Re: number of masters and quorum

2014-07-07 Thread Benjamin Mahler
Just to clarify:

You can run a single master (--quorum=1) if you are looking to experiment
and don't care about high availability.

You can run 3 masters (--quorum=2) if you want to remain operating with 1
machine being down (planned or unplanned). You can also operate in the face
of the complete loss of 1 of the disks/machines.

You can run 5 masters (--quorum=3) if you want to remain operating with 2
machines being down (planned or unplanned). You can also operate in the
face of the complete loss of 2 of the disks/machines.

And so on. I would recommend 3 or 5 depending on your requirements. Jie
and/or myself will look to get some documentation up for this soon!


On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Jie Yu yujie@gmail.com wrote:

 Dick, you are right.

 - Jie


 On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Dick Davies d...@hellooperator.net
 wrote:

 I might be wrong but doesn't the new quorum setting mean
 it only makes sense to run an odd number of masters
 (a la zookeepers)?

 i.e. 4 masters is no more resilient than 3 (in fact less so, since
 you increase your chance of a node failure as number of nodes
 increases).





number of masters and quorum

2014-07-01 Thread Dick Davies
I might be wrong but doesn't the new quorum setting mean
it only makes sense to run an odd number of masters
(a la zookeepers)?

i.e. 4 masters is no more resilient than 3 (in fact less so, since
you increase your chance of a node failure as number of nodes
increases).