Fair enough... agree to disagree :) In any case, I would never force
something like this on anyone, it would only ever be optional if I had
anything to say about it, so it probably wouldn't be a problem anyway. As
coded, there is absolutely nothing that says you have to use setupItems,
so that goal is achieved in its current form. Take care!
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Wed, March 9, 2005 3:45 pm, Shey Rab Pawo said:
> We probably have beat this to death, Frank, but having the framework
> setup pages with declarations in the action mappings is not consistent
> with MVC to my way of thinking. I definitley would not do this. I
> like to keep things simpler. But, others seem to like it. So, maybe
> you have something there. I probably am just being resistent to
> change. No more to say on this for me.
>
> --
> No one ever went blind looking at the bright side of life.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
