
background objects such as text in fields, field borders, button  
text, and button borders, print fuzzy, probably at screen resolution.


If the same objects are  copied and pasted as ungrouped objects, they  
print clearly.


This does not seem to be an issue for stacks whose HCstack property  
is false.


Rev Media 2, version 2.9.0. OS 10.4.11. Power PC Mac.

Any thoughts?

Tim Miller


On Jun 18, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Timothy Miller wrote:

We're talking about pretty elementary stacks here. Mostly buttons  
and fields. Text in the fields.


I'm keeping it simple by choosing Print card... from the File menu.

Some of my stacks print at device resolution. The printed output  
looks good. Text is very sharp. These are all stacks that were  
created in RR.


At least two of my stacks appear to print at screen resolution.  
Text looks like it came out of a crappy old dot matrix printer.  
Buttons look fuzzy, too, and so on. These are hyperCard retread  
stacks.


However, I have other hyperCard retread stacks that seem to print  
at device resolution.


Investigating further...

If I duplicate a field that normally prints fuzzy, and print again,  
both fields print fuzzy. This would be on a HC retread stack.


On the other hand, if I make a new field and type identical text  
into it, with identical font and textsize, the new one prints real  
nice, even though right next to fuzzy fields.


It appears that this phenomenon is related to the hyperCard retread  
issue.


I'm looking at the field properties, comparing the fuzzy-printing  
ones to the clear-printing ones. I don't see anything that would  
account for the difference.


The screen display of fuzzy-printing and clear-printing stacks  
seems similar.


What am I not getting?

Thanks,


Tim
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Print card -- inconsistent results -- clarification

2008-06-19 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 It's me, the OP, posting a clarification.
 
 I've isolated the issue more precisely.
 
 As far as I can tell, on stacks where the HCstack
 property is true,  
 background objects such as text in fields, field
 borders, button  
 text, and button borders, print fuzzy, probably at
 screen resolution.
 
 If the same objects are  copied and pasted as
 ungrouped objects, they  
 print clearly.
 
 This does not seem to be an issue for stacks whose
 HCstack property  
 is false.
 
 Rev Media 2, version 2.9.0. OS 10.4.11. Power PC
 Mac.
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 Tim Miller
 

Do the groups have an ink or blend applied to them?
You should probably open an entry in the Quality
Center http://quality.runrev.com and attach an
example stack. That way, the engineers at the
Mothership can see what's going on.

Best regards,

Jan Schenkel.

Quartam Reports  PDF Library for Revolution
http://www.quartam.com

=
As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time.  (La 
Rochefoucauld)


  
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Print card -- inconsistent results -- clarification

2008-06-19 Thread Timothy Miller


On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote:



Do the groups have an ink or blend applied to them?


I don't think so, though inks and blends are not very familiar to me.


You should probably open an entry in the Quality
Center http://quality.runrev.com and attach an
example stack. That way, the engineers at the
Mothership can see what's going on.


Okey dokey. Maybe a bug, huh?






Tim Miller
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Print card -- inconsistent results -- clarification

2008-06-19 Thread Timothy Miller

On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote:



You should probably open an entry in the Quality
Center http://quality.runrev.com and attach an
example stack.


I started to do that by making a minimal version of the problem stack.

After reducing the number of cards (of the same bg) from 450 to 2,  
the number of bg fields from 185 to 5, the number of bg btns from 50  
to 3 (some of these buttons and fields contained substantial scripts,  
and at least one had a script of 40,000 characters), removing 30,000  
characters from the bg script and another 30,000 from the stack  
script, resizing the stack and background (much, much smaller -- the  
cards were four screens tall before), the remaining bg objects  
started printing clearly, with the exception of the text in two bg  
buttons. I compared the printed output side by side. It's not my  
imagination.


Meanwhile, I've discovered I cannot reliably replicate all phenomena  
I previously reported. I've found some inexplicable inconsistencies.


Meanwhile, the original large and cluttered stack continues to print  
badly.


I suppose, at this point, something is painfully obvious to everyone  
but me.


What is it?

FWIW -- I have almost a GB of physical RAM. If no other large  
applications are open, RR does not page out to virtual memory.  
Closing all other applications does not improve the fuzzy printing.  
This machine is an old, slow G4. Even with print jobs stopped, Print  
card maxes the CPU for several seconds. But print card on a small,  
simple stack that prints without problems also maxes the CPU. I have  
not noticed printing problems with any other application.


Thanks again.


Tim Miller 
___

use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Print card -- inconsistent results -- clarification

2008-06-19 Thread J. Landman Gay

Timothy Miller wrote:

Meanwhile, I've discovered I cannot reliably replicate all 

phenomena I previously reported. I've found some inexplicable

inconsistencies. 


Like my backscript. I'll trade you a working field for a preOpenCard 
handler.


I suppose, at this point, something is painfully obvious to everyone but 
me.


Don't think so, or somebody would have said by now. :) I haven't a clue 
why it's doing that. My gut says it's something about fonts, but I have 
no real evidence. But HC used Geneva and Rev doesn't, and HC used 
bitmapped fonts (which print like you're describing) and Rev doesn't, 
and...I don't know. Something in there sounds like the reason.


I wonder what would happen if you changed the font on a bad field, 
saved the stack, and then changed it back. Maybe that would cause Rev to 
re-examine the font rendering.




What is it?


Magic.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Print card -- inconsistent results

2008-06-18 Thread Timothy Miller
We're talking about pretty elementary stacks here. Mostly buttons and  
fields. Text in the fields.


I'm keeping it simple by choosing Print card... from the File menu.

Some of my stacks print at device resolution. The printed output  
looks good. Text is very sharp. These are all stacks that were  
created in RR.


At least two of my stacks appear to print at screen resolution. Text  
looks like it came out of a crappy old dot matrix printer. Buttons  
look fuzzy, too, and so on. These are hyperCard retread stacks.


However, I have other hyperCard retread stacks that seem to print at  
device resolution.


Investigating further...

If I duplicate a field that normally prints fuzzy, and print again,  
both fields print fuzzy. This would be on a HC retread stack.


On the other hand, if I make a new field and type identical text into  
it, with identical font and textsize, the new one prints real nice,  
even though right next to fuzzy fields.


It appears that this phenomenon is related to the hyperCard retread  
issue.


I'm looking at the field properties, comparing the fuzzy-printing  
ones to the clear-printing ones. I don't see anything that would  
account for the difference.


The screen display of fuzzy-printing and clear-printing stacks seems  
similar.


What am I not getting?

Thanks,


Tim
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution