Re: Marking fields having errors

2005-07-06 Thread Laurie Harper

Or see the errorClassId attributes on the the form tags.

L.

Rauf Khan wrote:

Hi, 
  In ur application resources file, u can add this

 errors.header=h3font color=OrangeError List/font/h3ul
errors.footer=/ulhr
here color = anycolor
 Regards
Khan
 On 7/5/05, Kalra, Ashwani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 



Hi,
Does struts has any facility to show fields having validation error in
red color or mark it in some way?

Thanks
Ashwani







--
Laurie, Open Source advocate, Java geek and novice blogger:
http://www.holoweb.net/~laurie/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Marking fields having errors

2005-07-04 Thread Kalra, Ashwani

Hi,
Does struts has any facility to show fields having validation error in
red color or mark it in some way?

Thanks
Ashwani

-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 3:44 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Struts vs .NET??? - Real Stats

Actually, this did not help me at all.  I understand that differences,
etc.  I just wondered what you thought, since I thought your conclusions
were contrary to the facts.

On 7/3/05, Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:48:37PM -0700, Dakota Jack wrote:
 } What is your basis for your assessment of .NET and Struts?  What
 sort } of problem are you talking about/

 My assessment is based on my own development experience with both,
 plus lurking on this list for a few years. I will reiterate that I am
 not interested in converting Java/Struts developers to C#/.NET
 developers; I want Java and Struts to be the best they can be, and
 that knowing the competition is a step toward that.

 I posted something fairly in-depth about the advantages of
 C#-the-language over Java-the-language. Check the archives for the
 last couple of days. A few of those advantages have to do with the
 .NET runtime itself (in particular, 1) properties being first-class
 reflectable objects, just like methods and members, rather than
 derived from the JavaBeans get/set naming convention, and 2) events
 and delegate (method pointer) types being first-class reflectable
objects rather than using interfaces for handlers).
 For now, Java has the advantages of generics and anonymous inner
 classes over C#, but the next version of C# (due out this year, and
 what I'm hearing about the betas leads me to believe that it will
 actually be out this year) supports both of those and simplifies a few

 other common idioms (iteration, in particular).

 I have not done any comparison of .NET vs. Java performance, nor have
 I compared their garbage collection strategies or threading models.
 They seem to be pretty similar, and they can be expected to maintain
 very similar performance profiles since the optimization techniques
 for such things are old in academia and well-published. Their
 different choices of performance tradeoffs may eventually effect their

 usefulness for particular purposes, at which point it may be
 appropriate to choose one or the other based on one's specific
application.

 The APIs (system libraries and extension libraries) considered part of

 either Java or .NET are pretty similar. Java has a much larger set of
 third-party free libraries (in good part thanks to Apache's Jakarta
 project), but many of those are being ported to .NET. On the other
 hand, there are many commercially-licensed components for .NET, and
 there are likely to be more, simply because it is in the Microsoft
 world. I don't have exact (or meaningful) figures on this, so take it
 with a grain of salt. Anecdotally, I can say that in a previous
 project I sought a particular ASP.NET control and found dozens of
 candidates, commercial and otherwise, and the one that best suited our

 application was commercial. (We bought it, we used it, their tech
 support was excellent (including accepting patches from me), and it
 did what we needed.)

 Comparing JSP and Struts to ASP.NET turns up sharp corners in both.
 It's very easy to encapsulate functionality in a custom tag in
 ASP.NET, much harder to do so for JSP. Struts abstracts away the
 specifics of the generated HTML (both outgoing HTML and incoming form
 data), which supports the MVC model; ASP.NET requires a bit more
hoop-jumping to do so.
 Validation, both server-side and client-side, is far easier in ASP.NET

 than with Struts. ASP.NET has almost no configuration required other
 than the .aspx/.ascx (equivalent to .jsp) files themselves, whereas
 Struts requires a configuration file that grows increasingly
 complicated as the site grows larger (though, to its credit, it does
 centralize the transition graph of the site). Neither Struts nor
 ASP.NET cares much about business objects, but both can deal with them

 just like any other object. Finally, while ASP.NET scales well from a
 single page to an entire site, Struts doesn't really shine until you
get to at least 5-10 separate forms/pages.

 I hope this is a useful answer to your question.

 --Greg


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its
back.
~Dakota Jack~

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is 
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom 
it is addressed. If 

Re: Marking fields having errors

2005-07-04 Thread Rauf Khan
Hi, 
  In ur application resources file, u can add this
 errors.header=h3font color=OrangeError List/font/h3ul
errors.footer=/ulhr
here color = anycolor
 Regards
Khan
 On 7/5/05, Kalra, Ashwani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
 
 Hi,
 Does struts has any facility to show fields having validation error in
 red color or mark it in some way?
 
 Thanks
 Ashwani


Re: Marking fields having errors

2005-07-04 Thread Wendy Smoak

From: Kalra, Ashwani [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I want to highlight the field labels or show some marker text like '!',
Not the error messages


The form element tags (since 1.2.5) have 'errorKey' 'errorStyle' 
'errorStyleClass' and 'errorStyleId' attributes.  Some combination of those 
should do what you want.


http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/struts-html.html#text

--
Wendy Smoak 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Marking fields having errors in struts 1.1

2005-07-04 Thread Kalra, Ashwani

Thanks Wendy, But I am working withd 1.1 , I think I have to customize
the tags of 1.1,
Or can I use struts 1.2 html tags in 1.1?
Has any one faced this situation?

-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 9:50 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Marking fields having errors

From: Kalra, Ashwani [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I want to highlight the field labels or show some marker text like
 '!', Not the error messages

The form element tags (since 1.2.5) have 'errorKey' 'errorStyle'
'errorStyleClass' and 'errorStyleId' attributes.  Some combination of
those should do what you want.

http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/struts-html.html#text

--
Wendy Smoak



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is 
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom 
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are not authorized 
to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, or use this message or 
any part thereof. If you receive this  message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete all  copies of this message.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]