Re: Integrating shale+ajax4jsf (+facelets+trinidad)
>From: "Bruno Aranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi, > > I have an existing application with ajax4jsf+facelets+trinidad and I > thought it was high time to test shale. Of course, I found that > ajax4jsf and shale do not play well together since shale 1.0.4. I do > not know the insights of shale and I don't have much time now, so what > is the status of that integration between these two?. One alternative > is that I use shale 1.0.3 (with that one words, but I guess I will get > old stuff and new bugs) > A few posts and a JIRA issue already comment on this problem. > > Any quickfix? :-) > There is a quick-fix but I've not had time to block off an afternoon[1]. We need to move the problem code into the tiger library. I think the ViewControllerCallbacks2 would be the best place to relocate. [1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-409 > Cheers, > > Bruno Gary
Integrating shale+ajax4jsf (+facelets+trinidad)
Hi, I have an existing application with ajax4jsf+facelets+trinidad and I thought it was high time to test shale. Of course, I found that ajax4jsf and shale do not play well together since shale 1.0.4. I do not know the insights of shale and I don't have much time now, so what is the status of that integration between these two?. One alternative is that I use shale 1.0.3 (with that one words, but I guess I will get old stuff and new bugs) A few posts and a JIRA issue already comment on this problem. Any quickfix? :-) Cheers, Bruno
Re: [shale-validator] Shale + Ajax4jsf
Hello Thomas- guys like Craig are usually a bit more bussy than other guys. Can you do me a favor and upload a SMALL demo WAR (incl. sources) that shows the issues ? Upload to our JIRA. I will take a look soon. Thanks, Matthias On 2/27/07, TrippleT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Craig, can you please respond on this thread when you have some new progress about the bug! Thanks again, Thomas craigmcc wrote: > > Not yet, I'm afraid ... just got back from four days of all day meetings, > with a predicatable impact on my backlog of stuff to do :-(. But it's > high > on the open source part of that list. > > Craig > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shale-%2B-Ajax4jsf-tf3151878.html#a9179588 Sent from the Shale - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [shale-validator] Shale + Ajax4jsf
Craig, can you please respond on this thread when you have some new progress about the bug! Thanks again, Thomas craigmcc wrote: > > Not yet, I'm afraid ... just got back from four days of all day meetings, > with a predicatable impact on my backlog of stuff to do :-(. But it's > high > on the open source part of that list. > > Craig > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shale-%2B-Ajax4jsf-tf3151878.html#a9179588 Sent from the Shale - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Shale + Ajax4jsf
On 2/16/07, TrippleT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: craigmcc wrote: > > > I plan to look into this over the weekend. Any quick examples of the > kinds > of problems you encounter would be helpful in narrowing this down. > > Craig > Hi Craig! Do you got any progress finding the problems integrating ajax4jsf and shale? Thks Thomas Not yet, I'm afraid ... just got back from four days of all day meetings, with a predicatable impact on my backlog of stuff to do :-(. But it's high on the open source part of that list. Craig -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shale-%2B-Ajax4jsf-tf3151878.html#a9004997 Sent from the Shale - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Shale + Ajax4jsf
craigmcc wrote: > > > I plan to look into this over the weekend. Any quick examples of the > kinds > of problems you encounter would be helpful in narrowing this down. > > Craig > Hi Craig! Do you got any progress finding the problems integrating ajax4jsf and shale? Thks Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shale-%2B-Ajax4jsf-tf3151878.html#a9004997 Sent from the Shale - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
AW: Shale + Ajax4jsf
hi, just make one of these examples work. https://ajax4jsf.dev.java.net/nonav/ajax/ajax-jsf/download.html#examples my favour is: http://webdownload.exadel.com/downloads/ajax4jsf/examples/a4j-include/a4j-include.zip Try to integrate the app-manager and a viewController to each view. If I can help you, send a todo list to my mail-address. when it works, I can test it with some more sophisticated ajax stuff :-) kind regard DaWorm
Re: Shale + Ajax4jsf
On 2/2/07, Worm, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi again, I've successfully integrate Ajax4Jsf without Shale. But I don't understand the problem. I hope my report in the extern forum can help to solve the problem, because I'm very interested in shale :-) But I've to use ajax4jsf. I plan to look into this over the weekend. Any quick examples of the kinds of problems you encounter would be helpful in narrowing this down. Craig Kind regards DaWorm
AW: Shale + Ajax4jsf
Hi again, I've successfully integrate Ajax4Jsf without Shale. But I don't understand the problem. I hope my report in the extern forum can help to solve the problem, because I'm very interested in shale :-) But I've to use ajax4jsf. Kind regards DaWorm
Re: Shale + Ajax4jsf
Hi, I'm currently using JSF 1.2, Facelets, Tomahawk & Sandbox and Shale. Now I want to integrate Ajax4Jsf and I have some trouble too. Tomorrow I will trying to extract Shale and fit in Ajax4jsf to solve the errors. I got some conflicts with duplicated component - ID's after an post-request. The inital request render successfully. A complete report is here: http://forum.exadel.com/viewtopic.php?t=5982 kind regards DaWorm
RE: Shale + Ajax4jsf
Apparently, the shale-view.jar is the culprit that is breaking ajax4jsf in my app. Using trial and error, I removed various components of my app until the a4j "Echo" example worked. Even with *all* Shale settings removed from my web.xml, just adding the shale-view.jar to my project breaks it. I tried it with shale-view-1.0.4.jar and a shale-view-1.1.0 snapshot to no avail. If you have a working Shale + ajax4jsf set up, I'd love to hear from you. I'm hoping that there is some workaround available. -Original Message- From: Reynolds, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:58 PM To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: Shale + Ajax4jsf I've been trying to incorporate ajax4jsf into my app. After having troubles, I found some threads on the web indicating that there may be a conflict between the ajax4jsf filter and the Shale filter. Is this the case? Is anyone currently using these two technologies together? My set up is Shale 1.1.0 + myfaces RI 1.1.1 + facelets 1.1.11 E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
Shale + Ajax4jsf
I've been trying to incorporate ajax4jsf into my app. After having troubles, I found some threads on the web indicating that there may be a conflict between the ajax4jsf filter and the Shale filter. Is this the case? Is anyone currently using these two technologies together? My set up is Shale 1.1.0 + myfaces RI 1.1.1 + facelets 1.1.11 E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
