RE: Create new theme in struts Tutorial
This should get you started, it took me forever to figure it all out... http://mikeski.net/site/node/16 >-Original Message- >From: Eduard Neuwirt [mailto:eduard.neuw...@googlemail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 3:33 PM >To: Struts Users Mailing List >Subject: Re: Create new theme in struts Tutorial > >Hi Martin, > >I have two kinds of forms. Table view and Entity View for different >entities and tables. The look-and-feel shall be the same, only the >content and columns differ. >I don't use any template library. >CSS is planned. > >Eduard Neuwirt > >Martin Gainty schrieb: >> i would have to agree with patrick in saying its easier to wrap the >simple theme than creating from scratch >> http://struts.apache.org/2.0.14/docs/extending-themes.html >> >> a few questions: >> what is the purpose of this theme? >> which Template Libraries would you be using? >> will you be using CSS? >> >> Martin Gainty >> __ >> Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de >confidentialité >> >> Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene >Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede >unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. >Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und >entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten >Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt >uebernehmen. >> Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes >pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour >satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non >autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à >l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement >obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à >la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le >contenu fourni. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:03:27 +0200 >>> From: eduard.neuw...@googlemail.com >>> To: user@struts.apache.org >>> Subject: Create new theme in struts Tutorial >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to create my own Struts theme. The topic seems to be >rather >>> rarely. I am looking for an tutorial or how to guide describing this. >>> Does a tutorial exist ? Is it useful to create a won theme ? >>> >>> Regards >>> Eduard >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> _ >> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. >> >http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tu >torial_QuickAdd_062009 >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: Create new theme in struts Tutorial
Hi Martin, I have two kinds of forms. Table view and Entity View for different entities and tables. The look-and-feel shall be the same, only the content and columns differ. I don't use any template library. CSS is planned. Eduard Neuwirt Martin Gainty schrieb: i would have to agree with patrick in saying its easier to wrap the simple theme than creating from scratch http://struts.apache.org/2.0.14/docs/extending-themes.html a few questions: what is the purpose of this theme? which Template Libraries would you be using? will you be using CSS? Martin Gainty __ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:03:27 +0200 From: eduard.neuw...@googlemail.com To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: Create new theme in struts Tutorial Hello, I am trying to create my own Struts theme. The topic seems to be rather rarely. I am looking for an tutorial or how to guide describing this. Does a tutorial exist ? Is it useful to create a won theme ? Regards Eduard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org _ Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
RE: Create new theme in struts Tutorial
i would have to agree with patrick in saying its easier to wrap the simple theme than creating from scratch http://struts.apache.org/2.0.14/docs/extending-themes.html a few questions: what is the purpose of this theme? which Template Libraries would you be using? will you be using CSS? Martin Gainty __ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:03:27 +0200 > From: eduard.neuw...@googlemail.com > To: user@struts.apache.org > Subject: Create new theme in struts Tutorial > > Hello, > > I am trying to create my own Struts theme. The topic seems to be rather > rarely. I am looking for an tutorial or how to guide describing this. > Does a tutorial exist ? Is it useful to create a won theme ? > > Regards > Eduard > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > _ Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
Create new theme in struts Tutorial
Hello, I am trying to create my own Struts theme. The topic seems to be rather rarely. I am looking for an tutorial or how to guide describing this. Does a tutorial exist ? Is it useful to create a won theme ? Regards Eduard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
Re: fail to run struts tutorial
struts2-archetype-starter-2.0.5-20070212.050844-2.jar thats seems to be the latest available... 2007/4/18, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Are you using the latest version of the archetype? I think I had this same problem with an older version. musachy On 4/18/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > I've followed struts tutorial and cannot run the archetype webapp in jetty > : > > WARN: failed action2 > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/velocity/app/VelocityEngine > ... > > adding velocity 1.5 and velocty-tools-view 1.2 as dependency solve this, > but > this looks strange to me. Isn't velocity optional ? > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: fail to run struts tutorial
Are you using the latest version of the archetype? I think I had this same problem with an older version. musachy On 4/18/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello I've followed struts tutorial and cannot run the archetype webapp in jetty : WARN: failed action2 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/velocity/app/VelocityEngine ... adding velocity 1.5 and velocty-tools-view 1.2 as dependency solve this, but this looks strange to me. Isn't velocity optional ? -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
fail to run struts tutorial
Hello I've followed struts tutorial and cannot run the archetype webapp in jetty : WARN: failed action2 java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/velocity/app/VelocityEngine ... adding velocity 1.5 and velocty-tools-view 1.2 as dependency solve this, but this looks strange to me. Isn't velocity optional ?
Re: seeking quick start struts tutorial
Hello I've tried this tutorial in "http://www.roseindia.net/struts"; i've downloaded the struts tutorial source code beside that the example use an old version of tomcat and struts I'm using tomcat 5.0.28 & struts 1.2.9 I've deployed the example on tomcat webapps directory but I get an "HTTP ERROR 404" anyone went thru this ? Thanks Hicham - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seeking quick start struts tutorial
Hi Kumar, u go through this url definatly it vil help u http://www.learntechnology.net/ On 6/27/06, Kumar deepak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, Try http://www.roseindia.net/struts Regards hicham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hello I'm a newbie to struts framework if anybody knows of a quick start easy tutorial that can get me on the road links ? pdf ? Thank you hicham - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
Re: seeking quick start struts tutorial
hi, Try http://www.roseindia.net/struts Regards hicham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hello I'm a newbie to struts framework if anybody knows of a quick start easy tutorial that can get me on the road links ? pdf ? Thank you hicham - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
Re: seeking quick start struts tutorial
On 6/21/06, Ed Griebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's too many to mention; here are some of my favorites: http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/index.html http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/index.html http://www.learntechnology.net/ Look at Struts Lessons in left menu http://courses.coreservlets.com/Course-Materials/struts.html -ed Thanks : ) I'll look at them hicham - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: seeking quick start struts tutorial
There's too many to mention; here are some of my favorites: http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/index.html http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/index.html http://www.learntechnology.net/ Look at Struts Lessons in left menu http://courses.coreservlets.com/Course-Materials/struts.html -ed On 6/21/06, hicham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hello I'm a newbie to struts framework if anybody knows of a quick start easy tutorial that can get me on the road links ? pdf ? Thank you hicham - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seeking quick start struts tutorial
hello I'm a newbie to struts framework if anybody knows of a quick start easy tutorial that can get me on the road links ? pdf ? Thank you hicham - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
If you go to * http://www.java201.com/ and search for "filters", you will fid several articles. -Ted. On 3/26/06, chuanjiang lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm also rather new here and im interested to know how to apply filters to > the web application... > > is there any useful guides around too? > > thanks > > On 3/26/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dakota Jack wrote: > > > If you are smart, go elsewhere where things are not this nuts. > > > > > > > *ponder* > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- HTH, Ted. ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
i'm also rather new here and im interested to know how to apply filters to the web application... is there any useful guides around too? thanks On 3/26/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dakota Jack wrote: > > If you are smart, go elsewhere where things are not this nuts. > > > > *ponder* > > Dave > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Struts Tutorial
Dakota Jack wrote: > If you are smart, go elsewhere where things are not this nuts. > *ponder* Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
It is Struts that is confused, not this person. If you are smart, go elsewhere where things are not this nuts. On 3/24/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion > exists when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or > the server? > > > -- > James Mitchell > EdgeTech, Inc. > http://edgetechservices.net/ > 678.910.8017 > Skype: jmitchtx > > > > On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Dave Newton wrote: > > > Andreas wrote: > >> Hi, I'm a newbie in Struts so I'm looking for a struts tutorial on > >> the net. > > > > Which Struts? > > > > See, I don't like that I have to ask that question, and on this I > > completely agree with Jonathon etc. :P > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
Re: Struts Tutorial
Ted Husted wrote: On 3/24/06, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is not really an accurate parallel...no one is saying that the apache web server and the apache organization are the same thing...but I guess struts-shale and struts-action aren't either...so why are they the same project again? Is it just a branding thing? It's a people thing, Larry. It's really the same reason most of us came here in the first place. We came here because we believe that we can build a better framework working together than we can working apart. Likewise, we believe that we can build both a better Shale and a better Action by working together, than we could working apart. If you tune into the dev@ list, you can see this already happening. I think the crux of the problem is that users perceive Struts as a codebase, a product, some kind of car that we built. The committers perceive Struts as a community of developers. Well, the body of work that will be Struts Action 2 shortly was not developed here. Webwork was developed under the OpenSymphony umbrella. There was a de facto competition going on to produce the better framework and they won that competition. The fact remains that you and your colleagues failed to keep Struts development going and it became uncompetitive in its space. Have you guys really taken stock of why that occurred? What I have observed is that whenever anybody questions your project management practices, you simply point them to a page that outlines the project management practices. FYI, this is commonly known as the "beg the question" fallacy. In the commercial world, pointy-haired bosses try very hard to take individual developers out of the equation. Bosses want developers to be plug and play, like network cards. In the ASF world, we value people more than we value the code. Code is just a snapshot of the work our people do. The code may be golden eggs, but our focus is on the geese. In this case, I have no idea what you're talking about. The above paragraph seems like meaningless gobbledy-gook to me. If you value people as you say, how is it that I perceive such a culture of arrogance and contempt here? Somebody offers an opinion about your website's front page (me in this case, but it could be someone else) and is told to put up or shut up. Craig McClanahan wrote a post that shocked me. He simply said: This is how it is. If you can't deal with it, go away. Is that the discourse of somebody who values other people? You get other people arguing vociferously that committers on an ASF project have no obligation to listen to people. This is not a claim made by one lone nutcase. Various people have made this extraordinary claim. So I get absolutely no sense that you value people here. You hold yourselves in high esteem, I guess, but there is just no sense that there is a culture here of respecting people and valuing them. My opinion is that this, more than any narrow technical issue, is what has led to the technical stagnation of Struts 1.x. So when people talk about sending some of us packing, it tears my heart. These people are my friends. I like working with my friends. Ted, this strikes me as a red herring issue. If you and other people who like working together want to collaborate on something, there is no obstacle to that. Actually, there's this great site called sourceforge where you can start a project and have all the necessary infrastructure to collaborate effectively: mailing lists, forums, bug tracker, code repository Isn't the problem that, if you do that, you have to simply compete on an even footing with other open source projects out there? You don't have any of these placement/visibility advantages. Your work would just stand or fall on its own technical merit. Let's strip away the pretension for a sec. If you went and started a project on sourceforge, all these people who love working with you so much, would they follow you there and work with you? Maybe, just maybe, they don't like working with you that much and they are actually here because they know that what work they do here will get an in ordinate amount of attention and publicity. Once they don't have that (say on a sourceforge project you go start) then they aren't all that interested in working with you any more. It's a bit like a rich guy who has all these friends. See how many friends he has when he loses his money. :-) > It's one of the reasons I volunteer. And, I know if we stick together, > we will find more and more places where we can share work, and make > life easier for all the developers that use our products (including > ourselves). We already see sharing and reuse happening with Tiles, Commons Chain, and Spring. Now we are seeting it happen with XWork. I think that before we are done, we may be able to take virtually the same Action and use it in Shale or in Action 2. Well, that sounds good, but if Shale were a separate p
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a people thing, Larry. It's really the same reason most of us > came here in the first place. We came here because we believe that we > can build a better framework working together than we can working > apart. Likewise, we believe that we can build both a better Shale and > a better Action by working together, than we could working apart. If > you tune into the dev@ list, you can see this already happening. That's great Ted, I hope we can all continue on the same path, but I disagree about the reason people come here. I wish that you were right, but deep down, if people were totally honest, I'd bet 90% came looking for a simple web framework, not a community. > I think the crux of the problem is that users perceive Struts as a > codebase, a product, some kind of car that we built. The committers > perceive Struts as a community of developers. The users don't - it is a product, they download it and use it, and at this point (as one of the users), I don't know where to start. The community is great, but I can't download it, and at this point, it seems very fragmented. > In the commercial world, pointy-haired bosses try very hard to take > individual developers out of the equation. Bosses want developers to > be plug and play, like network cards. I agree, and as much as it pains me to say it, I can see their point. It should be easy to find a struts developer...but it ISN'T! Because struts is so fragmented now that it is several different tool sets. > In the ASF world, we value people more than we value the code. Code > is just a snapshot of the work our people do. The code may be golden > eggs, but our focus is on the geese. > > So when people talk about sending some of us packing, it tears my > heart. These people are my friends. I like working with my friends. > It's one of the reasons I volunteer. And, I know if we stick together, > we will find more and more places where we can share work, and make > life easier for all the developers that use our products (including > ourselves). I totally agree. > We already see sharing and reuse happening with Tiles, Commons Chain, > and Spring. Now we are seeting it happen with XWork. I think that > before we are done, we may be able to take virtually the same Action > and use it in Shale or in Action 2. Hm, that sounds awesome, but as a pessimistic user, I'll believe it when I see it. ;-) > People who think like PHBs want everything to be about brand and > product differentiation. But, that's not what we are trying to do > here. We are trying to level the playing field for the developer. Not > for the product managers, or for the larger entities. But for our own > selves. Are you calling me a PHB?!? ;-) In all seriousness, I think I agree with you more than I disagree with you. I even agree that we an do more together that we can alone. But, I think the users of the framework are confused by the lack of separation. While it is great that the devs can share code and ideas, it is darn confusing for the users to go looking for a Porsche, and end up getting a VW. Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shale is no Mustang anymore. Will it turn out a Lambo is question > number one. Will many Mustang devotees decide to change from Mustang > to Lambo is question number two. I agree, but this is where the car analogy breaks down (ha, a pun). Just like struts-shale and struts-action are both frameworks, a tricycle and a ferrari are both modes of transportation. My children could control a tricycle at 3, but would they have been able to have the same degree of control in a Ferrari? Of course not, because they are radically different modes of transportation, just like struts-shale and struts-action are both frameworks, but radically different frameworks. Calling them the same thing does not make them the same thing. Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is not really an accurate parallel...no one is saying that the > apache web server and the apache organization are the same thing...but > I guess struts-shale and struts-action aren't either...so why are they > the same project again? Is it just a branding thing? It's a people thing, Larry. It's really the same reason most of us came here in the first place. We came here because we believe that we can build a better framework working together than we can working apart. Likewise, we believe that we can build both a better Shale and a better Action by working together, than we could working apart. If you tune into the dev@ list, you can see this already happening. I think the crux of the problem is that users perceive Struts as a codebase, a product, some kind of car that we built. The committers perceive Struts as a community of developers. In the commercial world, pointy-haired bosses try very hard to take individual developers out of the equation. Bosses want developers to be plug and play, like network cards. In the ASF world, we value people more than we value the code. Code is just a snapshot of the work our people do. The code may be golden eggs, but our focus is on the geese. So when people talk about sending some of us packing, it tears my heart. These people are my friends. I like working with my friends. It's one of the reasons I volunteer. And, I know if we stick together, we will find more and more places where we can share work, and make life easier for all the developers that use our products (including ourselves). We already see sharing and reuse happening with Tiles, Commons Chain, and Spring. Now we are seeting it happen with XWork. I think that before we are done, we may be able to take virtually the same Action and use it in Shale or in Action 2. People who think like PHBs want everything to be about brand and product differentiation. But, that's not what we are trying to do here. We are trying to level the playing field for the developer. Not for the product managers, or for the larger entities. But for our own selves. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Al Eridani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But cars are a good example of the type of branding being attempted > with Struts. Why does Ford keep marketing a model like the Mustang that > it has changed so radically over the years, instead of calling it something > else? Changed radically? Current generation is the one that finally got some massaging in last twenty years or so. Even after the changes it still has solid axle on the rear. The car is a fossil, good only for straight-line driving. But here is a kink: they wanted to use independent rear suspension from Jag, but hardcore Mustang-heads said resounding "no". They want fast, but simple. Shale is no Mustang anymore. Will it turn out a Lambo is question number one. Will many Mustang devotees decide to change from Mustang to Lambo is question number two. Michael. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Al Eridani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But cars are a good example of the type of branding being attempted > with Struts. Why does Ford keep marketing a model like the Mustang that > it has changed so radically over the years, instead of calling it something > else? > > Because they are banking on the familiarity and (hopefully) the good > reputation of the name among the general buying public; to the marketeers, > any connection between the name and the content is irrelevant. I agree, and to go even further with the analogy, you do not need to learn how to drive again when you get a new Mustang. The switch for the wipers may be in a different location, and the cruise control may be a bit different, but the brake is still on the left, and the gas is still the skinny pedal on the right. Again, this is NOT the case with with struts-action and struts-shale...so why are we pretending it is? Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
I'm not sure how the books didn't fit your needs, but maybe you can give this a try: http://www.learntechnology.net/ It's one of the most common tutorials we pass around in here. Hubert On 3/24/06, Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I'm a newbie in Struts so I'm looking for a struts tutorial on the net. > I've revised some books but all of them doesn't fit my needs. Any help would > be appreciated. Thanks a lot. Andreas > > > Broadband interface (RIA) + mail box saftey = > http://Struts_User_List.roomity.com > *Your* clubs, no sign up to read, ad supported; try broadband internet. > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, come on. Ford has Ford, Lincoln and Mercury. Fiat has Fiat, Alfa > Romeo, Lancia, Ferrari and whatever else. Renault has Renault, Nissan > and Volvo Trucks? Whatever. > > We just need to set a default. Do you think Ferrari when you say Fiat? ;-) Those are different brands with different names marketed by the same parent company, while the current Struts situation is different products marketed with the same name, so I don't understand your point. But cars are a good example of the type of branding being attempted with Struts. Why does Ford keep marketing a model like the Mustang that it has changed so radically over the years, instead of calling it something else? Because they are banking on the familiarity and (hopefully) the good reputation of the name among the general buying public; to the marketeers, any connection between the name and the content is irrelevant. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
Heh, so, when someone says "Volkswagon" are you saying that you know they really meant "Porsche", or that when someone says "Porsche" they really meant "VW"? My guess is that the people who make Porsches do not want people to look at a 928 and think "Cool, a Volkswagon...". My guess is that they do their best to keep them seperate - because they are RADICALLY different cars...just like struts-action and struts-shale are RADICALLY different frameworks. Here is an interesting parallel, however...the people who make VW's might want to go to great lengths to make their customers think they are really buying a Porsche, but just a bit different... Kind of like the people selling shale want to make people think it is really just struts, but a bit different. Larry On 3/24/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/24/06, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/24/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > > > > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > > > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion > > > exists when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or > > > the server? > > > > That is not really an accurate parallel...no one is saying that the > > apache web server and the apache organization are the same thing...but > > I guess struts-shale and struts-action aren't either...so why are they > > the same project again? Is it just a branding thing? > > Oh, come on. Ford has Ford, Lincoln and Mercury. Fiat has Fiat, Alfa > Romeo, Lancia, Ferrari and whatever else. Renault has Renault, Nissan > and Volvo Trucks? Whatever. > > We just need to set a default. Do you think Ferrari when you say Fiat? ;-) > > Michael. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/24/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion > > exists when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or > > the server? > > That is not really an accurate parallel...no one is saying that the > apache web server and the apache organization are the same thing...but > I guess struts-shale and struts-action aren't either...so why are they > the same project again? Is it just a branding thing? It looks that way. The people involved have a vested interest to keep the Struts name alive, even while they throw away the code. They benefit too much from books, talks, seminars, apache.org addresses, you name it, to start their new projects with a different name. Not that they will admit it, but it's the simplest explanation (Occam's razor and all that). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
Depends, do Ferrari and Fiat engineeers use the same mailing list? On 3/24/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/24/06, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/24/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > > > > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > > > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion > > > exists when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or > > > the server? > > > > That is not really an accurate parallel...no one is saying that the > > apache web server and the apache organization are the same thing...but > > I guess struts-shale and struts-action aren't either...so why are they > > the same project again? Is it just a branding thing? > > Oh, come on. Ford has Ford, Lincoln and Mercury. Fiat has Fiat, Alfa > Romeo, Lancia, Ferrari and whatever else. Renault has Renault, Nissan > and Volvo Trucks? Whatever. > > We just need to set a default. Do you think Ferrari when you say Fiat? ;-) > > Michael. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Ghetto Java: http://www.ghettojava.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/24/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion > > exists when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or > > the server? > > That is not really an accurate parallel...no one is saying that the > apache web server and the apache organization are the same thing...but > I guess struts-shale and struts-action aren't either...so why are they > the same project again? Is it just a branding thing? Oh, come on. Ford has Ford, Lincoln and Mercury. Fiat has Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Ferrari and whatever else. Renault has Renault, Nissan and Volvo Trucks? Whatever. We just need to set a default. Do you think Ferrari when you say Fiat? ;-) Michael. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
No, that makes you a cheese head...it is Friday, right? Larry On 3/24/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Larry Meadors wrote: > > On 3/24/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> James Mitchell wrote: > >> > >>> As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > >>> > >>> Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > >>> isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion exists > >>> when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or the server? > >>> > >> I mean the Indian. > >> > > > > You insensitive racist, they are "native americans". ;-) > > > > Wait; I was born in Wisconsin! Doesn't that make me a native american? > > Dave > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
Larry Meadors wrote: > On 3/24/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> James Mitchell wrote: >> >>> As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. >>> >>> Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there >>> isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion exists >>> when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or the server? >>> >> I mean the Indian. >> > > You insensitive racist, they are "native americans". ;-) > Wait; I was born in Wisconsin! Doesn't that make me a native american? Dave
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Mitchell wrote: > > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion exists > > when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or the server? > > I mean the Indian. You insensitive racist, they are "native americans". ;-) Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
I'm still lobbying for a mailing list split. struts_shale struts_action Too much context switching going on here for my poor brain. Yeah I know filters, label, dogs and bees. Anyone with me on this ? On 3/24/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Mitchell wrote: > > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion exists > > when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or the server? > > I mean the Indian. > > Dave > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Ghetto Java: http://www.ghettojava.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
On 3/24/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion > exists when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or > the server? That is not really an accurate parallel...no one is saying that the apache web server and the apache organization are the same thing...but I guess struts-shale and struts-action aren't either...so why are they the same project again? Is it just a branding thing? Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
James Mitchell wrote: > As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. > > Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there > isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion exists > when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or the server? I mean the Indian. Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale. Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there isn't usually a misunderstanding. I suppose the same confusion exists when someone says 'Apache'. Do you mean the organization or the server? -- James Mitchell EdgeTech, Inc. http://edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 Skype: jmitchtx On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Dave Newton wrote: Andreas wrote: Hi, I'm a newbie in Struts so I'm looking for a struts tutorial on the net. Which Struts? See, I don't like that I have to ask that question, and on this I completely agree with Jonathon etc. :P Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
Andreas wrote: > Hi, I'm a newbie in Struts so I'm looking for a struts tutorial on the net. Which Struts? See, I don't like that I have to ask that question, and on this I completely agree with Jonathon etc. :P Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
My favorite book for newbies is "Struts for Dummies". * http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0764559575/apachesoftwar-20/ For Struts 1.2, the "Struts: The Complete Reference" by James Holes is also quite good. Most chapters end with a lab, so it's much like a tutorial. * http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0072231319/apachesoftwar-20/ For Just the Stuff without the Fluff, there are also two Struts cookbooks * http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1932394249/apachesoftwar-20/ * http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/059600771X/apachesoftwar-20/ There's a complete list of articles about Struts, including tutorials, at Struts Central. * http://www.StrutsCentral.net/Resources/Action/articles-2006.html -- HTH, Ted. On 3/24/06, Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I'm a newbie in Struts so I'm looking for a struts tutorial on the net. > I've revised some books but all of them doesn't fit my needs. Any help would > be appreciated. Thanks a lot. > Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Struts Tutorial
Andreas ha scritto: Hi, I'm a newbie in Struts so I'm looking for a struts tutorial on the net. I've revised some books but all of them doesn't fit my needs. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks a lot. Andreas A book I really liked and that I suggest to newbies is Struts Survival Guide: http://www.objectsource.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Struts Tutorial
Hi, I'm a newbie in Struts so I'm looking for a struts tutorial on the net. I've revised some books but all of them doesn't fit my needs. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks a lot. Andreas Broadband interface (RIA) + mail box saftey = http://Struts_User_List.roomity.com *Your* clubs, no sign up to read, ad supported; try broadband internet.
Re: tabs & struts tutorial
On 1/23/06, Garner, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to do page tabs in struts? > I seem to recall somebody saying there was. There are common-controls.com, but they are not free, and if you ask me they have their limitations - they are not just page drop-ins. There is http://209.61.157.8:8080/taglibs/ project, pretty nice but afaik these tabs are not drop-ins too. What I mean by drop-ins is that they are not independent from the rest of a page. Take a look at my tab template, maybe it will work for you. You just include your tab component into a page, and this is it. How-to: http://jroller.com/page/javadujour?entry=create_tab_component_in_jsp Project page: http://jspcontrols.sourceforge.net/ Struts integration: http://jspcontrols.sourceforge.net/jsptaglib/struts.html Next version will contain a ready-to-use component that will encapsulate tab rendering. Currently, you need to render tabs yourself, but check out the how-to, Tigris-style tabs are really simple. Don't forget: * you MUST define your tab component in a separate JSP file because this file will be navigated to when you click on tabs. * The page where tab component resides, must allow explicit refresh, it will be redirected to each time you switch tabs, if Javascript is not available. Write back if you have questions. Michael. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tabs & struts tutorial
Is there a way to do page tabs in struts? I seem to recall somebody saying there was. Also does anyone know of a good struts tutorial/refresher? I'm starting up a project with a person who hasn't worked with struts for a few years. Shawn This email may contain confidential material. If you were not an intended recipient, Please notify the sender and delete all copies. We may monitor email to and from our network.
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Yes, 1.x and 2.x are different enough to make the transition not much fun...not terribly difficult, but if you can avoid it, do. Also, version 1.x is not currently being maintained, so I would suggest that you go for 2.x instead...it is way better anyway. :-) Larry On 12/8/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is 1.x usage so different from 2.0 ? Does it make sense to start from > 1.x and then move to 2.0 features or it is better to start from 2.0 > right away? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Opps. We used iBatis 2.0 on a project 2 years ago, 1up.com. The main difference is that it does not need to map as much, looked similar to me, minor things. So 2.x all the way. .V Michael Jouravlev wrote: Er... Actually, I was asking about IBatis 1.x vs. IBatis 2.x. Thanks for giving me insight on Struts versions, though ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Er... Actually, I was asking about IBatis 1.x vs. IBatis 2.x. Thanks for giving me insight on Struts versions, though ;-) Michael. On 12/8/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no concreate Struts 2.0 afaik! So you can't use it to build. > > There's hardly a 1.3 you can download yet to even try. > > Lots of changes are yet to happen to "Ti" even at high level. No Api has > been set. And no date set for it. Look how long 1.3 has been baking. > > .V > Michael Jouravlev wrote: > > >>>Is 1.x usage so different from 2.0 ? Does it make sense to start from > >>>1.x and then move to 2.0 features or it is better to start from 2.0 > >>>right away? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
There is no concreate Struts 2.0 afaik! So you can't use it to build. There's hardly a 1.3 you can download yet to even try. Lots of changes are yet to happen to "Ti" even at high level. No Api has been set. And no date set for it. Look how long 1.3 has been baking. .V Michael Jouravlev wrote: Is 1.x usage so different from 2.0 ? Does it make sense to start from 1.x and then move to 2.0 features or it is better to start from 2.0 right away? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Vic, I am sorry I did not get this one ;) On 12/8/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there not even 1.3, hold on early adators. > > > > Is 1.x usage so different from 2.0 ? Does it make sense to start from > > 1.x and then move to 2.0 features or it is better to start from 2.0 > > right away? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
I have one I wrote for a internal developer class I gave. If you're interest let me know and I'll send it to you. 2005/12/8, Access Denied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Would someone please recommend a current tutorial that may include iBATIS > integration? > > tia, > am > >
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
there not even 1.3, hold on early adators. .V Is 1.x usage so different from 2.0 ? Does it make sense to start from 1.x and then move to 2.0 features or it is better to start from 2.0 right away? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
On 12/8/05, Rick R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (By the way, I just started using gmail for my struts stuff now.. why does > it include the sender also when I click reply and not just the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? Does that happen for other gmail users > also?) Yes, but not always. > On 12/8/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > Rick's is old old old - version 1.x ibatis...I keep hounding the > > slacker to update it, but he says he's busy. ;-) Is 1.x usage so different from 2.0 ? Does it make sense to start from 1.x and then move to 2.0 features or it is better to start from 2.0 right away? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Ha I was just going to say that is definitely outdated:) I'll get around to updating it... I keep saying that I know:) (By the way, I just started using gmail for my struts stuff now.. why does it include the sender also when I click reply and not just the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? Does that happen for other gmail users also?) On 12/8/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Rick's is old old old - version 1.x ibatis...I keep hounding the > slacker to update it, but he says he's busy. ;-) > > Larry > > > On 12/8/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the wiki, I think there's a rick reuman Struts and iBatis tutorial > > > > Access Denied wrote: > > > Would someone please recommend a current tutorial that may include > iBATIS > > > integration? > > > > > > tia, > > > am > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Rick
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Rick's is old old old - version 1.x ibatis...I keep hounding the slacker to update it, but he says he's busy. ;-) Larry On 12/8/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the wiki, I think there's a rick reuman Struts and iBatis tutorial > > Access Denied wrote: > > Would someone please recommend a current tutorial that may include iBATIS > > integration? > > > > tia, > > am > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
In the wiki, I think there's a rick reuman Struts and iBatis tutorial Access Denied wrote: Would someone please recommend a current tutorial that may include iBATIS integration? tia, am - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Thanks a lot, Larry! Are there instructions on how to set everything up from scratch? How to get a hello world working? ad 2005/12/8, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hey there, Mr. Denied, > > JPetstore 5 is available in the iBATIS SVN repository...more of an > example than a tutorial, but it does use Struts and iBATIS ... as well > as junit+emma for testing. > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ibatis/trunk/java/jpetstore/jpetstore5/ > > Larry > > > On 12/8/05, Access Denied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would someone please recommend a current tutorial that may include > iBATIS > > integration? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Online Struts Tutorial
Hey there, Mr. Denied, JPetstore 5 is available in the iBATIS SVN repository...more of an example than a tutorial, but it does use Struts and iBATIS ... as well as junit+emma for testing. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ibatis/trunk/java/jpetstore/jpetstore5/ Larry On 12/8/05, Access Denied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would someone please recommend a current tutorial that may include iBATIS > integration? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online Struts Tutorial
Would someone please recommend a current tutorial that may include iBATIS integration? tia, am
RE: Struts tutorial on forwarding to action needing different request parameters
None none, it's funny seeing that there :) Guess I should change my profile to have my real name. There we go (I think). From: Irfandhy Franciscus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Struts tutorial on forwarding to action needing different request parameters Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 05:41:53 +0800 Hi, After following this discussion on how to forward to action with different parameters : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.user/83362/match=forwarding+action+needing+different+request+parameters I decided to summarize the discussion in : http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ForwardingWithDifferentParameter I believe that this problem is a very general problem that we often overlook due to its simplicity. I hope everyone can benefit from the article :) Regards, Irfandhy Franciscus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get 200+ ad-free, high-fidelity stations and LIVE Major League Baseball Gameday Audio! http://radio.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200491ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Struts tutorial on forwarding to action needing different request parameters
Hi, After following this discussion on how to forward to action with different parameters : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.user/83362/match=forwarding+action+needing+different+request+parameters I decided to summarize the discussion in : http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ForwardingWithDifferentParameter I believe that this problem is a very general problem that we often overlook due to its simplicity. I hope everyone can benefit from the article :) Regards, Irfandhy Franciscus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Struts tutorial in Struts Wiki
There are currently four flavours of "Validator" ActionForms, so IMO it would be good to say something about this. Your example shows using the ValidatorForm - the alternative is if someone wants to use "Dyna" forms and the equivalent is DynaValidatorForm, it would be good to show an example of this. Both ValidatorForm and DynaValidatorForm use the form "name" attribute from the struts-config.xml action mapping to find the validation rules from the validation.xml - there is an alternative to this, which is to use the action's "path" attribute from the struts-config.xml action mapping - ValidatorActionForm and DynaValidatorActionForm use this mechanism. Niall - Original Message - From: "Irfandhy Franciscus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 5:54 PM Subject: New Struts tutorial in Struts Wiki > Hi all, > > After a year of using Struts I want to contribute something to the > community. So I decided to write a short tutorial on Struts validator > framework in Struts wiki > > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBeginnerValidatorFramework > > I will really appreciate it, if you guys can stop by for a minute to > review the tutorial for any errata, especially those Struts Guru in the > mailing list :D > > Regards, > Irfandhy Franciscus > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Struts tutorial in Struts Wiki
Hi all, After a year of using Struts I want to contribute something to the community. So I decided to write a short tutorial on Struts validator framework in Struts wiki http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBeginnerValidatorFramework I will really appreciate it, if you guys can stop by for a minute to review the tutorial for any errata, especially those Struts Guru in the mailing list :D Regards, Irfandhy Franciscus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
