Re: imagedata problem

2004-08-08 Thread Dar Scott
On Aug 8, 2004, at 7:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone else have this experience? -- I'm trying to analyze the
imagedata
of a whole bunch of grayscale images.

I'm using 2.2.1 and MacOSX.
But I may be onto an answer -- could have more to do with something I
probably did wrong in GraphicConverter. Except it still is puzzling 
that the
imagedata would be so obviously corrupt while the image looks fine.
See if you get good imageData the second access or after getting 'the 
text' of the image.  If so, use that as a workaround.  This sounds 
familiar.

Maybe you should bugzilla this, especially if you are willing to supply 
RunRev with an example image.  Check the image bugs; this might be 
there, but I think this is different.  I'm going to do a rash of image 
checks in the next beta, so if bugzilla is a bother, I'll look for this 
then.

I think I have seen Revolution gag on some gray PNG files and display a 
squished pink image.  Maybe some gray formats are a problem.

Dar Scott
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: imagedata problem

2004-08-08 Thread FMoyer
> On Aug 7, 2004, at 4:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Does anyone else have this experience? -- I'm trying to analyze the
> > imagedata
> > of a whole bunch of grayscale images.
> >
> What version are you using?  (Some things are fixed in the beta and
> some weird stuff has been added.)
> 
> Dar Scott
> 
> 
> 
I'm using 2.2.1 and MacOSX.

But I may be onto an answer -- could have more to do with something I 
probably did wrong in GraphicConverter. Except it still is puzzling that the 
imagedata would be so obviously corrupt while the image looks fine.

Thanks.
Fred
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


imagedata problem Ken Ray

2004-08-07 Thread FMoyer
Does anyone else have this experience? -- I'm trying to analyze the imagedata 
of a whole bunch of grayscale images.

The problem is that the imagedata for almost every pixel is:
 0,191,191,191
or 
 0,85,85,85
or 
 0,200,200,200

Each image has its own favorite number and it seems to make no difference 
whether the pixel is actually white or black or gray.   On the other hand, there 
are parts of the image (usually the far left side or the far right side) where 
believable numbers suddenly appear.

These images are bxw tiffs that I turned into transparent gifs in 
GraphicConverter. But I don't understand: if the imageData is corrupt, why do the 
images 
look fine?

Any ideas how I can figure out the correct imagedata? Maybe I'm mistaken, but 
I'm expecting to see white pixels listed as: "0,255,255,255" and black   
pixels: "0,0,0,0"

Thanks.
Fred Moyer
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution