RE: [C*2.1]memtable_allocation_type: offheap_objects

2016-03-10 Thread aeljami.ext
Thank you !

Another question please : In the blog post 
(http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/off-heap-memtables-in-Cassandra-2-1), it is 
noted that offheap_objects it effective for small values like ints or uuids as 
well. offheap_buffers for the tables with string or blobs.

in my case, the tables contains many columns with string type. But in  
cassandra.yaml, it is noted that offheap_objects is: native memory, heap buffer 
nio Eliminating overhead.

I must in all cases use offheap_objects?

Thanks.
De : Jeff Jirsa [mailto:jeff.ji...@crowdstrike.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 9 mars 2016 17:13
À : user@cassandra.apache.org
Objet : Re: [C*2.1]memtable_allocation_type: offheap_objects

We use them. No signs of stability problems in 2.1 that we’ve attributed to 
offheap objects.


From: "aeljami@orange.com<mailto:aeljami@orange.com>"
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 1:54 AM
To: user
Subject: [C*2.1]memtable_allocation_type: offheap_objects

Hi,

offheap_objects was removed in releases 3.2.x then reintroduced  in release 
3.4: I vould like to know if someone has used offheap_objects in Cassandra 2.1: 
stable or not, improvementobservedor not…

Thanks.
Ahmed


_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.



Re: [C*2.1]memtable_allocation_type: offheap_objects

2016-03-09 Thread Jeff Jirsa
We use them. No signs of stability problems in 2.1 that we’ve attributed to 
offheap objects.


From:  "aeljami@orange.com"
Reply-To:  "user@cassandra.apache.org"
Date:  Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 1:54 AM
To:  user
Subject:  [C*2.1]memtable_allocation_type: offheap_objects

Hi,

 

offheap_objects was removed in releases 3.2.x then reintroduced  in release 
3.4: I vould like to know if someone has used offheap_objects in Cassandra 2.1: 
stable or not, improvementobservedor not…

 

Thanks.

Ahmed

 
_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [C*2.1]memtable_allocation_type: offheap_objects

2016-03-09 Thread Jonathan Haddad
Check out Al's Tuning Guide.  He discusses offheap objects.

https://tobert.github.io/pages/als-cassandra-21-tuning-guide.html

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:54 AM  wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> offheap_objects was removed in releases 3.2.x then reintroduced  in
> release 3.4: I vould like to know if someone has used offheap_objects in
> Cassandra 2.1: stable or not, improvement observed or not…
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ahmed
>
>
>
> _
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>


[C*2.1]memtable_allocation_type: offheap_objects

2016-03-09 Thread aeljami.ext
Hi,

offheap_objects was removed in releases 3.2.x then reintroduced  in release 
3.4: I vould like to know if someone has used offheap_objects in Cassandra 2.1: 
stable or not, improvement observed or not...

Thanks.
Ahmed


_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.