Re: Quicktime vs Animation

[Marcus Bointon]

on 5/3/2002 1:04 am, Tim Chambers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> It occurs to me that I could do the imagery and sound in Hypercard, make
> the Quicktime movies from there then import the movies to Revolution.
> But with the images being in PICT format, I wonder what they would look
> like on the Net.

Why should that be a problem? QT will play a bunch of any kind of images as
a movie, plus if you're planning on putting it inline, you'll be better off
compressing it with something better and turning it into a regular movie.
PNG is a great choice if you have flat colours, much better than the
animation codec.

Marcus
-- 
Marcus Bointon
Synchromedia Limited: Putting you in the picture

[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Quicktime vs Animation

[Tim Chambers]

Troy

Thanks again, you're way beyond my competence at this point. I'm totally 
new to Revolution, animation and programming. Hypercard I can do, and if 
I could import the color stacks I'd do it all in Hypercard and transfer 
it to Revolution. Will keep experimenting with getting the images the 
way I want them then I'll get back to you.

It occurs to me that I could do the imagery and sound in Hypercard, make 
the Quicktime movies from there then import the movies to Revolution. 
But with the images being in PICT format, I wonder what they would look 
like on the Net.

Tim



___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution