Re: CHANGES.txt?

2017-02-06 Thread Rakesh Radhakrishnan
Hi All,

I hope all are agreeing to remove CHANGE.txt file from ZK project
repository. I believe, ZOOKEEPER-2672 jira needs to be concluded(to avoid
confusions) before cutting 3.4.10 release. I'm planning to remove
CHANGE.txt file in 2 days time frame, 8 February 2017, 6:00 PM (PST), if
there is no objection. Thanks!

Thanks & Regards,
Rakesh

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 for removing the CHANGE.txt file.
>
> I agree to rely on source control (github) revision logs instead of
> CHANGE.txt moving forward.
>
> Note: Jira issue ZOOKEEPER-2672 will be used to remove this file.
>
> Thanks,
> Rakesh
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Michael Han <h...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> See https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@zookeeper.apache.org/msg37108.html
>>
>> I think there was no decision explicitly made but looks like every one was
>> OK to head towards the direction of removing CHANGE.TXT.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Could anyone remind me of what we decided for CHANGES.txt? Are we
>> supposed
>> > to add resolved jiras to it or are we going to rely on the git log?
>> >
>> > I have committed ZK-761 to master without the change to CHANGES.txt, but
>> > then I noticed that some commits are going in with it, so I did it to
>> the
>> > 3.5 branch. I want to know if I need to make it consistent or not.
>> >
>> > -Flavio
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Michael.
>>
>
>


Re: CHANGES.txt?

2017-02-02 Thread Rakesh Radhakrishnan
+1 for removing the CHANGE.txt file.

I agree to rely on source control (github) revision logs instead of
CHANGE.txt moving forward.

Note: Jira issue ZOOKEEPER-2672 will be used to remove this file.

Thanks,
Rakesh


On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Michael Han <h...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> See https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@zookeeper.apache.org/msg37108.html
>
> I think there was no decision explicitly made but looks like every one was
> OK to head towards the direction of removing CHANGE.TXT.
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Could anyone remind me of what we decided for CHANGES.txt? Are we
> supposed
> > to add resolved jiras to it or are we going to rely on the git log?
> >
> > I have committed ZK-761 to master without the change to CHANGES.txt, but
> > then I noticed that some commits are going in with it, so I did it to the
> > 3.5 branch. I want to know if I need to make it consistent or not.
> >
> > -Flavio
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Michael.
>