Re: stack vs. exe behavior in altSplash deployment

2006-11-26 Thread J. Landman Gay

Chipp Walters wrote:

Hi Mark,

see below for answers:

On 11/26/06, Mark Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Anyway, a couple of questions

-1-  Cursor idiosynracies:
Rev's built-in cursors aren't available (e.g. instead of hand and busy,
I get the hourglass).  How do I ensure that cursors port over correctly
when a stack is deployed as a non-executable?


I believe you can always embed a cursor in a stack and use it by
setting the cursor ID to it. Perhaps Jacque can help out more here.


Right, that's commonly used for custom cursors. You can do the same 
thing with the standard cursors, but then you can't refer to them by 
their named constants (i.e., "busy").


An easier way to embed standard cursors is to just tick the "Cursors" 
checkbox in the standalone settings dialog before building. Then they 
will work as expected.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: stack vs. exe behavior in altSplash deployment

2006-11-26 Thread Chipp Walters

Hi Mark,

see below for answers:

On 11/26/06, Mark Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Anyway, a couple of questions

-1-  Cursor idiosynracies:
Rev's built-in cursors aren't available (e.g. instead of hand and busy,
I get the hourglass).  How do I ensure that cursors port over correctly
when a stack is deployed as a non-executable?


I believe you can always embed a cursor in a stack and use it by
setting the cursor ID to it. Perhaps Jacque can help out more here.



-2-  Saving state:
When deployed as a non-executable, is it accurate to say that saving
state (i.e. preferences, last state of checkbox, etc) is as
straightforward as asking whether to save when the stack is closed?


Certainly, that's one way. I prefer to separate my GUI/Business Logic
with content and data..and in that end I prefer using small XML files
to store prefs, and invisible stacks to store content-- I copy the
content from the inv stack over to the Biz stack for editing, then
close the stack. When I save, I generally create a new stack from
scratch (or use a 'template stack') and write OVER the older stack.



-3-  Alpha channels:
When used in the context of altSplash, is "alpha channel" synonymous
with "transparency layer".  I am getting transparency to work, but am
wondering if I am not capitalizing on the effects available in the
engine.


Some PNG's have an 8 bit alpha channel. altSplash, built before alpha
window effects came in 2.7+, faked it's own soft window effects. It
still works in 2.7+.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: stack vs. exe behavior in altSplash deployment

2006-11-26 Thread Chipp Walters

Hi Bill,

altSplash is an unsupported splash screen architecture I provide for
free. It works with the supported (and commercial) MagicCarpet, which
is version control for files and works as a plugin within Rev.

You can learn about altSplash at:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/MagicCarpetAAA/default.htm

and MagicCarpet at:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/MagicCarpet/RevolutionPlugin.htm

There is a much more advanced version of altSplash with new
capabilities, but I don't have it fully documented yet. I'll hopefully
get around to it soon and create a video tutorial on how to use it.

BTW, Altuit currently uses altSplash to update and manage delivered
code in virtually all of our projects. I imagine we've got 20 or 30
versions of it here at Altuit, and others, like Dan Shafer, use it as
well.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: stack vs. exe behavior in altSplash deployment

2006-11-26 Thread Bill Marriott
I've heard mention of altSplash a couple times... are you talking about the 
"butterfly" stack at

http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/Downloads.htm

or something else?

A search on altuit.com on "altsplash" yields no results.

Mark Powell" wrote:
> [BTW Chipp: altSplash is to Rev apps what Dick Fosbury was to high
> jumping--I hope you understand the compliment] 



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


stack vs. exe behavior in altSplash deployment

2006-11-26 Thread Mark Powell
I have an app in development that I am now transitioning to be
"suitcased" with Altuit's altSplash architecture.  

[BTW Chipp: altSplash is to Rev apps what Dick Fosbury was to high
jumping--I hope you understand the compliment]

Anyway, a couple of questions

-1-  Cursor idiosynracies:  
Rev's built-in cursors aren't available (e.g. instead of hand and busy,
I get the hourglass).  How do I ensure that cursors port over correctly
when a stack is deployed as a non-executable?

-2-  Saving state:  
When deployed as a non-executable, is it accurate to say that saving
state (i.e. preferences, last state of checkbox, etc) is as
straightforward as asking whether to save when the stack is closed?

-3-  Alpha channels:
When used in the context of altSplash, is "alpha channel" synonymous
with "transparency layer".  I am getting transparency to work, but am
wondering if I am not capitalizing on the effects available in the
engine.

Thanks very much

Mark









___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution