arrays as custom properties or custom property sets

2003-08-27 Thread rand valentine
 i have been reading old posts to the list to try and figure out as much as
I can about using custom properties and custom property sets to store arrays
of data. But there is some indeterminancy in the list posts, as one might
expect, since they almost always address very specific needs. So, could
someone knowledgeable clarify for me how exactly one differentially loads
(and accesses) an array as a custom property versus a custom property set? I
want to have about 6 arrays, all as distinct custom properties, but in the
same set. My reason for doing things this way is simple -- if I make each
array a differnt custom property set, don't i always have to be setting the
custom property set to the appropriate one in order to access that array's
data? Thanks so much.

rand valentine

___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: arrays as custom properties or custom property sets

2003-08-27 Thread Alex Rice
On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 10:47  AM, rand valentine wrote:

 i have been reading old posts to the list to try and figure out as 
much as
I can about using custom properties and custom property sets to store 
arrays
of data. But there is some indeterminancy in the list posts, as one 
might
expect, since they almost always address very specific needs. So, could
someone knowledgeable clarify for me how exactly one differentially 
loads
(and accesses) an array as a custom property versus a custom property 
set? I
want to have about 6 arrays, all as distinct custom properties, but in 
the
same set. My reason for doing things this way is simple -- if I make 
each
array a differnt custom property set, don't i always have to be 
setting the
custom property set to the appropriate one in order to access that 
array's
data? Thanks so much.
Rand, you have to make 6 custom property sets. Each set is an array. It 
is true you can set a particular set like

set the customPropertySet of this stack to set1
get the uWhatever of this stack --  from the current set
However, there is a more convenient syntax you can use to get and set 
values using an array notation that does not require you to set the 
customPropertySet first:

set the set1[value] of this stack to something -- into set 1
get the setx[value] of this stack -- from set x
get the sety[value] of this stack --- from set y
sometimes it is convenient to go ahead and set the customProperty set 
if you are going to be accessing the set a lot. Also then you can use 
the customKeys to get the array keys without making a copy of the array.

Hope this helps a little,

Alex Rice, Software Developer
Architectural Research Consultants, Inc.
http://ARCplanning.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: arrays as custom properties or custom property sets

2003-08-27 Thread Alex Rice
On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 11:01  AM, Alex Rice wrote:
set the set1[value] of this stack to something -- into set 1
get the setx[value] of this stack -- from set x
get the sety[value] of this stack --- from set y
Oops, key, not value. better written as

set the set1[uPropName] of this stack to something
get the setx[uPropName] of this stack
get the sety[uPropName] of this stack
Alex Rice, Software Developer
Architectural Research Consultants, Inc.
http://ARCplanning.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution