thank you Tim,
>>Caused by: java.io.IOException: Failed to perform GET on: https://URL
>>Reason: null
>>at
org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:33)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3]
>>at
org.apache.activemq.transport.http.HttpClientTransport.run(HttpClientTransport.java:205)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3]
>>... 1 more
>>Caused by: java.io.EOFException
>>at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(Unknown Source)[:1.8.0_60]
>>at
org.apache.activemq.transport.util.TextWireFormat.unmarshal(TextWireFormat.java:52)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3]
>>at
org.apache.activemq.transport.http.HttpClientTransport.run(HttpClientTransport.java:196)[120:org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:5.12.3]
>>... 1 more
>>Is this the root cause of why your connections are already closed when
>>trying to open sessions, etc.? If so, there's one of two possibilities:
>>1. The broker is experiencing errors that cause it to close the connection
>>prematurely. What do you see in the broker logs? Everything you've
provided
>>so far has been from the consumer's logs.
>>2. The load balancer is experiencing behavior that cause it to terminate
>>the connection prematurely, e.g. due to inactivity or other problems. If
>>there's nothing in the broker's logs that indicates a problem, this would
>>be the next place to dig into.
for the IOException, we are seeing below problem
clientID: ID:7450-51820-1521801292483-0:1
2018-03-23 06:35:01,302 58688438 [CustHttpTransportServer_1926295252-120]
(org.apache.activemq.activemq-osgi:org.apache.activemq.transport.http.HttpTunnelServlet:175)
WARN - The clientID header specified is invalid. Client sesion has not yet
been established for it: ID:7450-51820-1521801292483-0:1
so, we are suspecting this is coming bcz blockingqueus are not able to
create, in our n/w peer we removed
networkConnector.addDynamicallyIncludedDestination condition because of this
even blocking queues are also replicated which is causing this problem
[assumption].
so blocking queues are created with *blockingQueue_*
can you please suggest what pattern to exclude this blocking queue. or any
other suggestions ?
if we exclude blockingQueue_* or blockingQueue.* ?
or any other way we need to follow ? please suggest
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html