Re: Commons bsf

[aisen faith marrero]

Watch our YouTube videos about Innovation.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 12:27 PM Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) 
wrote:

> On 01.02.2023 09:49, sebb wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 00:22, Alex O'Ree  wrote:
> >> No problem. There was some activity on github.
> > Please note: That does not mean the component is being developed.
> > Dependabot runs on most components, and that generates traffic.
> > Also there may need to be changes to asf.yaml which affect all
> > components on github.
> > Etc. This is no indication that the component is being actively
> > maintained, as such changes need very little (if any) knowledge of the
> > component.
>
> Well, I have been interesting in keeping BSF up and going.
>
> >> I ran the owasp dependency
> >> check thing against it and found a few issues, attempted to update some
> of
> >> the dependencies (jython) and hit a bit of a snag. I'm not entirely sure
> >> where to go from here. I'm not sure if anyone else has attempted this or
> >> not.
> > Note that the component has a separate 3.x version, which is based on
> > JSR-223 - see https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bsf/
> >
> > I’m not entirely sure that either are still needed.
>
> BSF 3.0, the open-source implementation JSR-223 (package javax.script) may
> not be needed anymore
> with OpenJDK containing it.
>
> >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 6:34 PM Gary Gregory 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is an open source project, so support is as best as us volunteers
> see
> >>> fit or have itches to scratch ;-)
> >>>
> >>> In this case the lack of activity might show that the original authors
> >>> could have abandoned the component. Let's see how else pipes in.
> At least one project (BSF4ooRexx, e.g. <
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/bsf4oorexx/files/beta/>)
> has been actively using it.
> >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023, 17:21 Alex O'Ree  wrote:
> >>>
>  Is the bsf library still supported? Looks like the website hasn't been
>  published since 2011.
>
> This is mostly a question of free time on one's hands. E.g. for the
> BSF4ooRexx project I have a few
> little changes applied to BSF which I have always been meaning to
> incorporate.
>
> Alex, your initiative w.r.t. jython and the website are highly welcome!
>
> ---rony
>
> P.S.: Will try to assess the differences between the official BSF and the
> one in BSF4ooRexx in the
> next weeks (time permitting) and then adding the few enhancements with
> JIRA tickets for tracking.
> One thing that will take me some time is re-orienting myself to
>  and learn about becoming able to
> commit there (not sure
> where I would have to register/report my github id such that it can be
> associated with my ASF id).
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: Commons bsf

[aisen faith marrero]

Hello! Good to see you.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 12:58 PM Gilles Sadowski 
wrote:

> Le mer. 1 févr. 2023 à 13:27, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
>  a écrit :
> >
> > [...]
> > One thing that will take me some time is re-orienting myself to
> >  and learn about becoming able
> to commit there
>
> Why "there", when you can commit directly here (at ASF "Commons")?
>
> > (not sure
> > where I would have to register/report my github id such that it can be
> associated with my ASF id).
>
> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committer/__self__
>
> HTH,
> Gilles
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: Commons bsf

[aisen faith marrero]

Have a great day! lia

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 1:01 PM Alex O'Ree  wrote:

> Hmm if it's no longer needed, maybe consider a vote to move it to the attic
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023, 7:27 AM Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) 
> wrote:
>
> > On 01.02.2023 09:49, sebb wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 00:22, Alex O'Ree  wrote:
> > >> No problem. There was some activity on github.
> > > Please note: That does not mean the component is being developed.
> > > Dependabot runs on most components, and that generates traffic.
> > > Also there may need to be changes to asf.yaml which affect all
> > > components on github.
> > > Etc. This is no indication that the component is being actively
> > > maintained, as such changes need very little (if any) knowledge of the
> > > component.
> >
> > Well, I have been interesting in keeping BSF up and going.
> >
> > >> I ran the owasp dependency
> > >> check thing against it and found a few issues, attempted to update
> some
> > of
> > >> the dependencies (jython) and hit a bit of a snag. I'm not entirely
> sure
> > >> where to go from here. I'm not sure if anyone else has attempted this
> or
> > >> not.
> > > Note that the component has a separate 3.x version, which is based on
> > > JSR-223 - see https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bsf/
> > >
> > > I’m not entirely sure that either are still needed.
> >
> > BSF 3.0, the open-source implementation JSR-223 (package javax.script)
> may
> > not be needed anymore
> > with OpenJDK containing it.
> >
> > >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 6:34 PM Gary Gregory 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This is an open source project, so support is as best as us
> volunteers
> > see
> > >>> fit or have itches to scratch ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>> In this case the lack of activity might show that the original
> authors
> > >>> could have abandoned the component. Let's see how else pipes in.
> > At least one project (BSF4ooRexx, e.g. <
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/bsf4oorexx/files/beta/>)
> > has been actively using it.
> > >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023, 17:21 Alex O'Ree  wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Is the bsf library still supported? Looks like the website hasn't
> been
> >  published since 2011.
> >
> > This is mostly a question of free time on one's hands. E.g. for the
> > BSF4ooRexx project I have a few
> > little changes applied to BSF which I have always been meaning to
> > incorporate.
> >
> > Alex, your initiative w.r.t. jython and the website are highly welcome!
> >
> > ---rony
> >
> > P.S.: Will try to assess the differences between the official BSF and the
> > one in BSF4ooRexx in the
> > next weeks (time permitting) and then adding the few enhancements with
> > JIRA tickets for tracking.
> > One thing that will take me some time is re-orienting myself to
> >  and learn about becoming able to
> > commit there (not sure
> > where I would have to register/report my github id such that it can be
> > associated with my ASF id).
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: Commons bsf

[aisen faith marrero]

Join us on 2023

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 1:21 PM Alex O'Ree  wrote:

> I'm not sure I have commit permissions to that repo. It would be rather
> rude of me to just commit to a project I've never supported before. IMO
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023, 7:58 AM Gilles Sadowski  wrote:
>
> > Le mer. 1 févr. 2023 à 13:27, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
> >  a écrit :
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > One thing that will take me some time is re-orienting myself to
> > >  and learn about becoming able
> > to commit there
> >
> > Why "there", when you can commit directly here (at ASF "Commons")?
> >
> > > (not sure
> > > where I would have to register/report my github id such that it can be
> > associated with my ASF id).
> >
> > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committer/__self__
> >
> > HTH,
> > Gilles
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: Commons bsf

[aisen faith marrero]

Hey

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 1:32 PM robertlazarski 
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 2:27 AM Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)  >
> wrote:
>
> > On 01.02.2023 09:49, sebb wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 00:22, Alex O'Ree  wrote:
> > >> No problem. There was some activity on github.
> > > Please note: That does not mean the component is being developed.
> > > Dependabot runs on most components, and that generates traffic.
> > > Also there may need to be changes to asf.yaml which affect all
> > > components on github.
> > > Etc. This is no indication that the component is being actively
> > > maintained, as such changes need very little (if any) knowledge of the
> > > component.
> >
> > Well, I have been interesting in keeping BSF up and going.
> >
> > >> I ran the owasp dependency
> > >> check thing against it and found a few issues, attempted to update
> some
> > of
> > >> the dependencies (jython) and hit a bit of a snag. I'm not entirely
> sure
> > >> where to go from here. I'm not sure if anyone else has attempted this
> or
> > >> not.
> > > Note that the component has a separate 3.x version, which is based on
> > > JSR-223 - see https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bsf/
> > >
> > > I’m not entirely sure that either are still needed.
> >
> > BSF 3.0, the open-source implementation JSR-223 (package javax.script)
> may
> > not be needed anymore
> > with OpenJDK containing it.
> >
> >
> My 2 cents as someone who spent the last decade at my day job on a JSR-223
> implementation for running JavaScript in a  Java Class ...
>
> The OpenJDK implementation, Rhino, has performance that is awful. That may
> be fine for smaller scripts. The performance however is a show stopper for
> us as the scripts are enormous.
>
> A couple years ago after using J2V8 - they only support Android now - we
> moved to the Javet project that is Apache licensed.
>
> On a scale of 1/10 I give it a 10. They do an impressive release about once
> a month lately and most importantly they ship with the latest V8 which is
> important for us.
>
> If you need something else besides JS though I have no idea.
>

Re: Commons bsf

[aisen faith marrero]

Hi there! Welcome to CM-Team. We’ll get back to you as soon as possible

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 1:34 PM Gilles Sadowski  wrote:

> Le mer. 1 févr. 2023 à 14:21, Alex O'Ree  a écrit :
> >
> > I'm not sure I have commit permissions to that repo. It would be rather
> > rude of me to just commit to a project I've never supported before. IMO
>
> Actually, I was replying to Rony Flatscher, who had asked (AFAICT from
> the email message) and who is a member of the "Commons" PMC.
>
> Any ASF committer can obtain write access to "Commons" repositories;
> just ask Gary (PMC Chair).
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2023, 7:58 AM Gilles Sadowski 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Le mer. 1 févr. 2023 à 13:27, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
> > >  a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > One thing that will take me some time is re-orienting myself to
> > > >  and learn about becoming
> able
> > > to commit there
> > >
> > > Why "there", when you can commit directly here (at ASF "Commons")?
> > >
> > > > (not sure
> > > > where I would have to register/report my github id such that it can
> be
> > > associated with my ASF id).
> > >
> > > https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committer/__self__
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Gilles
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: Commons bsf

[aisen faith marrero]

Thank you for your application for the role of senior data.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 1:43 PM robertlazarski 
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 3:32 AM robertlazarski 
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A couple years ago after using J2V8 - they only support Android now - we
> > moved to the Javet project that is Apache licensed.
> >
> > On a scale of 1/10 I give it a 10. They do an impressive release about
> > once a month lately and most importantly they ship with the latest V8
> which
> > is important for us.
> >
> > If you need something else besides JS though I have no idea.
> >
>
> I forgot about GraalVM but the performance wasn't much better than Rhino
> but it is a small improvement.
>
> For us, Javet is by far the best one out there.
>

Re: [jexl] Make jexl consider power operator

[aisen faith marrero]

Thanks a million for... !

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 23, 2020, at 7:28 AM, BENGUIGUI Michael 
>  wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I am trying to evaluate the following expression via jexl :  x^y
> What I've tried, is to extend JexlArithmetic:
> 
> // Extend Arithmetic
> public class ExtendedJexlArithmetic extends JexlArithmetic
> {
>public ExtendedJexlArithmetic(boolean strict){
>super(strict);
>}
> 
>public xor(Object l, Object r){
>return Math.pow(l, r);
>}
> }
> 
> def engine = new 
> JexlBuilder().cache(512).strict(true).silent(false).namespaces(ns).arithmetic(new
>  ExtendedJexlArithmetic(true)).create();
> engine.createExpression(model_formula).evaluate(contextMap);
> 
> 
> However, it does not consider operator priority. As a result, I am still 
> getting wrong results:
> 
> 2+4^3 -> 216 (instead of 66).
> 
> How can I properly fix this ?
> 
> Thhhx!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org