Re: Struts 1.3 + Tiles + Chain config
... ... Related to this, is there a way to specify the tiles-defs file to use? For example, my application has 3 modules, each with its own tiles-defs file. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sslext -- anyone using it?
I have been using the sslext library for some time. I have only used it with Struts 1.1 and 1.2 though, never with 1.3. As for your concerns regarding the custom controller/processor class, sslext comes with a SecureTilesRequestProcessor class. I have been using it with tiles without issue. Adam Thats helpful. I guess I'll download it and give it a try. Thanks! -michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sslext -- anyone using it?
I'm looking into implementing something to force ssl for logins (and a few other pages) and then switching back to standard http once logged in. I found sslext at http://sslext.sourceforge.net/ but it looks like it hasn't been updated in a couple of years. I have a couple of concerns: * I'm running struts 1.3.x, which isn't officially supported * it requires using a custom controller/processorClass. I'm currently using the TilesRequestProcessor. So (I think) I'd have to create a custom Tiles processor that extends their SecureRequestProcessor. Are any of you using sslext? Or, any other solution? I also saw Ted's page at http://husted.com/struts/FAQ/controller- ssl.htm where another solution was offered, but I'm opposed to putting the host/domain info in the struts config file. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "name" Attribute in tag
Struts uses the "name" attribute to repopulate your form on
submit. So if you have an action /someAction mapped to a form bean
named "myForm", it should look like , and thus . So in your
JavaScript you can refer to document.myForm.
unless of course you're using xhtml mode, in which case it's id="myForm"...>, so in your javascript you could do
document.getElementById('myForm');
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: Centralized logging software
Hello, This my question off the topic, but was just wondering if you guys know of any open source software that lets me view all my application logs deployed on various servers to be viewable from one place and that should be online. Please share if you know of any such software? Thanks much Gnan Here's one way... log4j has a number of appenders that would allow you to send logging into to a central logging server. Chainsaw (http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/chainsaw.html) is a GUI tool that allows you to read multiple log files: "Rather than rely on a combination of tail/grep/vi or equivalent to view/query/trace-through a huge trail of logging events, you can use Chainsaw. Chainsaw can read log files formatted in Log4j's XMLLayout, receive events from remote locations, read events from a DB, it can even work with the JDK 1.4 logging events." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts and Jsessionid control
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/config/context.html says: Set to true if you want cookies to be used for session identifier communication if supported by the client (this is the default). Set to false if you want to disable the use of cookies for session identifier communication, and rely only on URL rewriting by the application. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
html:form / styleId in xhtml mode
I was just looking into upgrading my app from 1.2.9 to 1.3.4 and have
run into a snag:
2006-08-01 15:33:49,911 (ERROR) InsertTag.doEndTag - ServletException
in '/pages/site/entry.jsp': Cannot specify "styleId" when in XHTML
mode as the HTML "id" attribute is already used to store the bean name
javax.servlet.ServletException: Cannot specify "styleId" when in
XHTML mode as the HTML "id" attribute is already used to store the
bean name
FormTag dictates that the styleId attribute cannot be set in the
html:form tag when using xhtml mode:
protected void renderName(StringBuffer results)
throws JspException {
if (this.isXhtml()) {
if (getStyleId() == null) {
renderAttribute(results, "id", beanName);
} else {
throw new JspException(messages.getMessage
("formTag.ignoredId"));
}
} else {
renderAttribute(results, "name", beanName);
renderAttribute(results, "id", getStyleId());
}
}
The question is, why?
Couldn't it just as easily be done as the following?
if (this.isXhtml()) {
if (getStyleId() == null) {
renderAttribute(results, "id", beanName);
} else {
renderAttribute(results, "id", getStyleId());
}
}
We're using quite a bit of AJAX in our application and referring to
document elements by id quite regularly, not to mention that
stylesheets reference specific ids as well (i.e. all of our forms
have a styleId attribute). Going through and renaming all of the ids
of the forms doesn't seem very attractive. Can someone verify that
it's necessary?
Thanks,
Michael
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: javascript question
Excellent. I figured there was something like this. Your solution worked nicely. For any others that may be interested, here's an example of what I used: onclick="this.form['parent.nestedname'][2].checked='true'" Thanks, Michael On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:51 AM, Jason King wrote: document.formname["parent.nestedname"] will reference an element in the form formname which has a period in it's name. Michael Rush wrote: I've got a form that's using nested forms, with the following type of layout.. [radio] option 1 [text] value 1 [text] value 2 [radio] option 2 [text] value 1 [text] value 2 [radio] option 3 [text] value 1 [text] value 2 Each of the groups is a nested form, so the form element names are in the form of nestedform.property. I would like to add an onclick to the text fields so that the radio button for that group is selected if someone starts entering text in the value1 or value 2 fields. The problem is that the field names have a period in them, so javascript is thinking there's another object in the hierarchy. Is there a way to escape or quote the name of the field? Or another way to identify the field? Thanks, Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
javascript question
I've got a form that's using nested forms, with the following type of layout.. [radio] option 1 [text] value 1 [text] value 2 [radio] option 2 [text] value 1 [text] value 2 [radio] option 3 [text] value 1 [text] value 2 Each of the groups is a nested form, so the form element names are in the form of nestedform.property. I would like to add an onclick to the text fields so that the radio button for that group is selected if someone starts entering text in the value1 or value 2 fields. The problem is that the field names have a period in them, so javascript is thinking there's another object in the hierarchy. Is there a way to escape or quote the name of the field? Or another way to identify the field? Thanks, Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: IE loosing session / cookies
It's probably related to security settings . More specifically you may want to look into deploying a compact privacy policy (P3P). On Aug 5, 2004, at 7:10 AM, Rosenberg, Leon wrote: Hi, A bit off-topic, but maybe you have had this too... We have an application running with struts on tomcat 5 in an application running with xslt on tomcat 3 in a frame. The problem is, that explorer doesn't send the jsession cookie to the embedded application (we tcpdumped this). The embedded application is running under different domain, it works fine with mozilla and firefox. Does anybody know anything about this problem? Regards Leon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sharing images across modules
I'd like to use some common images across modules. I've found that I can accomplish what I need by using: "/> Originally I was trying to accomplish this using the html:img tag, but the module attribute is ignored in this case: Does anyone know why the latter doesn't work? Is it possible that it will work in the future? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sharing images across modules
I'd like to use some common images across modules. I've found that I can accomplish what I need by using: "/> Originally I was trying to accomplish this using the html:img tag, but the module attribute is ignored in this case: Does anyone know why the latter doesn't work? Is it possible that it will work in the future? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
