tooltip alignment in date field

2010-03-27 Thread james_sg

Hi,

I noticed that the tooltip for date field with popup, is not aligned
horizontally with the field.
This is not consistent with other fields. Is there a fix for this?

Regards,
James

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/tooltip-alignment-in-date-field-tp1693953p1693953.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: error in google product export.

2010-03-27 Thread rohit

just checking is someone encountered similar problems. I couldn't find how to
change the quotes in the form, but couldn't do it, any help will be
appreciated.

Thanks

Rohit


rohit wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think there is an error in googlebase product export.
> 
> if we export a single item, the code works OK, but when we try to export
> multiple item to google base the code fails. 
> 
> The probable error is with the way the multiple product ids are passed to
> the java code for processing.
> 
> till sometime, the part of the FTL holding the multiple porductids were in
> '[]' or second brackets, with a recent path they have been changed to '{}'
> or third bracket. I am not sure if this causes the failure for the java
> code to accept multiple items, but its the only change I noticed in Google
> base recently.
> 
> I am using the latest SVN on a linux machine.
> 
> Any feedback is welcome.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rohit
>  
> 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n4.nabble.com/error-in-google-product-export-tp1594536p1693554.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: virtual product and features

2010-03-27 Thread BJ Freeman
If selenium works in 4.0 then I suggest you install it.
then create data file similar to the demo data that has what you
describe here.
run selenium to establish 4.0 behavior.
then put in a patch with your results to as you stated here.
this will let anyone that is interested have a test case to work against
without having to do all the work of setup and reproducing your environment.
Not saying anyone will work on it, just saying it would give people more
incentive to look at it if inclined.
It would also shorten time if you have to get someone to consult with
you on the problem.

also note selenium has some holes in it that also need to be addressed,
you may hit one and need to work with the selenium group to resolve it.
See the jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3511


=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation 

Specialtymarket.com 

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin



Christopher Snow sent the following on 3/26/2010 11:26 PM:
> Hi Ruth/Scott,
> 
> This post is related to a post I did some time ago. My client is a
> vehicle breaker that scraps vehicles, and sells the individual
> components. When they scrap a vehicle, they keep the main components
> such as the engine and later sell those items individually. Some of the
> engines may be serialized and some may not.
> 
> For example, they may have scrapped 10 "Porsche 911 3.2 Carrera series
> (1984–1989)" cars and have the following engines:
> 
> Porsche 911 3.2 liter horizontally opposed flat 6 cylinder engine
> - non-serialized, QOH = 8, price £1,500 each
> - serialized, QOH 2 :
> - serial #12345, description "excellent condition", price £2,000
> - serial #23456, description "doesn't start", price £500
> 
> From the trials that I have done with ofbiz r4.0, the stock management
> aspect works great. Using the following steps:
> 
> - create a product of type virtual (e.g. POR911-3.2-FL6)
> - create non-serialized stock for POR911-3.2-FL6 and add 8 units
> - create a product of type variant (e.g. POR911-3.2-FL6-12345)
> - select POR911-3.2-FL6 product, in variants tab, enter POR911-3.2-FL6
> and click "Add variant product"
> - create a product of type variant (e.g. POR911-3.2-FL6-23456)
> - select POR911-3.2-FL6 product, in variants tab, enter POR911-3.2-FL6
> and click "Add variant product"
> - create serialized stock for POR911-3.2-FL6-12345 and POR911-3.2-FL6-12345
> - create serialized stock for POR911-3.2-FL6-12345 and POR911-3.2-FL6-23456
> 
> At the moment they don't need ecommerce, they just need stock
> management, but when they do need ecommerce, then I guess I will have to
> write some custom pages to allow their customers to be able to see the
> description and prices of individual stock items and choose the item
> that best suits their requirements. Features don't seem to make sense
> for this application, and I'm not sure where virtual/variant products is
> the right way to go either. Perhaps I should model the association
> purely as a product association of "equivalent or substitute". However,
> one benefit of using virtual/variant is that in the catalog inventory
> screens, it shows a nice summary of stock for each variant.
> 
> However, when trying to add variants in various ofbiz versions, I get
> the following result:
> 
> TRUNK: Error calling event:
> org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: Service invocation error
> (null)
> 9.04: No selectable Features found . Please create some and try again.
> 4.0: All ok - no error
> 
> - create a product of type virtual (e.g. CS-VIRT1)
> - create a product of type variant (e.g. CS-VAR1)
> - select CS-VIRT1 product, in variants tab, enter CS-VAR1 and click "Add
> variant product"
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> Ruth Hoffman wrote:
>> Hi Chris:
>> This is just my opinion, but yes you could do that, but be aware that
>> the ecommerce application makes some assumptions about virtual and
>> variant products. (For example, how to display HTML select boxes that
>> allow a site visitor to choose the variation of a virtual product.)
>>
>> At a minimum, the ecommerce application may not know how to handle
>> your products in terms of catalog listings, shopping cart displays
>> etc. I haven't looked at the code lately so I'm not sure what the
>> total impact would be.
>>
>> What are you trying to do?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ruth
>> Chris Snow wrote:
>>> Can a variant product be linked to a virtual product without using
>>> features?
>>>
>>> Many thanks in advance,
>>>
>>>
> 
>