Re: Get environment variable
This is what I have done. Thx.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Scott England-Sullivan sully6...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Charles,
Kind of a hack but I believe you would have to pass the ENV in as a
command line property using something like
-Dopenshift.internal.ip=$OPENSHIFT_INTERNAL_IP. Adding this to the
/bin/karaf shell script and then set the following in the
org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg:
org.ops4j.pax.web.listening.addresses=${openshift.internal.ip}.
I just verified that this will do what you are looking for.
Best Regards,
Scott ES
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Karaf is deployed on a remote Unix machine where I need to get the
following variable : $OPENSHIFT_INTERNAL_IP which corresponds to this value
[fabric-fuse.rhcloud.com fabric]\ printenv | grep OPENSHIFT_INTERNAL
OPENSHIFT_INTERNAL_IP=127.6.51.129
This variable has been added in the file org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg --
org.ops4j.pax.web.listening.addresses=$OPENSHIFT_INTERNAL_IP
but when Karaf boots, this value is not retrieved
config:list
karaf@root config:list | grep org.ops4j.pax.web
Pid:org.ops4j.pax.web
BundleLocation: mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-runtime/1.0.10
service.pid = org.ops4j.pax.web
felix.fileinstall.filename =
file:/var/lib/stickshift/2ee23a78e9664b8593ebbc77e16aac38/app-root/runtime/fabric/etc/org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg
org.ops4j.pax.web.listening.addresses = $OPENSHIFT_INTERNAL_IP
Is there a trick to resolve this enviroment variable ?
Regards,
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com
Twitter : @cmoulliard
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
--
--
Scott England-Sullivan
--
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
Twitter: sully6768
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com
Twitter : @cmoulliard
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Re: Aries error: No transaction currently active
Hi,
There seems to be some race-condition in aries there. Something similar
has been reported previously [1] [2].
I think we were able to fix it by synchronizing entity-manager-access
with synchronized-blocks
synchronized(entityManager){
entityManager.merge(...);
}
kind regards,
christoph
[1]
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Exception-No-transaction-currently-active-td4025308.html
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/aries-dev/201207.mbox/%3CCAEQV%2BEEhx4zNS%3D9MbxBhBUfedeC8F%3DBvGXn7v49EzwYxBJdf3g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On 25/08/12 10:12, johnsas wrote:
Hi,
I am using Aries 0.3 for transaction management in Karaf 2.2.8.
It works in gereral but sometimes I get the following exception when
accessing a database:
javax.persistence.TransactionRequiredException: No transaction currently
active
at
org.apache.aries.jpa.container.context.transaction.impl.JTAPersistenceContextRegistry.getCurrentPersistenceContext(JTAPersistenceContextRegistry.java:103)
at
org.apache.aries.jpa.container.context.transaction.impl.JTAEntityManager.getPersistenceContext(JTAEntityManager.java:83)
at
org.apache.aries.jpa.container.context.transaction.impl.JTAEntityManager.merge(JTAEntityManager.java:270)
at
org.xxx.persistence.impl.DatabaseProviderDao.merge(DatabaseProviderDao.java:304)
This error occurs out of the blue.
Do you have an idea why this happens, and what can be done to avoid it?
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Aries-error-No-transaction-currently-active-tp4025825.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Aries error: No transaction currently active
Hi, It seems that the issue was fixed in ARIES-885. But this will only be available with Aries 1.0. Do you have an idea to synchronize all calls to the EM with Aries 0.3? We have a blueprint similar to this: bean id=serviceBean class=org.xxx.MyServiceImpl jpa:context unitname=store property=entityManager / tx:transaction method=* value=Required / /bean service ref=serviceBean interface=org.xxx.MyService / How can I replace the entityManager with one that synchronizes the calls? John -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Aries-error-No-transaction-currently-active-tp4025825p4025844.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Aries error: No transaction currently active
What I don't understand is why my persistence bundle exports two EntityManagerFactory Services. Component (44) provides: objectClass = javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory org.apache.aries.jpa.container.managed = true org.apache.aries.jpa.default.unit.name = false osgi.unit.name = registry osgi.unit.provider = org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider osgi.unit.version = 1.0.0 service.id = 350 objectClass = javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory org.apache.aries.jpa.container.managed = true org.apache.aries.jpa.default.unit.name = false org.apache.aries.jpa.proxy.factory = true osgi.unit.name = registry osgi.unit.provider = org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider osgi.unit.version = 1.0.0 service.id = 351 objectClass = xxx.Registry osgi.service.blueprint.compname = registryService service.id = 379 version = 1 objectClass = org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainer osgi.blueprint.container.symbolicname = org.oparo.services.registry.registry-component osgi.blueprint.container.version = 1.0.0 service.id = 389 Is this normal behaviour? If yes, which bundle is using those OSGi-services? -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Aries-error-No-transaction-currently-active-tp4025825p4025846.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
