Re: Performance OpenJDK compared with SunJDK

[Toni Menendez Lopez]

My loadserver is running in this server,

Hardware :

Proliant BL460C G1
2xIntel Xeon @2,53Ghz (quad)
32 GB of memory

O.S :
RHEL5.4(Tikanga)

I don´t have stats about that but I will collect in few days that I
will have again the server available, but my impression is that JMeter
is taking much more CPU with OpenJDK and is doing lots of big peaks,
seems problems with GC.

But I will analyze it later, when my actual testing finished.

Toni.


2011/12/13, Deepak Goel :
> Hey
>
> Looks like an evolution and quality problem..Sun JDK more evolved v/s
> OpenJDK
>
> What is the hardware? What is the performance difference? Stats please...
>
> Deepak
>
> On 12/13/11, Toni Menendez Lopez  wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I want to ask all of you on question !
>>
>> I am normally working with SunJDK for Jmeter and running in non-gui
>> mode, but now I want to migrate the openJDK ( OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
>> (build 1.6.0-b09, mixed mode)).
>>
>> I have executed the same test in SunJDK and OpenJDK and I have
>> experienced that Jmeter has worst performance sending the traffic with
>> OPenJDK that with SunJDK.
>>
>> Any of you have got some similar experience ?
>>
>> My O.S is RHEL5.4
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Toni.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
>
>
>--
> Keigu
>
> Deepak
> +91-9765089593
> deic...@gmail.com
> http://www.simtree.net
>
> Skype: thumsupdeicool
> Google talk: deicool
> Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool
>
> "Contribute to the world, environment and more : http://www.gridrepublic.org
> "
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Alternative to the static modifier in BeanShell

[sebb]

On 13 December 2011 15:03, aidy lewis  wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> I am able to use a user defined variable in a BeanShell post-processor?

See:

http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#BeanShell_PostProcessor

> UDV
> name: count
> value: 0
>
> BeanShell post-processor
> print(vars.get("count");
>
> Thanks
>
> Aidy
>
>
>
>
>
> On 13 December 2011 14:27, sebb  wrote:
>> On 13 December 2011 13:57, aidy lewis  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Without a static modifier in BeanShell, how can I prevent the below
>>> ArrayList from being re-initialised  during each thread?
>>
>> Use the init file to define the variable.
>>
>> Or store the list in a JMeter variable which you create if missing.
>>
>>> """
>>>
>>> headerList = new ArrayList();
>>>
>>> countCacheMisses() {
>>>  print("counting cache misses");
>>>  if (vars.get("HEADER") =="MISS");
>>>    headerList.add("MISS");
>>>    print("the size of the array");
>>>    print(headerList.size());
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> countCacheMisses()
>>>
>>> """
>>>
>>> Aidy Lewis
>>> Test Discipline Lead (News and Knowledge)
>>> m: +44 (0) 7539655835
>>> w: +44 (0) 208 008 4584
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Alternative to the static modifier in BeanShell

[aidy lewis]

Hi Sebb,

Thanks for your response.

I am able to use a user defined variable in a BeanShell post-processor?

UDV
name: count
value: 0

BeanShell post-processor
print(vars.get("count");

Thanks

Aidy





On 13 December 2011 14:27, sebb  wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 13:57, aidy lewis  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Without a static modifier in BeanShell, how can I prevent the below
>> ArrayList from being re-initialised  during each thread?
>
> Use the init file to define the variable.
>
> Or store the list in a JMeter variable which you create if missing.
>
>> """
>>
>> headerList = new ArrayList();
>>
>> countCacheMisses() {
>>  print("counting cache misses");
>>  if (vars.get("HEADER") =="MISS");
>>    headerList.add("MISS");
>>    print("the size of the array");
>>    print(headerList.size());
>> }
>>
>>
>> countCacheMisses()
>>
>> """
>>
>> Aidy Lewis
>> Test Discipline Lead (News and Knowledge)
>> m: +44 (0) 7539655835
>> w: +44 (0) 208 008 4584
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Alternative to the static modifier in BeanShell

[sebb]

On 13 December 2011 13:57, aidy lewis  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Without a static modifier in BeanShell, how can I prevent the below
> ArrayList from being re-initialised  during each thread?

Use the init file to define the variable.

Or store the list in a JMeter variable which you create if missing.

> """
>
> headerList = new ArrayList();
>
> countCacheMisses() {
>  print("counting cache misses");
>  if (vars.get("HEADER") =="MISS");
>    headerList.add("MISS");
>    print("the size of the array");
>    print(headerList.size());
> }
>
>
> countCacheMisses()
>
> """
>
> Aidy Lewis
> Test Discipline Lead (News and Knowledge)
> m: +44 (0) 7539655835
> w: +44 (0) 208 008 4584
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Alternative to the static modifier in BeanShell

[aidy lewis]

Hi,

Without a static modifier in BeanShell, how can I prevent the below
ArrayList from being re-initialised  during each thread?

"""

headerList = new ArrayList();

countCacheMisses() {
  print("counting cache misses");
  if (vars.get("HEADER") =="MISS");
headerList.add("MISS");
print("the size of the array");
print(headerList.size());
}


countCacheMisses()

"""

Aidy Lewis
Test Discipline Lead (News and Knowledge)
m: +44 (0) 7539655835
w: +44 (0) 208 008 4584

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Authentication Error

[Dcunha, Stephanie]

Hi,
I am testing a website in which the authentication is getting done by a 
server which is different from the application server.
While running my script in JMeter 2.4 , I am getting a 200 (OK) response code 
at the authentication page however the response recorded gives me a ref no with 
the following error:

Error
There was a problem accessing the site. Try to browse to the site again.
If the problem persists, contact the administrator of this site and provide the 
reference number to identify the problem.

When the site is accessed manually the authentication is successful.
I have done the necessary correlation.

Your guidance will be appreciated.

Regards,
Stephanie




Information contained and transmitted by this e-mail is confidential and 
proprietary to iGATE Patni and its affiliates and is intended for use only by 
the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited and you are requested to delete this e-mail immediately and notify 
the originator or mailad...@igatepatni.com. iGATE Patni does not enter into any 
agreement with any party by e-mail. Any views expressed by an individual do not 
necessarily reflect the view of iGATE Patni. iGATE Patni is not responsible for 
the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of information provided, 
through this email. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain 
software viruses, which could damage your own computer system. While iGATE 
Patni has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot 
accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software 
viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening an 
attachment. To know more about iGATE Patni please visit www.igatepatni.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Rajiv Nanduani]

Hi All,

Thanks a lot for the guidance

after updating jmeter properties in master machine

mode=Statistical
num_sample_threshold=100
time_threshold=6

I am getting some good results

>From Linux machine



Scenarios

# of Transactions

Avg Time (Milli Sec)

Min Time (Milli Sec)

Max Time (Milli Sec)

Std Dev (Milli Sec)

Error %

Throughput/Sec

KB/Sec

 Avg Bytes

MobileFAQ

7417

23

12

635

25.36

0.00

41.20

4560.55

113338





Remote Server from Windows to Linux machine



Scenarios

# of Transactions

Avg Time (Milli Sec)

Min Time (Milli Sec)

Max Time (Milli Sec)

Std Dev (Milli Sec)

Error %

Throughput/Sec

KB/Sec

 Avg Bytes

MobileFAQ

4989

24

19

37

4.65

0.00

27.71

3066.82

113338




On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Rajiv Nanduani <
rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In jmeter properties file of slave machine or master machine???
>
> I have updated in master machine.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:11 PM, sebb  wrote:
>
>> On 13 December 2011 12:30, Rajiv Nanduani 
>> wrote:
>> > Why this is not happening in remote server distributed environment. I am
>> > trying in remote server distributed environment
>>
>> At least give it a try.
>>
>> It will show if there are any fundamental differences accessing the
>> Australian server from USA and India.
>>
>> JMeter Client-Server mode is inherently more resource intensive than
>> using stand-alone non-GUI mode, though statistical mode helps.
>>
>> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/remote-test.html#sendermode
>>
>> Might also be worth trying the new "Asynch" mode (assuming you are
>> using JMeter 2.5.1).
>>
>> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:55 PM, sebb  wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 13 December 2011 12:10, Rajiv Nanduani <
>> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi deepak,
>> >> >
>> >> > one slave is  in india and another slave in USA, and server is
>> another
>> >> > location Australia
>> >> >
>> >> > I want to  run from india so that i can merge both results(india
>> salve,
>> >> USA
>> >> > slave).
>> >> > The master machine is placed in India
>> >>
>> >> So just run the tests in batch non-GUI mode on each server, then copy
>> >> the files back to India where they can be merged and processed.
>> >>
>> >> It's trivial to merge CSV files - just concatenate them.
>> >>
>> >> If you want to get an idea of performance during the run, just use
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results
>> >>
>> >> The output can be directed to the console, or you can tail the log
>> file.
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Deepak Goel 
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hey Rajiv
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
>> >> >> in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
>> >> >> consuming, etc...etc...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >> www.simtree.net
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Please guide me.
>> >> >> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the
>> >> Server
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> > the US and the slaves at india)?
>> >> >> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Hey Rajiv
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
>> >> >> >>=
>> >> >> >> (Response Time +
>> Think
>> >> Time)
>> >> >> >> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying,
>> so
>> >> you
>> >> >> >> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And
>> that
>> >> >> >> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup
>> for
>> >> >> >> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are
>> similar
>> >> >> >> to the US Machine test.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >> >> www.simtree.net
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com <
>> >> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Hi deepak,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I did not get your point
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
>> >> concurrent
>> >> >> >> > users.???
>> >> >> >> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > It means?
>> >> >> >> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to
>> linux)
>> >> is
>> >> >> >> > not
>> >> >> >> > useful.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Hey
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Namaskara~Nala

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Rajiv Nanduani]

In jmeter properties file of slave machine or master machine???

I have updated in master machine.

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:11 PM, sebb  wrote:

> On 13 December 2011 12:30, Rajiv Nanduani 
> wrote:
> > Why this is not happening in remote server distributed environment. I am
> > trying in remote server distributed environment
>
> At least give it a try.
>
> It will show if there are any fundamental differences accessing the
> Australian server from USA and India.
>
> JMeter Client-Server mode is inherently more resource intensive than
> using stand-alone non-GUI mode, though statistical mode helps.
>
> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/remote-test.html#sendermode
>
> Might also be worth trying the new "Asynch" mode (assuming you are
> using JMeter 2.5.1).
>
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:55 PM, sebb  wrote:
> >
> >> On 13 December 2011 12:10, Rajiv Nanduani  >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi deepak,
> >> >
> >> > one slave is  in india and another slave in USA, and server is another
> >> > location Australia
> >> >
> >> > I want to  run from india so that i can merge both results(india
> salve,
> >> USA
> >> > slave).
> >> > The master machine is placed in India
> >>
> >> So just run the tests in batch non-GUI mode on each server, then copy
> >> the files back to India where they can be merged and processed.
> >>
> >> It's trivial to merge CSV files - just concatenate them.
> >>
> >> If you want to get an idea of performance during the run, just use
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results
> >>
> >> The output can be directed to the console, or you can tail the log file.
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Deepak Goel 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hey Rajiv
> >> >>
> >> >> Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
> >> >> in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
> >> >> consuming, etc...etc...
> >> >>
> >> >> Deepak
> >> >> www.simtree.net
> >> >>
> >> >> On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
> >> >> > Hi All,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Please guide me.
> >> >> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the
> >> Server
> >> >> in
> >> >> > the US and the slaves at india)?
> >> >> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel 
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hey Rajiv
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
> >> >> >>=
> >> >> >> (Response Time + Think
> >> Time)
> >> >> >> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying, so
> >> you
> >> >> >> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And
> that
> >> >> >> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup
> for
> >> >> >> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are
> similar
> >> >> >> to the US Machine test.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Deepak
> >> >> >> www.simtree.net
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com <
> >> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi deepak,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I did not get your point
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
> >> concurrent
> >> >> >> > users.???
> >> >> >> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > It means?
> >> >> >> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to
> linux)
> >> is
> >> >> >> > not
> >> >> >> > useful.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Hey
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
> >> concurrent
> >> >> >> >> users.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> If you run it from India, there is a approx lag of 1000ms and
> >> hence
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> transaction difference of 100 (India) with a response time of
> >> 1000ms
> >> >> to
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> 1 (USA) with a response time of 20ms. The remote server
> >> >> distributed
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> testing seems not to be adding about 800ms to the result of
> >> response
> >> >> >> time
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> and hence shows about 20ms as the response time (Although it
> >> >> restricts
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> number of transactions to be about 100). Looks like a skewed
> >> result.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Deepak
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Ke

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[sebb]

On 13 December 2011 12:30, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
> Why this is not happening in remote server distributed environment. I am
> trying in remote server distributed environment

At least give it a try.

It will show if there are any fundamental differences accessing the
Australian server from USA and India.

JMeter Client-Server mode is inherently more resource intensive than
using stand-alone non-GUI mode, though statistical mode helps.

http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/remote-test.html#sendermode

Might also be worth trying the new "Asynch" mode (assuming you are
using JMeter 2.5.1).

> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:55 PM, sebb  wrote:
>
>> On 13 December 2011 12:10, Rajiv Nanduani 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi deepak,
>> >
>> > one slave is  in india and another slave in USA, and server is another
>> > location Australia
>> >
>> > I want to  run from india so that i can merge both results(india salve,
>> USA
>> > slave).
>> > The master machine is placed in India
>>
>> So just run the tests in batch non-GUI mode on each server, then copy
>> the files back to India where they can be merged and processed.
>>
>> It's trivial to merge CSV files - just concatenate them.
>>
>> If you want to get an idea of performance during the run, just use
>>
>>
>> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results
>>
>> The output can be directed to the console, or you can tail the log file.
>>
>> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey Rajiv
>> >>
>> >> Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
>> >> in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
>> >> consuming, etc...etc...
>> >>
>> >> Deepak
>> >> www.simtree.net
>> >>
>> >> On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >
>> >> > Please guide me.
>> >> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the
>> Server
>> >> in
>> >> > the US and the slaves at india)?
>> >> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel 
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hey Rajiv
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
>> >> >>                                            =
>> >> >>                                             (Response Time + Think
>> Time)
>> >> >> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying, so
>> you
>> >> >> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And that
>> >> >> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup for
>> >> >> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are similar
>> >> >> to the US Machine test.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >> www.simtree.net
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com <
>> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi deepak,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I did not get your point
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
>> concurrent
>> >> >> > users.???
>> >> >> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > It means?
>> >> >> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to linux)
>> is
>> >> >> > not
>> >> >> > useful.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >> >> >> Hey
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
>> concurrent
>> >> >> >> users.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> If you run it from India, there is a approx lag of 1000ms and
>> hence
>> >> the
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> transaction difference of 100 (India) with a response time of
>> 1000ms
>> >> to
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> 1 (USA) with a response time of 20ms. The remote server
>> >> distributed
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> testing seems not to be adding about 800ms to the result of
>> response
>> >> >> time
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> and hence shows about 20ms as the response time (Although it
>> >> restricts
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> number of transactions to be about 100). Looks like a skewed
>> result.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Keigu
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> +91-9765089593
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> deic...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> http://www.simtree.net
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Skype: thumsupdeicool
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Google talk: deicool
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Rajiv Nanduani]

Here i am running the script in USA machine by using remote server
distributed environment then why it is not generating the same output as
direct run from USA machine.
The only difference is that  I am sending the request(from INDIA) to start
the test in USA machine instead of direct run on USA machine

>From Linux machine (USA machine)



Scenarios

# of Transactions

Avg Time (Milli Sec)

Min Time (Milli Sec)

Max Time (Milli Sec)

Std Dev (Milli Sec)

Error %

Throughput/Sec

KB/Sec

 Avg Bytes

MobileFAQ

10085

17

12

826

19.43

0.00

56.03

6163.14

112641





Remote Server from Windows (india)  to Linux machine (USA)



Scenarios

# of Transactions

Avg Time (Milli Sec)

Min Time (Milli Sec)

Max Time (Milli Sec)

Std Dev (Milli Sec)

Error %

Throughput/Sec

KB/Sec

 Avg Bytes

MobileFAQ

89

22

15

221

24.32

0.00

0.50

55.00

112641




On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Rajiv Nanduani <
rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why this is not happening in remote server distributed environment. I am
> trying in remote server distributed environment
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:55 PM, sebb  wrote:
>
>> On 13 December 2011 12:10, Rajiv Nanduani 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi deepak,
>> >
>> > one slave is  in india and another slave in USA, and server is another
>> > location Australia
>> >
>> > I want to  run from india so that i can merge both results(india salve,
>> USA
>> > slave).
>> > The master machine is placed in India
>>
>> So just run the tests in batch non-GUI mode on each server, then copy
>> the files back to India where they can be merged and processed.
>>
>> It's trivial to merge CSV files - just concatenate them.
>>
>> If you want to get an idea of performance during the run, just use
>>
>>
>> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results
>>
>> The output can be directed to the console, or you can tail the log file.
>>
>> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey Rajiv
>> >>
>> >> Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
>> >> in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
>> >> consuming, etc...etc...
>> >>
>> >> Deepak
>> >> www.simtree.net
>> >>
>> >> On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >
>> >> > Please guide me.
>> >> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the
>> Server
>> >> in
>> >> > the US and the slaves at india)?
>> >> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel 
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hey Rajiv
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
>> >> >>=
>> >> >> (Response Time + Think
>> Time)
>> >> >> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying, so
>> you
>> >> >> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And that
>> >> >> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup for
>> >> >> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are
>> similar
>> >> >> to the US Machine test.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >> www.simtree.net
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com <
>> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi deepak,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I did not get your point
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
>> concurrent
>> >> >> > users.???
>> >> >> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > It means?
>> >> >> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to
>> linux) is
>> >> >> > not
>> >> >> > useful.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >> >> >> Hey
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
>> concurrent
>> >> >> >> users.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> If you run it from India, there is a approx lag of 1000ms and
>> hence
>> >> the
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> transaction difference of 100 (India) with a response time of
>> 1000ms
>> >> to
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> 1 (USA) with a response time of 20ms. The remote server
>> >> distributed
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> testing seems not to be adding about 800ms to the result of
>> response
>> >> >> time
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> and hence shows about 20ms as the response time (Although it
>> >> restricts
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> number of transactions to be about 100). Looks like a skewed
>> result.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >>

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Rajiv Nanduani]

Why this is not happening in remote server distributed environment. I am
trying in remote server distributed environment

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:55 PM, sebb  wrote:

> On 13 December 2011 12:10, Rajiv Nanduani 
> wrote:
> > Hi deepak,
> >
> > one slave is  in india and another slave in USA, and server is another
> > location Australia
> >
> > I want to  run from india so that i can merge both results(india salve,
> USA
> > slave).
> > The master machine is placed in India
>
> So just run the tests in batch non-GUI mode on each server, then copy
> the files back to India where they can be merged and processed.
>
> It's trivial to merge CSV files - just concatenate them.
>
> If you want to get an idea of performance during the run, just use
>
>
> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results
>
> The output can be directed to the console, or you can tail the log file.
>
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Rajiv
> >>
> >> Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
> >> in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
> >> consuming, etc...etc...
> >>
> >> Deepak
> >> www.simtree.net
> >>
> >> On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Please guide me.
> >> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the
> Server
> >> in
> >> > the US and the slaves at india)?
> >> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hey Rajiv
> >> >>
> >> >> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
> >> >>=
> >> >> (Response Time + Think
> Time)
> >> >> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying, so
> you
> >> >> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And that
> >> >> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
> >> >>
> >> >> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
> >> >>
> >> >> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup for
> >> >> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are similar
> >> >> to the US Machine test.
> >> >>
> >> >> Deepak
> >> >> www.simtree.net
> >> >>
> >> >> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com <
> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi deepak,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I did not get your point
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
> concurrent
> >> >> > users.???
> >> >> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It means?
> >> >> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to linux)
> is
> >> >> > not
> >> >> > useful.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
> >> >> >> Hey
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000
> concurrent
> >> >> >> users.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> If you run it from India, there is a approx lag of 1000ms and
> hence
> >> the
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> transaction difference of 100 (India) with a response time of
> 1000ms
> >> to
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> 1 (USA) with a response time of 20ms. The remote server
> >> distributed
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> testing seems not to be adding about 800ms to the result of
> response
> >> >> time
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> and hence shows about 20ms as the response time (Although it
> >> restricts
> >> >> the
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> number of transactions to be about 100). Looks like a skewed
> result.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Deepak
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Keigu
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Deepak
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> +91-9765089593
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> deic...@gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> http://www.simtree.net
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Skype: thumsupdeicool
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Google talk: deicool
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Contribute to the world, environment and more :
> >> >> >> http://www.gridrepublic.org
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Rajiv Nanduani
> >> >> >> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Hi All,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I have performed a testing with Jmeter. I have to Analysis the
> >> output
> >> >> >> which
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > is better to run from where  Please help me out on this
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >

Re: jdbc connection

[waseemfa]

overcame that error.  Just had to add the db name at the end

facing a new error now
Response message: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: The
connection to the host TEST_MACHINE, named instance SQLEXPRESS/Testdb has
failed. Error: "java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Receive timed out". Verify
the server and instance names, check that no firewall is blocking UDP
traffic to port 1434, and for SQL Server 2005 or later verify that the SQL
Server Browser Service is running on the host.


there are no firewall that are blocking any of the content

my exact config details
db URL : jdbc:sqlserver://TEST_MACHINE\\SQLEXPRESS/Testdb
jdbc Driver Calss : com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver 

--
View this message in context: 
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/jdbc-connection-tp5071152p5071299.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: jdbc connection

[waseemfa]

overcame that error.  Just had to add the db name at the end

facing a new error now
Response message: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: The
connection to the host TEST_MACHINE, named instance \SQLEXPRESS/Testdb has
failed. Error: "java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Receive timed out". Verify
the server and instance names, check that no firewall is blocking UDP
traffic to port 1434, and for SQL Server 2005 or later verify that the SQL
Server Browser Service is running on the host.


there are no firewall that are blocking any of the content

my exact config details
db URL : jdbc:sqlserver://TEST_MACHINE\\SQLEXPRESS/Testdb
jdbc Driver Calss : com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver



--
View this message in context: 
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/jdbc-connection-tp5071152p5071295.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[sebb]

On 13 December 2011 12:10, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
> Hi deepak,
>
> one slave is  in india and another slave in USA, and server is another
> location Australia
>
> I want to  run from india so that i can merge both results(india salve, USA
> slave).
> The master machine is placed in India

So just run the tests in batch non-GUI mode on each server, then copy
the files back to India where they can be merged and processed.

It's trivial to merge CSV files - just concatenate them.

If you want to get an idea of performance during the run, just use

http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/component_reference.html#Generate_Summary_Results

The output can be directed to the console, or you can tail the log file.

> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:
>
>> Hey Rajiv
>>
>> Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
>> in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
>> consuming, etc...etc...
>>
>> Deepak
>> www.simtree.net
>>
>> On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Please guide me.
>> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the Server
>> in
>> > the US and the slaves at india)?
>> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey Rajiv
>> >>
>> >> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
>> >>                                            =
>> >>                                             (Response Time + Think Time)
>> >> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying, so you
>> >> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And that
>> >> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
>> >>
>> >> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
>> >>
>> >> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup for
>> >> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are similar
>> >> to the US Machine test.
>> >>
>> >> Deepak
>> >> www.simtree.net
>> >>
>> >> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com > >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi deepak,
>> >> >
>> >> > I did not get your point
>> >> >
>> >> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000 concurrent
>> >> > users.???
>> >> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > It means?
>> >> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to linux) is
>> >> > not
>> >> > useful.
>> >> >
>> >> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
>> >> >
>> >> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >> >> Hey
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000 concurrent
>> >> >> users.
>> >> >
>> >> >> If you run it from India, there is a approx lag of 1000ms and hence
>> the
>> >> >
>> >> >> transaction difference of 100 (India) with a response time of 1000ms
>> to
>> >> >
>> >> >> 1 (USA) with a response time of 20ms. The remote server
>> distributed
>> >> >
>> >> >> testing seems not to be adding about 800ms to the result of response
>> >> time
>> >> >
>> >> >> and hence shows about 20ms as the response time (Although it
>> restricts
>> >> the
>> >> >
>> >> >> number of transactions to be about 100). Looks like a skewed result.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> --
>> >> >
>> >> >> Keigu
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Deepak
>> >> >
>> >> >> +91-9765089593
>> >> >
>> >> >> deic...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> http://www.simtree.net
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Skype: thumsupdeicool
>> >> >
>> >> >> Google talk: deicool
>> >> >
>> >> >> Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Contribute to the world, environment and more :
>> >> >> http://www.gridrepublic.org
>> >> >
>> >> >> "
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Rajiv Nanduani
>> >> >> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> > I have performed a testing with Jmeter. I have to Analysis the
>> output
>> >> >> which
>> >> >
>> >> >> > is better to run from where  Please help me out on this
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> > I have two machines. One is in INDIA and second in US( client side)
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> > I have also remote access of remote machine(Linux machine in US)
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> > I have executed same request for 5 minutes with 1 thread from every
>> >> >
>> >> >> > location and getting the below output.
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> > 1. Executed from india local windows machine (Windows in INDIA)
>> >> >
>> >> >> > 2. Executed from US by using remote machine access (Linux machine
>> in
>> >> US
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> )
>> >> >

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[rajivkumarnandvani]

http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/file/n5071290/master_Slave.png  this is
the structure

-

rajivkumarnandvani
--
View this message in context: 
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Re-Re-remote-server-distributed-testing-JMETER-Analysis-the-output-which-is-better-to-run-from-wh-tp5067986p5071290.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: jdbc connection

[Felix Frank]

More details then.

What is the exact configuration of the JDBC sampler?

What errors are generated when you do it this way?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Rajiv Nanduani]

Hi deepak,

one slave is  in india and another slave in USA, and server is another
location Australia

I want to  run from india so that i can merge both results(india salve, USA
slave).
The master machine is placed in India

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:

> Hey Rajiv
>
> Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
> in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
> consuming, etc...etc...
>
> Deepak
> www.simtree.net
>
> On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Please guide me.
> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the Server
> in
> > the US and the slaves at india)?
> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Rajiv
> >>
> >> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
> >>=
> >> (Response Time + Think Time)
> >> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying, so you
> >> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And that
> >> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
> >>
> >> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
> >>
> >> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup for
> >> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are similar
> >> to the US Machine test.
> >>
> >> Deepak
> >> www.simtree.net
> >>
> >> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com  >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi deepak,
> >> >
> >> > I did not get your point
> >> >
> >> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000 concurrent
> >> > users.???
> >> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > It means?
> >> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to linux) is
> >> > not
> >> > useful.
> >> >
> >> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
> >> >
> >> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
> >> >> Hey
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000 concurrent
> >> >> users.
> >> >
> >> >> If you run it from India, there is a approx lag of 1000ms and hence
> the
> >> >
> >> >> transaction difference of 100 (India) with a response time of 1000ms
> to
> >> >
> >> >> 1 (USA) with a response time of 20ms. The remote server
> distributed
> >> >
> >> >> testing seems not to be adding about 800ms to the result of response
> >> time
> >> >
> >> >> and hence shows about 20ms as the response time (Although it
> restricts
> >> the
> >> >
> >> >> number of transactions to be about 100). Looks like a skewed result.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Deepak
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> --
> >> >
> >> >> Keigu
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Deepak
> >> >
> >> >> +91-9765089593
> >> >
> >> >> deic...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> http://www.simtree.net
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Skype: thumsupdeicool
> >> >
> >> >> Google talk: deicool
> >> >
> >> >> Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com
> >> >
> >> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> "Contribute to the world, environment and more :
> >> >> http://www.gridrepublic.org
> >> >
> >> >> "
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Rajiv Nanduani
> >> >> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > I have performed a testing with Jmeter. I have to Analysis the
> output
> >> >> which
> >> >
> >> >> > is better to run from where  Please help me out on this
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > I have two machines. One is in INDIA and second in US( client side)
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > I have also remote access of remote machine(Linux machine in US)
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > I have executed same request for 5 minutes with 1 thread from every
> >> >
> >> >> > location and getting the below output.
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > 1. Executed from india local windows machine (Windows in INDIA)
> >> >
> >> >> > 2. Executed from US by using remote machine access (Linux machine
> in
> >> US
> >> >> >
> >> >> )
> >> >
> >> >> > 3. Executed from India in US machine by using remote server
> >> distributed
> >> >
> >> >> > testing JMETER
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > From local machine Windows in INDIA
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Scenarios
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > # of Transactions
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Avg Time (Milli Sec)
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Min Time (Milli Sec)
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Max Time (Milli Sec)
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Std Dev (Milli Sec)
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Error %
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Throughput/Sec
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> > 

Re: Performance OpenJDK compared with SunJDK

[Deepak Goel]

Hey

Looks like an evolution and quality problem..Sun JDK more evolved v/s OpenJDK

What is the hardware? What is the performance difference? Stats please...

Deepak

On 12/13/11, Toni Menendez Lopez  wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to ask all of you on question !
>
> I am normally working with SunJDK for Jmeter and running in non-gui
> mode, but now I want to migrate the openJDK ( OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
> (build 1.6.0-b09, mixed mode)).
>
> I have executed the same test in SunJDK and OpenJDK and I have
> experienced that Jmeter has worst performance sending the traffic with
> OPenJDK that with SunJDK.
>
> Any of you have got some similar experience ?
>
> My O.S is RHEL5.4
>
> Best regards,
>
> Toni.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour


   --
Keigu

Deepak
+91-9765089593
deic...@gmail.com
http://www.simtree.net

Skype: thumsupdeicool
Google talk: deicool
Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool

"Contribute to the world, environment and more : http://www.gridrepublic.org
"

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Deepak Goel]

Hey Rajiv

Why would you like to keep the server in USA when all the slaves are
in India? More expensive, difficult to control and manage, bandwidth
consuming, etc...etc...

Deepak
www.simtree.net

On 12/13/11, Rajiv Nanduani  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please guide me.
> How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the Server in
> the US and the slaves at india)?
> What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Deepak Goel  wrote:
>
>> Hey Rajiv
>>
>> Number Of Concurrent Users = Throughput
>>=
>> (Response Time + Think Time)
>> I raised this point as your number of transactions are varying, so you
>> need some steady parameter to measure your results against. And that
>> can be "Number of Concurrent Users"
>>
>> Answer to your second point: Test from US Machine only...
>>
>> Thats what it look likes until unless you can fix up your setup for
>> the other two test (from India) to give out results which are similar
>> to the US Machine test.
>>
>> Deepak
>> www.simtree.net
>>
>> On 12/12/11, rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi deepak,
>> >
>> > I did not get your point
>> >
>> >  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000 concurrent
>> > users.???
>> >>> i am running 1 thread for 5 minutes loop count forever
>> >
>> >
>> > It means?
>> > Remote server testing running from India to USA ( window to linux) is
>> > not
>> > useful.
>> >
>> > Should I run from linux machine (USA) only??
>> >
>> > On , Deepak Goel  wrote:
>> >> Hey
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>  From the data, you are running a test of approx 2500-3000 concurrent
>> >> users.
>> >
>> >> If you run it from India, there is a approx lag of 1000ms and hence the
>> >
>> >> transaction difference of 100 (India) with a response time of 1000ms to
>> >
>> >> 1 (USA) with a response time of 20ms. The remote server distributed
>> >
>> >> testing seems not to be adding about 800ms to the result of response
>> time
>> >
>> >> and hence shows about 20ms as the response time (Although it restricts
>> the
>> >
>> >> number of transactions to be about 100). Looks like a skewed result.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> Deepak
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> --
>> >
>> >> Keigu
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> Deepak
>> >
>> >> +91-9765089593
>> >
>> >> deic...@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> http://www.simtree.net
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> Skype: thumsupdeicool
>> >
>> >> Google talk: deicool
>> >
>> >> Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com
>> >
>> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> "Contribute to the world, environment and more :
>> >> http://www.gridrepublic.org
>> >
>> >> "
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Rajiv Nanduani
>> >> rajivkumarnandv...@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > I have performed a testing with Jmeter. I have to Analysis the output
>> >> which
>> >
>> >> > is better to run from where  Please help me out on this
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > I have two machines. One is in INDIA and second in US( client side)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > I have also remote access of remote machine(Linux machine in US)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > I have executed same request for 5 minutes with 1 thread from every
>> >
>> >> > location and getting the below output.
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 1. Executed from india local windows machine (Windows in INDIA)
>> >
>> >> > 2. Executed from US by using remote machine access (Linux machine in
>> US
>> >> >
>> >> )
>> >
>> >> > 3. Executed from India in US machine by using remote server
>> distributed
>> >
>> >> > testing JMETER
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > From local machine Windows in INDIA
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Scenarios
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > # of Transactions
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Avg Time (Milli Sec)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Min Time (Milli Sec)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Max Time (Milli Sec)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Std Dev (Milli Sec)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Error %
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Throughput/Sec
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > KB/Sec
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Avg Bytes
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > MobileFAQ
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 99
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 821
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 261
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 7399
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 1355.12
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 0.00
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 1.22
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 133.90
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > 112641
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > From Linux machine in US
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Scenarios
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > # of Transactions
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Avg Time (Milli Sec)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Min Time (Milli Sec)
>> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> > Max Time (Milli Sec)
>> >
>> >> >

Re: jdbc connection

[waseemfa]

Already tried that as well.  but didn't work.



--
View this message in context: 
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/jdbc-connection-tp5071152p5071242.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Rajiv Nanduani]

Hi felix

I tried with statistical result send mode but it did not work.

But here i running the script in USA machine by using remote server
distributed environment then why it is not generating the same output as
direct run from USA machine.
The only difference is that  I am sending the request(from INDIA) to start
the test in USA machine instead of direct run on USA machine

>From Linux machine (USA machine)



Scenarios

# of Transactions

Avg Time (Milli Sec)

Min Time (Milli Sec)

Max Time (Milli Sec)

Std Dev (Milli Sec)

Error %

Throughput/Sec

KB/Sec

 Avg Bytes

MobileFAQ

10085

17

12

826

19.43

0.00

56.03

6163.14

112641





Remote Server from Windows (india)  to Linux machine (USA)



Scenarios

# of Transactions

Avg Time (Milli Sec)

Min Time (Milli Sec)

Max Time (Milli Sec)

Std Dev (Milli Sec)

Error %

Throughput/Sec

KB/Sec

 Avg Bytes

MobileFAQ

89

22

15

221

24.32

0.00

0.50

55.00

112641





On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Felix Frank  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 12/13/2011 08:28 AM, Rajiv Nanduani wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Please guide me.
> > How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the Server
> in
> > the US and the slaves at india)?
> > What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???
>
> I've been told that using statistical result sending is much more
> bandwidth-efficient than the default, so you may want to try and enable
> that.
>
> http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/remote-test.html#sendermode
>
> In case you're using Listeners such as View Results Tree in the US to
> display results from India, You're Doing It Wrong anyway. Don't do that.
>
> HTH,
> Felix
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org
>
>


-- 

Regards

*RAJIV 
KUMAR
NANDVANI *

http://rajivkumarnandvani.wordpress.com
http://testeverythingqtp.blogspot.com/

Re: jdbc connection

[Felix Frank]

Hi,

On 12/13/2011 12:09 PM, waseemfa wrote:
> I added a HTTP authorization manager witht eh appropriate URL but
> it fails.

I disbelive that you can use a *HTTP* Authorization Manager to manage
JDBC authorization.
Remove it.
Fill all appropriate fields in your JDBC Sampler instead.

HTH,
Felix

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: Create custom log files

[waseemfa]

Thanks for the reply sebb.  But that wasn't my requirement.

But any how figured that we can add custom response message to our request
so that pretty much solves my problem.
Creation of jtl files with user response messages will give a clear
understanding of the data used.

-Waseem



--
View this message in context: 
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Create-custom-log-files-tp5067691p5071157.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

jdbc connection

[waseemfa]

HI,

I have created a test plan to connect to a database (created locally on a
test system for testing) which uses my windows login ID as teh user name and
password.  I added a HTTP authorization manager witht eh appropriate URL but
it fails.

My db URL is : jdbc:sqlserver://TEST_MACHINE\SQLEXPRESS
JDBC Driver Class Name : com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver

it gives an error that com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException:
Login failed for user ''.

Can someone help.

Thanks in advance,
Waseem

--
View this message in context: 
http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/jdbc-connection-tp5071152p5071152.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org

Re: remote server distributed testing JMETER: Analysis the output which is better to run from wh

[Felix Frank]

Hi,

On 12/13/2011 08:28 AM, Rajiv Nanduani wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Please guide me.
> How can we effectively setup a distributed environment (with the Server in
> the US and the slaves at india)?
> What are the setups are required ?? needs to be check???

I've been told that using statistical result sending is much more
bandwidth-efficient than the default, so you may want to try and enable
that.

http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/remote-test.html#sendermode

In case you're using Listeners such as View Results Tree in the US to
display results from India, You're Doing It Wrong anyway. Don't do that.

HTH,
Felix

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@jmeter.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@jmeter.apache.org