I've been following this thread, and agree it's sometimes confusing.
My plugin suite at:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/NewPlugins.htm
Prints to the message box when RR launches the following:
RunRev version: 1.5 A1 r1
MetaCard engine version: 2.4.2
Build Number: 2
it does this with the following function:
on answerVersion
if exists(stack "revMenuBar") then
put "RunRev version: " & revAppVersion() & return & "MetaCard engine
version: " & the version & return & "Build Number: " & the buildNumber into
theMsg
else
put "MetaCard engine version: " & the version & return & "Build Number:
" & the buildNumber into theMsg
end if
put theMsg
end answerVersion
Chipp
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Norris
> (dialup)
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RR/MC mixup (was 'Ken's recent bad day')
>
>
> **
> > From: "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Ken's recent bad day.
> > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:45:45 -0600
>
> >
> >>> I have not reported this because (a) I am waiting to see whether it
> >>> is fixed in v2.5 and (b) I can work around the problem by making a
> >>> card the current card before trying to access its controls via the AO.
> >> --
> >> At least I'm not alone with some anamolies.
> >>
> >> Version 2.5? You mean 2.0 right? Rev hasn't said anything
> about a version
> >> 2.5 AFAIK.
> >
> > I believe Rob was talking about the MetaCard engine under Rev
> 2.0 (which is
> > MetaCard 2.5).
> --
> I seem to remember a similar mixup back then as well.
>
> Can we get a definitive list of which RR versions use which MC engines?
>
> Ken N.
>
> ___
> use-revolution mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
