Re: group a single object?
When it comes to groups, however, you can't count on the word "last" to refer to the last group on the card (if the group you want is nested within another group, for example). I believe there's a bug report or 2 in the RQCC about this, but one workaround is to use the templateGroup and establish a name before grouping the object/s. Another workaround is to get the owner of the object immediately after you've grouped it: group control id aa get the long id of the owner of control id aa David Epstein ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: group a single object?
Seemingly only if the item is not already part of a group (no idea why). The code I posted will work at any level of nested groups. gc On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Chipp Walters wrote: > Can't you also: > > group img 1 > set the name of it to "mySpecialGrp" > > .?? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: group a single object?
Can't you also: group img 1 set the name of it to "mySpecialGrp" .?? Chipp Walters CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc On May 11, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Scott Rossi wrote: > Recently, Nicolas Cueto wrote: > >> Is there a way to group a single object? >> >> Something like: >> >> select image "img1" >> group image "img1" >> put the ID of the last group into tID >> set the name of group tID to "gpImg1" > > You shouldn't need to select anything, you can just write: > > group image "img1" > > When it comes to groups, however, you can't count on the word "last" to > refer to the last group on the card (if the group you want is nested within > another group, for example). I believe there's a bug report or 2 in the > RQCC about this, but one workaround is to use the templateGroup and > establish a name before grouping the object/s. Like: > > set the name of the templateGroup to "mySpecialGroup" > group image "img1" > reset the templateGroup > > You can then refer to the group by name, rather than "last". > > Regards, > > Scott Rossi > Creative Director > Tactile Media, UX Design > > > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: group a single object?
I think this works reasonably well: put the layer of btn "target" into L set the relayerGroupedControls to true create group "container" put the long id of it into C set the layer of btn "target" to the layer of C set the layer of C to L The business with long id is to make sure there isn't another group called "container." When I first wrote this I just referred to it by name, and then of course I tried it twice in a row and it failed the second time. This version seems to work fine, ever-more-deeply nesting button "target" into groups called container. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: group a single object?
Recently, Nicolas Cueto wrote: > Is there a way to group a single object? > > Something like: > >select image "img1" >group image "img1" >put the ID of the last group into tID >set the name of group tID to "gpImg1" You shouldn't need to select anything, you can just write: group image "img1" When it comes to groups, however, you can't count on the word "last" to refer to the last group on the card (if the group you want is nested within another group, for example). I believe there's a bug report or 2 in the RQCC about this, but one workaround is to use the templateGroup and establish a name before grouping the object/s. Like: set the name of the templateGroup to "mySpecialGroup" group image "img1" reset the templateGroup You can then refer to the group by name, rather than "last". Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, UX Design ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
group a single object?
Is there a way to group a single object? Something like: select image "img1" group image "img1" put the ID of the last group into tID set the name of group tID to "gpImg1" Thank you. -- Nicolas Cueto ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
