Re: Rev and version control systems

2007-02-25 Thread David Bovill

Hi Ben - hows Brighton?

Yes _ ia have been using CVS and Revolution from 1999 and switched to svn
last year. I have a library for controlling svn from within Rev and some GUI
work, integrated with a documentation web site. If you would like to check
this out contact me off list.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Rev and version control systems

2007-02-21 Thread Ben Rubinstein
Has anyone got experience of using Revolution with general version control 
systems (eg CVS, Subversion)?  (I'm aware of MagicCarpet, but I'm interested 
in experience of working with Rev and general systems.)


Obviously stacks can be submitted as binary files, but I was wondering whether 
anyone has gone beyond this.


TIA,

  Ben Rubinstein  |  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cogapp  |  Phone: +44 (0)1273-821600
  http://www.cogapp.com   |  Fax  : +44 (0)1273-728866

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Rev and version control systems

2007-02-21 Thread Richard Gaskin

Ben Rubinstein wrote:
Has anyone got experience of using Revolution with general version control 
systems (eg CVS, Subversion)?  (I'm aware of MagicCarpet, but I'm interested 
in experience of working with Rev and general systems.)


Obviously stacks can be submitted as binary files, but I was wondering whether 
anyone has gone beyond this.


I've never needed a finer level of granularity than the stack.  Not only 
does it make a natural dividing line that works easily from a technical 
standpoint, I've found that it helps project management to keep the 
focus at that level, allowing specific team members to work on discrete 
UI windows and libraries without interference.


The stack-level approach has worked well for me with teams with as few 
as three and as many as 25 members.


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Managing Editor, revJournal
 ___
 Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Rev and version control systems

2007-02-21 Thread Marielle Lange

On 21 Feb 2007, at 19:35, Ben Rubinstein wrote:

Has anyone got experience of using Revolution with general version  
control systems (eg CVS, Subversion)?


Obviously stacks can be submitted as binary files, but I was  
wondering whether anyone has gone beyond this.


Hi Ben,

What I do is store all my scripts within groups rather than at card  
or stack level. Because of this, I can easily create a system for  
managing my libraries, by which the library group is created on the  
fly, using a text file stored locally. I have version control on the  
text versions of the files.


If you wonder what I mean by library, have a look at:
http://revolution.widged.com/libraries/lib_textprocessing_v0.1.txt
http://revolution.widged.com/libraries/lib_fileprocessing_v0.2.txt
http://revolution.widged.com/libraries/lib_xml_v0.1.txt

I have more than 60 of them ;-).


Best,
Marielle

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution