Re:Re: Re: Support java/11/17/21
Thank you for your reply.Thank you for letting me know about this. At 2024-07-10 16:16:16, "Ayush Saxena" wrote: >I know about that, I only flagged that [1] :-) > >That got sorted by upgrading the protobuf to 3.23, [2], & merging [3] > >Hadoop can't even compile JDK-8+, there are bunch of issue, Jersey >being the biggest one, All the JDK upgrade tickets are open >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16795 >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17177 > >And they aren't being actively chased, There is no plan to drop jdk-8 >in 3.4.x. Hive will anyway move to JDK-17 in 2-3 months > >-Ayush > > >[1] >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18197?focusedCommentId=17818651&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17818651 >[2] >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18197?focusedCommentId=17820711&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17820711 >[3] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6593 > >On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 13:15, lisoda wrote: >> >> Hello Sir. >> Hadoop upgraded the protobuf version in 3.4.0, and it caused problems with >> incompatibility with some jdk8 versions.They plan to drop support for java8 >> outright in 3.4.x.You can check out the changelog for hadoop 3.4.0. >> >> >> >> >> >> 在 2024-07-10 15:38:35，"Ayush Saxena" 写道： >> >> We are working towards supporting JDK-17, should take couple of months, we >> don’t have a planned deadline for that as of now >> >> Btw. hadoop didn’t drop support for JDK-8…. >> >> -Ayush >> >> On 10 Jul 2024, at 12:52 PM, lisoda wrote: >> >> >> Hi. Currently, Iceberg/hadoop/spark and the rest of the third-party >> frameworks have dropped support for JAVA8 (or are planning to do so). When >> will HIVE be able to support a higher version of the JDK and what progress >> has been made in this regard?
Re: Re: Support java/11/17/21
I know about that, I only flagged that [1] :-) That got sorted by upgrading the protobuf to 3.23, [2], & merging [3] Hadoop can't even compile JDK-8+, there are bunch of issue, Jersey being the biggest one, All the JDK upgrade tickets are open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16795 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17177 And they aren't being actively chased, There is no plan to drop jdk-8 in 3.4.x. Hive will anyway move to JDK-17 in 2-3 months -Ayush [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18197?focusedCommentId=17818651&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17818651 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18197?focusedCommentId=17820711&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17820711 [3] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6593 On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 13:15, lisoda wrote: > > Hello Sir. > Hadoop upgraded the protobuf version in 3.4.0, and it caused problems with > incompatibility with some jdk8 versions.They plan to drop support for java8 > outright in 3.4.x.You can check out the changelog for hadoop 3.4.0. > > > > > > 在 2024-07-10 15:38:35，"Ayush Saxena" 写道： > > We are working towards supporting JDK-17, should take couple of months, we > don’t have a planned deadline for that as of now > > Btw. hadoop didn’t drop support for JDK-8…. > > -Ayush > > On 10 Jul 2024, at 12:52 PM, lisoda wrote: > > > Hi. Currently, Iceberg/hadoop/spark and the rest of the third-party > frameworks have dropped support for JAVA8 (or are planning to do so). When > will HIVE be able to support a higher version of the JDK and what progress > has been made in this regard?
Re: Support java/11/17/21
We are working towards supporting JDK-17, should take couple of months, we don’t have a planned deadline for that as of now Btw. hadoop didn’t drop support for JDK-8…. -Ayush > On 10 Jul 2024, at 12:52 PM, lisoda wrote: > > > Hi. Currently, Iceberg/hadoop/spark and the rest of the third-party > frameworks have dropped support for JAVA8 (or are planning to do so). When > will HIVE be able to support a higher version of the JDK and what progress > has been made in this regard?
