Re: call to the "do" command...limited in standalones
Could you please give a real-world example of what you try to achieve? Mark Schonewille === I just have do commands that will wind up in standalones and was wondering what the problems are, in general. > > unfortunately, this is another call to the "do" command whose usage > is seriously limited in standalones (this has been already discussed). > I wish that there were to tell transcript that when "set the > of to ", refers to > variables whose value is the name of a transcript language chunk, > without using the "do" command. > I have never tried this before, but using a variable reference (with > @ for instance?) would perhaps do the trick? > > Best regards >François > > === > > What was the thread called? > > Merci, Erik > > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: call to the "do" command...limited in standalones [was: Creating variables]
Le 6 août 08 à 00:19, Hansen Erik a écrit : unfortunately, this is another call to the "do" command whose usage is seriously limited in standalones (this has been already discussed). I wish that there were to tell transcript that when "set the of to ", refers to variables whose value is the name of a transcript language chunk, without using the "do" command. I have never tried this before, but using a variable reference (with @ for instance?) would perhaps do the trick? Best regards François === What was the thread called? Merci, Erik it seems the reply was messed up. The previous post was from Eric Chatonet, quoted below: Bonjour Eric, Le 6 juil. 08 à 22:38, Éric Miclo a écrit : repeat for each line lineListOne in listOne repeat for each line lineListTwo in listTwo put (lineListOne & lineListTwo) into varName put "test" into varName end repeat end repeat put into tContents do "put tContents into" && varName Best regards from Paris, Eric Chatonet. (which prompted my remark on the do command) it was itself a reply to Hello, I've 2 lists of names and want to create variables by combining the names of the 2 lists. Example: listOne is: A B C listTwo is: 1 2 and I want to create those variables: A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 I did try this: repeat for each line lineListOne in listOne repeat for each line lineListTwo in listTwo put "test" into (lineListOne & lineListTwo) end repeat end repeat and this (though I was sure it didn't work): repeat for each line lineListOne in listOne repeat for each line lineListTwo in listTwo put (lineListOne & lineListTwo) into varName put "test" into varName end repeat end repeat and some other variants (using the value of...) but nothing is working. Is that possible or do I have to "manually" initialize the variables that way: put "test" into A1 put "test" into A2 ... by Eric Miclo. HTH ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: call to the "do" command...limited in standalones
Hi Erik, Could you please give a real-world example of what you try to achieve? -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Benefit from our inexpensive hosting services. See http://economy-x-talk.com/server.html for more info. On 6 aug 2008, at 00:19, Hansen Erik wrote: unfortunately, this is another call to the "do" command whose usage is seriously limited in standalones (this has been already discussed). I wish that there were to tell transcript that when "set the of to ", refers to variables whose value is the name of a transcript language chunk, without using the "do" command. I have never tried this before, but using a variable reference (with @ for instance?) would perhaps do the trick? Best regards François === What was the thread called? Merci, Erik ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
call to the "do" command...limited in standalones
unfortunately, this is another call to the "do" command whose usage is seriously limited in standalones (this has been already discussed). I wish that there were to tell transcript that when "set the of to ", refers to variables whose value is the name of a transcript language chunk, without using the "do" command. I have never tried this before, but using a variable reference (with @ for instance?) would perhaps do the trick? Best regards François === What was the thread called? Merci, Erik ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
