Stephen, I was in the understanding that if the cache is atomic (which is one of the cases jjimeno tried), that there are no transactions involved and that the putAll in fact is working on a row by row basis (some can fail).
So I don't understand what you mean with 'you're effectively creating a huge transaction'. Is this something internal to Ignite (so not user-space ?)? Could you help me in understanding this? Next to that, what you explain is about putAll (writing case), but the getAll (reading case) also seems to already have reached its limits at only 16 nodes. Any ideas on that one? Thanks! Bart -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
