RE: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

[Sudha Ponnaganti]

All

Fix has been checked in to 4.2-forward branch. You can try it out

Thanks
/Sudha

-Original Message-
From: Arnaud Gaillard [mailto:arnaud.gaill...@xtendsys.net] 
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 1:34 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

This is a known issue

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201309.mbox/%3C52307BF2.203%40apache.org%3E

You can find more information on the dev mailing list.




On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Tracy Phillips wrote:

> This is a known issue and is currently being worked on.
>
> You do realize that 4.2 has not been released yet and is in the 
> testing phase right?
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I proceed to upgrade my CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 by compiling it 
> > from source. However, after upgrading the management servers and all 
> > the KVM hosts, I am not able to start the management server with 
> > this error
> > message:
> >
> > ===
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > (Timer-1:null) DB version = 4.1.1 Code Version = 4.2.0
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > (Timer-1:null) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.1.1 to 
> > 4.2.0
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > (Timer-1:null) There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,517 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext]
> > (Timer-1:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup ===
> >
> > I checked and the documentation (Release_Notes.xml which comes with 
> > the
> > tar.bz2 file) doesn't mention anything about upgrading the database.
> >
> > 1. How can I upgrade the database from 4.1.1 version to 4.2.0 version?
> > 2. If cannot, how can I revert back to code 4.1.1 for the 
> > cloudstack-management server and cloudstack-agents on the KVM hosts?
> >
> > Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
>



--
*Arnaud Gaillard*
CTO
Mobile : +41 78 674 58 95

Re: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

[Milamber]

Le 12/09/2013 19:35, Indra Pramana a ecrit :

Dear all,

I proceed to upgrade my CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 by compiling it from
source. However, after upgrading the management servers and all the KVM
hosts, I am not able to start the management server with this error message:

===
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) DB version = 4.1.1 Code Version = 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0


That is a blocked bug for next CS 4.2 (a new release candidate process 
will be launch).

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4645



2013-09-13 02:18:00,517 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext]
(Timer-1:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup
===

I checked and the documentation (Release_Notes.xml which comes with the
tar.bz2 file) doesn't mention anything about upgrading the database.

1. How can I upgrade the database from 4.1.1 version to 4.2.0 version?
2. If cannot, how can I revert back to code 4.1.1 for the
cloudstack-management server and cloudstack-agents on the KVM hosts?

Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

V4.1 Advanced Network, VR reboot, NAT rules gone

[Noel Kendall]

FW rules are not persistent in VR? I am trying to figure out why a V4.1 VR does 
not properly NAT, and of course,reboot several times to reset state. I see that 
after each reboot, the NAT rules are gone. If I go to the mgr, and touchthe 
rules for the network in some way, the rules are re-instated.
Makes me think that the mgr is not aware of the VR change of state on reboot, 
and is failing to command it with properset of rules.
Rather discouraging. I had a working environment in 4.0.1, now, toast.
Thoughts??
N 

RE: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

[Conrad Geiger]

4.2 is going to have another RC, it was not published yet due to this issue.

-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] 
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:35 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

Dear all,

I proceed to upgrade my CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 by compiling it from source. 
However, after upgrading the management servers and all the KVM hosts, I am not 
able to start the management server with this error message:

===
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) DB version = 4.1.1 Code Version = 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,517 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext]
(Timer-1:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup ===

I checked and the documentation (Release_Notes.xml which comes with the
tar.bz2 file) doesn't mention anything about upgrading the database.

1. How can I upgrade the database from 4.1.1 version to 4.2.0 version?
2. If cannot, how can I revert back to code 4.1.1 for the cloudstack-management 
server and cloudstack-agents on the KVM hosts?

Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

[Indra Pramana]

Dear all,

I proceed to upgrade my CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 by compiling it from
source. However, after upgrading the management servers and all the KVM
hosts, I am not able to start the management server with this error message:

===
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) DB version = 4.1.1 Code Version = 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,517 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext]
(Timer-1:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup
===

I checked and the documentation (Release_Notes.xml which comes with the
tar.bz2 file) doesn't mention anything about upgrading the database.

1. How can I upgrade the database from 4.1.1 version to 4.2.0 version?
2. If cannot, how can I revert back to code 4.1.1 for the
cloudstack-management server and cloudstack-agents on the KVM hosts?

Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

Re: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

[Arnaud Gaillard]

This is a known issue

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201309.mbox/%3C52307BF2.203%40apache.org%3E

You can find more information on the dev mailing list.




On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Tracy Phillips wrote:

> This is a known issue and is currently being worked on.
>
> You do realize that 4.2 has not been released yet and is in the testing
> phase right?
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Indra Pramana  wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I proceed to upgrade my CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 by compiling it from
> > source. However, after upgrading the management servers and all the KVM
> > hosts, I am not able to start the management server with this error
> > message:
> >
> > ===
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > (Timer-1:null) DB version = 4.1.1 Code Version = 4.2.0
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > (Timer-1:null) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> > (Timer-1:null) There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
> > 2013-09-13 02:18:00,517 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext]
> > (Timer-1:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup
> > ===
> >
> > I checked and the documentation (Release_Notes.xml which comes with the
> > tar.bz2 file) doesn't mention anything about upgrading the database.
> >
> > 1. How can I upgrade the database from 4.1.1 version to 4.2.0 version?
> > 2. If cannot, how can I revert back to code 4.1.1 for the
> > cloudstack-management server and cloudstack-agents on the KVM hosts?
> >
> > Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
>



-- 
*Arnaud Gaillard*
CTO
Mobile : +41 78 674 58 95

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

Well, after mark this storage as shared, nothing changes. The same error.
Any ideas that could be wrong?


2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 

> No, but I will try!
> On Sep 12, 2013 6:03 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" 
> wrote:
>
>> have you tried to mark it as shared on the hypervisor?
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>>
>> > No. In CS this storage marked as local.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>> >
>> > > is you local storage at the hypvervisor host marked as shared?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>> > >
>> > > > Of course!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>> > > >
>> > > > > did you restart the CS?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > "system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I am not using local storage,
>> > > > > > > Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
>> > > > > > > system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > In your global settings, what do you have
>> > > > > "system.vm.use.local.storage"
>> > > > > > > > set to?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Travis
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
>> > > > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
>> > > > > > > > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you
>> have
>> > to
>> > > > > enable
>> > > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by
>> > > default.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >> 1) Nfs on management.
>> > > > > > > > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
>> > > > > > > > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
>> > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner <
>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
>> > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom <
>> > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a
>> > > suitable
>> > > > > > > storage
>> > > > > > > > >>> pool
>> > > > > > > >  so take a closer look at your storage
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  Regards
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  Geoff Higginbottom
>> > > > > > > >  CTO / Cloud Architect
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20
>> 3603
>> > > 0540
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> > > > > > > > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
>> > > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London,
>> > WC2N
>> > > > 4HS
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin" <
>> > > nrg3...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  Sure. That's all i captured now.
>> > > http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner <
>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  could you post a little more of the log?
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > > > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still
>> don't
>> > > > > > understand
>> > > > > > > > >> why?
>> > > > > > > >  This is log of management-server.log
>> > > > > http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
>> > > > > > > >  Thanks!
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > > > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
>> > > > > > > >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
>> > > > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >  wrote:
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > 
>> > > > > > > > >>

Re: Cloustack 4.1.0 + GlusterFS

[Chiradeep Vittal]

John, care to write a HOWTO use GlusterFS in the wiki?


On 9/11/13 5:27 PM, "John Skinner"  wrote:

>I ran each test independently for each block size.
>
>iozone -I -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -r 4k -s 1G
>
>In order: -I to specify direct-IO, -i 0 to specify write/rewrite, -i 1 to
>specify read/re-read, -i 2 to specify random read/write, -r specify block
>size, -s to specify file size.
>
>The report is pretty thorough. What I put in the email was different, I
>just took the throughput from each test and put it into a table outside
>of the full report.
>
>- Original Message -
>
>From: "Rafael Weingartner" 
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:16:23 PM
>Subject: Re: Cloustack 4.1.0 + GlusterFS
>
>I have never used iozone before,
>
>How did you get that report?
>
>I tried: iozone -s 1024m -t 1 -R
>
>But the report was pretty different from yours.
>
>
>2013/9/11 John Skinner 
>
>> I currently have GlusterFS deployed into an 8 node KVM cluster running
>>on 
>> CloudStack 4.1 for primary storage. Gluster is deployed on 28 1TB
>>drives 
>> across 2 separate storage appliances using a distributed-replicated
>>volume 
>> with the replica set to 2. The storage network is 10Gb copper.
>> 
>> These are the options I have configured for the volume in Gluster, most
>>of 
>> them are from a Red Hat document on configuring Red Hat Enterprise
>>Storage 
>> for VM hosting: 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> performance.io-thread-count: 32
>> performance.cache-size: 1024MB
>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 5MB
>> performance.write-behind: on
>> network.remote-dio: on
>> cluster.eager-lock: enable
>> performance.stat-prefetch: off
>> performance.io-cache: on
>> performance.read-ahead: on
>> performance.quick-read: on
>> 
>> Here are some of the numbers I was getting when benchmarking the
>>storage 
>> from the KVM node directly (not a VM)
>> 
>> The below table is in KB/s. The test is single stream 1GB file
>>utilizing 
>> Direct I/O (no cache). I used iozone to run the benchmark.
>> 
>> Write 4k 45729 
>> Read 4k 10189 
>> Random Write 4k 31983
>> Random Read 4k 9859
>> Write 16k 182246
>> Read 16k 37146 
>> Random Write 16k 113026
>> Random Read 16k 37237
>> Write 64k 420908
>> Read 64k 125315 
>> Random Write 64k 383848
>> Random Read 64k 125218
>> Write 256k 567501
>> Read 256k 218413
>> Random Write 256k 508650
>> Random Read 256k 229117
>> 
>> In the above results, I have the volume mounted to each KVM host as a
>>FUSE 
>> glusterfs file system. They are added to CloudStack as a shared mount
>> point. In the future it would be great to utilize GlusterFS qemu
>>libvirt 
>> integration with libgfapi so I could bypass fuse altogether. However,
>>that 
>> would require adding that code to CloudStack to support that.
>> 
>> I maybe have 15 or so VMs running from the storage now and it is still
>> pretty snappy. Need to do some more testing though and really get it
>>loaded. 
>> 
>> - Original Message -
>
>> 
>> From: "Rafael Weingartner" 
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:48:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: Cloustack 4.1.0 + GlusterFS
>> 
>> Right now I can think in three main reasons:
>> 
>> The first reason, performance (I do not know Gluster and its
>>performance 
>> and if the read and write speed are satisfactory). Please if you can
>>make a 
>> test, post the results.
>> 
>> Second consistency, I do not know Gluster, but swift that is also a
>> Distributed File System is not consistency and they make it pretty
>>clear on 
>> their page (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/)
>> 
>> "Swift is a highly available, distributed, eventually consistent
>> object/blob store...".
>> 
>> I would not accept to storage my VMs images on a FS that is eventually
>> consistent. 
>> 
>> Third, network, I haven't used this kind of FS, but I can image that it
>> uses a lot of bandwidth to keep synchronizing, managing and securing
>>the 
>> data. So, managing the networking would be a pain.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/9/11 Olivier Mauras 
>> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Hi, 
>> > 
>> > Those thinking that it's not a good idea, do you mind
>> > explaining your point of view?
>> > GlusterFS seems like the only real
>> > alternative to a highly priced SAN for the primary storage...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Thanks, 
>> > Olivier 
>> > 
>> > On 2013-09-11 15:08, Rafael Weingartner wrote:
>> > 
>> > > I 
>> > totally agree with Tomasz, I do not think that using a distributed FS
>> > as 
>> > > primary storage is a good idea, but as a secondary it sounds
>> > interesting. 
>> > > 
>> > > But, off course you can try *;*)
>> > > 
>> > > 2013/9/11 
>> > Shanker Balan 
>> > > 
>> > >> On 11-Sep-2013, at
>> > 5:14 PM, Tomasz Zięba  wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >>> Hi, Some 
>> > time ago I tried to use GlusterFS as storage for cloudstacka but I
>> > noticed that cloudstack uses the default settings for mount command.
>>By 
>> > default mount command is using the UDP protocol but glusterfs works
>> > >> 
>> > only 
>> > >> 

Re: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

[Milamber]

Le 12/09/2013 19:35, Indra Pramana a ecrit :

Dear all,

I proceed to upgrade my CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 by compiling it from
source. However, after upgrading the management servers and all the KVM
hosts, I am not able to start the management server with this error message:

===
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) DB version = 4.1.1 Code Version = 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
(Timer-1:null) There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0


That is a blocked bug for next CS 4.2 (a new release candidate process 
will be launch).

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4645



2013-09-13 02:18:00,517 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext]
(Timer-1:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup
===

I checked and the documentation (Release_Notes.xml which comes with the
tar.bz2 file) doesn't mention anything about upgrading the database.

1. How can I upgrade the database from 4.1.1 version to 4.2.0 version?
2. If cannot, how can I revert back to code 4.1.1 for the
cloudstack-management server and cloudstack-agents on the KVM hosts?

Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.

Cheers.

Re: Security Groups

[Lynch, Gerard]

It would be useful if you provided some more information about your setup
- hypervisor type etc.

>From the sounds of your question, your network is working (I.e. You can
ping your VM), and this is specific to security groups.


One check you can perform is to ssh onto the host you're running your VM
on, and trace traffic through the iptables chains (while performing a ping
to/from the VM), e.g.

iptables -Z && watch -n .5 iptables -nvL
iptables -Z && watch -n .5 iptables -nvL BRIDGE-FIREWALL
iptables -Z && watch -n .5 iptables -nvL i-2-8-def


On XenServer, security groups requires using Linux Bridge instead of Open
vSwitch.  

/opt/xensource/bin/xe-switch-network-backend bridge

By default XenServer (6.x) disables iptable/arptable checking over bridges
- you'll need to ensure those are enabled.
# Disable *tables rules for bridge traffic to increase performance
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 1


I believe the functionality provided by CSP (iptables/ebtables handling
etc) was included in XenServer 6.1

Hope that helps




On 12/09/2013 14:26, "Michael Phillips"  wrote:

>That's what I thought. In that case, what are some things I can look at
>to troubleshoot because that process is not working for me.
>
>> From: jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Security Groups
>> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:41:49 +
>> 
>> You are right.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jayapal
>> 
>> On 12-Sep-2013, at 11:45 AM, Michael Phillips 
>>wrote:
>> 
>> > So If I have created a zone with the
>>"DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService" network offerring. Created a
>>VM using the default security group, which has 0 ingress rules, I should
>>NOT be able to do things like PING that VM correct?   
>>
>> 
> 


Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, 
confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed 
may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you 
have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete 
it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, 
use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please note we reserve the right to 
monitor all e-mail communication through our internal and external networks. 
SKY and the SKY marks are trademarks of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and 
Sky International AG and are used under licence. British Sky Broadcasting 
Limited (Registration No. 2906991), Sky-In-Home Service Limited (Registration 
No. 2067075) and Sky Subscribers Services Limited (Registration No. 2340150) 
are direct or indirect subsidiaries of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc 
(Registration No. 2247735). All of the companies mentioned in this paragraph 
are incorporated in England and Wales and share the same registered office at 
Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD.

Re: URGENT: Unable to upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

[Tracy Phillips]

This is a known issue and is currently being worked on.

You do realize that 4.2 has not been released yet and is in the testing
phase right?


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Indra Pramana  wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I proceed to upgrade my CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 by compiling it from
> source. However, after upgrading the management servers and all the KVM
> hosts, I am not able to start the management server with this error
> message:
>
> ===
> 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> (Timer-1:null) DB version = 4.1.1 Code Version = 4.2.0
> 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 INFO  [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> (Timer-1:null) Database upgrade must be performed from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
> 2013-09-13 02:18:00,512 ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker]
> (Timer-1:null) There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0
> 2013-09-13 02:18:00,517 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext]
> (Timer-1:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup
> ===
>
> I checked and the documentation (Release_Notes.xml which comes with the
> tar.bz2 file) doesn't mention anything about upgrading the database.
>
> 1. How can I upgrade the database from 4.1.1 version to 4.2.0 version?
> 2. If cannot, how can I revert back to code 4.1.1 for the
> cloudstack-management server and cloudstack-agents on the KVM hosts?
>
> Urgently looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>

RE: Security Groups

[Michael Phillips]

So I am running xen 6.0.2, and going off what Sangeetha responded with earlier. 
I am definitely missing the CSP packages for XEN. I missed that in section 
8.2.7 of the install guideGuess it pays to be thorough when reading!

> From: gerard.ly...@bskyb.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Security Groups
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:43:08 +
> 
> It would be useful if you provided some more information about your setup
> - hypervisor type etc.
> 
> From the sounds of your question, your network is working (I.e. You can
> ping your VM), and this is specific to security groups.
> 
> 
> One check you can perform is to ssh onto the host you're running your VM
> on, and trace traffic through the iptables chains (while performing a ping
> to/from the VM), e.g.
> 
> iptables -Z && watch -n .5 iptables -nvL
> iptables -Z && watch -n .5 iptables -nvL BRIDGE-FIREWALL
> iptables -Z && watch -n .5 iptables -nvL i-2-8-def
> 
> 
> On XenServer, security groups requires using Linux Bridge instead of Open
> vSwitch.  
> 
> /opt/xensource/bin/xe-switch-network-backend bridge
> 
> By default XenServer (6.x) disables iptable/arptable checking over bridges
> - you'll need to ensure those are enabled.
> # Disable *tables rules for bridge traffic to increase performance
> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1
> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 1
> 
> 
> I believe the functionality provided by CSP (iptables/ebtables handling
> etc) was included in XenServer 6.1
> 
> Hope that helps
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/09/2013 14:26, "Michael Phillips"  wrote:
> 
> >That's what I thought. In that case, what are some things I can look at
> >to troubleshoot because that process is not working for me.
> >
> >> From: jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
> >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Security Groups
> >> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:41:49 +
> >> 
> >> You are right.
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jayapal
> >> 
> >> On 12-Sep-2013, at 11:45 AM, Michael Phillips 
> >>wrote:
> >> 
> >> > So If I have created a zone with the
> >>"DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService" network offerring. Created a
> >>VM using the default security group, which has 0 ingress rules, I should
> >>NOT be able to do things like PING that VM correct? 
> >>
> >> 
> >   
> 
> 
> Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, 
> confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views 
> expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the 
> originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by 
> return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, 
> distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please 
> note we reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communication through our 
> internal and external networks. SKY and the SKY marks are trademarks of 
> British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Sky International AG and are used 
> under licence. British Sky Broadcasting Limited (Registration No. 2906991), 
> Sky-In-Home Service Limited (Registration No. 2067075) and Sky Subscribers 
> Services Limited (Registration No. 2340150) are direct or indirect 
> subsidiaries of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (Registration No. 
> 2247735). All of the companies mentioned in this paragraph are incorporated 
> in England and Wales and share the same registered office at Grant Way, 
> Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD.
> 
> 
  

CS Mgmt Server can't connect to virtual router by management network

[caowei]

In cloudstack 4.0.1 with vmware vsphere 5 as the hypervisor,  I  create a 
shared network use default shared network offering. 

when I  create a vm in this shared network , the vrouter be created at first, 
and the vrouter will be assigned 2 IP address . The firtst is in the VLAN A 
which is for guest network, and the second is in the VLAN B which is for the 
management network( locallink network) , and  my CS management server is in the 
VLAN C. Then I find that the mgmt server cannot communicate with the vrouter by 
the management network. The vrouter is in a starting status and the VM cannot 
be created.

Then I login  the vrouter and I find that the default gateway is set the VLAN 
A's gateway,  and the VLAN B's IP address not have a gateway. So my mgmt server 
can't connect to the vrouter.

So what can I do to let my mgmt server connect to the vrouter?

Post instalaltion script for virtual routers

[Dean Kamali]

Hello everyone

Just wondering if it is possible to add a simple Perl or Bash script to run
after virtual routers get deployed ??

Maybe download a php page to show performance graphs? something like that
:)

Dean

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

No, but I will try!
On Sep 12, 2013 6:03 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" 
wrote:

> have you tried to mark it as shared on the hypervisor?
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>
> > No. In CS this storage marked as local.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> >
> > > is you local storage at the hypvervisor host marked as shared?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > >
> > > > Of course!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > >
> > > > > did you restart the CS?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > > >
> > > > > > "system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am not using local storage,
> > > > > > > Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
> > > > > > > system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In your global settings, what do you have
> > > > > "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> > > > > > > > set to?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Travis
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > > > > > > > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have
> > to
> > > > > enable
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by
> > > default.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> 1) Nfs on management.
> > > > > > > > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > > > > > > > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner  >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom <
> > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a
> > > suitable
> > > > > > > storage
> > > > > > > > >>> pool
> > > > > > > >  so take a closer look at your storage
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  Regards
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  Geoff Higginbottom
> > > > > > > >  CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603
> > > 0540
> > > > >  > > > > > > >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > > > > > > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London,
> > WC2N
> > > > 4HS
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin" <
> > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >  > > > > > > >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  Sure. That's all i captured now.
> > > http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
> > > > >  > > > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  could you post a little more of the log?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still
> don't
> > > > > > understand
> > > > > > > > >> why?
> > > > > > > >  This is log of management-server.log
> > > > > http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > > > > > >  Thanks!
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > > > > > >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >  In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > > > > > >  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i
> > added
> > > > > > vmware
> > > > > > > >  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Rafael Weingartner]

have you tried to mark it as shared on the hypervisor?


2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 

> No. In CS this storage marked as local.
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>
> > is you local storage at the hypvervisor host marked as shared?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> >
> > > Of course!
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > >
> > > > did you restart the CS?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > >
> > > > > "system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am not using local storage,
> > > > > > Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
> > > > > > system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In your global settings, what do you have
> > > > "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> > > > > > > set to?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Travis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > > > > > > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have
> to
> > > > enable
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by
> > default.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> 1) Nfs on management.
> > > > > > > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > > > > > > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom <
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > >
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a
> > suitable
> > > > > > storage
> > > > > > > >>> pool
> > > > > > >  so take a closer look at your storage
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  Regards
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  Geoff Higginbottom
> > > > > > >  CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603
> > 0540
> > > >  > > > > > >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > > > > > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London,
> WC2N
> > > 4HS
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin" <
> > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > >  > > > > > >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  Sure. That's all i captured now.
> > http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > >  > > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  could you post a little more of the log?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't
> > > > > understand
> > > > > > > >> why?
> > > > > > >  This is log of management-server.log
> > > > http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > > > > >  Thanks!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > > > > >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > > > > >  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i
> added
> > > > > vmware
> > > > > > >  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > > > > > >  Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded
> and
> > > have
> > > > > > >  status
> > > > > > >  "Ready".
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > >  > > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >  have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the
> > > > router?
> > > > > > > >>>

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

No. In CS this storage marked as local.


2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 

> is you local storage at the hypvervisor host marked as shared?
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>
> > Of course!
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> >
> > > did you restart the CS?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > >
> > > > "system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > >
> > > > > I am not using local storage,
> > > > > Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
> > > > > system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In your global settings, what do you have
> > > "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> > > > > > set to?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Travis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > > > > > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to
> > > enable
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by
> default.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> 1) Nfs on management.
> > > > > > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > > > > > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > >
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a
> suitable
> > > > > storage
> > > > > > >>> pool
> > > > > >  so take a closer look at your storage
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Regards
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Geoff Higginbottom
> > > > > >  CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603
> 0540
> > >  > > > > >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > > > > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > > > > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N
> > 4HS
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin" <
> nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > >  > > > > >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Sure. That's all i captured now.
> http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > >  > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  could you post a little more of the log?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't
> > > > understand
> > > > > > >> why?
> > > > > >  This is log of management-server.log
> > > http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > > > >  Thanks!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > > > >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > > > >  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added
> > > > vmware
> > > > > >  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > > > > >  Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and
> > have
> > > > > >  status
> > > > > >  "Ready".
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > >  > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the
> > > router?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > >  > > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  the system VMs started normally?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Rafael Weingartner]

is you local storage at the hypvervisor host marked as shared?


2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 

> Of course!
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>
> > did you restart the CS?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> >
> > > "system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > >
> > > > I am not using local storage,
> > > > Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
> > > > system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
> > > >
> > > > > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
> > > > >
> > > > > In your global settings, what do you have
> > "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> > > > > set to?
> > > > >
> > > > > Travis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > > > > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to
> > enable
> > > > > this
> > > > > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> 1) Nfs on management.
> > > > > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > > > > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom  >
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable
> > > > storage
> > > > > >>> pool
> > > > >  so take a closer look at your storage
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Regards
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Geoff Higginbottom
> > > > >  CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > > > 
> > > > >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> >  > > > >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > > > 
> > > > >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > > > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > > > 
> > > > >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N
> 4HS
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"  > > >  > > > >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  could you post a little more of the log?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't
> > > understand
> > > > > >> why?
> > > > >  This is log of management-server.log
> > http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > > >  Thanks!
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > > >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > > >  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added
> > > vmware
> > > > >  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > > > >  Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and
> have
> > > > >  status
> > > > >  "Ready".
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the
> > router?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  the system VMs started normally?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  In vmware logs - nothing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  > > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

Of course!


2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 

> did you restart the CS?
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>
> > "system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> >
> > > I am not using local storage,
> > > Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
> > > system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
> > >
> > > > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
> > > >
> > > > In your global settings, what do you have
> "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> > > > set to?
> > > >
> > > > Travis
> > > >
> > > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > > > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to
> enable
> > > > this
> > > > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > > >
> > > > >> 1) Nfs on management.
> > > > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > > > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
> > > > >>>
> > > >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable
> > > storage
> > > > >>> pool
> > > >  so take a closer look at your storage
> > > > 
> > > >  Regards
> > > > 
> > > >  Geoff Higginbottom
> > > >  CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > > 
> > > >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540
>  > > >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > > 
> > > >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > > 
> > > >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"  > >  > > >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >  Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > 
> > > >  could you post a little more of the log?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't
> > understand
> > > > >> why?
> > > >  This is log of management-server.log
> http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > >  Thanks!
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com >>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > >  In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > >  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added
> > vmware
> > > >  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > > >  Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> > > >  status
> > > >  "Ready".
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > 
> > > >  have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the
> router?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > >  System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > 
> > > >  the system VMs started normally?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > >  In vmware logs - nothing.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   > > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > 
> > > >  could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > >  Dear all!
> > > > 
> > > >  In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> > > >  router,
> > > >  can't
> > > >  understand why?
> > > > 
> > > >  This is log of management-server
> > > >  http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> > > > 
> > > >  Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> > > > 
> > > >  CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu<
> > > http://cloudstack.apt-ge

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Rafael Weingartner]

did you restart the CS?


2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 

> "system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.
>
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>
> > I am not using local storage,
> > Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
> > system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
> >
> > > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
> > >
> > > In your global settings, what do you have "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> > > set to?
> > >
> > > Travis
> > >
> > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable
> > > this
> > > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > > >
> > > >> 1) Nfs on management.
> > > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > > >>
> > > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
> > > >>>
> > >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable
> > storage
> > > >>> pool
> > >  so take a closer look at your storage
> > > 
> > >  Regards
> > > 
> > >  Geoff Higginbottom
> > >  CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > 
> > >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 > >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > 
> > >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > 
> > >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"  >  > >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > 
> > >  could you post a little more of the log?
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > 
> > >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't
> understand
> > > >> why?
> > >  This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > >  Thanks!
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > 
> > >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > >  wrote:
> > > 
> > >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > 
> > >  In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > >  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added
> vmware
> > >  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > >  Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> > >  status
> > >  "Ready".
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > 
> > >  have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > 
> > >  System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > 
> > >  the system VMs started normally?
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > 
> > >  In vmware logs - nothing.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > 
> > >  could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  > nrg3...@gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > 
> > >  Dear all!
> > > 
> > >  In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> > >  router,
> > >  can't
> > >  understand why?
> > > 
> > >  This is log of management-server
> > >  http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> > > 
> > >  Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> > > 
> > >  CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu<
> > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu>
> > >  (rpm)
> > > 
> > >  Thanks!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  --
> > >  Rafael Weingartner
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  --
> > >  Rafael Weingartner
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  --
> > >  Rafael Weingartner
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

"system.vm.use.local.storage" is already set to true.



2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 

> I am not using local storage,
> Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
> system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.
>
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Travis Graham 
>
> > Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
> >
> > In your global settings, what do you have "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> > set to?
> >
> > Travis
> >
> > On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable
> > this
> > > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> > >
> > >> 1) Nfs on management.
> > >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > >>
> > >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
> > >>>
> >  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable
> storage
> > >>> pool
> >  so take a closer look at your storage
> > 
> >  Regards
> > 
> >  Geoff Higginbottom
> >  CTO / Cloud Architect
> > 
> >  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 >  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > 
> >  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > 
> >  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > 
> > 
> >  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> > 
> > 
> >  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"   >  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > 
> >  Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > 
> >  could you post a little more of the log?
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > 
> >  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand
> > >> why?
> >  This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> >  Thanks!
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > 
> >  It's good question! No, but I will try...
> >  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> >  wrote:
> > 
> >  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > 
> >  In kvm cluster i already have router.
> >  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> >  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> >  Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> >  status
> >  "Ready".
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > 
> >  have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > 
> >  System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > 
> >  the system VMs started normally?
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > 
> >  In vmware logs - nothing.
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  >  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > 
> >  could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > 
> > 
> >  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > 
> >  Dear all!
> > 
> >  In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> >  router,
> >  can't
> >  understand why?
> > 
> >  This is log of management-server
> >  http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> > 
> >  Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> > 
> >  CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu<
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu>
> >  (rpm)
> > 
> >  Thanks!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  Rafael Weingartner
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  Rafael Weingartner
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  Rafael Weingartner
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  Rafael Weingartner
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  --
> >  Rafael Weingartner
> > 
> >  This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > >> intended
> >  solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> > views
> > >>> or
> >  opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> > >> necessarily
> >  represent those o

RE: Security Groups

[Michael Phillips]

That's what I thought. In that case, what are some things I can look at to 
troubleshoot because that process is not working for me.

> From: jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Security Groups
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:41:49 +
> 
> You are right.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
> 
> On 12-Sep-2013, at 11:45 AM, Michael Phillips  wrote:
> 
> > So If I have created a zone with the 
> > "DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService" network offerring. Created a VM 
> > using the default security group, which has 0 ingress rules, I should NOT 
> > be able to do things like PING that VM correct? 
> >
> 
  

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Rafael Weingartner]

I am not using local storage,
Neither my disk offering storage type is local nor "
system.vm.use.local.storage" is set to true.



2013/9/12 Travis Graham 

> Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?
>
> In your global settings, what do you have "system.vm.use.local.storage"
> set to?
>
> Travis
>
> On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable
> this
> > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> >
> >> 1) Nfs on management.
> >> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> >> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> >>
> >>> How many primary storages do you have?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
> >>>
>  Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable storage
> >>> pool
>  so take a closer look at your storage
> 
>  Regards
> 
>  Geoff Higginbottom
>  CTO / Cloud Architect
> 
>  D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540  +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> 
>  geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com >> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> 
>  |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> >> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> 
> 
>  ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> 
> 
>  On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"   nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>  Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> 
>  could you post a little more of the log?
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> 
>  Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand
> >> why?
>  This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
>  Thanks!
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> 
>  It's good question! No, but I will try...
>  On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
>  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> 
>  have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> 
>  In kvm cluster i already have router.
>  First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
>  cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
>  Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
>  status
>  "Ready".
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> 
>  have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> 
>  System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> 
>  the system VMs started normally?
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> 
>  In vmware logs - nothing.
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner   rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> 
>  could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> 
> 
>  2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> 
>  Dear all!
> 
>  In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
>  router,
>  can't
>  understand why?
> 
>  This is log of management-server
>  http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> 
>  Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> 
>  CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu
>  (rpm)
> 
>  Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  Rafael Weingartner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  Rafael Weingartner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  Rafael Weingartner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  Rafael Weingartner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  Rafael Weingartner
> 
>  This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> >> intended
>  solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> views
> >>> or
>  opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> >> necessarily
>  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> >>> the
>  intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> >> based
>  upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> >>> sender
>  if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
> >> is a
>  company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
> >> is
>  operated under license from Sh

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

[Ron Wheeler]

It is not really off topic since these are identified as blocking JIRA 
issues for 4.2


Ron

On 12/09/2013 4:23 AM, Jörgen Maas wrote:

Since this thread is allready gone offtopic; what's the ETA for the 4.2
packages?
Thanks!


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Dean Kamali  wrote:


alright, I will tune in, and see if I can help with anything :)


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:


I have set up a GTM with Ron tomorrow 10 AM PST. Anyone else interested

is

welcome to join, GTM details are provided below



1.  Please join my meeting.
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/725491376

2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
  Or, call in using your telephone.

United States: +1 (224) 649-0001
United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2073

Access Code: 725-491-376
Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting

Meeting ID: 725-491-376

GoToMeeting(r)
Online Meetings Made Easy(r)

Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your
iPhone(r), iPad(r) or Android(r) device via the GoToMeeting app.


Thanks
Animesh


-Original Message-
From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:32 AM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth
round)

I would be happy to work with you on the issues that I raised and on

the

installation process in general.
I can set up a collaboration meeting if that suits you.

Ron


On 10/09/2013 7:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:

Ron

I am not too happy with the documentation side too and will put in

time in next 2-3 days to clear up whatever I can on documentation

before

the formal annoucement. This is a community effort and every help is
appreciated.


Animesh


-Original Message-
From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:56 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth
round)

I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing
longstanding documentation problems.
There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers
are not going to fix them.

The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation

docs.

It is makes the whole project look amateurish  when the installation
does not work.


Ron

On 10/09/2013 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:

The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes

indicated with a "*" next to their name:

+1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove
+Ewerlid
-1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller

I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution
repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks

The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is

available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for

4.2.1.

If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward
with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue
will be release noted.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618


Thanks
Animesh







--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Travis Graham]

Is your disk offering storage type marked as "local"?

In your global settings, what do you have "system.vm.use.local.storage" set to?

Travis

On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rafael Weingartner  
wrote:

> What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable this
> option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
> 
> 
> 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> 
>> 1) Nfs on management.
>> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
>> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>> 
>>> How many primary storages do you have?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
>>> 
 Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable storage
>>> pool
 so take a closer look at your storage
 
 Regards
 
 Geoff Higginbottom
 CTO / Cloud Architect
 
 D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540>>> +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
 
 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
 
 |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
>> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
 
 
 ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
 
 
 On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin" >>> nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 
 Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
 
 
 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner >>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
 
 could you post a little more of the log?
 
 
 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
 
 Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand
>> why?
 This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
 Thanks!
 
 
 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
 
 It's good question! No, but I will try...
 On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
 rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 
 have you tried to create a instance with this template?
 
 
 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
 
 In kvm cluster i already have router.
 First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
 cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
 Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
 status
 "Ready".
 
 
 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner >>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
 
 have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
 
 
 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
 
 System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
 
 
 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner >>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
 
 the system VMs started normally?
 
 
 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
 
 In vmware logs - nothing.
 
 
 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner >>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
 
 could you check the hypervisor logs ?
 
 
 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
 
 Dear all!
 
 In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
 router,
 can't
 understand why?
 
 This is log of management-server
 http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
 
 Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
 
 CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu
 (rpm)
 
 Thanks!
 
 
 
 
 --
 Rafael Weingartner
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Rafael Weingartner
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Rafael Weingartner
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Rafael Weingartner
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 Rafael Weingartner
 
 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
>>> or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>> necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
>>> the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
>> based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
>>> sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
>> is a
 company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
>> is
 operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
 trademark.
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Rafael Weingartner
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rafael Weingartner

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Rafael Weingartner]

looking at you log it seems there is something wrong with your storages
could just recheck the config and if they are correctly configure on the
hypervisor:

   1. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,098 DEBUG
   [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-6:job-143)
   Is localStorageAllocationNeeded? false
   2. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,098 DEBUG
   [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-6:job-143)
   Is storage pool shared? false
   3. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,098 DEBUG
   [storage.allocator.AbstractStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-6:job-143)
   StoragePool is not of correct type, skipping this pool
   4. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,098 DEBUG
   [storage.allocator.FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-6:job-143)
   FirstFitStoragePoolAllocator returning 0 suitable storage pools
   5. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,098 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
   (Job-Executor-6:job-143) No suitable pools found for volume:
   Vol[38|vm=27|ROOT] under cluster: 8
   6. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,098 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
   (Job-Executor-6:job-143) No suitable pools found
   7. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,098 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
   (Job-Executor-6:job-143) No suitable storagePools found under this Cluster:
   8
   8. 2013-09-12 12:09:57,101 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
   (Job-Executor-6:job-143) Cluster: 1 has HyperVisorType that does not match
   the VM, skipping this cluster



2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 

> My management server also is using as nfs server for primary/secondary
> storage.
> About local storage in the zone, is set to "Yes".
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>
> > What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> > If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable
> this
> > option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
> >
> > > 1) Nfs on management.
> > > 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > > 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> > >
> > > > How many primary storages do you have?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
> > > >
> > > > > Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable
> storage
> > > > pool
> > > > > so take a closer look at your storage
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Geoff Higginbottom
> > > > > CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > > >
> > > > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 > > > > +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > > >
> > > > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > > >
> > > > > |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > > https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"  >  > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > >
> > > > > could you post a little more of the log?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't
> understand
> > > why?
> > > > > This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > > > On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > > > First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> > > > > cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > > > > Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> > > > > status
> > > > > "Ready".
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > >
> > > > > have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > >
> > > > > the system VMs started normally?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > In vmware logs - nothing.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > > >
> > > > > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin  nrg3...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > 

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

On the vmware local storage was added "storage tag" and with this "storage
tag" was created disk offering. So when i try to create vm from tempate,
choose this disk offering and cs can't find suitable storage, why?


2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 

> My management server also is using as nfs server for primary/secondary
> storage.
> About local storage in the zone, is set to "Yes".
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>
>> What do you mean with NFS on management ?
>> If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable this
>> option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>>
>> > 1) Nfs on management.
>> > 2) Local datastore on vmware host
>> > 3) Local storage on kvm host.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>> >
>> > > How many primary storages do you have?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
>> > >
>> > > > Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable
>> storage
>> > > pool
>> > > > so take a closer look at your storage
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > >
>> > > > Geoff Higginbottom
>> > > > CTO / Cloud Architect
>> > > >
>> > > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540> > > > +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
>> > > >
>> > > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>> > > >
>> > > > |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
>> > https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin" > > > > > nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > could you post a little more of the log?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand
>> > why?
>> > > > This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > It's good question! No, but I will try...
>> > > > On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
>> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > have you tried to create a instance with this template?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > In kvm cluster i already have router.
>> > > > First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
>> > > > cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
>> > > > Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
>> > > > status
>> > > > "Ready".
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > the system VMs started normally?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > In vmware logs - nothing.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin > nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>> > > >
>> > > > Dear all!
>> > > >
>> > > > In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
>> > > > router,
>> > > > can't
>> > > > understand why?
>> > > >
>> > > > This is log of management-server
>> > > > http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
>> > > >
>> > > > Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
>> > > >
>> > > > CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu<
>> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu>
>> > > > (rpm)
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Rafael Weingartner
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Rafael Weingartner
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Rafael Weingartner
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Rafael Weingartner
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Rafael Weingartner
>> > > >
>> > > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> > intended
>> > > > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
>> views
>> > > or
>> > > > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>> > necessarily
>> > > > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are
>> not
>> > > the
>> > > > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
>> > based
>> > > > upon its contents, n

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

My management server also is using as nfs server for primary/secondary
storage.
About local storage in the zone, is set to "Yes".


2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 

> What do you mean with NFS on management ?
> If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable this
> option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 
>
> > 1) Nfs on management.
> > 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> > 3) Local storage on kvm host.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
> >
> > > How many primary storages do you have?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
> > >
> > > > Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable storage
> > > pool
> > > > so take a closer look at your storage
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Geoff Higginbottom
> > > > CTO / Cloud Architect
> > > >
> > > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 > > > +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > > >
> > > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > > >
> > > > |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> > https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"   > > > nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > >
> > > > could you post a little more of the log?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> > > >
> > > > Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand
> > why?
> > > > This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> > > >
> > > > It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > > On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> > > >
> > > > In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > > First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> > > > cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > > > Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> > > > status
> > > > "Ready".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > >
> > > > have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> > > >
> > > > System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > >
> > > > the system VMs started normally?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> > > >
> > > > In vmware logs - nothing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > > >
> > > > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com
> >>
> > > >
> > > > Dear all!
> > > >
> > > > In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> > > > router,
> > > > can't
> > > > understand why?
> > > >
> > > > This is log of management-server
> > > > http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> > > >
> > > > Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> > > >
> > > > CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu >
> > > > (rpm)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rafael Weingartner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rafael Weingartner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rafael Weingartner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rafael Weingartner
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rafael Weingartner
> > > >
> > > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > intended
> > > > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> views
> > > or
> > > > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> > necessarily
> > > > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are
> not
> > > the
> > > > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> > based
> > > > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> > > sender
> > > > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
> > is a
> > > > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
> > is
> > > > operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
> > > > trademark.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingartne

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

[Ron Wheeler]

See you there.

If anyone has issues to add to the JIRA for documentation, please add 
them now.


Ron


On 11/09/2013 9:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:

I have set up a GTM with Ron tomorrow 10 AM PST. Anyone else interested is 
welcome to join, GTM details are provided below



1.  Please join my meeting.
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/725491376

2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.  Or, 
call in using your telephone.

United States: +1 (224) 649-0001
United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2073

Access Code: 725-491-376
Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting

Meeting ID: 725-491-376

GoToMeeting(r)
Online Meetings Made Easy(r)

Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your iPhone(r), 
iPad(r) or Android(r) device via the GoToMeeting app.


Thanks
Animesh


-Original Message-
From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:32 AM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth
round)

I would be happy to work with you on the issues that I raised and on the
installation process in general.
I can set up a collaboration meeting if that suits you.

Ron


On 10/09/2013 7:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:

Ron

I am not too happy with the documentation side too and will put in

time in next 2-3 days to clear up whatever I can on documentation before
the formal annoucement. This is a community effort and every help is
appreciated.


Animesh


-Original Message-
From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:56 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth
round)

I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing
longstanding documentation problems.
There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers
are not going to fix them.

The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation docs.
It is makes the whole project look amateurish  when the installation
does not work.


Ron

On 10/09/2013 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:

The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes

indicated with a "*" next to their name:

+1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove
+Ewerlid
-1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller

I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution
repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks

The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is

available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for

4.2.1.

If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward
with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue
will be release noted.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618


Thanks
Animesh




--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Rafael Weingartner]

What do you mean with NFS on management ?
If you want to use local storage on the hypervisor you have to enable this
option on CS, if I am not wrong this options is false by default.


2013/9/12 Alexey Samarin 

> 1) Nfs on management.
> 2) Local datastore on vmware host
> 3) Local storage on kvm host.
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 
>
> > How many primary storages do you have?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
> >
> > > Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable storage
> > pool
> > > so take a closer look at your storage
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Geoff Higginbottom
> > > CTO / Cloud Architect
> > >
> > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 > > +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> > >
> > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > >
> > > |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<
> https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"  > > nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > could you post a little more of the log?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand
> why?
> > > This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > > First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> > > cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > > Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> > > status
> > > "Ready".
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > the system VMs started normally?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > In vmware logs - nothing.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> > >
> > > Dear all!
> > >
> > > In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> > > router,
> > > can't
> > > understand why?
> > >
> > > This is log of management-server
> > > http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> > >
> > > Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> > >
> > > CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu
> > > (rpm)
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >
> > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended
> > > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> > or
> > > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily
> > > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> > the
> > > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> based
> > > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> > sender
> > > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
> is a
> > > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
> is
> > > operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
> > > trademark.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingartner
> >
>



-- 
Rafael Weingartner

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

1) Nfs on management.
2) Local datastore on vmware host
3) Local storage on kvm host.


2013/9/12 Rafael Weingartner 

> How many primary storages do you have?
>
>
> 2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 
>
> > Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable storage
> pool
> > so take a closer look at your storage
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> > CTO / Cloud Architect
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 > +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com >
> > |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue >
> >
> > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> >
> >
> > On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"  > nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > could you post a little more of the log?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand why?
> > This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> > cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> > status
> > "Ready".
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > the system VMs started normally?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > In vmware logs - nothing.
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > Dear all!
> >
> > In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> > router,
> > can't
> > understand why?
> >
> > This is log of management-server
> > http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> >
> > Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> >
> > CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu
> > (rpm)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingartner
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingartner
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingartner
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingartner
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingartner
> >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> or
> > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> sender
> > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
> > operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
> > trademark.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Rafael Weingartner]

How many primary storages do you have?


2013/9/12 Geoff Higginbottom 

> Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable storage pool
> so take a closer look at your storage
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 +442036030540>| M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
>
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
>
>
> On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin"  nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>
> could you post a little more of the log?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>
> Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand why?
> This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> Thanks!
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>
> It's good question! No, but I will try...
> On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> have you tried to create a instance with this template?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>
> In kvm cluster i already have router.
> First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> status
> "Ready".
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>
> have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>
> System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>
> the system VMs started normally?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>
> In vmware logs - nothing.
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner  rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>
>
> could you check the hypervisor logs ?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>
>
> Dear all!
>
> In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> router,
> can't
> understand why?
>
> This is log of management-server
> http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
>
> Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
>
> CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu
> (rpm)
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
> trademark.
>



-- 
Rafael Weingartner

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Looking at the logs you posted its failing to find a suitable storage pool so 
take a closer look at your storage

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 
0540| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com 
|www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS


On 12 Sep 2013, at 09:13, "Alexey Samarin" 
mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK


2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 
mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>

could you post a little more of the log?


2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>

Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand why?
This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
Thanks!


2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>

It's good question! No, but I will try...
On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
wrote:

have you tried to create a instance with this template?


2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>

In kvm cluster i already have router.
First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
status
"Ready".


2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 
mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>

have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?


2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>

System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)


2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 
mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>

the system VMs started normally?


2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>

In vmware logs - nothing.


2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 
mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>>

could you check the hypervisor logs ?


2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin mailto:nrg3...@gmail.com>>

Dear all!

In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
router,
can't
understand why?

This is log of management-server
http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w

Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)

CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu (rpm)

Thanks!




--
Rafael Weingartner





--
Rafael Weingartner





--
Rafael Weingartner





--
Rafael Weingartner






--
Rafael Weingartner

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

[Jörgen Maas]

Since this thread is allready gone offtopic; what's the ETA for the 4.2
packages?
Thanks!


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Dean Kamali  wrote:

> alright, I will tune in, and see if I can help with anything :)
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I have set up a GTM with Ron tomorrow 10 AM PST. Anyone else interested
> is
> > welcome to join, GTM details are provided below
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.  Please join my meeting.
> > https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/725491376
> >
> > 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
> >  Or, call in using your telephone.
> >
> > United States: +1 (224) 649-0001
> > United States (toll-free): 1 877 309 2073
> >
> > Access Code: 725-491-376
> > Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
> >
> > Meeting ID: 725-491-376
> >
> > GoToMeeting(r)
> > Online Meetings Made Easy(r)
> >
> > Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your
> > iPhone(r), iPad(r) or Android(r) device via the GoToMeeting app.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Animesh
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:32 AM
> > > To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > > Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth
> > > round)
> > >
> > > I would be happy to work with you on the issues that I raised and on
> the
> > > installation process in general.
> > > I can set up a collaboration meeting if that suits you.
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/09/2013 7:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > > > I am not too happy with the documentation side too and will put in
> > > time in next 2-3 days to clear up whatever I can on documentation
> before
> > > the formal annoucement. This is a community effort and every help is
> > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Animesh
> > > >
> > > >> -Original Message-
> > > >> From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
> > > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:56 PM
> > > >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth
> > > >> round)
> > > >>
> > > >> I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing
> > > >> longstanding documentation problems.
> > > >> There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers
> > > >> are not going to fix them.
> > > >>
> > > >> The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation
> docs.
> > > >> It is makes the whole project look amateurish  when the installation
> > > >> does not work.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Ron
> > > >>
> > > >> On 10/09/2013 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > > >>> The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes
> > > >> indicated with a "*" next to their name:
> > > >>> +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove
> > > >>> +Ewerlid
> > > >>> -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution
> > > >>> repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is
> > > >> available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for
> > > 4.2.1.
> > > >> If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward
> > > >> with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue
> > > >> will be release noted.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks
> > > >>> Animesh
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Ron Wheeler
> > > >> President
> > > >> Artifact Software Inc
> > > >> email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
> > > >> skype: ronaldmwheeler
> > > >> phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ron Wheeler
> > > President
> > > Artifact Software Inc
> > > email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
> > > skype: ronaldmwheeler
> > > phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
> >
> >
>



-- 
Grtz,
Jörgen Maas

Re: Vmware vrouter

[Alexey Samarin]

Sure. That's all i captured now. http://pastebin.com/GqzmZVhK


2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 

> could you post a little more of the log?
>
>
> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin 
>
> > Yes, this template can't be deploy as vm, but still don't understand why?
> > This is log of management-server.log http://pastebin.com/hqcHMBd0
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin 
> >
> > > It's good question! No, but I will try...
> > > On Sep 11, 2013 5:49 PM, "Rafael Weingartner" <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> have you tried to create a instance with this template?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin 
> > >>
> > >> > In kvm cluster i already have router.
> > >> > First was added kvm cluster and works perfectly. Now i added vmware
> > >> > cluster, but in vmware router can't start.
> > >> > Default template for vmware was successfully downloaded and have
> > status
> > >> > "Ready".
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 
> > >> >
> > >> > > have you tried to remove the VMware cluster and start the router?
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin 
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > System VMs already started in KVM cluster :)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > the system VMs started normally?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin 
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > In vmware logs - nothing.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > 2013/9/11 Rafael Weingartner 
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > could you check the hypervisor logs ?
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > 2013/9/11 Alexey Samarin 
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Dear all!
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > In my cs 4.1.1 with vmware cluster. Can't start virtual
> > >> router,
> > >> > > > can't
> > >> > > > > > > > understand why?
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > This is log of management-server
> > >> http://pastebin.com/pbN0qG9w
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Please, if anyone have any idea - write me :)
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > CS 4.1.1 got from cloudstack.apt-get.eu (rpm)
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --
> > >> > > > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Rafael Weingartner
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Rafael Weingartner
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingartner
>