Error displays while creating a new employment from Human Resources.
Hi All, I am using apache-ofbiz-10.04 stable version. The following error displays when creating a new employment from Human Resources. ERROR: Could not complete the Create Employment [file:/E:/ofbiz10.04_lsvn/apache-ofbiz-10.04/applications/humanres/script/org/ofbiz/humanres/HumanResServices.xml#createEmployment] process [problem creating the newEntity value: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:Employment][createdStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:40.105(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:39.995(java.sql.Timestamp)][fromDate,2011-04-01 13:28:36.495(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:40.105(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:39.995(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyIdFrom,Company(java.lang.String)][partyIdTo,1(java.lang.String)][roleTypeIdFrom,INTERNAL_ORGANIZATIO(java.lang.String)][roleTypeIdTo,EMPLOYEE(java.lang.String)][terminationReasonId,null()][terminationTypeId,null()][thruDate,null()] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.EMPLOYMENT (ROLE_TYPE_ID_FROM, ROLE_TYPE_ID_TO, PARTY_ID_FROM, PARTY_ID_TO, FROM_DATE, THRU_DATE, TERMINATION_REASON_ID, TERMINATION_TYPE_ID, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'EMPLOYMENT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'EMPLMNT_TPTRL' for key (1,EMPLOYEE). The statement has been rolled back.))] Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Monica -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Error-displays-while-creating-a-new-employment-from-Human-Resources-tp3392849p3392849.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Display VAT on checkout pages
It seems nobody wants to add anything, so at this stage I'd say, yes Jacques From: Raj Saini rajsa...@gmail.com I agree it is better to enhance the existing method. Should I create a JIRA issue for further discussion? Thanks, Raj On Sunday 20 March 2011 06:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Though I did not look into code yet, I agree with Paul, I don't think there are currently any countries in the world where you have Sale and Vat tax simultaneously. Of course, this could happens but I doubt. Anyway counting them both makes sense, even if it's maybe a shoot in the dark. I totally agree on the purchase difference for VAT_TAX vs SALES_TAX. I'm not quite sure how is calculated VAT on discount so I have added a small explanation at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/VAT#VAT-Discountsappliedperline My 2 cts Jacques From: Paul Foxworthy p...@cohsoft.com.au Hi Raj, I vote for enhancing the existing methods. If we think of the methods getTotalSalesTax and getOrderTaxByTaxAuthGeoAndParty as what tax was collected as part of the sale that must be paid to a tax authority? then those methods should look for VAT/GST as well as sales tax. Maybe there is some place in the world that has both a sales tax and a VAT/GST. If there was such a place, would you want these methods to count both taxes or not? I think the answer is yes, you would want both counted. To me, the tax types SALES_TAX and VAT_TAX are almost the same thing *for a sale*. In both cases, we're collecting tax which is a liability that must be paid to a tax authority. The major difference between a VAT/GST tax and a sales tax is we also record the VAT tax we paid on *purchases*, and that affects the overall liability at the time we must pay the tax authority. There's no sales tax on purchases. If you grep for SALES_TAX in the Ofbiz code, there are several instances where there's no mention of VAT_TAX, and yet the business rule should probably apply to both. I have been intending to do a thorough study of all these instances when I get some time. I believe most of them should change to taxtype == SALES_TAX OR taxtype == VAT_TAX. It seems to me you're looking at several of those instances right now. When we summarise tax at the bottom of an order, I think the most interesting thing to show is total tax of whatever type, and the getTotalSalesTax method should do that job. The method getTotalSalesTax could possibly have a more general name, but I don't think that's really important. So as I said, I think it would be better to modify the methods. For existing Ofbiz installations that only define tax authorities that collect a sales tax, this change will not break anything at all. Cheers Paul Foxworthy rajsaini wrote: Hi, I am working a e-commerce application and using new VAT implementation. I have a problem showing the VAT adjustment as TAX on cart/checkout pages. ShoppingCart#getTotalSalesTax and in turn OrderReadHelper#getOrderTaxByTaxAuthGeoAndParty always returns zero as it does not consider the OrderAdjusment of VAT_TAX type. I am working on enhancements and trying to find the best way so that it is generic and my work could be contributed back to the community. My question is should we add other method in ShippingCart and OrderReadHelper classes for VAT or enhance the existing methods to include the OrderAdjustments of VAT_TAX type. Thanks, Raj -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Display-VAT-on-checkout-pages-tp3386374p3390807.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: removing validations
Go through the practice application to remove and add validation from a specific page. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Tutorial+-+A+Beginners+Development+Guide To remove the validation put(optional=false) for the desire field in services.xml file. -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/removing-validations-tp3344057p3392887.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Error displays while creating a new employment from Human Resources.
I tried it with trunk and it seems to work. It also looks like you can create an employee by using party with role type Employee. Try that. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:55 AM, monica.das monica.das2...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, I am using apache-ofbiz-10.04 stable version. The following error displays when creating a new employment from Human Resources. ERROR: Could not complete the Create Employment [file:/E:/ofbiz10.04_lsvn/apache-ofbiz-10.04/applications/humanres/script/org/ofbiz/humanres/HumanResServices.xml#createEmployment] process [problem creating the newEntity value: Error while inserting: [GenericEntity:Employment][createdStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:40.105(java.sql.Timestamp)][createdTxStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:39.995(java.sql.Timestamp)][fromDate,2011-04-01 13:28:36.495(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:40.105(java.sql.Timestamp)][lastUpdatedTxStamp,2011-03-21 13:28:39.995(java.sql.Timestamp)][partyIdFrom,Company(java.lang.String)][partyIdTo,1(java.lang.String)][roleTypeIdFrom,INTERNAL_ORGANIZATIO(java.lang.String)][roleTypeIdTo,EMPLOYEE(java.lang.String)][terminationReasonId,null()][terminationTypeId,null()][thruDate,null()] (SQL Exception while executing the following:INSERT INTO OFBIZ.EMPLOYMENT (ROLE_TYPE_ID_FROM, ROLE_TYPE_ID_TO, PARTY_ID_FROM, PARTY_ID_TO, FROM_DATE, THRU_DATE, TERMINATION_REASON_ID, TERMINATION_TYPE_ID, LAST_UPDATED_STAMP, LAST_UPDATED_TX_STAMP, CREATED_STAMP, CREATED_TX_STAMP) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) (INSERT on table 'EMPLOYMENT' caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'EMPLMNT_TPTRL' for key (1,EMPLOYEE). The statement has been rolled back.))] Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Monica -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Error-displays-while-creating-a-new-employment-from-Human-Resources-tp3392849p3392849.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Error displays while creating a new employment from Human Resources.
Thanks a lot. It works fine. Regards Monica -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Error-displays-while-creating-a-new-employment-from-Human-Resources-tp3392849p3392965.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Open link in a new tab
Hi All Is there any option in ofbiz that can enable me to open a new tab or new window when I click a button? so instead of navigating to another page i want that page in anew window or tab If so how? -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Open-link-in-a-new-tab-tp3393348p3393348.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Open link in a new tab
Look for a target=_blank in FTL target-window=_BLANK in widgets Jacques Shereen wrote: Hi All Is there any option in ofbiz that can enable me to open a new tab or new window when I click a button? so instead of navigating to another page i want that page in anew window or tab If so how?
Re: Display VAT on checkout pages
Bonjour Jacques, Yes, I agree it's unlikely. I only mentioned it as a thought experiment to clarify our thoughts on what the method should return. Cheers Paul Foxworthy Jacques Le Roux wrote: I don't think there are currently any countries in the world where you have Sale and Vat tax simultaneously. Of course, this could happens but I doubt. Anyway counting them both makes sense, even if it's maybe a shoot in the dark. -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Display-VAT-on-checkout-pages-tp3386374p3395508.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Category Level Price
Not sure how good of a solution it is, but you can do it by setting price rules too (condition:category, action:flatAmountOverride). Though you will need to create some price data for that to work. But things will be easily manageable after that. Thanks Regards Atul Vani Enterprise Software Developer HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/ We are the Global Leaders in Apache OFBiz, Google 'ofbiz' and see for yourself. On Thursday 17 March 2011 10:20 PM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote: Why not use a seed data file, with possible proper import process? It's easy to edit and, I believe, certainly faster than any specific UI, more error prone tough (C/P, etc.)... If you don't want to maintain price information for each product separately, you could override calculateProductPrice service and introduce your custom price calculating logic based on categories. Bilgin Jacques From: araya...@kenfuse.com Hi Community, I have a requirement where there are lots of products (upto 50 or more in cases) under each category. Each of them are different but are priced the same with same rules etc. Right now the way seems to be setting up pricing details for each of these products (i.e. default and list price). However, this is painful for 100s of product if done through the user interface which is the preference. To simplify wondering if there is a way to apply some inheritence based on product's primary category. For example if there are no direct price associated can we look for prices associated with the primary category . If that too is not available then recurse further to its primary parent all the way to the top potentially. An example scenario is music download by style / genre all of which are priced the same and there are potentially hundreds or thousands of them. Of course would love to override the price with a direct product price for cases but generally apply a site wide pricing. Is this possible? Do advice if there are simpler ways to model this or perhaps a support already exists. Thanks in advance ar -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Category-Level-Price-tp3380888p3380888.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
