Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-17 Thread Dar Scott
On Apr 30, 2005, at 1:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
My Panther license says this:
 2.A
 This License allows you to install and use one copy
 of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
 computer at a time.  This License does not allow
 the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
 at a time [...]
I was planning out a testing system that would have lots of Apple boots 
and realized I might have a problem.

Does this mean that if I have only one license for Panther that I can 
have only one version of Panther per computer.  It says I can install 
one copy.

Dar
--
**
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
Programming and software
**
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-04 Thread David Burgun
What about all those hundreds on industrialized Mac's? They have no 
labels on at all! They are just regular Mac's with the insides put 
into a sealed steal box with a Giant On/Off switch on the front!

I guess you'd have to define what constitues a computer too! I mean I 
can run Linux on my Tivo which has a PowerPC and it's a Digital Video 
Recorder not a computer! That would be a good one for the lawyers 
to fight out!

All the Best
Dave

My Panther license says this:
 2.A
 This License allows you to install and use one copy
 of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
 computer at a time.  This License does not allow
 the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
 at a time [...]
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-04 Thread Derek Bump
Chipp,
Thank you for the compliments.  I can't tell you how much I appreciate 
that coming from you.

The MacOS X port is coming along, but it's difficult trying to remember 
some of the differences between Mac and Windows. :)  The funny thing is 
that I grew up on a Mac.

I am working on a Linux port, but until 2.5.1 I was not ready to 
distribute it.  My hopes now are to release 2.7 on all 3 platforms. 
Hopefully that will help in my attempts for donations towards a Mac Mini.

So again, thank you.
Derek Bump
Dreamscape Software
___
Compress Images Easily with JPEGCompress 2.6.1
http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com/
Chipp Walters wrote:
Derek,
I just downloaded your JPEGCompress application. Very professional and 
what a wonderful set of features. I like it! You should definitely port 
to Mac and Linux.

best,
Chipp
Derek Bump wrote:
So thank you to who ever it was that brought up this topic.  I will 
now be able to bring JPEGCompress to Mac OS X (well, provided that Rev 
will work after it's downloaded).
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Derek Bump
Well, PearPC may have been off-topic, but it's the best off-topic post 
I've seen in a while.

My Dell-labeled computer is running Panther in another window, 
downloading Revolution 2.5.1, all while I'm writing this message to you 
in Thunderbird on XP.

So thank you to who ever it was that brought up this topic.  I will now 
be able to bring JPEGCompress to Mac OS X (well, provided that Rev will 
work after it's downloaded).

Derek Bump
Dreamscape Software
___
Compress Images Easily with JPEGCompress 2.6.1
http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread MisterX

So if i stick the Apple Label from my old 128K, 
on my PC I can run it!

Those guys should think differently! ;))

VNC does a great job too! With cheap 500$ HW... 
Why bother with a 240MHz G3 (info pulled of the web)?

Time is money! ;)

Cheers
Xav 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Frank D. Engel, Jr.
 Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 15:07
 To: How to use Revolution
 Subject: Re: OT : PearPC
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Right, the key phrase being Apple-labeled computer.
 
 On Apr 30, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
 
 
  On Apr 30, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
 
  If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a 
 clause which 
  states that it cannot legally be installed on non-apple hardware.
 
  My Panther license says this:
 
   2.A
   This License allows you to install and use one copy
   of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
   computer at a time.  This License does not allow
   the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
   at a time [...]
 
  Dar
 
  --
  **
  DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
  http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
  A Sponsor of RevCon West
  **
 
  ___
  use-revolution mailing list
  use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
  http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 
 - ---
 Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 $ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
 $ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
 John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only 
 begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not 
 perish, but have everlasting life.
 $
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
 
 iD8DBQFCdiX37aqtWrR9cZoRAmY4AJ43lIxqILhSIoGSXjSXq/+Co35g+gCeOP9a
 WoXP193ApSxFbvpmn1t7ri0=
 =zieJ
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 
 ___
 $0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer 
 10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
 Signup at www.doteasy.com
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I suspect the argument is that Apple-labeled means Labeled by 
Apple, not Labeled with an Apple

Although, conspicuously, a definitive definition does seem to be 
lacking from the license...

On May 3, 2005, at 11:20 AM, MisterX wrote:
So if i stick the Apple Label from my old 128K,
on my PC I can run it!
Those guys should think differently! ;))
VNC does a great job too! With cheap 500$ HW...
Why bother with a 240MHz G3 (info pulled of the web)?
Time is money! ;)
Cheers
Xav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank D. Engel, Jr.
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 15:07
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: OT : PearPC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Right, the key phrase being Apple-labeled computer.
On Apr 30, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Apr 30, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a
clause which
states that it cannot legally be installed on non-apple hardware.
My Panther license says this:
 2.A
 This License allows you to install and use one copy
 of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
 computer at a time.  This License does not allow
 the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
 at a time [...]
Dar
--
**
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
A Sponsor of RevCon West
**
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only
begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not
perish, but have everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCdiX37aqtWrR9cZoRAmY4AJ43lIxqILhSIoGSXjSXq/+Co35g+gCeOP9a
WoXP193ApSxFbvpmn1t7ri0=
=zieJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten 
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have 
everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCd5jX7aqtWrR9cZoRArbiAKCLnL6xLgzORQmV8Sc4lc+on1gt8ACbBMY4
fEiHxZ3oQugfkpn03rb0DF0=
=MLRT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Dennis Brown
Sloppy contract wording by Apple (and clever wording by MS) was how MS 
got the right to make Windows from Apple in the first place.  In fact 
clever contract wording is how MS became the dominant provider of an OS 
to PC makers.  Superior contract writing wins out over superior 
technologies in business --make sure you read the fine print.

Dennis
On May 3, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I suspect the argument is that Apple-labeled means Labeled by 
Apple, not Labeled with an Apple

Although, conspicuously, a definitive definition does seem to be 
lacking from the license...

On May 3, 2005, at 11:20 AM, MisterX wrote:
So if i stick the Apple Label from my old 128K,
on my PC I can run it!
Those guys should think differently! ;))
VNC does a great job too! With cheap 500$ HW...
Why bother with a 240MHz G3 (info pulled of the web)?
Time is money! ;)
Cheers
Xav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank D. Engel, Jr.
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 15:07
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: OT : PearPC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Right, the key phrase being Apple-labeled computer.
On Apr 30, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Apr 30, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a
clause which
states that it cannot legally be installed on non-apple hardware.
My Panther license says this:
 2.A
 This License allows you to install and use one copy
 of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
 computer at a time.  This License does not allow
 the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
 at a time [...]
Dar
--
**
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
A Sponsor of RevCon West
**
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only
begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not
perish, but have everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCdiX37aqtWrR9cZoRAmY4AJ43lIxqILhSIoGSXjSXq/+Co35g+gCeOP9a
WoXP193ApSxFbvpmn1t7ri0=
=zieJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten 
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have 
everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCd5jX7aqtWrR9cZoRArbiAKCLnL6xLgzORQmV8Sc4lc+on1gt8ACbBMY4
fEiHxZ3oQugfkpn03rb0DF0=
=MLRT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Dar Scott
On May 3, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Dennis Brown wrote:
Sloppy contract wording by Apple (and clever wording by MS) was how MS 
got the right to make Windows from Apple in the first place.  In fact 
clever contract wording is how MS became the dominant provider of an 
OS to PC makers.  Superior contract writing wins out over superior 
technologies in business --make sure you read the fine print.
Personally, I think the meaning of Apple labeled is clear.
However, the wording is sloppy in general.  Strictly, it says you can't 
run it on more than one Apple computer and you can't store it on more 
than one computer.  That leaves PearPC in the clear.

However, I think the intent is to exclude PearPC.
Also, Apples lawyers are bigger than mine and even bigger than those of 
most of my customers.

And, public opinion favors Apple.
I'd save my nickels for a mini and personal kvm switch.
I think Darwin is another matter.
If I was writing a driver for a board that needed to be emulated 
because its still being prototyped, I'd beg Apple for special 
permission.  I'd still hustle the prototype.

Dar
--
**
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
A Sponsor of RevCon West
**
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Dan Shafer
Amen.
It's never about the technology. I've seen so many great technologies  
buried by inferior products that had either more marketing money or  
better lawyers than I've seen succeed.

On May 3, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Dennis Brown wrote:
Sloppy contract wording by Apple (and clever wording by MS) was how  
MS got the right to make Windows from Apple in the first place.  In  
fact clever contract wording is how MS became the dominant provider  
of an OS to PC makers.  Superior contract writing wins out over  
superior technologies in business --make sure you read the fine print.

Dennis
On May 3, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I suspect the argument is that Apple-labeled means Labeled by  
Apple, not Labeled with an Apple

Although, conspicuously, a definitive definition does seem to be  
lacking from the license...

On May 3, 2005, at 11:20 AM, MisterX wrote:

So if i stick the Apple Label from my old 128K,
on my PC I can run it!
Those guys should think differently! ;))
VNC does a great job too! With cheap 500$ HW...
Why bother with a 240MHz G3 (info pulled of the web)?
Time is money! ;)
Cheers
Xav

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank D. Engel, Jr.
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 15:07
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: OT : PearPC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Right, the key phrase being Apple-labeled computer.
On Apr 30, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:

On Apr 30, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:

If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a
clause which
states that it cannot legally be installed on non-apple hardware.
My Panther license says this:
 2.A
 This License allows you to install and use one copy
 of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
 computer at a time.  This License does not allow
 the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
 at a time [...]
Dar
--
**
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
A Sponsor of RevCon West
**
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only
begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not
perish, but have everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCdiX37aqtWrR9cZoRAmY4AJ43lIxqILhSIoGSXjSXq/+Co35g+gCeOP9a
WoXP193ApSxFbvpmn1t7ri0=
=zieJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only  
begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish,  
but have everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCd5jX7aqtWrR9cZoRArbiAKCLnL6xLgzORQmV8Sc4lc+on1gt8ACbBMY4
fEiHxZ3oQugfkpn03rb0DF0=
=MLRT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


~~
Dan Shafer, Co-Chair
RevConWest '05
June 17-18, 2005, Monterey, California
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit/RevConWest
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Lynn Fredricks
 Amen.
 
 It's never about the technology. I've seen so many great 
 technologies buried by inferior products that had either more 
 marketing money or better lawyers than I've seen succeed.

Technology isnt usually what wins the day, but neither is it entirely money
or lawyers, but strategic use of both. Marketing (and sales) isnt a big
packaging machine that vendors throw money into, as its very possible to
spend gobs and gobs of money and still end up with a total failure.

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
President
Proactive International, LLC

- Because it is about who you know.(tm)



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread MisterX
Sorry to disapoint you but Microsfoot has delivered in terms of
server availability, scalability, clustering, AD, DFS, compatibility (since
long ago),
and multiprocessing. Just like Macs or mainframes... 

Still, without software, an OS is not happy...

As we all know, or microsoft never sued another interface there after...
They! got sued for things like one-clik this or that... 

Then we got MetaCard for any GUI anytime!

Same with this company suing apple for the tiger name!
Howtotally-ridiculous! Instead of reaping on the accrued name marketing
partisanship! Bunch of dweebs IMOHO! 

Had they combined forces... 

Xav
http://monsieurx.com/taoo 
Q: nitrous + imagination = ?
A: bumbastic scripting environments
Programming Jazz for all!

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Dan Shafer
 Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 19:14
 To: How to use Revolution
 Subject: Re: OT : PearPC
 
 Amen.
 
 It's never about the technology. I've seen so many great 
 technologies buried by inferior products that had either more 
 marketing money or better lawyers than I've seen succeed.
 
 
 On May 3, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Dennis Brown wrote:
 
  Sloppy contract wording by Apple (and clever wording by MS) 
 was how MS 
  got the right to make Windows from Apple in the first 
 place.  In fact 
  clever contract wording is how MS became the dominant 
 provider of an 
  OS to PC makers.  Superior contract writing wins out over superior 
  technologies in business --make sure you read the fine print.
 
  Dennis
 
  On May 3, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
 
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  I suspect the argument is that Apple-labeled means Labeled by 
  Apple, not Labeled with an Apple
 
  Although, conspicuously, a definitive definition does seem to be 
  lacking from the license...
 
 
  On May 3, 2005, at 11:20 AM, MisterX wrote:
 
 
 
  So if i stick the Apple Label from my old 128K, on my 
 PC I can run 
  it!
 
  Those guys should think differently! ;))
 
  VNC does a great job too! With cheap 500$ HW...
  Why bother with a 240MHz G3 (info pulled of the web)?
 
  Time is money! ;)
 
  Cheers
  Xav
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Frank 
  D. Engel, Jr.
  Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 15:07
  To: How to use Revolution
  Subject: Re: OT : PearPC
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Right, the key phrase being Apple-labeled computer.
 
  On Apr 30, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
 
 
 
  On Apr 30, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
 
 
  If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a
 
  clause which
 
  states that it cannot legally be installed on 
 non-apple hardware.
 
 
  My Panther license says this:
 
   2.A
   This License allows you to install and use one copy
   of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
   computer at a time.  This License does not allow
   the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
   at a time [...]
 
  Dar
 
  --
  **
  DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
  http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
  A Sponsor of RevCon West
  **
 
  ___
  use-revolution mailing list
  use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
  http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 
 
  - ---
  Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  $ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual $ true | cat 
 /usr/manual | 
  grep John 3:16
  John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only 
  begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, 
  but have everlasting life.
  $
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
 
  iD8DBQFCdiX37aqtWrR9cZoRAmY4AJ43lIxqILhSIoGSXjSXq/+Co35g+gCeOP9a
  WoXP193ApSxFbvpmn1t7ri0=
  =zieJ
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 
  ___
  $0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer 10 
  Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
  Signup at www.doteasy.com
 
  ___
  use-revolution mailing list
  use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
  http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 
 
  ___
  use-revolution mailing list
  use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
  http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 
 
  - ---
  Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  $ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual $ true | cat /usr/manual | 
  grep John 3:16
  John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his 
 only begotten 
  Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have 
  everlasting life

Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Dan Shafer
Well, Lynn, while I wouldn't disagree with your perspective, I would  
nonetheless argue that a world-class technology product with few  
marketing resources and no legal clout will get buried by a  
competitive product which, though inferior, has more marketing money  
and/or legal backing 99 times out of 100.

While it's certainly true that you can spend gobs and gobs of money  
and still end up with a total failure, it's less likely than having a  
total failure from *lack* of marketing resources. And given a market  
with two products characterized as I did above, the one with more  
marketing will beat the superior product with mind-numbing regularity.

On May 3, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Amen.
It's never about the technology. I've seen so many great
technologies buried by inferior products that had either more
marketing money or better lawyers than I've seen succeed.
Technology isnt usually what wins the day, but neither is it  
entirely money
or lawyers, but strategic use of both. Marketing (and sales) isnt a  
big
packaging machine that vendors throw money into, as its very  
possible to
spend gobs and gobs of money and still end up with a total failure.

Best regards,
Lynn Fredricks
President
Proactive International, LLC
- Because it is about who you know.(tm)

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


~~
Dan Shafer, Co-Chair
RevConWest '05
June 17-18, 2005, Monterey, California
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit/RevConWest
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread jbv
when do you guys write product, do you men computer / software
product only, or does it apply to any kind of product ?
I'm asking because in the field of movies for instance, a superior film

with low marketing resources can nevertheless meet a great success by
word of mouth... this happens on a regular basis. And the opposite also
happens : a bad movie with huge marketing resources can fail, because
of word of mouth...
JB

 Well, Lynn, while I wouldn't disagree with your perspective, I would
 nonetheless argue that a world-class technology product with few
 marketing resources and no legal clout will get buried by a
 competitive product which, though inferior, has more marketing money
 and/or legal backing 99 times out of 100.

 While it's certainly true that you can spend gobs and gobs of money
 and still end up with a total failure, it's less likely than having a
 total failure from *lack* of marketing resources. And given a market
 with two products characterized as I did above, the one with more
 marketing will beat the superior product with mind-numbing regularity.

 On May 3, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:

  Amen.
 
  It's never about the technology. I've seen so many great
  technologies buried by inferior products that had either more
  marketing money or better lawyers than I've seen succeed.
 
 
  Technology isnt usually what wins the day, but neither is it
  entirely money
  or lawyers, but strategic use of both. Marketing (and sales) isnt a
  big
  packaging machine that vendors throw money into, as its very
  possible to
  spend gobs and gobs of money and still end up with a total failure.
 
  Best regards,
 
  Lynn Fredricks
  President
  Proactive International, LLC
 
  - Because it is about who you know.(tm)
 
 
 
  ___
  use-revolution mailing list
  use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
  http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
 
 

 ~~
 Dan Shafer, Co-Chair
 RevConWest '05
 June 17-18, 2005, Monterey, California
 http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit/RevConWest

 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Lynn Fredricks
 Well, Lynn, while I wouldn't disagree with your perspective, 
 I would nonetheless argue that a world-class technology 
 product with few marketing resources and no legal clout will 
 get buried by a competitive product which, though inferior, 
 has more marketing money and/or legal backing 99 times out of 100.
 
 While it's certainly true that you can spend gobs and gobs of 
 money and still end up with a total failure, it's less likely 
 than having a total failure from *lack* of marketing 
 resources. And given a market with two products characterized 
 as I did above, the one with more marketing will beat the 
 superior product with mind-numbing regularity.

Right, and there's my point -- its about sufficient marketing *resources*,
which includes having competent marketing for whatever your budget is. Not
having enough money is a contributing but different factor. The commonality
is that they are both the result of poor management decisions.

There are many vendors that field technically superior products then crash
and burn, and their argument is that they were outspent or overwhelmed by a
superior force (which is almost as genuine as the customers just didn't get
it). In many instances, the vendor _never really marketed at all_ and
thought that superior technology or vision of superior technology would
carry the day.

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
President
Proactive International, LLC

- Because it is about who you know.(tm)




___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Lynn Fredricks
 when do you guys write product, do you men computer / 
 software product only, or does it apply to any kind of product ?
 I'm asking because in the field of movies for instance, a 
 superior film
 
 with low marketing resources can nevertheless meet a great 
 success by word of mouth... this happens on a regular basis. 
 And the opposite also happens : a bad movie with huge 
 marketing resources can fail, because of word of mouth...

Word of mouth is also a form of marketing: viral marketing.

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
President
Proactive International, LLC

- Because it is about who you know.(tm)


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread jbv



 Word of mouth is also a form of marketing: viral marketing.


IMHO word of mouth and viral marketing are 2 completely
different things : viral marketing is usually part of a strategy
built by a distributor, while word of mouth is rather out of
control and not part of a strategy (ie: telling your friends to
go and see a movie)...

Best,
JB

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Lynn Fredricks
  Word of mouth is also a form of marketing: viral marketing.
 
 
 IMHO word of mouth and viral marketing are 2 completely 
 different things : viral marketing is usually part of a 
 strategy built by a distributor, while word of mouth is 
 rather out of control and not part of a strategy (ie: telling 
 your friends to go and see a movie)...

It is art to conceal art. -Ars est celare artem 
-Ovid

Thank you, my classical education :-)

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
President
Proactive International, LLC

- Because it is about who you know.(tm)



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-03 Thread Chipp Walters
Derek,
I just downloaded your JPEGCompress application. Very professional and 
what a wonderful set of features. I like it! You should definitely port 
to Mac and Linux.

best,
Chipp
Derek Bump wrote:
So thank you to who ever it was that brought up this topic.  I will now 
be able to bring JPEGCompress to Mac OS X (well, provided that Rev will 
work after it's downloaded).
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-05-02 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Right, the key phrase being Apple-labeled computer.
On Apr 30, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Apr 30, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a clause which 
states that it cannot legally be installed on non-apple hardware.
My Panther license says this:
 2.A
 This License allows you to install and use one copy
 of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
 computer at a time.  This License does not allow
 the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
 at a time [...]
Dar
--
**
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
A Sponsor of RevCon West
**
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten 
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have 
everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCdiX37aqtWrR9cZoRAmY4AJ43lIxqILhSIoGSXjSXq/+Co35g+gCeOP9a
WoXP193ApSxFbvpmn1t7ri0=
=zieJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-04-30 Thread Frank D. Engel, Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a clause which 
states that it cannot legally be installed on non-apple hardware.  You 
could use that to run Linux, I'm sure, but you can't legally install OS 
X on that emulator (or any other, for that matter).

On Apr 30, 2005, at 10:54 AM, jbv wrote:
Has anyone seen / used this :
http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/about.html
http://prasys.skidsoftware.com/intro.htm
just curious...
JB
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

- ---
Frank D. Engel, Jr.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ ln -s /usr/share/kjvbible /usr/manual
$ true | cat /usr/manual | grep John 3:16
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten 
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have 
everlasting life.
$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCc5xS7aqtWrR9cZoRAn2XAJ479ZqaVR2oO0dcwIUEy1xp/iR++wCdGi64
RtVM2vunoUNx8st5lsd9PJE=
=qLvs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: OT : PearPC

2005-04-30 Thread Dar Scott
On Apr 30, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
If you read the license agreement for OS X, there is a clause which 
states that it cannot legally be installed on non-apple hardware.
My Panther license says this:
 2.A
 This License allows you to install and use one copy
 of the Apple Software on a single Apple-labeled
 computer at a time.  This License does not allow
 the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer
 at a time [...]
Dar
--
**
DSC (Dar Scott Consulting  Dar's Lab)
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
A Sponsor of RevCon West
**
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution