Re: Product Associations
I agree with Rishi here, as the 12345 product is the new version
replacement of 38726 product thus *38726* is being obsolete here.
Thanks & Regards,
Devanshu Vyas.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:59 PM Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> productIdTo="12345" fromDate="2001-05-13 12:00:00.0" quantity="1.00"
> reason="Any reason."/>
>
> This is what I was suggesting, as I understand from James initial email
> that 38726 is an product and its new version will be 12345. I was referring
> to - https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/big-gizmo-GZ-8544-p
>
> Here productId="GZ-8544" and productIdTo="WG-9943" used in the demo data.
>
> Please let me know if something is unclear or I misunderstood something.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Rishi Solanki
> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> Direct: +91-9893287847
> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> www.hotwax.co
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:18 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
>
> > I thought the same thing. Product 12345 was the product from. Can we
> > clarify?
> >
> > Original Message
> > Subject: Re: Product Associations
> > From: Benjamin Jugl <benjamin.j...@ecomify.de>
> > Date: Thu, April 26, 2018 3:02 am
> > To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> >
> > Are you sure?
> >
> > Because the code I mentioned tries to find the old/replaced/obsolescence
> >
> > Product and refers to "productIdTo".
> >
> > Thus I think that 38726 should be productIdTo.
> >
> > I can be mistaken, though. :)
> >
> >
> > Am 26.04.18 um 10:59 schrieb Rishi Solanki:
> > > In addition you need to change the association from and to.
> > >>>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the
> Product
> > to
> > > and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
> > >
> > > 38726 should be product from and 12345 should be product to.
> > >
> > > Please refer the demo data for association type mentioned by Benjamin.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rishi Solanki
> > > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> > > Direct: +91-9893287847
> > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> > > www.hotwax.co
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Benjamin Jugl <
> benjamin.j...@ecomify.de
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi there,
> > >>
> > >> I would say yes, the code implies this usage.
> > >>
> > >> See ProductDetail.groovy:
> > >>
> > >> obsolenscenseProducts = dispatcher.runSync("getAssociatedProducts",
> > >> [productIdTo : productId, type : "PRODUCT_OBSOLESCENCE",
> checkViewAllow
> > :
> > >> true, prodCatalogId : currentCatalogId]);
> > >> context.obsolenscenseProducts = obsolenscenseProducts.assocProducts;
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Am 25.04.18 um 18:13 schrieb ja...@productive1.com:
> > >>
> > >> Ok Dumb question of the day!
> > >>> In product associations if Product 12345 is the New Version
> Replacement
> > >>> to Product 38726 inside of Catalog
> > >>>
> > >>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product
> > to
> > >>> and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> James
> > >>> Original Message
> > >>> Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
> > >>> From: <ja...@productive1.com>
> > >>> Date: Wed, April 25, 2018 4:56 am
> > >>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks guys! I know this might sound stupid but what is the no-eca
> > >>> delegator?
> > >>>
> > >>> Original Message
> > >>> Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
> > >>> From: Yashwant Dhakad <yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > >>> Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 9:55 pm
> > >>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi James,
> > >>>
> > >>> You can create custom import service and use store operation to
> create
> > >>> the
> > >>>
Re: Product Associations
This is what I was suggesting, as I understand from James initial email
that 38726 is an product and its new version will be 12345. I was referring
to - https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/big-gizmo-GZ-8544-p
Here productId="GZ-8544" and productIdTo="WG-9943" used in the demo data.
Please let me know if something is unclear or I misunderstood something.
Thanks!
Rishi Solanki
Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
www.hotwax.co
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:18 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
> I thought the same thing. Product 12345 was the product from. Can we
> clarify?
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: Product Associations
> From: Benjamin Jugl <benjamin.j...@ecomify.de>
> Date: Thu, April 26, 2018 3:02 am
> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>
> Are you sure?
>
> Because the code I mentioned tries to find the old/replaced/obsolescence
>
> Product and refers to "productIdTo".
>
> Thus I think that 38726 should be productIdTo.
>
> I can be mistaken, though. :)
>
>
> Am 26.04.18 um 10:59 schrieb Rishi Solanki:
> > In addition you need to change the association from and to.
> >>>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product
> to
> > and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
> >
> > 38726 should be product from and 12345 should be product to.
> >
> > Please refer the demo data for association type mentioned by Benjamin.
> >
> >
> >
> > Rishi Solanki
> > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> > Direct: +91-9893287847
> > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> > www.hotwax.co
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Benjamin Jugl <benjamin.j...@ecomify.de
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> I would say yes, the code implies this usage.
> >>
> >> See ProductDetail.groovy:
> >>
> >> obsolenscenseProducts = dispatcher.runSync("getAssociatedProducts",
> >> [productIdTo : productId, type : "PRODUCT_OBSOLESCENCE", checkViewAllow
> :
> >> true, prodCatalogId : currentCatalogId]);
> >> context.obsolenscenseProducts = obsolenscenseProducts.assocProducts;
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 25.04.18 um 18:13 schrieb ja...@productive1.com:
> >>
> >> Ok Dumb question of the day!
> >>> In product associations if Product 12345 is the New Version Replacement
> >>> to Product 38726 inside of Catalog
> >>>
> >>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product
> to
> >>> and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> James
> >>> Original Message
> >>> Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
> >>> From: <ja...@productive1.com>
> >>> Date: Wed, April 25, 2018 4:56 am
> >>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> Thanks guys! I know this might sound stupid but what is the no-eca
> >>> delegator?
> >>>
> >>> Original Message
> >>> Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
> >>> From: Yashwant Dhakad <yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com>
> >>> Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 9:55 pm
> >>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> Hi James,
> >>>
> >>> You can create custom import service and use store operation to create
> >>> the
> >>> new records for orders with default-no-eca delegator. Please create all
> >>> the
> >>> related entities data for order and by default-no-eca delegator, eca
> and
> >>> seca would not be triggered and inventory and the financial records
> >>> would
> >>> not be affected.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks & Regards
> >>> --
> >>> Yashwant Dhakad
> >>> HotWax Systems
> >>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:35 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Anyone have any experience uploading a closed sales order that would
> not
> >>>> affect inventory or financials. I would like to import closed sales
> >>>> order just to use for returns
> >>>> Original Message
> >>>> Subject: R
RE: Product Associations
I thought the same thing. Product 12345 was the product from. Can we
clarify?
Original Message
Subject: Re: Product Associations
From: Benjamin Jugl <benjamin.j...@ecomify.de>
Date: Thu, April 26, 2018 3:02 am
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Are you sure?
Because the code I mentioned tries to find the old/replaced/obsolescence
Product and refers to "productIdTo".
Thus I think that 38726 should be productIdTo.
I can be mistaken, though. :)
Am 26.04.18 um 10:59 schrieb Rishi Solanki:
> In addition you need to change the association from and to.
>>>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to
> and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
>
> 38726 should be product from and 12345 should be product to.
>
> Please refer the demo data for association type mentioned by Benjamin.
>
>
>
> Rishi Solanki
> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
> Direct: +91-9893287847
> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
> www.hotwax.co
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Benjamin Jugl <benjamin.j...@ecomify.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I would say yes, the code implies this usage.
>>
>> See ProductDetail.groovy:
>>
>> obsolenscenseProducts = dispatcher.runSync("getAssociatedProducts",
>> [productIdTo : productId, type : "PRODUCT_OBSOLESCENCE", checkViewAllow :
>> true, prodCatalogId : currentCatalogId]);
>> context.obsolenscenseProducts = obsolenscenseProducts.assocProducts;
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 25.04.18 um 18:13 schrieb ja...@productive1.com:
>>
>> Ok Dumb question of the day!
>>> In product associations if Product 12345 is the New Version Replacement
>>> to Product 38726 inside of Catalog
>>>
>>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to
>>> and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> James
>>> Original Message
>>> Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>>> From: <ja...@productive1.com>
>>> Date: Wed, April 25, 2018 4:56 am
>>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>>
>>> Thanks guys! I know this might sound stupid but what is the no-eca
>>> delegator?
>>>
>>> Original Message
>>> Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>>> From: Yashwant Dhakad <yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com>
>>> Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 9:55 pm
>>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> You can create custom import service and use store operation to create
>>> the
>>> new records for orders with default-no-eca delegator. Please create all
>>> the
>>> related entities data for order and by default-no-eca delegator, eca and
>>> seca would not be triggered and inventory and the financial records
>>> would
>>> not be affected.
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> --
>>> Yashwant Dhakad
>>> HotWax Systems
>>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:35 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyone have any experience uploading a closed sales order that would not
>>>> affect inventory or financials. I would like to import closed sales
>>>> order just to use for returns
>>>> Original Message
>>>> Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>>>> From: <ja...@productive1.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 12:07 am
>>>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> What happens when you need to return a Sales Order? I think you have to
>>>> have it in the system. So how do you import a closed sales order
>>>>
>>>> Original Message
>>>> Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>>>> From: James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
>>>> Date: Mon, April 23, 2018 5:00 pm
>>>> To: <user@ofbiz.apache.org>
>>>>
>>>> Hi James,
>>>>
>>>> 1. You can use Receive Inventory function and just receive the product.
>>>>
>>>> 2. No need to migrate closed sales orders to the new system.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> James Yong
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/04/17 23:36:40, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When you first launch Ofbiz it is extremely important to upload Open
>>>>> Sales, Open Purchase Orders, Trial Balances as well as initial inventory
>>>>> quantities and open accounts receivable and open accounts payable. This
>>>>> is a minimum to get a corporate system ready to utilize.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now comes the question. Typically closed sales orders are not imported,
>>>>> but there comes the issue where a customer wants to return a product
>>>>> from a closed sales order which is not in Ofbiz.
>>>>>
>>>>> Question:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Is there a way to create a blanket return not against a sales order?
>>>>> 2. If not is there a way of uploading closed sales order that doesn't
>>>>> affect financials?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> James
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: Product Associations
Are you sure?
Because the code I mentioned tries to find the old/replaced/obsolescence
Product and refers to "productIdTo".
Thus I think that 38726 should be productIdTo.
I can be mistaken, though. :)
Am 26.04.18 um 10:59 schrieb Rishi Solanki:
In addition you need to change the association from and to.
Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to
and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
38726 should be product from and 12345 should be product to.
Please refer the demo data for association type mentioned by Benjamin.
Rishi Solanki
Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
www.hotwax.co
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Benjamin Jugl <benjamin.j...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
Hi there,
I would say yes, the code implies this usage.
See ProductDetail.groovy:
obsolenscenseProducts = dispatcher.runSync("getAssociatedProducts",
[productIdTo : productId, type : "PRODUCT_OBSOLESCENCE", checkViewAllow :
true, prodCatalogId : currentCatalogId]);
context.obsolenscenseProducts = obsolenscenseProducts.assocProducts;
Am 25.04.18 um 18:13 schrieb ja...@productive1.com:
Ok Dumb question of the day!
In product associations if Product 12345 is the New Version Replacement
to Product 38726 inside of Catalog
Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to
and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
Thanks,
James
Original Message
Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: <ja...@productive1.com>
Date: Wed, April 25, 2018 4:56 am
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Thanks guys! I know this might sound stupid but what is the no-eca
delegator?
Original Message
Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: Yashwant Dhakad <yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com>
Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 9:55 pm
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Hi James,
You can create custom import service and use store operation to create
the
new records for orders with default-no-eca delegator. Please create all
the
related entities data for order and by default-no-eca delegator, eca and
seca would not be triggered and inventory and the financial records
would
not be affected.
Thanks & Regards
--
Yashwant Dhakad
HotWax Systems
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:35 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
Anyone have any experience uploading a closed sales order that would not
affect inventory or financials. I would like to import closed sales
order just to use for returns
Original Message
Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: <ja...@productive1.com>
Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 12:07 am
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
What happens when you need to return a Sales Order? I think you have to
have it in the system. So how do you import a closed sales order
Original Message
Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
Date: Mon, April 23, 2018 5:00 pm
To: <user@ofbiz.apache.org>
Hi James,
1. You can use Receive Inventory function and just receive the product.
2. No need to migrate closed sales orders to the new system.
Regards,
James Yong
On 2018/04/17 23:36:40, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
When you first launch Ofbiz it is extremely important to upload Open
Sales, Open Purchase Orders, Trial Balances as well as initial inventory
quantities and open accounts receivable and open accounts payable. This
is a minimum to get a corporate system ready to utilize.
Now comes the question. Typically closed sales orders are not imported,
but there comes the issue where a customer wants to return a product
from a closed sales order which is not in Ofbiz.
Question:
1. Is there a way to create a blanket return not against a sales order?
2. If not is there a way of uploading closed sales order that doesn't
affect financials?
Thanks,
James
Re: Product Associations
In addition you need to change the association from and to.
>>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to
and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
38726 should be product from and 12345 should be product to.
Please refer the demo data for association type mentioned by Benjamin.
Rishi Solanki
Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
www.hotwax.co
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Benjamin Jugl <benjamin.j...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would say yes, the code implies this usage.
>
> See ProductDetail.groovy:
>
> obsolenscenseProducts = dispatcher.runSync("getAssociatedProducts",
> [productIdTo : productId, type : "PRODUCT_OBSOLESCENCE", checkViewAllow :
> true, prodCatalogId : currentCatalogId]);
> context.obsolenscenseProducts = obsolenscenseProducts.assocProducts;
>
>
>
> Am 25.04.18 um 18:13 schrieb ja...@productive1.com:
>
> Ok Dumb question of the day!
>>
>> In product associations if Product 12345 is the New Version Replacement
>> to Product 38726 inside of Catalog
>>
>> Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to
>> and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>> Original Message
>> Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>> From: <ja...@productive1.com>
>> Date: Wed, April 25, 2018 4:56 am
>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>
>> Thanks guys! I know this might sound stupid but what is the no-eca
>> delegator?
>>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>> From: Yashwant Dhakad <yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com>
>> Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 9:55 pm
>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> You can create custom import service and use store operation to create
>> the
>> new records for orders with default-no-eca delegator. Please create all
>> the
>> related entities data for order and by default-no-eca delegator, eca and
>> seca would not be triggered and inventory and the financial records
>> would
>> not be affected.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> --
>> Yashwant Dhakad
>> HotWax Systems
>> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:35 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anyone have any experience uploading a closed sales order that would not
>>> affect inventory or financials. I would like to import closed sales
>>> order just to use for returns
>>> Original Message
>>> Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>>> From: <ja...@productive1.com>
>>> Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 12:07 am
>>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>>>
>>> What happens when you need to return a Sales Order? I think you have to
>>> have it in the system. So how do you import a closed sales order
>>>
>>> Original Message
>>> Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
>>> From: James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
>>> Date: Mon, April 23, 2018 5:00 pm
>>> To: <user@ofbiz.apache.org>
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> 1. You can use Receive Inventory function and just receive the product.
>>>
>>> 2. No need to migrate closed sales orders to the new system.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> James Yong
>>>
>>> On 2018/04/17 23:36:40, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When you first launch Ofbiz it is extremely important to upload Open
>>>> Sales, Open Purchase Orders, Trial Balances as well as initial inventory
>>>> quantities and open accounts receivable and open accounts payable. This
>>>> is a minimum to get a corporate system ready to utilize.
>>>>
>>>> Now comes the question. Typically closed sales orders are not imported,
>>>> but there comes the issue where a customer wants to return a product
>>>> from a closed sales order which is not in Ofbiz.
>>>>
>>>> Question:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Is there a way to create a blanket return not against a sales order?
>>>> 2. If not is there a way of uploading closed sales order that doesn't
>>>> affect financials?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>>
> --
> Benjamin Jugl
> Consultant
>
> Fon +49 521 448 157-90
> Fax +49 521 448 157-93
> Mobil +49 160 807 8611
> Xing xing.com/profile/Benjamin_Jugl3/
> LinkedIn linkedin.com/in/benjamin-jugl-693664ab/
>
> Company and Management Headquarters:
> ecomify GmbH, Gustav-Winkler-Str. 22, 33699 Bielefeld, Deutschland
> Fon: +49 521 448157-90, Fax: +49 521 448157-99, www.ecomify.de
>
> Court Registration: Amtsgericht Bielefeld HRB 41683
> Chief Executive Officer: Martin Becker, Michael Brohl
>
>
>
Re: Product Associations
Hi there,
I would say yes, the code implies this usage.
See ProductDetail.groovy:
obsolenscenseProducts = dispatcher.runSync("getAssociatedProducts", [productIdTo :
productId, type : "PRODUCT_OBSOLESCENCE", checkViewAllow : true, prodCatalogId :
currentCatalogId]);
context.obsolenscenseProducts = obsolenscenseProducts.assocProducts;
Am 25.04.18 um 18:13 schrieb ja...@productive1.com:
Ok Dumb question of the day!
In product associations if Product 12345 is the New Version Replacement
to Product 38726 inside of Catalog
Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to
and the association is New Version Replacement Correct?
Thanks,
James
Original Message
Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: <ja...@productive1.com>
Date: Wed, April 25, 2018 4:56 am
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Thanks guys! I know this might sound stupid but what is the no-eca
delegator?
Original Message
Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: Yashwant Dhakad <yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com>
Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 9:55 pm
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Hi James,
You can create custom import service and use store operation to create
the
new records for orders with default-no-eca delegator. Please create all
the
related entities data for order and by default-no-eca delegator, eca and
seca would not be triggered and inventory and the financial records
would
not be affected.
Thanks & Regards
--
Yashwant Dhakad
HotWax Systems
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:35 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
Anyone have any experience uploading a closed sales order that would not
affect inventory or financials. I would like to import closed sales
order just to use for returns
Original Message
Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: <ja...@productive1.com>
Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 12:07 am
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
What happens when you need to return a Sales Order? I think you have to
have it in the system. So how do you import a closed sales order
Original Message
Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders
From: James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org>
Date: Mon, April 23, 2018 5:00 pm
To: <user@ofbiz.apache.org>
Hi James,
1. You can use Receive Inventory function and just receive the product.
2. No need to migrate closed sales orders to the new system.
Regards,
James Yong
On 2018/04/17 23:36:40, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote:
When you first launch Ofbiz it is extremely important to upload Open
Sales, Open Purchase Orders, Trial Balances as well as initial inventory
quantities and open accounts receivable and open accounts payable. This
is a minimum to get a corporate system ready to utilize.
Now comes the question. Typically closed sales orders are not imported,
but there comes the issue where a customer wants to return a product
from a closed sales order which is not in Ofbiz.
Question:
1. Is there a way to create a blanket return not against a sales order?
2. If not is there a way of uploading closed sales order that doesn't
affect financials?
Thanks,
James
--
Benjamin Jugl
Consultant
Fon +49 521 448 157-90
Fax +49 521 448 157-93
Mobil +49 160 807 8611
Xing xing.com/profile/Benjamin_Jugl3/
LinkedIn linkedin.com/in/benjamin-jugl-693664ab/
Company and Management Headquarters:
ecomify GmbH, Gustav-Winkler-Str. 22, 33699 Bielefeld, Deutschland
Fon: +49 521 448157-90, Fax: +49 521 448157-99, www.ecomify.de
Court Registration: Amtsgericht Bielefeld HRB 41683
Chief Executive Officer: Martin Becker, Michael Brohl
Product Associations
Ok Dumb question of the day! In product associations if Product 12345 is the New Version Replacement to Product 38726 inside of Catalog Product is 12345 is the Product From and Product 38726 is the Product to and the association is New Version Replacement Correct? Thanks, James Original Message Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders From: <ja...@productive1.com> Date: Wed, April 25, 2018 4:56 am To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Thanks guys! I know this might sound stupid but what is the no-eca delegator? Original Message Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders From: Yashwant Dhakad <yashwant.dha...@hotwaxsystems.com> Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 9:55 pm To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Hi James, You can create custom import service and use store operation to create the new records for orders with default-no-eca delegator. Please create all the related entities data for order and by default-no-eca delegator, eca and seca would not be triggered and inventory and the financial records would not be affected. Thanks & Regards -- Yashwant Dhakad HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:35 PM, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote: > > Anyone have any experience uploading a closed sales order that would not > affect inventory or financials. I would like to import closed sales > order just to use for returns > Original Message > Subject: RE: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders > From: <ja...@productive1.com> > Date: Tue, April 24, 2018 12:07 am > To: user@ofbiz.apache.org > > What happens when you need to return a Sales Order? I think you have to > have it in the system. So how do you import a closed sales order > > Original Message > Subject: Re: Best Practice Uploading Sales Orders > From: James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> > Date: Mon, April 23, 2018 5:00 pm > To: <user@ofbiz.apache.org> > > Hi James, > > 1. You can use Receive Inventory function and just receive the product. > > 2. No need to migrate closed sales orders to the new system. > > Regards, > James Yong > > On 2018/04/17 23:36:40, <ja...@productive1.com> wrote: > > When you first launch Ofbiz it is extremely important to upload Open > > Sales, Open Purchase Orders, Trial Balances as well as initial inventory > > quantities and open accounts receivable and open accounts payable. This > > is a minimum to get a corporate system ready to utilize. > > > > Now comes the question. Typically closed sales orders are not imported, > > but there comes the issue where a customer wants to return a product > > from a closed sales order which is not in Ofbiz. > > > > Question: > > > > 1. Is there a way to create a blanket return not against a sales order? > > 2. If not is there a way of uploading closed sales order that doesn't > > affect financials? > > > > Thanks, > > > > James > > >
Re: product associations in catalog manager
I will have a look into demoproduct.xml. thanks. Heidi 2009/1/8 Vivek Mishra vivek.mis...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Heidi, You can refer DemoProduct.xml file of e-commerce for knowing more about this. We use ProdcutAssoc entity for association of one product to another and give association type to specify what kind of association is this. For example when we associate variants to its virtual product we give product association type = Product variant. Just refer the file which I have specified and you get to know the use of other association type. Kind Regards, -- Vivek Mishra Heidi Dehaes wrote: Hello, In the catalog manager if you choose a product , you have a tab available in the product management page for associations. There are different association types available. The only one i think which works in version 4.0 is the following one: - complementary or cross-sell This one is therefore visible on the e-commerce screen when accessing the meaned product. The other types are: - Accessory - Actual product component - Also bought - Contient - Engineering Bill of Materials - Equivalent or substitute - Est emballé dans - Incompatable - Manufacturing Bill of Materials - New version, replacement - Product manufactured as - Product variant - Revision - Unique Item - Upgrade or Up-Sell I don't see any difference in the e-commerce screen when i try to use them. Can anyone give me more information on how to use them or how to implement them if they are not yet implemented in version 4.0 ? Which ftl 's i have to look into and which .java files i have to look into in order to further develop this functionality? thanks, Heidi Dehaes www.olagos.eu
Re: product associations in catalog manager
Hi Heidi, You can refer DemoProduct.xml file of e-commerce for knowing more about this. We use ProdcutAssoc entity for association of one product to another and give association type to specify what kind of association is this. For example when we associate variants to its virtual product we give product association type = Product variant. Just refer the file which I have specified and you get to know the use of other association type. Kind Regards, -- Vivek Mishra Heidi Dehaes wrote: Hello, In the catalog manager if you choose a product , you have a tab available in the product management page for associations. There are different association types available. The only one i think which works in version 4.0 is the following one: - complementary or cross-sell This one is therefore visible on the e-commerce screen when accessing the meaned product. The other types are: - Accessory - Actual product component - Also bought - Contient - Engineering Bill of Materials - Equivalent or substitute - Est emballé dans - Incompatable - Manufacturing Bill of Materials - New version, replacement - Product manufactured as - Product variant - Revision - Unique Item - Upgrade or Up-Sell I don't see any difference in the e-commerce screen when i try to use them. Can anyone give me more information on how to use them or how to implement them if they are not yet implemented in version 4.0 ? Which ftl 's i have to look into and which .java files i have to look into in order to further develop this functionality? thanks, Heidi Dehaes www.olagos.eu smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
