Re: substack behavior
I have need to read the hard drive serial number. How is this did? Paul Salyers PS1 - Senior Rep. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Http://ps1.SoftSeven.org (918) 465-7426 -- Cell (918) 967-1013 -- Home ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
substack behavior
I was under the impression that a mainstack cannot be modified, but that substacks could be. Is there some process involved for text changes in fields of substacks to be retained? Byron As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron. --H. L. Mencken ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: substack behavior
Recently, Byron Turner wrote: I was under the impression that a mainstack cannot be modified, but that substacks could be. Is there some process involved for text changes in fields of substacks to be retained? Any stacks that are *not* part of a standalone can be modified and saved. Stacks that are made into standalone applications, and any included substacks, can be modified but not saved. If you want to save changes to a stack that is part of a standalone distribution, you need to store the stack outside of the standalone. This concept is similar to using a text application to modify/save a text file, or a graphics application to modify/save an image file. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Development Design - E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
substack behavior
Greetings to all, and many thanks for all of the helpful posts to this list. I'm working on a fairly elaborate database (a dictionary research tool), using RR 2.0. I want to be able to provide myself and my research partner with reference materials, and the logical way to do this would seem to be to have floating substacks that provide different kinds of information in fields. But when I open a substack, I have to negotiate all of the open stack, close stack, etc. stuff -- but what I really want is just a floating window that provides information -- is there any way to suppress the open-stack messages and that sort of stuff? It's easy enough to have a blank open-stack handler in the sub-stack, e.g., on openstack end openstack but this seems kludgy and there may be all sorts of handlers going off that I'm unaware of -- is there like a global setting for a stack that goes -- pretend this isn't a stack but just a popup window? Thanks. rand valentine ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: substack behavior
Hi Rand, Greetings to all, and many thanks for all of the helpful posts to this list. I'm working on a fairly elaborate database (a dictionary research tool), using RR 2.0. I want to be able to provide myself and my research partner with reference materials, and the logical way to do this would seem to be to have floating substacks that provide different kinds of information in fields. But when I open a substack, I have to negotiate all of the open stack, close stack, etc. stuff -- but what I really want is just a floating window that provides information -- is there any way to suppress the open-stack messages and that sort of stuff? It's easy enough to have a blank open-stack handler in the sub-stack, e.g., on openstack end openstack but this seems kludgy and there may be all sorts of handlers going off that I'm unaware of -- is there like a global setting for a stack that goes -- pretend this isn't a stack but just a popup window? Thanks. on mouseup ## or whenever set the lockmessages to true ## this might be what you're after... palette stack xyz ## or toplevel or... ... end mouseup rand valentine Hope that helps. Regards Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: substack behavior
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 10:38 AM, rand valentine wrote: I have to negotiate all of the open stack, close stack, etc. stuff -- but what I really want is just a floating window that provides information -- is there any way to suppress the open-stack messages and that sort of stuff? How about this? lock messages go stack simpleInfoStack Alex Rice, Software Developer Architectural Research Consultants, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: substack behavior
rand valentine wrote: Greetings to all, and many thanks for all of the helpful posts to this list. I'm working on a fairly elaborate database (a dictionary research tool), using RR 2.0. I want to be able to provide myself and my research partner with reference materials, and the logical way to do this would seem to be to have floating substacks that provide different kinds of information in fields. But when I open a substack, I have to negotiate all of the open stack, close stack, etc. stuff -- but what I really want is just a floating window that provides information -- is there any way to suppress the open-stack messages and that sort of stuff? If your mainstack has just one card or a common shared group, just move its system messages handlers to that object to prevent substacks from triggering them. The mainstack scrit is a great place for commonly-use handlers but not the best place for handlers to be used only by the mainstack. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution