Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
Coolio, let us know when you get going on this, would be superinteresting to see more of your thoughts! Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:59 AM, amitp wrote: > No problem, I plan to make the code available for free, but there's currently > no code, so I'll publish the location of the code repository when I'll write > some.. :) > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3425623.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
No problem, I plan to make the code available for free, but there's currently no code, so I'll publish the location of the code repository when I'll write some.. :) -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3425623.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:38 AM, amitp wrote: > Hey thanks for the answers, > > after thinking about it for a while, I got to the conclusion that both > neo4j > HA and GoldenOrb don't really solve my problem, because they both help to > distribute the problem but not in a P2P way but they distributed with some > centralized control. > I need a solution with autonomous P2P agents... > > My plan for now is to make my own version of a parser for a subset of the > cypher language, hopefuly that parser will be able to split a query into a > few sub queries (for some real underlying graph DBs that are found in the > peers) Sounds very interesting. I'd love to follow your progress if it's possible. Andrés ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
Hey thanks for the answers, after thinking about it for a while, I got to the conclusion that both neo4j HA and GoldenOrb don't really solve my problem, because they both help to distribute the problem but not in a P2P way but they distributed with some centralized control. I need a solution with autonomous P2P agents... My plan for now is to make my own version of a parser for a subset of the cypher language, hopefuly that parser will be able to split a query into a few sub queries (for some real underlying graph DBs that are found in the peers) -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3425563.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
Mmh, I would actually do it the other way round - have a number of replicated Neo4j instances (possibly via Neo4j HA, see http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/ha-setup-tutorial.html) and then push traversals via GoldenOrb onto these instances and merge the results. WDYT? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:40 AM, amitp wrote: > Hey thanks, > > I've just read goldenOrb wiki, it's seem related BUT if I understand > correctly it's helps just with the distribution. I'm looking for a more > complete graph package that can be easily distributed (I don't want to > implement my own query engine). > > So I think I'll need to get into the depths of neo4j and see if I can change > the implentation to work on GoldenOrb Nodes... > > Does this make sense? any points before I get lost in the code? > > Thanks again, > Amit > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3414876.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
Hey thanks, I've just read goldenOrb wiki, it's seem related BUT if I understand correctly it's helps just with the distribution. I'm looking for a more complete graph package that can be easily distributed (I don't want to implement my own query engine). So I think I'll need to get into the depths of neo4j and see if I can change the implentation to work on GoldenOrb Nodes... Does this make sense? any points before I get lost in the code? Thanks again, Amit -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3414876.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
You can try to implement Google Pregel http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1807167.1807184 algorithm on top of Neo4j or use existing implementation http://www.goldenorbos.org/ On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:26 PM, amitp wrote: > Hey, > > - I'm designing a P2P application in which every peer have a partial graph > > - some nodes in the partial graph can be proxy nodes which contain contact > information for another peer > > - that peer's partial graph includes that proxy node (and potentially other > parts of the complete graph) > > Any chance you can give me some direction on how to implement this? > is neo4j suitable? can you recommand something else? > > Thanks, > Amit > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3414168.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > ___ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- _ entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem, (entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.) ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
[Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?
Hey, - I'm designing a P2P application in which every peer have a partial graph - some nodes in the partial graph can be proxy nodes which contain contact information for another peer - that peer's partial graph includes that proxy node (and potentially other parts of the complete graph) Any chance you can give me some direction on how to implement this? is neo4j suitable? can you recommand something else? Thanks, Amit -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3414168.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
