RE: [EVENT] Announcing Apache CloudStack Bangalore December Meetup

2013-11-27 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath 
Please RSVP at http://t.co/Iift0ehUl1


-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:08 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; market...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
CloudStack-Users
Subject: [EVENT] Announcing Apache CloudStack Bangalore December Meetup

Hi All,

Agenda is ready for the last Meetup of the year 2013.  We have the lady 
battalion of Citrix ready to speak about Apache CloudStack. To give them a 
company, Iliyas Shirol, Cloud/BigData Evangelist at InMobi has come up an 
interesting topic.

The agenda is

5.00 - 5.30 PM

Automation Using Marvin Framework
-Sowmya Krishnan, Apache CloudStack Committer

5.30 - 6.15 PM

Troubleshooting Apache CloudStack
-Sailaja Mada and Likitha Shetty, Apache CloudStack Committers

6.20 to 7.15 PM

Nexenta Powered Apache CloudStack
-Iliyas Shirol, Cloud/BigData Evangelist, InMobi

We have not yet finalized the venue; if you are interested to host this event 
at your premises for free, please get in touch with one of the organizers.

Looking forward to meeting you all

-Radhika

[EVENT] Announcing Apache CloudStack Bangalore December Meetup

2013-11-27 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath 
Hi All,

Agenda is ready for the last Meetup of the year 2013.  We have the lady 
battalion of Citrix ready to speak about Apache CloudStack. To give them a 
company, Iliyas Shirol, Cloud/BigData Evangelist at InMobi has come up an 
interesting topic.

The agenda is

5.00 - 5.30 PM

Automation Using Marvin Framework
-Sowmya Krishnan, Apache CloudStack Committer

5.30 - 6.15 PM

Troubleshooting Apache CloudStack
-Sailaja Mada and Likitha Shetty, Apache CloudStack Committers

6.20 to 7.15 PM

Nexenta Powered Apache CloudStack
-Iliyas Shirol, Cloud/BigData Evangelist, InMobi

We have not yet finalized the venue; if you are interested to host this event 
at your premises for free, please get in touch with one of the organizers.

Looking forward to meeting you all

-Radhika

RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon?

2013-11-27 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi 


-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:24 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?

On 27.11.2013 18:10, sebgoa wrote:
> My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if 
> you are eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your 
> upgrade procedure (from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev 
> systems.

Is there a list somewhere with features and bugfixes that will make it into 
4.2.1?

Lucian

Animesh> Here is the list of issues that are fixed 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325707. This being a 
maintenance release there are no new features


--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

2013-11-27 Thread Jake G. 
Hi Geoff,

I followed the standard method of creating a IPsec VPN using the built-in 
windows client. I have done this uncountable times in the past and usually it 
depends on the VPN router as to whether internet traffic can be split off of 
VPN traffic. Also depends on the companies policies. Most large companies I 
know do not allow internet traffic while connecting to their VPN, as it poses a 
risk if the client PC is infected. From what I can gather off of blogs and 
other treads, cloudstack does not have split-tunnel capabilities. 

I could be wrong about my assumptions so it would be cool if someone could test 
for themselves using the windows VPN client in either windows 7 or 8? 

With out running the script I mentioned in my last email, if I checked the 
connection details for the VPN network, no gateway was provide by the 
Cloudstack VPN provider. I believe this is why internet traffic cannot be 
routed out.

Thanks,
Jake





On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:12 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:
 
Jake,

I'm pretty sure this is a Windows issue, can you share more info on how you 
configured your VPN connection on your windows machine

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 27 November 2013 02:36
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Jake G.
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

I am using a Standard Isolated network


I noticed after connecting to the cloudstack VPN on a Standard Isolated network 
that my connection does not have a default gateway. Perhaps this is the reason 
I am unable to access the internet while connected to the VPN?


Thanks,
Jake



On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:15 PM, Jake G.  
wrote:

Standard Isolated network




On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:01 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

Jake,

And just to clarify, are you connecting to a standard isolated network, or a 
VPC network

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 11:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

Hi Geoff,

The settings are remote.access.vpn.client.iprange= 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20

Best,
Jake



On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:34 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

Jake,

What is the setting within global setting 'remote.access.vpn.client.iprange'

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 11:31
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

No my VPN subnet is different than my local LAN subnet

VPN subnet: 192.168.1.0/25
VPC subnet: 172.3.9.0/25 (CS guest network for instances) Local Lan subnet: 
10.10.5.0/25 (my desktop)







On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:24 PM, Shanker Balan 
 wrote:

Comments inline.


On 26-Nov-2013, at 4:08 pm, Jake G.  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> From my desktop I am unable to connect to the internet after connecting to a 
> Cloudstack VPN I set up.
>
> I tried to uncheck the "Use default gateway on remote network" setting in the 
> VPN connection networking properties in windows and I can get to the internet 
> but then I can no longer connect to the instances in my CS network, even 
> though the VPN is still connected. The only way to access my instance in 
> cloudstack via VPN is to leave that checkbox checked on my desktop.
>
> Anyone know how to resolve this?

Is your VPC subnet the same as your “local” LAN subnet?


--
@shankerbalan

M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | 
www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd 
floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055

CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore 
http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/




This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a regist

Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?

2013-11-27 Thread Nux! 

On 27.11.2013 18:10, sebgoa wrote:

My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if
you are eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your
upgrade procedure (from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev
systems.


Is there a list somewhere with features and bugfixes that will make it 
into 4.2.1?


Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

Re: Scheduled snapshots doesn't work as expected

2013-11-27 Thread Nitin Mehta 
Seems like a bug to me. Please file one on Jira.

On 27/11/13 4:03 PM, "d...@soleks.com"  wrote:

> Nope, it didn't help.
>> Can you please try running the update resource count action for the
>> account and see if that helps ?
>>
>> On 27/11/13 12:24 PM, "d...@soleks.com"  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> For last couple days i was fighting with scheduled snapshot issue. I
>>> configured snapshot limit for one of the account as 64. Settings for
>>> hourly, daily, weekly and monthly also pretty high (but in sum not more
>>> then 64). Account has 2 volumes i scheduled snapshots for. Cloudstack
>>> created 8 snapshots (6 hourly and 2 daily) and started to complain that
>>> limit for 'snapshot' resources reached. I increased maximum allowed
>>> snapshots up to 128, CS said that 'secondary-storage' limit reached
>>>(it's
>>> configured as 512G). I removed all snapshots for that account, it was
>>> reflected on the dashboard, sec storage utilization changed, but still
>>> wasn't able to create snapshots for that account. Then i configured
>>> 'snapshot' settings for account as -1 and snapshot scheduler started to
>>> create snapshots. Does anybody has such problem or i miss-configured
>>> something.
>>>
>>> Dan.
>>>
>>> 
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: CPU overprovisioning.

2013-11-27 Thread dan 
 Super !!! Fixed. Thanks for heads-up. 
>  That is what i didn't know about. Is it possible to update that 
> settings for existing cluster ?
>> Did you change the global setting or the cluster setting ?
>> In 4.2 changing global setting only affects the newly created clusters
>> factor not the existing ones.
>>
>> On 27/11/13 12:26 PM, "d...@soleks.com"  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows
>>> no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2,
>>> 2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome.
>>>
>>> Dan.
>>>
>>> 
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>>
>
>
> 
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: CPU overprovisioning.

2013-11-27 Thread dan 
 That is what i didn't know about. Is it possible to update that settings for 
existing cluster ? 
> Did you change the global setting or the cluster setting ?
> In 4.2 changing global setting only affects the newly created clusters
> factor not the existing ones.
>
> On 27/11/13 12:26 PM, "d...@soleks.com"  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows
>> no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2,
>> 2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome.
>>
>> Dan.
>>
>> 
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: Scheduled snapshots doesn't work as expected

2013-11-27 Thread dan 
 Nope, it didn't help. 
> Can you please try running the update resource count action for the
> account and see if that helps ?
>
> On 27/11/13 12:24 PM, "d...@soleks.com"  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> For last couple days i was fighting with scheduled snapshot issue. I
>> configured snapshot limit for one of the account as 64. Settings for
>> hourly, daily, weekly and monthly also pretty high (but in sum not more
>> then 64). Account has 2 volumes i scheduled snapshots for. Cloudstack
>> created 8 snapshots (6 hourly and 2 daily) and started to complain that
>> limit for 'snapshot' resources reached. I increased maximum allowed
>> snapshots up to 128, CS said that 'secondary-storage' limit reached (it's
>> configured as 512G). I removed all snapshots for that account, it was
>> reflected on the dashboard, sec storage utilization changed, but still
>> wasn't able to create snapshots for that account. Then i configured
>> 'snapshot' settings for account as -1 and snapshot scheduler started to
>> create snapshots. Does anybody has such problem or i miss-configured
>> something.
>>
>> Dan.
>>
>> 
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: Scheduled snapshots doesn't work as expected

2013-11-27 Thread Nitin Mehta 
Can you please try running the update resource count action for the
account and see if that helps ?

On 27/11/13 12:24 PM, "d...@soleks.com"  wrote:

>
>
>Hi All,  
>
>For last couple days i was fighting with scheduled snapshot issue. I
>configured snapshot limit for one of the account as 64. Settings for
>hourly, daily, weekly and monthly also pretty high (but in sum not more
>then 64). Account has 2 volumes i scheduled snapshots for. Cloudstack
>created 8 snapshots (6 hourly and 2 daily) and started to complain that
>limit for 'snapshot' resources reached. I increased maximum allowed
>snapshots up to 128, CS said that 'secondary-storage' limit reached (it's
>configured as 512G). I removed all snapshots for that account, it was
>reflected on the dashboard, sec storage utilization changed, but still
>wasn't able to create snapshots for that account. Then i configured
>'snapshot' settings for account as -1 and snapshot scheduler started to
>create snapshots. Does anybody has such problem or i miss-configured
>something. 
>
>Dan. 
>
>
>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: CPU overprovisioning.

2013-11-27 Thread Nitin Mehta 
Did you change the global setting or the cluster setting ?
In 4.2 changing global setting only affects the newly created clusters
factor not the existing ones.

On 27/11/13 12:26 PM, "d...@soleks.com"  wrote:

>
>
>Hi all,  
>
>I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows
>no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2,
>2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome.
>
>Dan.
>
>
>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: CPU overprovisioning.

2013-11-27 Thread Kirk Jantzer 
Did you restart the management service after making the change?


Regards,

Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM,  wrote:

>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows
> no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2,
> 2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome.
>
> Dan.
>
> 
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>

Re: CS 4.2 KVM cluster vlan configuration

2013-11-27 Thread motty cruz 
I had two interfaces one going for public eth0, management is eth1

here are my actual configuration file
[root@kvm1 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:25:90:88:51:5C
TYPE=Ethernet
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=cloudbr0


[root@kvm1 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr0
DEVICE=cloudbr0
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Bridge
[root@kvm1 network-scripts]#


### for management ##
[root@kvm1 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth1
DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:25:90:88:51:5D
TYPE=Ethernet
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=cloudbr1
[root@kvm1 network-scripts]#

[root@kvm1 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr1
DEVICE=cloudbr1
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Bridge
IPADDR=10.107.0.7
NETMASK=255.255.255.0

you do not have to create vlan interfaces, I was confused too, but by
chance I created bridges just as I mentioned above and install cloudstack
agent, configured zone and cloudstack created vlans

after configuring zones: (in the switch i created VLAN 99, 200 and 500)
[root@kvm1 network-scripts]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id   STP enabled interfaces
breth0-199  8000.00259088515c   no  eth0.199
vnet0
vnet3
breth0-200  8000.00259088515c   no  eth0.200
vnet7
breth0-500  8000.00259088515c   no  eth0.500
vnet6
cloud0  8000.fe00a9fe00a6   no  vnet1
vnet4
cloudbr08000.00259088515c   no  eth0
vnet2
vnet5
cloudbr18000.00259088515d   no  eth1
virbr0  8000.5254004059c4   yes virbr0-nic
[root@kvm1 network-scripts]#


if you have further questions please feel free to contact me, good luck!





On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Thitipong  wrote:

>
> Can you fix the error? I got the same error, so I'm looking for someone can
> help me please.
>
>
>

Re: CS 4.2 KVM cluster vlan configuration

2013-11-27 Thread Thitipong 

Can you fix the error? I got the same error, so I'm looking for someone can
help me please.

Scheduled snapshots doesn't work as expected

2013-11-27 Thread dan 


Hi All,  

For last couple days i was fighting with scheduled snapshot issue. I configured 
snapshot limit for one of the account as 64. Settings for hourly, daily, weekly 
and monthly also pretty high (but in sum not more then 64). Account has 2 
volumes i scheduled snapshots for. Cloudstack created 8 snapshots (6 hourly and 
2 daily) and started to complain that limit for 'snapshot' resources reached. I 
increased maximum allowed snapshots up to 128, CS said that 'secondary-storage' 
limit reached (it's configured as 512G). I removed all snapshots for that 
account, it was reflected on the dashboard, sec storage utilization changed, 
but still wasn't able to create snapshots for that account. Then i configured 
'snapshot' settings for account as -1 and snapshot scheduler started to create 
snapshots. Does anybody has such problem or i miss-configured something. 

Dan. 


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

CPU overprovisioning.

2013-11-27 Thread dan 


Hi all,  

I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows no 
changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2, 2x4cores. Any 
hints are more then welcome. 

Dan.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?

2013-11-27 Thread sebgoa 

On Nov 27, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Lewis  wrote:

> Hi Sebastien,
> 
> Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option. Are
> these RPMs likely to be upgrade-safe if I configure the mgmt. server with
> the relevant yum repo at a later date?

These rpms are built from the 4.2 branch, so they represent the latest on that 
branch and may differ slightly (be ahead ~4.2.2) from what we voted on for 4.2.1

I have not tried that type of upgrade, which If I understand you right, may 
actually be a 'downgrade'. That said it should only be bug fix changes so the 
schemas should not change.

My advice would be to wait couple days for the official 4.2.1 but if you are 
eager you can grab those rpms and start ironing out your upgrade procedure 
(from where you are at to ~4.2.1) on your dev systems.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Adrian
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 November 2013 17:33
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
> 
> 
> On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of
> 4.2.1?
>> A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine
>> with everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As
>> far as I can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release
>> notes but these too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of
>> the momentum to release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that
> I've missed?
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> You have not missed anything.
> It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the
> release announcement etc..
> 
> 
>> I appreciate that beggars can't be choosers but I'm too scared to try
>> building from source and am eagerly awaiting the 'easy' option of
>> having RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release.
>> 
> 
> You can always get the latest rpms from:
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/
> 
> Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we
> only release source tar ball)
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Any info on this welcomed.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Many thanks,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Adrian

RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon?

2013-11-27 Thread Adrian Lewis 
Hi Sebastien,

Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option. Are
these RPMs likely to be upgrade-safe if I configure the mgmt. server with
the relevant yum repo at a later date?

Cheers,

Adrian

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 November 2013 17:33
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?


On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of
4.2.1?
> A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine
> with everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As
> far as I can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release
> notes but these too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of
> the momentum to release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that
I've missed?
>
>
>

You have not missed anything.
It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the
release announcement etc..


> I appreciate that beggars can't be choosers but I'm too scared to try
> building from source and am eagerly awaiting the 'easy' option of
> having RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release.
>

You can always get the latest rpms from:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/

Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we
only release source tar ball)

>
>
> Any info on this welcomed.
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
> Adrian

Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?

2013-11-27 Thread sebgoa 

On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis  wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> 
> 
> Hoping that someone here might know what’s holding up the release of 4.2.1?
> A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with
> everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I
> can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes but these
> too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of the momentum to
> release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that I’ve missed?
> 
> 
> 

You have not missed anything. 
It's just lack of time in the day to check the final docs, make the release 
announcement etc..


> I appreciate that beggars can’t be choosers but I’m too scared to try
> building from source and am eagerly awaiting the ‘easy’ option of having
> RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release.
> 

You can always get the latest rpms from:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/package-rhel63-4.2/

Even though they are not the official release ones (and won't be since we only 
release source tar ball)

> 
> 
> Any info on this welcomed.
> 
> 
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> Adrian

Connection refused

2013-11-27 Thread Steven Liang 
Hi All,

My cs version is 4.0, host servers use kvm.
When I run cloud-set-guest-password, it prompted me "Connecting to
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080... failed: Connection refused".
I checked the firewall, the port 8080 of vrouter is allowed access.
What is wrong with it?
Thank you.

Regards,
Steven

Cloudstack with OpenContrail plugin

2013-11-27 Thread tawfiq zidi 
HI,

I've recently deployed CloudStack 4.4-SNAPSHOT with XenServer 6.2.

I'm looking for testing OpenContrail Plugins , But i've didn't found
Contrail plugin under Server Provider Networking Tab .

Can anyone describe the steps to integrate OpenContrail Plugin ?

Thank you.

Re: Cloudstack 4.3 RPM Build

2013-11-27 Thread tawfiq zidi 
Hi,


Okay , I've figured the Problem , It was the Hostname resolution causing
the problem,

log4j:ERROR  Error in crearting snmp object, cloudstack.cloud2:
cloudstack.cloud2
log4j:ERROR  size of ip addresses , communities, and ports list doesn't
match, setting all to null

cloudstack.cloud2 it is my VMbox hostname , it troubleshooted the DNS and
it works fine.

Also I faced some POMs problem in the build of cloud-awsapi

[INFO] Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge .. FAILURE [1.488s]
[INFO] 
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 6:19.165s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 13 06:31:34 JST 2013
[INFO] Final Memory: 53M/416M
[INFO] 
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile
(default-compile) on project cloud-awsapi: Compilation failure:
Compilation failure:
[ERROR] error: error reading
/root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/mex/1.5.4/mex-1.5.4-impl.jar;
error in opening zip file
[ERROR] error: error reading
/root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-mtompolicy/1.5.4/axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar;
error in opening zip file
[ERROR] error: error reading
/root/.m2/repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom/axiom-dom/1.2.10/axiom-dom-1.2.10.jar;
error in opening zip file
[ERROR] error: error reading
/root/.m2/repository/org/opensaml/opensaml1/1.1/opensaml1-1.1.jar;
error in opening zip file
[ERROR] error: error reading
/root/.m2/repository/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.3/commons-lang-2.3.jar;
error in opening zip file
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
the -e switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException
[ERROR]
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command
[ERROR]   mvn  -rf :cloud-awsapi
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uKNLdw (%build)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uKNLdw (%build)


I 've Corrected it by removing the older depedencies and downloading
new ones into ./m2/repository:


# cd /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/mex/1.5.4/
# mv mex-1.5.4-impl.jar mex-1.5.4-impl.jar.html
# wget 
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/axis2/mex/1.5.4/mex-1.5.4-impl.jar
# file mex-1.5.4-impl.jar
mex-1.5.4-impl.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract

# cd /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/axis2-mtompolicy/1.5.4/
# mv axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar.html
# wget 
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/axis2/axis2-mtompolicy/1.5.4/axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar
# file axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar
axis2-mtompolicy-1.5.4.jar: Zip archive data, at least v1.0 to extract

# cd /root/.m2/repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom/axiom-dom/1.2.10/
# mv axiom-dom-1.2.10.jar axiom-dom-1.2.10.jar.html
# wget 
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom/axiom-dom/1.2.10/axiom-dom-1.2.10.jar

# cd /root/.m2/repository/org/opensaml/opensaml1/1.1/
# mv opensaml1-1.1.jar opensaml1-1.1.jar.html
# wget 
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/opensaml/opensaml1/1.1/opensaml1-1.1.jar

# cd /root/.m2/repository/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.3/
# mv commons-lang-2.3.jar commons-lang-2.3.jar.html
# wget 
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.3/commons-lang-2.3.jar

# cd /root/.m2/repository/bouncycastle/bcprov-jdk14/140/
# mv 140/bcprov-jdk14-140.jar bcprov-jdk14-140.jar.html
# wget 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/bouncycastle/bcprov-jdk14/140/bcprov-jdk14-140.jar


After that , RPMs are builded and the are ready for yum repository



On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Go Chiba  wrote:

> Hi tawfiq,
>
> from the jenkins's build result, it should path the build process.
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/
>
> try it once again after clean up under the dist/ directory.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:13 PM, tawfiq zidi 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm Tryin to build CloudStack 4.3 RPMs From source.
> >
> > When I execute ./package.sh script , errors are shown about
> > goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test
> >
> > How to resolve this problem ?
> >
> > Here's a Snappet of the Build Log:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> >  T E S T S
> > ---
> > Running org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpTrapAppenderTest
> > log4j:ERROR  Error in crearting snmp object, cloudstack.cloud2:
> > cloudstack.cloud2
> > log4j:ERROR  size of ip addresses , communities, and ports list doesn't
> > m

4.2.1 anytime soon?

2013-11-27 Thread Adrian Lewis 
Hi All,



Hoping that someone here might know what’s holding up the release of 4.2.1?
A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with
everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I
can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes but these
too seem to be finished. Has CCCEU13 killed off all of the momentum to
release 4.2.1 or is there something else going on that I’ve missed?



I appreciate that beggars can’t be choosers but I’m too scared to try
building from source and am eagerly awaiting the ‘easy’ option of having
RPMs made from an officially sanctioned release.



Any info on this welcomed.



Many thanks,



Adrian

Re: Cloudstack 4.3 RPM Build

2013-11-27 Thread Go Chiba 
Hi tawfiq,

from the jenkins's build result, it should path the build process.
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-package-rpm/

try it once again after clean up under the dist/ directory.





On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:13 PM, tawfiq zidi  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm Tryin to build CloudStack 4.3 RPMs From source.
>
> When I execute ./package.sh script , errors are shown about
> goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test
>
> How to resolve this problem ?
>
> Here's a Snappet of the Build Log:
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>  T E S T S
> ---
> Running org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpTrapAppenderTest
> log4j:ERROR  Error in crearting snmp object, cloudstack.cloud2:
> cloudstack.cloud2
> log4j:ERROR  size of ip addresses , communities, and ports list doesn't
> match, setting all to null
> log4j:ERROR  Invalid format for the IP Addresses or Ports parameter
> log4j:ERROR  Invalid format for the IP Addresses or Ports parameter
> log4j:ERROR  size of ip addresses , communities, and ports list doesn't
> match, setting all to null
> Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.48 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> Running org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpEnhancedPatternLayoutTest
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.139 sec
>
> Results :
>
> Failed tests:
> appendTest(org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpTrapAppenderTest):  error
> snmpHelper list size not as expected  expected:<0> but was:<2>
>
> Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>
> [INFO]
> 
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack . SUCCESS [3.064s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent  SUCCESS [0.031s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Managed Context . SUCCESS [5.248s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ... SUCCESS
> [14.260s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework ... SUCCESS [0.018s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [9.355s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Configuration ... SUCCESS [4.601s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack API . SUCCESS
> [23.970s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - REST  SUCCESS [3.837s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - IPC . SUCCESS [7.236s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine  SUCCESS [0.051s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API  SUCCESS [5.144s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Core  SUCCESS
> [16.628s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents .. SUCCESS [9.869s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering .. SUCCESS [4.198s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs  SUCCESS [3.647s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component ... SUCCESS
> [19.398s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [2.272s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API  SUCCESS
> [3.306s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Server .. SUCCESS
> [1:39.880s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Usage Server  SUCCESS
> [32.614s]
> [INFO] Apache XenSource XAPI . SUCCESS [6.876s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component  SUCCESS
> [14.139s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Services .. SUCCESS [1.463s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage Service ... SUCCESS [8.387s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Component  SUCCESS
> [24.345s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume Component . SUCCESS [5.943s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Image Component .. SUCCESS [3.852s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Data Motion Component  SUCCESS
> [3.443s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Cache Component .. SUCCESS [3.150s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Snapshot Component  SUCCESS
> [9.557s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API  SUCCESS [5.949s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Service  SUCCESS [5.662s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin POM .. SUCCESS [1.071s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Rate Limit . SUCCESS
> [17.425s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Discovery .. SUCCESS [5.555s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - ACL Static Role Based .. SUCCESS [2.825s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Anti-Affinity Processor  SUCCESS
> [2.496s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor  SUCCESS
> [2.566s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Concentrated Pod Deployment Planner
>  SUCCESS [2.839s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User D

Cloudstack 4.3 RPM Build

2013-11-27 Thread tawfiq zidi 
Hi,

I'm Tryin to build CloudStack 4.3 RPMs From source.

When I execute ./package.sh script , errors are shown about
goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test

How to resolve this problem ?

Here's a Snappet of the Build Log:





---
 T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpTrapAppenderTest
log4j:ERROR  Error in crearting snmp object, cloudstack.cloud2:
cloudstack.cloud2
log4j:ERROR  size of ip addresses , communities, and ports list doesn't
match, setting all to null
log4j:ERROR  Invalid format for the IP Addresses or Ports parameter
log4j:ERROR  Invalid format for the IP Addresses or Ports parameter
log4j:ERROR  size of ip addresses , communities, and ports list doesn't
match, setting all to null
Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.48 sec
<<< FAILURE!
Running org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpEnhancedPatternLayoutTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.139 sec

Results :

Failed tests:
appendTest(org.apache.cloudstack.alert.snmp.SnmpTrapAppenderTest):  error
snmpHelper list size not as expected  expected:<0> but was:<2>

Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO]

[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack . SUCCESS [3.064s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent  SUCCESS [0.031s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Managed Context . SUCCESS [5.248s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ... SUCCESS [14.260s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework ... SUCCESS [0.018s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [9.355s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Configuration ... SUCCESS [4.601s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack API . SUCCESS [23.970s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - REST  SUCCESS [3.837s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - IPC . SUCCESS [7.236s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine  SUCCESS [0.051s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API  SUCCESS [5.144s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Core  SUCCESS [16.628s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents .. SUCCESS [9.869s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering .. SUCCESS [4.198s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs  SUCCESS [3.647s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component ... SUCCESS [19.398s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [2.272s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API  SUCCESS
[3.306s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Server .. SUCCESS
[1:39.880s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Usage Server  SUCCESS [32.614s]
[INFO] Apache XenSource XAPI . SUCCESS [6.876s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component  SUCCESS
[14.139s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Services .. SUCCESS [1.463s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage Service ... SUCCESS [8.387s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Component  SUCCESS [24.345s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume Component . SUCCESS [5.943s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Image Component .. SUCCESS [3.852s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Data Motion Component  SUCCESS
[3.443s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Cache Component .. SUCCESS [3.150s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Snapshot Component  SUCCESS [9.557s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API  SUCCESS [5.949s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Service  SUCCESS [5.662s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin POM .. SUCCESS [1.071s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Rate Limit . SUCCESS [17.425s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Discovery .. SUCCESS [5.555s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - ACL Static Role Based .. SUCCESS [2.825s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Anti-Affinity Processor  SUCCESS
[2.496s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor  SUCCESS
[2.566s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Concentrated Pod Deployment Planner
 SUCCESS [2.839s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Dispersing Deployment Planner
 SUCCESS [3.815s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Implicit Dedication Planner  SUCCESS
[14.777s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Allocator Random .. SUCCESS [8.765s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Dedicated Resources  SUCCESS [7.809s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor OracleVM  SUCCESS [3.758s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Open vSwitch ... SUCCESS [4.018s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack P

RE: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

2013-11-27 Thread Geoff Higginbottom 
Jake,

I'm pretty sure this is a Windows issue, can you share more info on how you 
configured your VPN connection on your windows machine

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 27 November 2013 02:36
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Jake G.
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

I am using a Standard Isolated network


I noticed after connecting to the cloudstack VPN on a Standard Isolated network 
that my connection does not have a default gateway. Perhaps this is the reason 
I am unable to access the internet while connected to the VPN?


Thanks,
Jake



On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:15 PM, Jake G.  
wrote:

Standard Isolated network




On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:01 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

Jake,

And just to clarify, are you connecting to a standard isolated network, or a 
VPC network

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 11:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

Hi Geoff,

The settings are remote.access.vpn.client.iprange= 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20

Best,
Jake



On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:34 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

Jake,

What is the setting within global setting 'remote.access.vpn.client.iprange'

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 11:31
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

No my VPN subnet is different than my local LAN subnet

VPN subnet: 192.168.1.0/25
VPC subnet: 172.3.9.0/25 (CS guest network for instances) Local Lan subnet: 
10.10.5.0/25 (my desktop)







On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:24 PM, Shanker Balan 
 wrote:

Comments inline.


On 26-Nov-2013, at 4:08 pm, Jake G.  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> From my desktop I am unable to connect to the internet after connecting to a 
> Cloudstack VPN I set up.
>
> I tried to uncheck the "Use default gateway on remote network" setting in the 
> VPN connection networking properties in windows and I can get to the internet 
> but then I can no longer connect to the instances in my CS network, even 
> though the VPN is still connected. The only way to access my instance in 
> cloudstack via VPN is to leave that checkbox checked on my desktop.
>
> Anyone know how to resolve this?

Is your VPC subnet the same as your “local” LAN subnet?


--
@shankerbalan

M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | 
www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd 
floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055

CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore 
http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/




This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions ex

Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

2013-11-27 Thread Jake G. 
Hi all,



On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 2:19 PM, Suresh Sadhu  
wrote:
 
try enabling the Internet connection sharing option on VPN Connection 
properties to get the internet access after connecting to vpn,. . Once you 
connected to vpn ,your system will get from  a guest IP range

regards
sadhu


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 27 November 2013 08:06
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Jake G.
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

I am using a Standard Isolated network


I noticed after connecting to the cloudstack VPN on a Standard Isolated network 
that my
 connection does not have a default gateway. Perhaps this is the reason I am 
unable to access the internet while connected to the VPN?


Thanks,
Jake



On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:15 PM, Jake G.  
wrote:

Standard Isolated network




On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:01 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

Jake,

And just to clarify, are you connecting to a standard
 isolated network, or a VPC network

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 11:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

Hi Geoff,

The settings are remote.access.vpn.client.iprange= 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20

Best,
Jake



On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:34 PM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

Jake,

What is the setting within global setting 'remote.access.vpn.client.iprange'

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Jake G. [mailto:dj_dark_jungl...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 26 November 2013 11:31
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No Internet after connecting to CS VPN

No my VPN subnet is different than my local LAN subnet

VPN subnet: 192.168.1.0/25
VPC subnet: 172.3.9.0/25 (CS guest network for instances) Local Lan subnet: 
10.10.5.0/25 (my desktop)







On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:24 PM, Shanker Balan 
 wrote:

Comments inline.


On 26-Nov-2013, at 4:08 pm, Jake G.  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> From my desktop I am unable to connect to the internet after connecting to a 
> Cloudstack VPN I set up.
>
> I tried to uncheck the "Use default gateway on remote network" setting in the 
> VPN connection networking properties in windows and I can get to the internet 
> but then I can no longer connect to the
 instances in my CS network, even though the VPN is still connected. The only 
way to access my instance in cloudstack via VPN is to leave that checkbox 
checked on my desktop.
>
> Anyone know how to resolve this?

Is your VPC subnet the same as your “local” LAN subnet?


--
@shankerbalan

M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | 
www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd 
floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055

CloudStack Bootcamp Training on 27/28 November, Bangalore 
http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/




This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
 registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is

Re: Unable to start VM

2013-11-27 Thread Serg Senko 
Hi,
I have same error after computing node restaring ...
Did you find solution? fix ?


On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:17 PM, m2m isb  wrote:

> Hello All
>
>
>
> We have a problem about Starting VMs.
>
> We have a ClousdStack 4.1.1 running with KVM,
>  Unable to start VMs with Following error.
>
>
> CloudStack management Server Log.
>
> /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
>
>
>
> 2013-11-16 14:30:56,859 DEBUG [cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner]
> (Job-Executor-14:job-926) DataCenter id = '2' provided is in avoid set,
> DeploymentPlanner cannot allocate the VM, returning.
>
> 2013-11-16 14:30:56,874 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-14:job-926) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped
> with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null
> host id before state transition: 28
>
> 2013-11-16 14:30:56,879 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-14:job-926) Hosts's actual total CPU: 59832 and CPU after
> applying overprovisioning: 119664
>
> 2013-11-16 14:30:56,879 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-14:job-926) release cpu from host: 28, old used:
> 21480,reserved: 4096, actual total: 59832, total with overprovisioning:
> 119664; new used: 17384,reserved:4096; movedfromreserved:
> false,moveToReserveredfalse
>
> 2013-11-16 14:30:56,879 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-14:job-926) release mem from host: 28, old used:
> 22682796032,reserved: 4294967296, total: 67519684608; new used:
> 18387828736,reserved:4294967296; movedfromreserved:
> false,moveToReserveredfalse
>
> 2013-11-16 14:30:56,895 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-14:job-926) Unexpected exception while executing
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.StartVMCmd
>
> com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a
> deployment for VM[User|m2m-vdgw02]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter;
> id=2
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:728)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.start(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:471)
>
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.deployVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:212)
>
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.deploy(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:209)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3871)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2579)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125)
>
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.StartVMCmd.execute(StartVMCmd.java:120)
>
> at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:162)
>
> at com.cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl$1.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:437)
>
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
>
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
>
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
>
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>
> 2013-11-16 14:30:56,895 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (Job-Executor-14:job-926) Complete async job-926, jobStatus: 2, resultCode:
> 530, result: Error Code: 530 Error text: Unable to create a deployment for
> VM[User|m2m-vdgw02]
>
>
>
>
>
> CloudStack Computing Node
>
>
>
> 013-11-16 15:36:57,148 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) Execution is successful.
>
> 2013-11-16 15:36:57,149 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) Try to stop the vm at first
>
> 2013-11-16 15:36:57,152 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
> (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) Failed to stop VM :i-3-110-VM :
>
> org.libvirt.LibvirtException: ドメインは見つかりませんでした: UUID
> '40a685f6-405a-3fef-8591-b73f00a4cdd3' に一致するドメインがありません
>
> at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
>
> at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
>
> at org.libvirt.Connect.domainLookupByUUIDString(Unknown Source)
>
> at org.libvirt.Connect.domainLookupByUUID(Unknown Source)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.stopVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:4021)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.stopVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3970)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:2894)
>
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1032)
>
> at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:525)
>
> at

RE: ACS 4.2.1 - Multi-Zone vSphere Architecture

2013-11-27 Thread Simon Murphy 
thanks. i found the management.cidr global setting that needs to be set to make 
the setup work.

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
Received: Wednesday, 27 Nov 2013, 6:12pm
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]; 
d...@cloudstack.apache.org [d...@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: RE: ACS 4.2.1 - Multi-Zone vSphere Architecture

Hi,

It is not mandatory to use single dedicated vlan in a multi zone environment. 
It is possible to have a dedicated VLAN at each site for vCenter, ESXi console 
ports and the system VM's, and then have the ACS server sitting in a separate 
VLAN that can route between both networks.

Thanks,
Sanjeev

From: Simon Murphy [mailto:simon.mur...@vifx.co.nz]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 7:32 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: ACS 4.2.1 - Multi-Zone vSphere Architecture

Hi all,

Im after some guidance on setting up ACS 4.2.1 with vSphere in a multi zone 
environment. The only way I have been able to successfully build a zone to this 
point is by having vSphere, ESXi console ports, ACS and the reserved system 
range on a single VLAN. This is OK for a small, single site deployment but how 
does this translate for multiple zones? The docs suggest that configuring a 
single /20 range for management is desired, does that imply that that range 
should be stretched across sites?

Should it be possible to have a dedicated VLAN at each site for vCenter, ESXi 
console ports and the system VM's, and then have the ACS server sitting in a 
separate VLAN that can route between both networks? I have been unsuccessful in 
getting his working to date so hopefully someone out there has some experience 
setting up a multi-site ACS/vSphere envoronment.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!


Simon Murphy
Solutions Architect

ViFX | Cloud Infrastructure
Level 7, 57 Fort Street, Auckland, New Zealand 1010
PO Box 106700, Auckland, New Zealand 1143
M +64 21 285 4519 | S simon_a_murphy
www.vifx.co.nz follow us on 
twitter
Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch

[cid:image003.jpg@01CDDF95.815BF160]

experience. expertise. execution.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, without 
prejudice and may contain information that is subject to legal privilege. It is 
intended solely for the use of the individual/s to whom it is addressed in 
accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act (1993). The content contained 
in this email does not, necessarily, reflect the official policy position of 
ViFX nor does ViFX have any responsibility for any alterations to the contents 
of this email that may occur following transmission. If you are not the 
addressee it may be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or 
otherwise use the information contained within this email. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender prior to deleting this email 
message from your system. Please note ViFX reserves the right to monitor, from 
time to time, the communications sent to and from its email network.