Re: EC2 Hadoop Cluster VS Amazon EMR
When I was testing EMR i had only spent around 17USD for testing and with a decent sized EMR cluster. On 2016-03-11 12:31, José Luis Larroque wrote: > Hi Jonathan! > I was trying to know which of those options use a time ago. For now i'm using > Amazon EMR, because it's more easy, you have some stuff configurated already. > > But, a few benefits could be that, with EC2, you can use the Free tier, and > save some money while you are testing your stuff. And probably should be more > cheaper the use of EC2 against EMR, but i'm not 100% sure of this. > > Bye! > Jose > > 2016-03-07 6:17 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Aquilina: > >> Good Morning, >> >> Just some food for thought as of late im noticing people using EC2 to setup >> ones own Hadoop cluster. What is the advantage of using ec2 over amazon's >> EMR hadoop cluster? >> >> Regard, >> >> Jonathan
Re: EC2 Hadoop Cluster VS Amazon EMR
Hi Jonathan! I was trying to know which of those options use a time ago. For now i'm using Amazon EMR, because it's more easy, you have some stuff configurated already. But, a few benefits could be that, with EC2, you can use the Free tier, and save some money while you are testing your stuff. And probably should be more cheaper the use of EC2 against EMR, but i'm not 100% sure of this. Bye! Jose 2016-03-07 6:17 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Aquilina: > Good Morning, > > Just some food for thought as of late im noticing people using EC2 to > setup ones own Hadoop cluster. What is the advantage of using ec2 over > amazon's EMR hadoop cluster? > > > > Regard, > > Jonathan > >
[Query:]Table creation with column family in Phoenix
Hi, I created a table in Phoenix with three column families and Inserted the values as shown below Syntax : > CREATE TABLE TESTCF (MYKEY VARCHAR NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, CF1.COL1 VARCHAR, > CF2.COL2 VARCHAR, CF3.COL3 VARCHAR) > UPSERT INTO TESTCF (MYKEY,CF1.COL1,CF2.COL2,CF3.COL3)values > ('Key2','CF1','CF2','CF3') > UPSERT INTO TESTCF (MYKEY,CF1.COL1,CF2.COL2,CF3.COL3)values > ('Key2','CF12','CF22','CF32') When I try to scan same table in Hbase hbase(main):010:0> scan "TESTCF" > ROW COLUMN+CELL > Key1 column=CF1:COL1, timestamp=1457682385805, value=CF1 > Key1 column=CF1:_0, timestamp=1457682385805, value= > Key1 column=CF2:COL2, timestamp=1457682385805, value=CF2 > Key1 column=CF3:COL3, timestamp=1457682385805, value=CF3 > Key2 column=CF1:COL1, timestamp=1457682426396, value=CF12 > Key2 column=CF1:_0, timestamp=1457682426396, value= > Key2 column=CF2:COL2, timestamp=1457682426396, value=CF22 > Key2 column=CF3:COL3, timestamp=1457682426396, value=CF32 > 2 row(s) in 0.0260 seconds My query is why I am getting CF1:_0 one extra column in each row with no value. Can any body explain me . Would really appreciate the help. Thanks, Divya
RE: Name node files are creating different directory
Hi vinodh As properties are wrong, it is taken default properties..Correct like following.. fs.namenode.name.dir should be like dfs.namenode.name.dir, fs.datanode.data.dir should be like dfs.datanode.data.dir Reference: https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.7.2/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-hdfs/hdfs-default.xml From: Vinodh Nagaraj [mailto:vinodh.db...@gmail.com] Sent: 11 March 2016 13:54 To: user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Name node files are creating different directory Hi, I configured hadoop 2.7.1 on windows 7 (32 bit ) in C Drive. I tried to format using "hdfs namenode -format',name node files are created at C:\tmp\hadoop-user\dfs\name.but the property "C:\name" in hdfs-site.xml . hdfs namenode -format -10.219.149.100-1457674982841 16/03/11 11:13:03 INFO common.Storage: Storage directory \tmp\hadoop-487174\dfs\name has been successfully formatted. core-site.xml fs.defaultFS hdfs://localhost/ hdfs-site.xml fs.namenode.name.dir C:\name fs.datanode.data.dir C:\data what is wrong in that?Please help me. Thanks & Regards, Vinodh.N