You had 160 tps with a 100ms sleep that gives a pool of 16 threads. In Netty
4.0 the default pool size will be twice the number of cores, I guess it's the
same for current 3.x that camel is using. You are running on a system with 8
CPU cores (and 0% overhead inside netty or camel).
A computer cannot run more task that number of cores. If your code is not
blocking (camel-netty doesn't block but your thread.sleep example does) then
any thread pool bigger than number of cores is big enough.
Why are you using Thread.sleep? Are you trying to simulate a CPU heavy task,
then you should add more CPU cores. If you are simulating an external system
that will take 100ms to respond then convert your SleepProcessor to use
AsyncProcessor and schedule the callback object to be notified after 100ms
http://camel.apache.org/asynchronous-processing.html
On 2013-06-25, at 13:56, kiranreddykasa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for quick reply.
>
> And generally on a netty consumer is it okay to use additional thread pool
> or default thread pool is enough ?
> If default pool is enough what is it's pool size and how can I increase it?
>
>
>
> -
> Regards
>
> kiran Reddy
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/netty-thread-pool-clarification-tp5734734p5734738.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
