Re: Continuous query order on transactional cache

2020-01-16 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello!

Why?

I don't think that transactions, semantically have any guarantees about the
order of updates inside a transaction.

I'd go with A).

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 17:39, Barney Pippin :

> Hi,
>
> If I have a continuous query running and it's listening to a transactional
> cache, what order will I receive the notifications if say 5 updates are
> committed in a single transaction?
>
> Is the order:
> A) Undefined
> B) The order the cache updates are written to the cache prior to the commit
> C) Another order?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>


Continuous query order on transactional cache

2020-01-16 Thread Barney Pippin
Hi,

If I have a continuous query running and it's listening to a transactional
cache, what order will I receive the notifications if say 5 updates are
committed in a single transaction?

Is the order:
A) Undefined
B) The order the cache updates are written to the cache prior to the commit
C) Another order?

Thanks,

James



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/