Re: MethodFilterInterceptor package
The logic considers the action name without regard to the package the action is contained within. On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote: independent of the methods' package name I am not sure what you mean by this. example? musachy -- Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone? Pink Floyd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: MethodFilterInterceptor package
stanlick wrote: The logic considers the action name without regard to the package the action is contained within. I'm confused by this also. I thought an example implied either a real-world or contrived scenario where the problem in question manifests itself. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MethodFilterInterceptor-%3Cpackage%3E-tp24465361p24491255.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
MethodFilterInterceptor package
Either I have been asleep at the wheel or have simply lucked into a naming scheme. It appears the MethodFilterInterceptor is performing its include/exclude logic independent of the methods' package name. Has anyone been snapped by this? Peace, Scott -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MethodFilterInterceptor-%3Cpackage%3E-tp24465361p24465361.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: MethodFilterInterceptor package
independent of the methods' package name I am not sure what you mean by this. example? musachy -- Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone? Pink Floyd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
