Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-05-25 Thread Robert Mann

Before I post a proposal to the quality center :

Would a command revBrowserPrintToPdf browserId, fileName (returning a result
if possible) be useful to many of us?

Problem though : on mac os, pdf is within the system so it makes sens. On
the other hand it seems that pdf was not included in windows, and is still
not shipping with  windows 7. So that is a problem for multi os development.
Is there an easy way around that?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/RevBrowserPrint-tp1564242p2231124.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-05-25 Thread Robert Mann

I am looking for a solution to print pdf files from the browser.

problems

to summit up regarding the limitations of revBrowserPrint command :

1) No background print process : revbrowser systematicaly calls the dialog,
no parameters can be passed and you get no answer about what has been going
on.

In my case, I wanted preset pdf printing and give a file name. Out it goes!
(why are so many basic needs only fullfilled to 90% by runrev
implementation... begining tro drive me nuts and doubtful!) 


2) Not reliable for flash content : doe not seem to print out flash
content... which is a serious problem for a lot of sites.. and revBrowser is
often crashed on intensive flash based sites when revBrowserPrint is called
(my experience on macBook mac os x 10.5.8).

3) Sometimes prints the whole html page, good, but other times only the
visible portion of the browser, like a picture, and that is no good! I did
not quite get the rationale of it (when exacly and why..). it seems it may
be linked with 2) maybe trying to offer an alternate view when not able to
print the flash content!?

to be a little bit positive, I'll have to troddle on and see what can be
done with safari scripting but there goes the windows compatibility away and
the whole point of using runrev as a multi-platform dev tool.. Sometimes I
do have the xTalk blues or is it the runrev blues!?? 



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/RevBrowserPrint-tp1564242p2229797.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RevBrowserPrint

2010-03-02 Thread Ray Horsley
Anyone have any experience working with this command?  I'd like to  
suppress the print dialog if possible, and if that's not possible then  
it's important to know whether the user completed or dismissed the  
print dialog.  I'm not getting anything returned in the result which  
would indicate what the user did with the print dialog window (which  
seems unavoidable).


Thanks,

Ray Horsley
LinkIt! Software

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-02-22 Thread Ray Horsley

Mark,

Once again, thanks for your input on this.  Here's my conclusion.  I  
can either:


   1)  Print only the browser part of the card and get clear text
   2)  Print only the non-browser part of the card and get clear text
   3)  Print both the browser and non-browser parts (via snap shot)  
and get fuzzy text


I think we can live with this limitation so we'll probably go with  
number 1.


Thanks,

Ray

On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:


Hi Ray,

Yes, indeed, the printing quality will be bad, but at least you'll  
be able to print something at all.


Do you have any good reason the believe that the revBrowserPrint  
command produces better results?


--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer

Economy-x-Talk is always looking for new software development  
projects. Feel free to contact me for a quote.


Op 22 feb 2010, om 17:01 heeft Ray Horsley het volgende geschreven:


Mark,

Thanks for this suggestion, but wouldn't that make the print-out  
grainy when it comes to the text portion of the print-out?  My  
experience is that printing images of text is usually kind of  
grainy as compared with printing the actual text fonts (even if  
they're substituted by printer fonts).  I can easily try it on my  
own printers but that may not reveal what will happen on other  
printers.  What do you think?


Thanks,

Ray


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-02-22 Thread stephen barncard
Yes, of course, it would be working with the native printing routines and
should look as expected.
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://houseofcubes.com/disco.irev


On 22 February 2010 08:19, Ray Horsley  wrote:

> Mark,
>
> Good question.  So I just printed using revBrowserPrint and got pretty good
> results.  In fact, the clarity was the same quality I would expect in
> printing any text and it was not grainy at all.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
>
>  Hi Ray,
>>
>> Yes, indeed, the printing quality will be bad, but at least you'll be able
>> to print something at all.
>>
>> Do you have any good reason the believe that the revBrowserPrint command
>> produces better results?
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Mark Schonewille
>>
>> Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
>> Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
>>
>> Economy-x-Talk is always looking for new software development projects.
>> Feel free to contact me for a quote.
>>
>> Op 22 feb 2010, om 17:01 heeft Ray Horsley het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>  Mark,
>>>
>>> Thanks for this suggestion, but wouldn't that make the print-out grainy
>>> when it comes to the text portion of the print-out?  My experience is that
>>> printing images of text is usually kind of grainy as compared with printing
>>> the actual text fonts (even if they're substituted by printer fonts).  I can
>>> easily try it on my own printers but that may not reveal what will happen on
>>> other printers.  What do you think?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>>
>
>
> ___
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-02-22 Thread Ray Horsley

Mark,

Good question.  So I just printed using revBrowserPrint and got pretty  
good results.  In fact, the clarity was the same quality I would  
expect in printing any text and it was not grainy at all.


Thanks,

Ray

On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:


Hi Ray,

Yes, indeed, the printing quality will be bad, but at least you'll  
be able to print something at all.


Do you have any good reason the believe that the revBrowserPrint  
command produces better results?


--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer

Economy-x-Talk is always looking for new software development  
projects. Feel free to contact me for a quote.


Op 22 feb 2010, om 17:01 heeft Ray Horsley het volgende geschreven:


Mark,

Thanks for this suggestion, but wouldn't that make the print-out  
grainy when it comes to the text portion of the print-out?  My  
experience is that printing images of text is usually kind of  
grainy as compared with printing the actual text fonts (even if  
they're substituted by printer fonts).  I can easily try it on my  
own printers but that may not reveal what will happen on other  
printers.  What do you think?


Thanks,

Ray


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-02-22 Thread Mark Schonewille

Hi Ray,

Yes, indeed, the printing quality will be bad, but at least you'll be  
able to print something at all.


Do you have any good reason the believe that the revBrowserPrint  
command produces better results?


--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer

Economy-x-Talk is always looking for new software development  
projects. Feel free to contact me for a quote.


Op 22 feb 2010, om 17:01 heeft Ray Horsley het volgende geschreven:


Mark,

Thanks for this suggestion, but wouldn't that make the print-out  
grainy when it comes to the text portion of the print-out?  My  
experience is that printing images of text is usually kind of grainy  
as compared with printing the actual text fonts (even if they're  
substituted by printer fonts).  I can easily try it on my own  
printers but that may not reveal what will happen on other  
printers.  What do you think?


Thanks,

Ray


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-02-22 Thread Ray Horsley

Mark,

Thanks for this suggestion, but wouldn't that make the print-out  
grainy when it comes to the text portion of the print-out?  My  
experience is that printing images of text is usually kind of grainy  
as compared with printing the actual text fonts (even if they're  
substituted by printer fonts).  I can easily try it on my own printers  
but that may not reveal what will happen on other printers.  What do  
you think?


Thanks,

Ray

On Feb 22, 2010, at 3:05 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:


Ray,

Make a snapshot of the browser window and put that on a card. Now  
print your cards.


--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer

Economy-x-Talk is always looking for new projects.

Op 22 feb 2010, om 14:46 heeft Ray Horsley het volgende geschreven:

I seem to have discovered several limitations to the  
RevBrowserPrint command.


Firstly, it seems to have no way of cooperating with batch  
printing.  That is, if I open printing, print a batch of cards via  
a repeat loop, and close printing (expecting to print the whole  
batch on closing) RevBrowserPrint behaves as if I never opened  
printing in the first place in that it presents the print dialog  
and prints the card on each iteration of the repeat loop.


The second limitation is I seem to have a choice of either printing  
the browser image or Revolution fields, but not the combination of  
both.  Any ideas on how to overcome either of these?


Thanks,

Ray Horsley
LinkIt! Software



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: RevBrowserPrint

2010-02-22 Thread Mark Schonewille

Ray,

Make a snapshot of the browser window and put that on a card. Now  
print your cards.


--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer

Economy-x-Talk is always looking for new projects.

Op 22 feb 2010, om 14:46 heeft Ray Horsley het volgende geschreven:

I seem to have discovered several limitations to the RevBrowserPrint  
command.


Firstly, it seems to have no way of cooperating with batch  
printing.  That is, if I open printing, print a batch of cards via a  
repeat loop, and close printing (expecting to print the whole batch  
on closing) RevBrowserPrint behaves as if I never opened printing in  
the first place in that it presents the print dialog and prints the  
card on each iteration of the repeat loop.


The second limitation is I seem to have a choice of either printing  
the browser image or Revolution fields, but not the combination of  
both.  Any ideas on how to overcome either of these?


Thanks,

Ray Horsley
LinkIt! Software



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RevBrowserPrint

2010-02-22 Thread Ray Horsley
I seem to have discovered several limitations to the RevBrowserPrint  
command.


Firstly, it seems to have no way of cooperating with batch printing.   
That is, if I open printing, print a batch of cards via a repeat loop,  
and close printing (expecting to print the whole batch on closing)  
RevBrowserPrint behaves as if I never opened printing in the first  
place in that it presents the print dialog and prints the card on each  
iteration of the repeat loop.


The second limitation is I seem to have a choice of either printing  
the browser image or Revolution fields, but not the combination of  
both.  Any ideas on how to overcome either of these?


Thanks,

Ray Horsley
LinkIt! Software

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution