Re: OM on port 443 nginx
Hello Rohit, On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 19:22, Rohit Dhamal wrote: > Hello, > As given by Tom the proxy configuration for nginx works fine. > I am yet facing a few problems and have a few queries. > The query: Whether I can now close all the other ports like 5443, 5080, > , 3478. 49152:65535 in PC and Router? > Earlier I had these ports opened but after a fresh format i have not > opened these ports. I have also closed forwarding from the router. > Is it ok? > > I have also used some other services like openmeetings,but I find > openmeetings the best. The only thing is we should be able to make it work > entirely on port 443/80. > I am trying the port 443 only option and let you know. > This is impossible please check mailing-list archives for details > > Now comes the problem. > I could not always get the openmeetings to transmit sound and video to the > other connected members.it is really frustrating to keep hellowing and > can you see me-hear me thing. > > Is there a solution for it? > > I had the said ports 80, 443, 5443, 5080, , 3478. 49152:65535 open at > that time. > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Rohit Dhamal. > Stop Corona Stay at Home Stay Safe. > -- Best regards, Maxim
OM on port 443 nginx
Hello, As given by Tom the proxy configuration for nginx works fine. I am yet facing a few problems and have a few queries. The query: Whether I can now close all the other ports like 5443, 5080, , 3478. 49152:65535 in PC and Router? Earlier I had these ports opened but after a fresh format i have not opened these ports. I have also closed forwarding from the router. Is it ok? I have also used some other services like openmeetings,but I find openmeetings the best. The only thing is we should be able to make it work entirely on port 443/80. I am trying the port 443 only option and let you know. Now comes the problem.I could not always get the openmeetings to transmit sound and video to the other connected members.it is really frustrating to keep hellowing and can you see me-hear me thing. Is there a solution for it? I had the said ports 80, 443, 5443, 5080, , 3478. 49152:65535 open at that time. Thanks and Regards, Rohit Dhamal. Stop Corona Stay at Home Stay Safe.
AW: New Features: "very fast conference" and more
Rene, this looks like Jitsi For Video conferencing it´s okay and simple to setup. But functionality is different than OM. Running on corporate links and firewalls seems to work fine with our subsidiaries. But with the German AVM Fritzbox router we did not got it working. There was a hard delay of video/voice, several seconds. ( often > 10 seconds) With all testing changes, forwarding, priority we did not got it working. The Internet bandwidth with 50/10 Mbit should be okay. We tested with different people, different links, differnent laptops/Pc`s It seems that the box has some priority for VOIP somehow setup. At the end this was the killer to use it, as a lot of people do have such a router in the home office. WLAN always seems to have not the best bandwidth for Jitsi and also OM. That’s why I recommend always cable connection to get a good result. Maybe someone knows a solution for this. Regards Gerald. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: R. Scholz [mailto:rene.sch...@abakus-edv-systems.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Mai 2020 19:14 An: user@openmeetings.apache.org Betreff: New Features: "very fast conference" and more Hello, today we had a online-conference from our marketing-company. They have their own conference-system. Total easy to login and runs very nice. All members (without exception) have no problems to enter the conference-room and use their microphone and, the notebook-user, their camera. I must admit freely: Not bad. I think there are some features we shpuld have a deeper look on it - and implement in our OM. - No problems with ports: All members, including the members from official institutions, can login without problems and no changes with their firewall. (I asked one (or two) weeks ago that question.) And use the microphone and camera. Essential point: It seems it is possible to make a video/audio-conference with all peoples, including this one who are behind a "Great firewall". - The handling -> New OM-feature: "Quick-conference": 1.) Calling a URL 2.) Enter a Name Thats all. (That was the only information we got from the marketing-company.) And it works. (We must use Google-Chrome. It was recommended.) - a very tidy desktop: a few icons and all work very good, including sharing desktop. - OK, security is not a focus here. But that is a "Quick-conference". ... If anybody wants to try: https://besprechung.konferenzen.online With best regards, René
Re: New Features: "very fast conference" and more
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 21:52, Konstantin Kuzov wrote: > The only thing Jitsi does regarding to ports in default configuration is > using nginx's APLN map feature ( > http://nginx.org/en/docs/stream/ngx_stream_ssl_preread_module.html) to > hide default stun/turn ports behind nginx https port. But be aware that > this feature can break secure websocket for some browsers like chrome. > I'm not aware of this module Does it exists for Apache? Can it be used (with care) to create config with less ports required? > > )сб, 16 мая 2020 г. в 17:36, Maxim Solodovnik : > >> This service uses Jitsi >> I'm still not sure if it is possible to configure WebRTC to use less ports >> AFAIK it is impossible >> >> -- Best regards, Maxim
