实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
没有正常删除主机（直接把主机格式化重做系统，后在管理端删除的主机和实例），导致实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval都已经改成了600，其他实例都可以正常删除。 应该怎么做，直接到数据库里操作吗？
Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
有什么错误提示吗？ 直接改也问题不大 在 2013年11月19日上午9:02，王磊 wang...@smartdot.com写道： 没有正常删除主机（直接把主机格式化重做系统，后在管理端删除的主机和实例），导致实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval都已经改成了600，其他实例都可以正常删除。 应该怎么做，直接到数据库里操作吗？
回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
没有错误提示，页面显示删除成功，但就是无法彻底删除，一直在Expunging，从实例点进去也一直在灰色页面转圈圈没有任何显示 实例对应的ip已经释放 实例对应的存储也无法删除 发件人：Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:04 主题：Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 有什么错误提示吗？ 直接改也问题不大 在 2013年11月19日上午9:02，王磊 wang...@smartdot.com写道： 没有正常删除主机（直接把主机格式化重做系统，后在管理端删除的主机和实例），导致实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval都已经改成了600，其他实例都可以正常删除。 应该怎么做，直接到数据库里操作吗？
Re: cloud-agent 启动不了
登陆CS的web，添加区域，在分配流量的时候，配置各种流量的流量标签
agent就是找这个标签名字
2013/11/19 Liu,Lin liulin0...@ufl.edu
请问一下。
我在host上装了agent，但是start不了，看了agent 的log。如下：2013-11-18 21:12:27,915{GMT}
INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:) Agent started
2013-11-18 21:12:27,916{GMT} INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:)
Implementation Version is 4.2.0
2013-11-18 21:12:27,917{GMT} INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:)
agent.properties found at /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
2013-11-18 21:12:27,918{GMT} INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:)
Defaulting to using properties file for storage
2013-11-18 21:12:27,919{GMT} INFO [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:)
Defaulting to the constant time backoff algorithm
2013-11-18 21:12:27,921{GMT} INFO [cloud.utils.LogUtils] (main:) log4j
configuration found at /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml
2013-11-18 21:12:27,980{GMT} INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:) id is
2013-11-18 21:12:27,982{GMT} WARN [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase]
(main:) Nics are not specified in properties file/db, will try to
autodiscover
2013-11-18 21:12:27,986{GMT} INFO [cloud.resource.ServerResourceBase]
(main:) Designating private to be nic br0
2013-11-18 21:12:27,993{GMT} INFO
[resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(main:) VirtualRoutingResource _scriptDir to use: scripts/network/domr/kvm
2013-11-18 21:12:28,139{GMT} ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:) Unable
to start agent: Failed to get private nic name
Unable to start agent: Failed to get private nic name
请问，我怎么让其找到private nic name？
十分感谢。
无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机
Hi, Cloudstack4.2貌似有一个bug，就是可以添加CPU频率等于2GHZ的双核的compute offering,但就是无法用这个compute offering启动虚拟机。但事实上我宿主机的CPU主频远远大于2GHZ。大家有时间的话帮我看看我的log吧，虽然说有点长，但描述了创建虚拟机的全过程，其中我觉得可疑的cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0已经红色标记了，有没有人知道原因的帮我解释一下，谢谢啦！：） 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,706 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,708 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,711 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=4400Mhz, Ram=2048 2013-11-19 17:22:32,718 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 3 has enough capacity for requested CPU: 4400 and requested RAM: 2147483648 , cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0 2013-11-19 17:22:32,720 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Hosts's actual total CPU: 64000 and CPU after applying overprovisioning: 64000 2013-11-19 17:22:32,720 DEBUG
??????????????CPU????????2GHZ????????
?? 2G2G??2??4G??3??6G??requested cpu:4400Host cpuFreqGood:false??VM??44002000\(^o^)/~ -- -- ??: Du Jun; : 2013??11??19??(??) 5:36 ??: users-cn; : CPU2GHZ Hi, Cloudstack4.2??bug??CPU2GHZcompute offering,compute offering??CPU2GHZlog??cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,706 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,708 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,711 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=4400Mhz, Ram=2048 2013-11-19 17:22:32,718
Fail to start vm with cpu clouk larger than 2GHZ
Hi all, I meet a problem in cloudstack4.2 that I am unbale to start vm with cpu clock larger than 2GHZ per core while My host's CPU clock is about 64GHZ.The strange thing is that I cant start a VM which have two cores and each core 1.5HZ.My log is pasted below,it's a bit long and I have colored the suspicious line like cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0.Can anyone help me explain this scene and provide me with some suggestions?Thank you in advance! 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,706 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,708 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,711 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=4400Mhz, Ram=2048 2013-11-19 17:22:32,718 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Checking if host: 3 has enough capacity for requested CPU: 4400 and requested RAM: 2147483648 , cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0 2013-11-19 17:22:32,720 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
Re: 回复：无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机
Looking for speed=4400Mhz, Ram=2048 你看看数据库里面host表的speed是多少？ 2013/11/19 Xuan Luo 465296...@qq.com 你好！ 我也遇到过这个问题。我发现如果服务器（物理机）的单个核是2G，那就只能做2G的倍数的服务方案，例如2核总共就是4G，3核就是6G。所以你做requested cpu:4400就会找不到合适的Host，找的时候会出现 cpuFreqGood:false，VM也无法启动。把4400改成2000的倍数试试看\(^o^)/~ -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Du Jun; 发送时间: 2013年11月19日(星期二) 下午5:36 收件人: users-cn; 主题: 无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机 Hi, Cloudstack4.2貌似有一个bug，就是可以添加CPU频率等于2GHZ的双核的compute offering,但就是无法用这个compute offering启动虚拟机。但事实上我宿主机的CPU主频远远大于2GHZ。大家有时间的话帮我看看我的log吧，虽然说有点长，但描述了创建虚拟机的全过程，其中我觉得可疑的cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0已经红色标记了，有没有人知道原因的帮我解释一下，谢谢啦！：） 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,706 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,708 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,711 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=4400Mhz, Ram=2048 2013-11-19 17:22:32,718 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [
Re: 回复：无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机
Hi Luo， 你的意思是你可以启动每个核为2GHZ，但核数为n(n=2)的虚拟机？请问你用的cloudstack是什么版本？谢谢！ -- Best regards, DuJun 2013/11/19 Xuan Luo 465296...@qq.com 你好！ 我也遇到过这个问题。我发现如果服务器（物理机）的单个核是2G，那就只能做2G的倍数的服务方案，例如2核总共就是4G，3核就是6G。所以你做requested cpu:4400就会找不到合适的Host，找的时候会出现 cpuFreqGood:false，VM也无法启动。把4400改成2000的倍数试试看\(^o^)/~ -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Du Jun; 发送时间: 2013年11月19日(星期二) 下午5:36 收件人: users-cn; 主题: 无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机 Hi, Cloudstack4.2貌似有一个bug，就是可以添加CPU频率等于2GHZ的双核的compute offering,但就是无法用这个compute offering启动虚拟机。但事实上我宿主机的CPU主频远远大于2GHZ。大家有时间的话帮我看看我的log吧，虽然说有点长，但描述了创建虚拟机的全过程，其中我觉得可疑的cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0已经红色标记了，有没有人知道原因的帮我解释一下，谢谢啦！：） 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,706 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,708 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,711 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=4400Mhz, Ram=2048 2013-11-19 17:22:32,718 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
Re: 回复：无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机
是这样的。cloudstack里面有判断。其实看看代码就都清楚了。 2013/11/19 Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com 经你们提醒，好像这个问题是解释得通的，就是虚拟机CPU每个核的主频必须小于物理机单核的主频。谢谢！恍然大悟！ 2013/11/19 Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com Hi Luo， 你的意思是你可以启动每个核为2GHZ，但核数为n(n=2)的虚拟机？请问你用的cloudstack是什么版本？谢谢！ -- Best regards, DuJun 2013/11/19 Xuan Luo 465296...@qq.com 你好！ 我也遇到过这个问题。我发现如果服务器（物理机）的单个核是2G，那就只能做2G的倍数的服务方案，例如2核总共就是4G，3核就是6G。所以你做requested cpu:4400就会找不到合适的Host，找的时候会出现 cpuFreqGood:false，VM也无法启动。把4400改成2000的倍数试试看\(^o^)/~ -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Du Jun; 发送时间: 2013年11月19日(星期二) 下午5:36 收件人: users-cn; 主题: 无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机 Hi, Cloudstack4.2貌似有一个bug，就是可以添加CPU频率等于2GHZ的双核的compute offering,但就是无法用这个compute offering启动虚拟机。但事实上我宿主机的CPU主频远远大于2GHZ。大家有时间的话帮我看看我的log吧，虽然说有点长，但描述了创建虚拟机的全过程，其中我觉得可疑的cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0已经红色标记了，有没有人知道原因的帮我解释一下，谢谢啦！：） 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,706 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,708 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,711 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-3-Routing]] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,713 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 1 hosts for allocation after
Re: 回复：无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机
Hi ZHOU, 哦？你还看过代码？分享下你看代码的经验吧。刚接触cloudstack，想深入学习下源码但一直不知道从哪里入手。谢谢啦！ Best regards, DuJun 2013/11/19 Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com 是这样的。cloudstack里面有判断。其实看看代码就都清楚了。 2013/11/19 Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com 经你们提醒，好像这个问题是解释得通的，就是虚拟机CPU每个核的主频必须小于物理机单核的主频。谢谢！恍然大悟！ 2013/11/19 Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com Hi Luo， 你的意思是你可以启动每个核为2GHZ，但核数为n(n=2)的虚拟机？请问你用的cloudstack是什么版本？谢谢！ -- Best regards, DuJun 2013/11/19 Xuan Luo 465296...@qq.com 你好！ 我也遇到过这个问题。我发现如果服务器（物理机）的单个核是2G，那就只能做2G的倍数的服务方案，例如2核总共就是4G，3核就是6G。所以你做requested cpu:4400就会找不到合适的Host，找的时候会出现 cpuFreqGood:false，VM也无法启动。把4400改成2000的倍数试试看\(^o^)/~ -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Du Jun; 发送时间: 2013年11月19日(星期二) 下午5:36 收件人: users-cn; 主题: 无法添加CPU频率大于2GHZ的虚拟机 Hi, Cloudstack4.2貌似有一个bug，就是可以添加CPU频率等于2GHZ的双核的compute offering,但就是无法用这个compute offering启动虚拟机。但事实上我宿主机的CPU主频远远大于2GHZ。大家有时间的话帮我看看我的log吧，虽然说有点长，但描述了创建虚拟机的全过程，其中我觉得可疑的cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0已经红色标记了，有没有人知道原因的帮我解释一下，谢谢啦！：） 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,706 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,708 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,711 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to
Re: 模板上传报错
DOWNLOAD_ERROR
我觉得是模版的问题
2013/11/19 Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
做的模板有问题吧？
2013/11/19 wanghaicheng2...@gmail.com wanghaicheng2...@gmail.com
XenServer6.0.2 + CS 3.0.5
上传WinXP 模板 上传能够成功，但是在进行模板install过程时报错，不论上传模板选择的是sp2或sp3都是这样
2013-11-19 17:42:13,276 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-15:null)
Seq 4-730989509: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 233845175752474, via: 4, Ver:
v1,
Flags: 100011,
[{storage.DownloadProgressCommand:{jobId:ba658b68-1af4-4a01-93e4-f1625671ccee,request:GET_STATUS,hvm:true,description:from
xenserver
32,maxDownloadSizeInBytes:53687091200,id:211,resourceType:TEMPLATE,url:
http://10.30.18.2/From-Xen-32.vhd
,format:VHD,accountId:2,name:211-2-e8223f0c-d942-3fe5-bbeb-c2253345947a,secUrl:nfs://
10.30.18.4/export/secondary1,wait:0}}] }
2013-11-19 17:42:13,322 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-730989509: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 233845175752474, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{storage.DownloadAnswer:{jobId:ba658b68-1af4-4a01-93e4-f1625671ccee,downloadPct:100,errorString:Failed
post download script: vhd check of
/mnt/SecStorage/d8852827-dc7e-3121-a7ac-faa842b1bd7b/template/tmpl/2/211/dnld391686155794118139tmp_
failed,downloadStatus:DOWNLOAD_ERROR,downloadPath:/mnt/SecStorage/d8852827-dc7e-3121-a7ac-faa842b1bd7b/template/tmpl/2/211/dnld391686155794118139tmp_,installPath:template/tmpl//2/211//665ba4c8-2cd8-37cc-805f-492c8d81f7e7.vhd,templateSize:0,templatePhySicalSize:0,checkSum:4b58c66065c6e62297fd829db537bb7d,result:false,details:Failed
post download script: vhd check of
/mnt/SecStorage/d8852827-dc7e-3121-a7ac-faa842b1bd7b/template/tmpl/2/211/dnld391686155794118139tmp_
failed,wait:0}}] }
wanghaicheng2...@gmail.com
回复: Re: 模板上传报错
我是在数据库中执行：
mysql select uuid,name,path,folder from volumes \G;
返回：其中需要的根卷名称为ROOT-24
| ea45ede1-f239-41a8-bd02-17c0b302a26d | 77541af8-b9f7-43cc-9795-f37417e94254 |
/export/primary1 | ROOT-24 | 26843545600
在住存储中找到77541af8-b9f7-43cc-9795-f37417e94254 .vhd（虚拟机）文件，并进行下载
将其作为模板上传到CS中，出现之前的报错
请问大家，这个操作的思路或流程正确么？
wanghaicheng2...@gmail.com
发件人： Du Jun
发送时间： 2013-11-19 18:36
收件人： users-cn
主题： Re: 模板上传报错
DOWNLOAD_ERROR
我觉得是模版的问题
2013/11/19 Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
做的模板有问题吧？
2013/11/19 wanghaicheng2...@gmail.com wanghaicheng2...@gmail.com
XenServer6.0.2 + CS 3.0.5
上传WinXP 模板 上传能够成功，但是在进行模板install过程时报错，不论上传模板选择的是sp2或sp3都是这样
2013-11-19 17:42:13,276 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Timer-15:null)
Seq 4-730989509: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 233845175752474, via: 4, Ver:
v1,
Flags: 100011,
[{storage.DownloadProgressCommand:{jobId:ba658b68-1af4-4a01-93e4-f1625671ccee,request:GET_STATUS,hvm:true,description:from
xenserver
32,maxDownloadSizeInBytes:53687091200,id:211,resourceType:TEMPLATE,url:
http://10.30.18.2/From-Xen-32.vhd
,format:VHD,accountId:2,name:211-2-e8223f0c-d942-3fe5-bbeb-c2253345947a,secUrl:nfs://
10.30.18.4/export/secondary1,wait:0}}] }
2013-11-19 17:42:13,322 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-12:null) Seq 4-730989509: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 233845175752474, via: 4, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{storage.DownloadAnswer:{jobId:ba658b68-1af4-4a01-93e4-f1625671ccee,downloadPct:100,errorString:Failed
post download script: vhd check of
/mnt/SecStorage/d8852827-dc7e-3121-a7ac-faa842b1bd7b/template/tmpl/2/211/dnld391686155794118139tmp_
failed,downloadStatus:DOWNLOAD_ERROR,downloadPath:/mnt/SecStorage/d8852827-dc7e-3121-a7ac-faa842b1bd7b/template/tmpl/2/211/dnld391686155794118139tmp_,installPath:template/tmpl//2/211//665ba4c8-2cd8-37cc-805f-492c8d81f7e7.vhd,templateSize:0,templatePhySicalSize:0,checkSum:4b58c66065c6e62297fd829db537bb7d,result:false,details:Failed
post download script: vhd check of
/mnt/SecStorage/d8852827-dc7e-3121-a7ac-faa842b1bd7b/template/tmpl/2/211/dnld391686155794118139tmp_
failed,wait:0}}] }
wanghaicheng2...@gmail.com
?????? ??????????????CPU????????2GHZ????????
?? -- -- ??: Du Jun; : 2013??11??19??(??) 6:04 ??: users-cn; : Re: ??CPU2GHZ Hi ZHOU, cloudstack?? Best regards, DuJun 2013/11/19 Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com ??cloudstack 2013/11/19 Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com CPU?? 2013/11/19 Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com Hi Luo?? 2GHZ??n(n=2)cloudstack?? -- Best regards, DuJun 2013/11/19 Xuan Luo 465296...@qq.com ?? 2G2G??2??4G??3??6G??requested cpu:4400Host cpuFreqGood:false??VM??44002000\(^o^)/~ -- -- ??: Du Jun; : 2013??11??19??(??) 5:36 ??: users-cn; : CPU2GHZ Hi, Cloudstack4.2??bug??CPU2GHZcompute offering,compute offering??CPU2GHZlog??cpuOverprovisioningFactor: 1.0 2013-11-19 17:22:32,651 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-2:null) ===END=== 10.10.15.18 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachinezoneId=de6081ca-0f25-44f0-aeec-81d0a844329etemplateId=f4a9b927-247c-429c-a0fe-e660c3f2dd23hypervisor=KVMserviceOfferingId=27287f8b-a488-4350-8b70-e57719f22b3bdiskOfferingId=43feaa9e-f7bd-4805-825a-d8527430ec02networkIds=6d4ca91d-cf83-4d71-9c3c-0b4df343b3bddisplayname=tfxt-222name=tfxt-222response=jsonsessionkey=kYuQ4zESaE%2FqGV%2Bjat8gMC4vI8Y%3D_=1384852954050 2013-11-19 17:22:32,655 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.ServiceOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,656 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.template.VirtualMachineTemplate 2013-11-19 17:22:32,659 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) ControlledEntity name is:com.cloud.network.Network 2013-11-19 17:22:32,661 DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) InfrastructureEntity name is:com.cloud.offering.DiskOffering 2013-11-19 17:22:32,678 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,681 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Service SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204 2013-11-19 17:22:32,695 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner_EnhancerByCloudStack_1ff4f9d9@303802fb 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 4400, requested ram: 2147483648 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2013-11-19 17:22:32,697 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,698 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1 2013-11-19 17:22:32,700 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-2:job-34 = [ 9b789b8d-055f-4077-a135-481d6d91b831 ]) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set:
Re: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
实际上你已经删除实例了，只是CS会将删除的实例保存一段时间。你可以在global settings里面搜索expuge关键字，设置expuge的时间，比如120。那么，过2分钟就会在UI上面移除虚拟机。 在 2013年11月19日下午4:23，toudsf 18600601...@163.com写道： 到数据库中，有一个表instance吧好像。把状态变为Stopped然后从画面进行删除。 2013-11-19 toudsf 发件人：王磊 wang...@smartdot.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:18 主题：回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 没有错误提示，页面显示删除成功，但就是无法彻底删除，一直在Expunging，从实例点进去也一直在灰色页面转圈圈没有任何显示 实例对应的ip已经释放 实例对应的存储也无法删除 发件人：Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:04 主题：Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 有什么错误提示吗？ 直接改也问题不大 在 2013年11月19日上午9:02，王磊 wang...@smartdot.com写道： 没有正常删除主机（直接把主机格式化重做系统，后在管理端删除的主机和实例），导致实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval都已经改成了600，其他实例都可以正常删除。 应该怎么做，直接到数据库里操作吗？
回复: 回复: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
update vm_instance set state = 'Stopped' where name = 'win2003-4'; 在数据库里执行了后命令后，页面上实例的状态确实改成Stopped了，但过了我设定的删除时间又变成Expunging了，并没有删除 2013-11-20 发件人：toudsf18600601...@163.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:23 主题：回复: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 到数据库中，有一个表instance吧好像。把状态变为Stopped然后从画面进行删除。 2013-11-19 toudsf 发件人：王磊 wang...@smartdot.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:18 主题：回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 没有错误提示，页面显示删除成功，但就是无法彻底删除，一直在Expunging，从实例点进去也一直在灰色页面转圈圈没有任何显示 实例对应的ip已经释放 实例对应的存储也无法删除 发件人：Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:04 主题：Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 有什么错误提示吗？ 直接改也问题不大 在 2013年11月19日上午9:02，王磊 wang...@smartdot.com写道： 没有正常删除主机（直接把主机格式化重做系统，后在管理端删除的主机和实例），导致实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval都已经改成了600，其他实例都可以正常删除。 应该怎么做，直接到数据库里操作吗？
回复: Re: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
expunge.delay和expunge.interval我已经全都改成600了 发件人：Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com 发送时间：2013-11-20 09:19 主题：Re: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 实际上你已经删除实例了，只是CS会将删除的实例保存一段时间。你可以在global settings里面搜索expuge关键字，设置expuge的时间，比如120。那么，过2分钟就会在UI上面移除虚拟机。 在 2013年11月19日下午4:23，toudsf 18600601...@163.com写道： 到数据库中，有一个表instance吧好像。把状态变为Stopped然后从画面进行删除。 2013-11-19 toudsf 发件人：王磊 wang...@smartdot.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:18 主题：回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 没有错误提示，页面显示删除成功，但就是无法彻底删除，一直在Expunging，从实例点进去也一直在灰色页面转圈圈没有任何显示 实例对应的ip已经释放 实例对应的存储也无法删除 发件人：Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:04 主题：Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 有什么错误提示吗？ 直接改也问题不大 在 2013年11月19日上午9:02，王磊 wang...@smartdot.com写道： 没有正常删除主机（直接把主机格式化重做系统，后在管理端删除的主机和实例），导致实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval都已经改成了600，其他实例都可以正常删除。 应该怎么做，直接到数据库里操作吗？
Re: 回复: Re: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
因为你先违规操作，先删除的主机，但你给的信息还不够，不够判断。 这个集群所有主机都删除了吗？还只是随意删除一台？ 但是数据卷不能删除，我感觉问题比较大，log里肯定有对应信息的。 刘宇超 Richard Liu 发件人： 王磊 发送时间： 2013-11-20 10:06:05 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： 回复: Re: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval我已经全都改成600了 发件人：Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com 发送时间：2013-11-20 09:19 主题：Re: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 实际上你已经删除实例了，只是CS会将删除的实例保存一段时间。你可以在global settings里面搜索expuge关键字，设置expuge的时间，比如120。那么，过2分钟就会在UI上面移除虚拟机。 在 2013年11月19日下午4:23，toudsf 18600601...@163.com写道： 到数据库中，有一个表instance吧好像。把状态变为Stopped然后从画面进行删除。 2013-11-19 toudsf 发件人：王磊 wang...@smartdot.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:18 主题：回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 没有错误提示，页面显示删除成功，但就是无法彻底删除，一直在Expunging，从实例点进去也一直在灰色页面转圈圈没有任何显示 实例对应的ip已经释放 实例对应的存储也无法删除 发件人：Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com 发送时间：2013-11-19 16:04 主题：Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 收件人：users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 抄送： 有什么错误提示吗？ 直接改也问题不大 在 2013年11月19日上午9:02，王磊 wang...@smartdot.com写道： 没有正常删除主机（直接把主机格式化重做系统，后在管理端删除的主机和实例），导致实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除 expunge.delay和expunge.interval都已经改成了600，其他实例都可以正常删除。 应该怎么做，直接到数据库里操作吗？
Re: cloudstack 部署 hyper-v的资料
暂不支持 刘宇超 Richard Liu 发件人： liy...@broada.com 发送时间： 2013-11-20 10:24:58 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： cloudstack 部署 hyper-v的资料 请问在哪里可以找到cloudstack部署hyper-v资料 liy...@broada.com
有没有人在4.0.2上装过win2012
看4.0.2的os清单上没有win2012的选项，有人在上面装过2012么？ 2013-11-20 陈珂 发件人： tanthalas 发送时间： 2013-11-20 10:34:27 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： Re: cloudstack 部署 hyper-v的资料 暂不支持 刘宇超 Richard Liu 发件人： liy...@broada.com 发送时间： 2013-11-20 10:24:58 收件人： users-cn 抄送： 主题： cloudstack 部署 hyper-v的资料 请问在哪里可以找到cloudstack部署hyper-v资料 liy...@broada.com
回复: Re: 回复: Re: 回复: Re: 实例一直是Expunging状态，无法删除
下面为日志，麻烦了 2013-11-20 11:03:38,338 INFO [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Found 6 vms to expunge. 2013-11-20 11:03:38,338 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Stopped called on VM[User|windows-2008-R2-X64] but the state is Expunging 2013-11-20 11:03:38,345 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) VM state transitted from :Expunging to Expunging with event: ExpungeOperationvm's original host id: 5 new host id: null host id before state transition: null 2013-11-20 11:03:38,345 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Destroying vm VM[User|windows-2008-R2-X64] 2013-11-20 11:03:38,345 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning up NICS 2013-11-20 11:03:38,345 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning network for vm: 50 2013-11-20 11:03:38,348 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning storage for vm: 50 2013-11-20 11:03:38,352 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 2 Name = cleanupVolumes; called by -Transaction.rollback:898-Transaction.removeUpTo:841-Transaction.close:665-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept:133-VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceExpunge:479-UserVmManagerImpl.expunge:1600-UserVmManagerImpl$ExpungeTask.run:1769-Executors$RunnableAdapter.call:471-FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset:351-FutureTask.runAndReset:178-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201:165 2013-11-20 11:03:38,352 WARN [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Unable to expunge VM[User|windows-2008-R2-X64] com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to locate datastore with id 3 at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.manager.PrimaryDataStoreProviderManagerImpl.getPrimaryDataStore(PrimaryDataStoreProviderManagerImpl.java:60) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.DataStoreManagerImpl.getDataStore(DataStoreManagerImpl.java:45) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeDataFactoryImpl.getVolume(VolumeDataFactoryImpl.java:89) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.destroyVolume(VolumeServiceImpl.java:581) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.cleanupVolumes(VolumeManagerImpl.java:2145) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceExpunge(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:479) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.expunge(UserVmManagerImpl.java:1600) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl$ExpungeTask.run(UserVmManagerImpl.java:1769) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701) 2013-11-20 11:03:38,353 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Stopped called on VM[User|win2008-1] but the state is Expunging 2013-11-20 11:03:38,365 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) VM state transitted from :Expunging to Expunging with event: ExpungeOperationvm's original host id: 7 new host id: null host id before state transition: null 2013-11-20 11:03:38,365 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Destroying vm VM[User|win2008-1] 2013-11-20 11:03:38,365 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning up NICS 2013-11-20 11:03:38,365 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning network for vm: 52 2013-11-20 11:03:38,368 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning storage for vm: 52 2013-11-20 11:03:38,371 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 2 Name = cleanupVolumes; called by
Re: System VMs problems
Yes, it should be Please take a trace to internet for example google and see which path is going Try to access your public network gw If something wrong then it should be network issue On switch wrong configuration vlan or access port Or on kvm box wrong interface selected for internet or vlan , access prt configuration is wrong VM On 18/11/13 23:53, Fariborz Navidan mdvlinqu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I could ssh into both system vms. However they can reach each other but cannot reach internet nor can be reached from internet via public ip. It means my network bridges are miss-configured. righ? On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.trwrote: I know that such command is available only for Xen but looks like its used for all Check this link , this guy install the kvm on ubuntu http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/cloudstack-single-server-on-ubuntu -w ith-kvm.html And Debugging System Vms section , its connected via link local ip ssh -i /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 root@169.254.1.74 You have to on right host where system vm server is running On 18/11/13 21:02, Fariborz Navidan mdvlinqu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. When I destroy VMs using virsh it creates them again but with the same status. I have downloaded system vm templates already. I think there is an issue with network bridges configuration. How do I get into VMs through virt-manager? It asks for password. On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Vahric Muhtaryan vah...@doruk.net.trwrote: Did you downloaded system vm templates and sure its in your nfs share ? Also i remember that installation guide there is a special config you have to do if nfs run on management. I¹m not faced such issue on my installation Regards VM On 18/11/13 19:38, Fariborz Navidan mdvlinqu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I have setup CloudStack in the way that management server is running on a VM on a KVM/QEMU host and used management server as NFS server as well. System VMS show running in both UI and through virsh command line. However they are not reachable and cannot open their console. I tried to get into their console via virt-manager but it asks for password. Also in the UI, agent status for system VMs is empty. (up is not displayed). I think I'm doing wrong with my networking setup. Please help me. TIA -- Fariborz Navidan Sales Technical Manager Shetab Rayan Limited. www.shetabrayan.com -- Fariborz Navidan Sales Technical Manager Shetab Rayan Limited. www.shetabrayan.com
Re: ISO problem after upgrade to 4.2
Hello, I try, but everything seems ok. If I go on System VM i see Console Proxy VM and Secondary Storage VM: both are Running, but agent state is Disconnect. Is this normal? On the SVMM the cloud service is up and can connect to MS... Any idea? Thanks Il 23/10/2013 18:11, Nitin Mehta ha scritto: Try step 1,2,3 @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Sec ondary+storage+troubleshooting On 23/10/13 6:56 AM, Paolo De Marco paolo.dema...@realcomm.it wrote: Hello, i've upgraded cloudstak from 4.0.2 to 4.2 using yum update. Everything seem working but i cannot upload ISO. In log i see No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint. Is it this error related to iso's problem? Any ideas? Thanks
Re: [SOLVED] ISO problem after upgrade to 4.2
I reboot VM from MS and now all seems ok... Il 19/11/2013 11:58, Paolo De Marco ha scritto: Hello, I try, but everything seems ok. If I go on System VM i see Console Proxy VM and Secondary Storage VM: both are Running, but agent state is Disconnect. Is this normal? On the SVMM the cloud service is up and can connect to MS... Any idea? Thanks Il 23/10/2013 18:11, Nitin Mehta ha scritto: Try step 1,2,3 @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Sec ondary+storage+troubleshooting On 23/10/13 6:56 AM, Paolo De Marco paolo.dema...@realcomm.it wrote: Hello, i've upgraded cloudstak from 4.0.2 to 4.2 using yum update. Everything seem working but i cannot upload ISO. In log i see No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint. Is it this error related to iso's problem? Any ideas? Thanks
Re: Guest VMs not able to acquire DHCP IP from Virtual Router unless Guest and VR are on the same KVM host
Good Morning David,
I'm not sure if you saw my reply from yesterday, but I'm now 99% sure the
problem is on our default router/dhcp server on 10.97.38.1. I think we did
everything we're supposed to to mitigate the normal issues you would expect
from having two competing DHCP servers on the same network. We went by your
instructions
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
Perhaps we implemented the filtering incorrectly? My bosses are getting
anxious with me and I don't have an answer for them yet.
Any further help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Adam Scarcella
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply.
I just did some more troubleshooting and I can definitely see using
dhcpdump on the VR that it only receives a DHCPREQUEST when the Guest VM
is on the same KVM Host. If I migrate the guest to any other KVM Host that
request never even makes it to the VR. I monitored the physical KVM host
running the VR, but it never registered the DHCPREQUEST regardless of where
the guest VM was running.
I even turned off the firewall on both KVM Hosts and still no DHCPREQUEST.
There actually is another physical DHCP server on the same network.
*10.97.38.1
Router DHCP*
However we (corporate IT Admin) have blocked off a range of IPs
{10.97.38.[110 -170]} from the 10.97.38.1 Router DHCP and filtered out
any DHCPREQUESTS made by a '06' MAC address per these instructions (written
by you I believe):
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
So that tells me that we probably did something wrong on the router and
it's got to be the 10.97.38.1 Router/Switch/DHCP server that's stopping
those requests from ever reaching the built in VR, but I have no visibility
into that unfortunately so I cannot continue to test. I need to be able to
give very precise instructions to my IT Admin on what to check.
Thoughts?
*dhcpdump from VR when Guest VM is on same KVM Host:*
root@r-21-VM:~# dhcpdump -i eth0
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:46.997
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 0
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet mask)
28 (Broadcast address)
2 (Time offset)
121 (Classless Static Route)
15 (Domainname)
6 (DNS server)
12 (Host name)
40 (NIS domain)
41 (NIS servers)
42 (NTP servers)
26 (Interface MTU)
119 (Domain Search)
3 (Routers)
121 (Classless Static Route)
249 (MSFT - Classless route)
42 (NTP servers)
---
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:53.998
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 7
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet mask)
28 (Broadcast address)
2 (Time offset)
121 (Classless Static Route)
15 (Domainname)
6 (DNS server)
12 (Host name)
40 (NIS domain)
41 (NIS servers)
Re: Guest VMs not able to acquire DHCP IP from Virtual Router unless Guest and VR are on the same KVM host
Since DHCP leases aren't something that immediately go away you could
temporarily stop DHCP services on your default router and see if that allows CS
instances to pull IPs correctly then enable your default DHCP server again once
you know more.
That would eliminate your default router from the possible causes list if
nothing changes or confirm it if things start working correctly in your CS
environment.
Travis
On Nov 19, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Good Morning David,
I'm not sure if you saw my reply from yesterday, but I'm now 99% sure the
problem is on our default router/dhcp server on 10.97.38.1. I think we did
everything we're supposed to to mitigate the normal issues you would expect
from having two competing DHCP servers on the same network. We went by your
instructions
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
Perhaps we implemented the filtering incorrectly? My bosses are getting
anxious with me and I don't have an answer for them yet.
Any further help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Adam Scarcella
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply.
I just did some more troubleshooting and I can definitely see using
dhcpdump on the VR that it only receives a DHCPREQUEST when the Guest VM
is on the same KVM Host. If I migrate the guest to any other KVM Host that
request never even makes it to the VR. I monitored the physical KVM host
running the VR, but it never registered the DHCPREQUEST regardless of where
the guest VM was running.
I even turned off the firewall on both KVM Hosts and still no DHCPREQUEST.
There actually is another physical DHCP server on the same network.
*10.97.38.1
Router DHCP*
However we (corporate IT Admin) have blocked off a range of IPs
{10.97.38.[110 -170]} from the 10.97.38.1 Router DHCP and filtered out
any DHCPREQUESTS made by a '06' MAC address per these instructions (written
by you I believe):
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
So that tells me that we probably did something wrong on the router and
it's got to be the 10.97.38.1 Router/Switch/DHCP server that's stopping
those requests from ever reaching the built in VR, but I have no visibility
into that unfortunately so I cannot continue to test. I need to be able to
give very precise instructions to my IT Admin on what to check.
Thoughts?
*dhcpdump from VR when Guest VM is on same KVM Host:*
root@r-21-VM:~# dhcpdump -i eth0
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:46.997
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 0
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet mask)
28 (Broadcast address)
2 (Time offset)
121 (Classless Static Route)
15 (Domainname)
6 (DNS server)
12 (Host name)
40 (NIS domain)
41 (NIS servers)
42 (NTP servers)
26 (Interface MTU)
119 (Domain Search)
3 (Routers)
121 (Classless Static Route)
249 (MSFT - Classless route)
42 (NTP servers)
---
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:53.998
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 7
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet mask)
28 (Broadcast
Re: api login
Hi Chiaradeep. As far as i could understand i have to add PlainText and Md5 into /etc/cloudstack/management/components.xml. So , my components.xml looks like: !-- Security adapters -- bean id=userAuthenticators class=com.cloud.utils.component.AdapterList property name=Adapters list ref bean=PlainTextUserAuthenticator/ ref bean=MD5UserAuthenticator/ ref bean=LDAPUserAuthenticator/ /list /property /bean But i'm still can't login using md5. What is wrong? Btw its new installation of CS 4.2.0 2013/8/13 Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com See this discussion (esp. the response from Prasanna) http://markmail.org/thread/7r6ia3ckkt6fzlic -Original Message- From: Valery Ciareszka [mailto:valery.teres...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 3:37 AM To: users Subject: api login Hi all. I'm using CS 4.1.0 and try to perform login api call, as described at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/root_admin/login.html However, it does not work with md5. And it works if i send password in plain text. MD5 worked in cs 4.0.2, but now it works with plaintext only. api login username=admin password=md5hashofpasswordhere HTTP Error 531: api login username=admin password=UNENCRYPTEDPASSWORDHERE account = admin domainid = e3bcebeb-9932-4448-aa9f-e2b613ba45e7 firstname = admin lastname = cloud registered = false sessionkey = XPNqQLFq7T250YLXWgawnfH0GM8= timeout = 1800 type = 1 userid = 79c285d1-54df-4169-84d1-72ff99f52998 username = admin What's wrong with md5 auth in cs 4.1 ? -- Regards, Valery http://protocol.by/slayer
Re: Guest VMs not able to acquire DHCP IP from Virtual Router unless Guest and VR are on the same KVM host
Thanks Travis. I agree and will see if Corporate IT will comply with that
request. Will post results/response soon.
Best Regards,
Adam Scarcella
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Travis Graham tgra...@tgraham.us wrote:
Since DHCP leases aren't something that immediately go away you could
temporarily stop DHCP services on your default router and see if that
allows CS instances to pull IPs correctly then enable your default DHCP
server again once you know more.
That would eliminate your default router from the possible causes list if
nothing changes or confirm it if things start working correctly in your CS
environment.
Travis
On Nov 19, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Good Morning David,
I'm not sure if you saw my reply from yesterday, but I'm now 99% sure the
problem is on our default router/dhcp server on 10.97.38.1. I think we
did
everything we're supposed to to mitigate the normal issues you would
expect
from having two competing DHCP servers on the same network. We went by
your
instructions
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
Perhaps we implemented the filtering incorrectly? My bosses are getting
anxious with me and I don't have an answer for them yet.
Any further help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Adam Scarcella
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply.
I just did some more troubleshooting and I can definitely see using
dhcpdump on the VR that it only receives a DHCPREQUEST when the Guest VM
is on the same KVM Host. If I migrate the guest to any other KVM Host
that
request never even makes it to the VR. I monitored the physical KVM host
running the VR, but it never registered the DHCPREQUEST regardless of
where
the guest VM was running.
I even turned off the firewall on both KVM Hosts and still no
DHCPREQUEST.
There actually is another physical DHCP server on the same network.
*10.97.38.1
Router DHCP*
However we (corporate IT Admin) have blocked off a range of IPs
{10.97.38.[110 -170]} from the 10.97.38.1 Router DHCP and filtered out
any DHCPREQUESTS made by a '06' MAC address per these instructions
(written
by you I believe):
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
So that tells me that we probably did something wrong on the router and
it's got to be the 10.97.38.1 Router/Switch/DHCP server that's stopping
those requests from ever reaching the built in VR, but I have no
visibility
into that unfortunately so I cannot continue to test. I need to be able
to
give very precise instructions to my IT Admin on what to check.
Thoughts?
*dhcpdump from VR when Guest VM is on same KVM Host:*
root@r-21-VM:~# dhcpdump -i eth0
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:46.997
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 0
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet mask)
28 (Broadcast address)
2 (Time offset)
121 (Classless Static Route)
15 (Domainname)
6 (DNS server)
12 (Host name)
40 (NIS domain)
41 (NIS servers)
42 (NTP servers)
26 (Interface MTU)
119 (Domain Search)
3 (Routers)
121 (Classless Static Route)
249 (MSFT - Classless route)
42 (NTP servers)
---
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:53.998
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 7
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
RE: Use of internet bandwidth
Worth testing. Ultimately I'd like to be able to build the router the with the features I want/need and then use that as the system vm template for future spin ups. If the group knows how that can be done I'd clear a huge hurdle Brandon Arms Network Engineer DSS ba...@dsscorp.com -Original Message- From: Eric Tykwinski [mailto:eric-l...@truenet.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:33 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Use of internet bandwidth Brandon, Just wondering, could you add other applications in the same way. More specifically: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipt-netflow/ Basically, adding netflow output for DDoS detection would be a nice addition... Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 On Nov 18, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Brandon Arms ba...@dsscorp.com wrote: Here is what I've done on each virtual router: apt-get update apt-get install snmpd apt-get install snmp apt-get install snmp-mibs-downloader chkconfig --add snmpd chkconfig snmpd on vi /etc/default/snmpd #export mibs SNMPDOPTS='-Lsd -Lf /dev/null -u snmp -I -p /var/run/snmpd.pid 0.0.0.0' mv /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf.org vi /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf rocommunity snmpstring syslocation location syscontact contact service snmpd restart iptables -A INPUT -s [sourceip] -p udp --dport 161 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT vi /etc/rc.local iptables -A INPUT -s [sourceip] -p udp --dport 161 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT this does work if the router is rebooted but does not if the router is rebuilt. We are currently using this method as well as working with usage data. Brandon Arms Network Engineer DSS ba...@dsscorp.com -Original Message- From: Vahric Muhtaryan [mailto:vah...@doruk.net.tr] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 12:16 PM To: CloudStack SupportMailingList Subject: Re: Use of internet bandwidth Hello Gerolamo, I¹m looking for it too I do not have a knowledge yet but usage meter may help but what i¹m thinking i don¹t know what switch you use but switch to open virtual switch and get the flow data and send it to any software and measure there usage. I¹m waiting other replies :D Also i know that VR¹s are debian but i don¹t know package installation allowed or not ? Did you try ? Regards VM On 18/11/13 19:10, Gerolamo Valcamonica gerol...@pyder.com wrote: Hi everybody I need to monitor the use of internet bandwidth of every customer on my platform. Measuring the internet bandwidth use outgoing the virtual routers could be the best practice to do that The problem is that the virtual routers are created by CloudStack out of the box without snmp services So.. do you have any ideas for internet usage measurements by costumer account? P.S. I use Zabbix as monitoring system -- Gerolamo Valcamonica
CloudStack secondary storage capacity issue
Hi All, I'm having an issue with CloudStack 4.2 (KVM) and secondary storage. CloudStack reports that 100% is used, according to CloudStack the capacity is 275.98MB but the capacity is actually 1.7T. Dashboard reports: Secondary Storage 275.98 MB / 275.98 MB Infrastructure - Secondary Storage settings: Name: secondary URL: nfs://172.30.11.20/mnt/vg2/vol2/nfs2 Provider: NFS Checking the storage from centos (mounted the nfs share temporarily): [root@host root]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on 172.30.11.20:/mnt/vg2/vol2/nfs2 1.8T 460M 1.7T 1%/mnt/secondary select id,name,status,type,resource_state,available,capabilities,version from cloud.host where type='SecondaryStorageVM'; '2', 's-19-VM', 'Up', 'SecondaryStorageVM', 'Enabled', '1', NULL, '4.2.0' I've been checking the management-servers logfiles but can't find any clue to what's causing this. As far as I can see the, the device is mounted correctly. I really don't understand why df -h would report 1.7T when the device is mounted, while CloudStack can only find/use a total of 275.98 MB. I don't know how to continue the troubleshooting, any help in the right direction from you guys would be highly appreciated. Best Regards, Magnus Jansson
CloudStack secondary storage capacity issue
Hi All, I'm having an issue with CloudStack 4.2 (KVM) and secondary storage. CloudStack reports that 100% is used, according to CloudStack the capacity is 275.98MB but the capacity is actually 1.7T. Dashboard reports: Secondary Storage 275.98 MB / 275.98 MB Infrastructure - Secondary Storage settings: Name: secondary URL: nfs://172.30.11.20/mnt/vg2/vol2/nfs2 Provider: NFS Checking the storage from centos (mounted the nfs share temporarily): [root@host root]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on 172.30.11.20:/mnt/vg2/vol2/nfs2 1.8T 460M 1.7T 1%/mnt/secondary select id,name,status,type,resource_state,available,capabilities,version from cloud.host where type='SecondaryStorageVM'; '2', 's-19-VM', 'Up', 'SecondaryStorageVM', 'Enabled', '1', NULL, '4.2.0' I've been checking the management-servers logfiles but can't find any clue to what's causing this. As far as I can see the, the device is mounted correctly. I really don't understand why df -h would report 1.7T when the device is mounted, while CloudStack can only find/use a total of 275.98 MB. I don't know how to continue the troubleshooting, any help in the right direction from you guys would be highly appreciated. Best Regards, Magnus Jansson
Image format supported by cloudstack
Hi Team, Can somebody please tell me which all image format are supported by the cloudstack? And do cloudstack (version 4.0 and 4.2) provide support for windows 7, Windows 2012, Ubuntu 12 and Ubuntu 13 ISO? Thanks, Jitendra
CS4.2 KVM and Xen hypervisor
Hello, I created a guest network with two routers, all is working fine but I decided that I don't want DHCP, is there a way to disabled DHCP? Thanks,
Re: CloudStack secondary storage capacity issue
So I did some more digging, and found out that I couldn't mount my drive correctly via the SSVM either. It takes extremely long time to mount it, and it seems like the routes are all messed up so it's not correctly mounting it in the end either. It seems that my management and storage networks are not separated in CloudStack. My SAN storage network is on 172.30.11. and management on 10.100.38. The SSVM tries to route the traffic for my SAN storage over my management network. It seems like it's using IP's from the range specified for my management network. I've added the SAN ip range to PhysicalNetworksInBasicZone-Storage but that doesn't seem to have any effect at all. root@s-19-VM:~# ip route default via 10.100.38.129 dev eth2 10.100.32.20 via 10.100.38.129 dev eth1 10.100.37.26 via 10.100.38.129 dev eth1 10.100.38.128/25 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10.100.38.130 10.100.38.128/25 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 10.100.38.135 10.100.38.128/25 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 10.100.38.131 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.0.167 172.30.11.20 via 10.100.38.129 dev eth1 How do I configure the SSVM to use 172.30.11. network for SAN? 2013/11/19 Magnus Janson mag...@fnutt.us Hi All, I'm having an issue with CloudStack 4.2 (KVM) and secondary storage. CloudStack reports that 100% is used, according to CloudStack the capacity is 275.98MB but the capacity is actually 1.7T. Dashboard reports: Secondary Storage 275.98 MB / 275.98 MB Infrastructure - Secondary Storage settings: Name: secondary URL: nfs://172.30.11.20/mnt/vg2/vol2/nfs2 Provider: NFS Checking the storage from centos (mounted the nfs share temporarily): [root@host root]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on 172.30.11.20:/mnt/vg2/vol2/nfs2 1.8T 460M 1.7T 1% /mnt/secondary select id,name,status,type,resource_state,available,capabilities,version from cloud.host where type='SecondaryStorageVM'; '2', 's-19-VM', 'Up', 'SecondaryStorageVM', 'Enabled', '1', NULL, '4.2.0' I've been checking the management-servers logfiles but can't find any clue to what's causing this. As far as I can see the, the device is mounted correctly. I really don't understand why df -h would report 1.7T when the device is mounted, while CloudStack can only find/use a total of 275.98 MB. I don't know how to continue the troubleshooting, any help in the right direction from you guys would be highly appreciated. Best Regards, Magnus Jansson
RE: Image format supported by cloudstack
Answers inline. -Original Message- From: jitendra shelar [mailto:jitendra.shelar...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:04 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org; issues- subscr...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Image format supported by cloudstack Hi Team, Can somebody please tell me which all image format are supported by the cloudstack? From the CloudStack UI, you can get the guest OS list in register template/register ISO form page, or try the API listOsTypes to get the complete list. And do cloudstack (version 4.0 and 4.2) provide support for windows 7, Windows 2012, Ubuntu 12 and Ubuntu 13 ISO? CloudStack supports all the mentioned guest OS. Only for Ubuntu 13, you need to register the template/ISO under Other Ubuntu guest OS type. Thanks, Jitendra --Sanjay
Re: Guest VMs not able to acquire DHCP IP from Virtual Router unless Guest and VR are on the same KVM host
Adam,
Any chance of getting your own /24 VLAN without DHCP? Then you just need a
switch that you control with all your machines hanging off of it connected
to that VLAN. As long as your IT sets up the routing so that you can get
to the rest of the network (and out) you should be ok. It may make things
easier for you. That is basically what I have.
Regards,
Carlos
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Good Morning David,
I'm not sure if you saw my reply from yesterday, but I'm now 99% sure the
problem is on our default router/dhcp server on 10.97.38.1. I think we did
everything we're supposed to to mitigate the normal issues you would expect
from having two competing DHCP servers on the same network. We went by your
instructions
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
Perhaps we implemented the filtering incorrectly? My bosses are getting
anxious with me and I don't have an answer for them yet.
Any further help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Adam Scarcella
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply.
I just did some more troubleshooting and I can definitely see using
dhcpdump on the VR that it only receives a DHCPREQUEST when the Guest VM
is on the same KVM Host. If I migrate the guest to any other KVM Host
that
request never even makes it to the VR. I monitored the physical KVM host
running the VR, but it never registered the DHCPREQUEST regardless of
where
the guest VM was running.
I even turned off the firewall on both KVM Hosts and still no
DHCPREQUEST.
There actually is another physical DHCP server on the same network.
*10.97.38.1
Router DHCP*
However we (corporate IT Admin) have blocked off a range of IPs
{10.97.38.[110 -170]} from the 10.97.38.1 Router DHCP and filtered out
any DHCPREQUESTS made by a '06' MAC address per these instructions
(written
by you I believe):
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
So that tells me that we probably did something wrong on the router and
it's got to be the 10.97.38.1 Router/Switch/DHCP server that's stopping
those requests from ever reaching the built in VR, but I have no
visibility
into that unfortunately so I cannot continue to test. I need to be able
to
give very precise instructions to my IT Admin on what to check.
Thoughts?
*dhcpdump from VR when Guest VM is on same KVM Host:*
root@r-21-VM:~# dhcpdump -i eth0
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:46.997
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 0
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet mask)
28 (Broadcast address)
2 (Time offset)
121 (Classless Static Route)
15 (Domainname)
6 (DNS server)
12 (Host name)
40 (NIS domain)
41 (NIS servers)
42 (NTP servers)
26 (Interface MTU)
119 (Domain Search)
3 (Routers)
121 (Classless Static Route)
249 (MSFT - Classless route)
42 (NTP servers)
---
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:53.998
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 7
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet
Re: Guest VMs not able to acquire DHCP IP from Virtual Router unless Guest and VR are on the same KVM host
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for the reply. That is exactly what I've requested, but our
CloudStack project is a grass-roots POC and hasn't actually received proper
wings yet, which is a catch-22 situation since if I can't prove how
useful and effective CS is than it probably won't take flight, but if they
don't give me my own /24 VLAN for this POC, then I probably won't be able
to fully demonstrate how powerful CS really is.
I'll keep pushing though. I really want this to work so that I can
ultimately build a large multi-regional CS cloud with 4 regions and
multiple zones per region for out Global Support, QC and Engineering teams.
I figure if we can master Puppet and configure this such that everyone who
uses it sees almost instantly that they can't live without it, then it will
absolutely take flight.
For this particular silly DHCP issue, I will have to continue to push for
our own /24 VLAN.
Best Regards,
Adam Scarcella
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Carlos Reategui car...@reategui.comwrote:
Adam,
Any chance of getting your own /24 VLAN without DHCP? Then you just need a
switch that you control with all your machines hanging off of it connected
to that VLAN. As long as your IT sets up the routing so that you can get
to the rest of the network (and out) you should be ok. It may make things
easier for you. That is basically what I have.
Regards,
Carlos
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Good Morning David,
I'm not sure if you saw my reply from yesterday, but I'm now 99% sure the
problem is on our default router/dhcp server on 10.97.38.1. I think we
did
everything we're supposed to to mitigate the normal issues you would
expect
from having two competing DHCP servers on the same network. We went by
your
instructions
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
Perhaps we implemented the filtering incorrectly? My bosses are getting
anxious with me and I don't have an answer for them yet.
Any further help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Adam Scarcella
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adam adam.scarce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply.
I just did some more troubleshooting and I can definitely see using
dhcpdump on the VR that it only receives a DHCPREQUEST when the Guest
VM
is on the same KVM Host. If I migrate the guest to any other KVM Host
that
request never even makes it to the VR. I monitored the physical KVM
host
running the VR, but it never registered the DHCPREQUEST regardless of
where
the guest VM was running.
I even turned off the firewall on both KVM Hosts and still no
DHCPREQUEST.
There actually is another physical DHCP server on the same network.
*10.97.38.1
Router DHCP*
However we (corporate IT Admin) have blocked off a range of IPs
{10.97.38.[110 -170]} from the 10.97.38.1 Router DHCP and filtered
out
any DHCPREQUESTS made by a '06' MAC address per these instructions
(written
by you I believe):
http://open.citrix.com/blog/42-tip-of-the-month-external-dhcp-server-and-cloudstack-on-the-same-network.html
So that tells me that we probably did something wrong on the router and
it's got to be the 10.97.38.1 Router/Switch/DHCP server that's stopping
those requests from ever reaching the built in VR, but I have no
visibility
into that unfortunately so I cannot continue to test. I need to be able
to
give very precise instructions to my IT Admin on what to check.
Thoughts?
*dhcpdump from VR when Guest VM is on same KVM Host:*
root@r-21-VM:~# dhcpdump -i eth0
TIME: 2013-11-18 08:24:46.997
IP: 0.0.0.0 (6:cc:20:0:0:c) 255.255.255.255 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff)
OP: 1 (BOOTPREQUEST)
HTYPE: 1 (Ethernet)
HLEN: 6
HOPS: 0
XID: 060d4c79
SECS: 0
FLAGS: 0
CIADDR: 0.0.0.0
YIADDR: 0.0.0.0
SIADDR: 0.0.0.0
GIADDR: 0.0.0.0
CHADDR: 06:cc:20:00:00:0c:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00
SNAME: .
FNAME: .
OPTION: 53 ( 1) DHCP message type 3 (DHCPREQUEST)
OPTION: 50 ( 4) Request IP address10.97.38.116
OPTION: 12 ( 16) Host name centos6-template
OPTION: 55 ( 16) Parameter Request List 1 (Subnet mask)
28 (Broadcast address)
2 (Time offset)
121 (Classless Static
Route)
15 (Domainname)
6 (DNS server)
12 (Host name)
40 (NIS domain)
41 (NIS servers)
Re: CS 4.2 Instance stuck Expunging
Bump for love! On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:53 AM, Jake G. dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All, Using CS 4.2 on Centos 6.4 with KVM hosts. I created a Windows 2008 Instance to make a template with. After making the template I tried destory the instaces but it has been stuck on expunging for over a day. My global settings are set to expunge after 10 mins. I would appropriate any help very much. Here is the log entries for this issue: 2013-11-19 20:38:44,737 INFO [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Found 1 vms to expunge. 2013-11-19 20:38:44,738 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Stopped called on VM[User|win2008-web03] but the state is Expunging 2013-11-19 20:38:44,845 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) VM state transitted from :Expunging to Expunging with event: ExpungeOp erationvm's original host id: 4 new host id: null host id before state transition: null 2013-11-19 20:38:44,845 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Destroying vm VM[User|win2008-web03] 2013-11-19 20:38:44,845 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning up NICS 2013-11-19 20:38:44,846 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning network for vm: 40 2013-11-19 20:38:44,849 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Cleaning storage for vm: 40 2013-11-19 20:38:44,854 DEBUG [storage.volume.VolumeObject] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Failed to transit volume: 56, due to: com.cloud.utils.fsm.NoTransitionExcepti on: Unable to transition to a new state from Migrating via DestroyRequested 2013-11-19 20:38:44,854 DEBUG [storage.volume.VolumeObject] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Failed to update state com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to transit volume: 56, due to: com.cloud.utils.fsm.NoTransitionException: Unable to transition to a new sta te from Migrating via DestroyRequested at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeObject.stateTransit(VolumeObject.java:158) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeObject.processEvent(VolumeObject.java:288) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.destroyVolume(VolumeServiceImpl.java:582) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.cleanupVolumes(VolumeManagerImpl.java:2145) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceExpunge(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:479) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.expunge(UserVmManagerImpl.java:1600) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl$ExpungeTask.run(UserVmManagerImpl.java:1769) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:304) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:178) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) 2013-11-19 20:38:44,855 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Rolling back the transaction: Time = 4 Name = cleanupVolumes; called by -Tran saction.rollback:898-Transaction.removeUpTo:841-Transaction.close:665-TransactionContextBuilder.interceptException:63-ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$Intercept orDispatcher.intercept:133-VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceExpunge:479-UserVmManagerImpl.expunge:1600-UserVmManagerImpl$ExpungeTask.run:1769-Executors$RunnableAda pter.call:471-FutureTask.runAndReset:304-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301:178-ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run:293 2013-11-19 20:38:44,855 WARN [cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl] (UserVm-Scavenger-1:null) Unable to expunge VM[User|win2008-web03] com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to update state:com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to transit volume: 56, due to: com. cloud.utils.fsm.NoTransitionException: Unable to transition to a new state from Migrating via DestroyRequested at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeObject.processEvent(VolumeObject.java:291) at org.apache.cloudstack.storage.volume.VolumeServiceImpl.destroyVolume(VolumeServiceImpl.java:582) at com.cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl.cleanupVolumes(VolumeManagerImpl.java:2145) at
Destroy Instance from CMD line
HI all, Wondering if there is a way to remove/destroy an instance from the CS manager via cmd line? Thank you, Jake
Re: Destroy Instance from CMD line
You'll want to use something like cloudmonkey or one of the clients that consume the API to do anything from the command line. * http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html#cloudmonkey * https://github.com/chipchilders/cloudstack_ruby_client * https://github.com/promptworks/stacker_bee On Nov 19, 2013, at 8:37 PM, Jake G. dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com wrote: HI all, Wondering if there is a way to remove/destroy an instance from the CS manager via cmd line? Thank you, Jake
Re: Destroy Instance from CMD line
Thanks! I have installed cloudmonkey. Do you know what the api commanad would be to destroy an instance? Or perhaps a list of cloudmonkey commands? On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:05 AM, Travis Graham tgra...@tgraham.us wrote: You'll want to use something like cloudmonkey or one of the clients that consume the API to do anything from the command line. * http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html#cloudmonkey * https://github.com/chipchilders/cloudstack_ruby_client * https://github.com/promptworks/stacker_bee On Nov 19, 2013, at 8:37 PM, Jake G. dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com wrote: HI all, Wondering if there is a way to remove/destroy an instance from the CS manager via cmd line? Thank you, Jake
Re: Destroy Instance from CMD line
On 20-Nov-2013, at 7:45 am, Jake G. dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks! I have installed cloudmonkey. Do you know what the api commanad would be to destroy an instance? Or perhaps a list of cloudmonkey commands? The complete APIs are listed at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/. http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/user/destroyVirtualMachine.html is probably what you need. On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:05 AM, Travis Graham tgra...@tgraham.us wrote: You'll want to use something like cloudmonkey or one of the clients that consume the API to do anything from the command line. * http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html#cloudmonkey * https://github.com/chipchilders/cloudstack_ruby_client * https://github.com/promptworks/stacker_bee On Nov 19, 2013, at 8:37 PM, Jake G. dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com wrote: HI all, Wondering if there is a way to remove/destroy an instance from the CS manager via cmd line? Thank you, Jake -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Image format supported by cloudstack
Good day. The image formats depends upon the Hypervisor you used. If it is XenServer/XCP then the image format is VHD and for KVM it is .img . It is nothing to do with Cloudstack. As XenServer/XCP keeping the virtual harddisks in .VHD format in attached NFS repository. Also in CloudStack for primary and secondary storage NFS storage has been used.You can import an existing .vhd file to CloudStack. Normally .VHD files are bigger than the actual Operting System (OS) space. As VHD is the complete harddisk that includes both OS spcae + empty space. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Sanjay Tripathi sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com wrote: Answers inline. -Original Message- From: jitendra shelar [mailto:jitendra.shelar...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:04 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org; issues- subscr...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Image format supported by cloudstack Hi Team, Can somebody please tell me which all image format are supported by the cloudstack? From the CloudStack UI, you can get the guest OS list in register template/register ISO form page, or try the API listOsTypes to get the complete list. And do cloudstack (version 4.0 and 4.2) provide support for windows 7, Windows 2012, Ubuntu 12 and Ubuntu 13 ISO? CloudStack supports all the mentioned guest OS. Only for Ubuntu 13, you need to register the template/ISO under Other Ubuntu guest OS type. Thanks, Jitendra --Sanjay -- Thanks and Regards Manas Ranjan Biswal Research Scientist, OpenTechnology Center, NIC,Chennai 08015698191,9776349149 manas.bis...@nic.in
Re: Image format supported by cloudstack
Thanks Sanjay. I will check it out. Regards, Jitendra On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Sanjay Tripathi sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com wrote: Answers inline. -Original Message- From: jitendra shelar [mailto:jitendra.shelar...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:04 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org; issues- subscr...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Image format supported by cloudstack Hi Team, Can somebody please tell me which all image format are supported by the cloudstack? From the CloudStack UI, you can get the guest OS list in register template/register ISO form page, or try the API listOsTypes to get the complete list. And do cloudstack (version 4.0 and 4.2) provide support for windows 7, Windows 2012, Ubuntu 12 and Ubuntu 13 ISO? CloudStack supports all the mentioned guest OS. Only for Ubuntu 13, you need to register the template/ISO under Other Ubuntu guest OS type. Thanks, Jitendra --Sanjay
Re: Image format supported by cloudstack
Thanks Manas. On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:16 AM, jitendra shelar jitendra.shelar...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Sanjay. I will check it out. Regards, Jitendra On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Sanjay Tripathi sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com wrote: Answers inline. -Original Message- From: jitendra shelar [mailto:jitendra.shelar...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:04 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org; issues- subscr...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Image format supported by cloudstack Hi Team, Can somebody please tell me which all image format are supported by the cloudstack? From the CloudStack UI, you can get the guest OS list in register template/register ISO form page, or try the API listOsTypes to get the complete list. And do cloudstack (version 4.0 and 4.2) provide support for windows 7, Windows 2012, Ubuntu 12 and Ubuntu 13 ISO? CloudStack supports all the mentioned guest OS. Only for Ubuntu 13, you need to register the template/ISO under Other Ubuntu guest OS type. Thanks, Jitendra --Sanjay
RE: Image format supported by cloudstack
For xenserver/xcp --- VHD KVM --- qcow2 Esx/VSphere --- ova HyperV --- VHD On any Hypervisor installing OS with ISO is supported, but root disk format will be created w.r.t hypervisor supported format mentioned above. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: manas biswal [mailto:manas.biswa...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:38 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; issues-subscr...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Image format supported by cloudstack Good day. The image formats depends upon the Hypervisor you used. If it is XenServer/XCP then the image format is VHD and for KVM it is .img . It is nothing to do with Cloudstack. As XenServer/XCP keeping the virtual harddisks in .VHD format in attached NFS repository. Also in CloudStack for primary and secondary storage NFS storage has been used.You can import an existing .vhd file to CloudStack. Normally .VHD files are bigger than the actual Operting System (OS) space. As VHD is the complete harddisk that includes both OS spcae + empty space. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Sanjay Tripathi sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com wrote: Answers inline. -Original Message- From: jitendra shelar [mailto:jitendra.shelar...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:04 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org; issues- subscr...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Image format supported by cloudstack Hi Team, Can somebody please tell me which all image format are supported by the cloudstack? From the CloudStack UI, you can get the guest OS list in register template/register ISO form page, or try the API listOsTypes to get the complete list. And do cloudstack (version 4.0 and 4.2) provide support for windows 7, Windows 2012, Ubuntu 12 and Ubuntu 13 ISO? CloudStack supports all the mentioned guest OS. Only for Ubuntu 13, you need to register the template/ISO under Other Ubuntu guest OS type. Thanks, Jitendra --Sanjay -- Thanks and Regards Manas Ranjan Biswal Research Scientist, OpenTechnology Center, NIC,Chennai 08015698191,9776349149 manas.bis...@nic.in
Reg: sechduled snapshot bug
Hi, In cloudstack 4.2 scheduled snapshot is having functionality bugs while i create daily snapshot job. It create snapshot hourly. where to post this bug. This is major bug in 4.1 it is working fine. Regards, Prakash.M
RE: sechduled snapshot bug
You can create bugs here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK -Original Message- From: prak...@assistanz.com [mailto:prak...@assistanz.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Reg: sechduled snapshot bug Hi, In cloudstack 4.2 scheduled snapshot is having functionality bugs while i create daily snapshot job. It create snapshot hourly. where to post this bug. This is major bug in 4.1 it is working fine. Regards, Prakash.M
RE: sechduled snapshot bug
HI Prakash, please post the api command also in the bug, you can use firebug/developer tools to find out the api command. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: prak...@assistanz.com [mailto:prak...@assistanz.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Reg: sechduled snapshot bug Hi, In cloudstack 4.2 scheduled snapshot is having functionality bugs while i create daily snapshot job. It create snapshot hourly. where to post this bug. This is major bug in 4.1 it is working fine. Regards, Prakash.M
RE: sechduled snapshot bug
Hi, Below is api command used in cloudstack command createSnapshotPolicy intervaltypedaily maxsnaps1 responsejson schedule10:12 sessionkey l2wYbaZ6VS1rOyy2dxBf3vc2ndA= timezoneAsia/Kolkata volumeid46085913-d648-4293-b918-f8185b75d3f8 Regards, Prakash.M AssistanZ HI Prakash, please post the api command also in the bug, you can use firebug/developer tools to find out the api command. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: prak...@assistanz.com [mailto:prak...@assistanz.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Reg: sechduled snapshot bug Hi, In cloudstack 4.2 scheduled snapshot is having functionality bugs while i create daily snapshot job. It create snapshot hourly. where to post this bug. This is major bug in 4.1 it is working fine. Regards, Prakash.M
