Re: Unable to deploy Guest VM Cloudstack 4.3

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi Santosh,
Thanks for replay,

I have followed the given link, and deleted systemvm-4.3.0 from
/secondary/systemvm/
still it's giving same error.

Also I followed below link and varifed public key it's they are same.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3014

[root@hyperv is]# cat /var/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
ssh-rsa
B3NzaC1yc2EBIwAAAQEAzQUMQc5H2UwsFyLYMuy7vEtIqfhlhDLSZ8BcaitZvy47J+2rNrrJX/W/tL7gaEMlKh05IBiXSw+/KeT+bnnuMvarlqO/U60tWMUoBEPqiUC2PYKpVYVI/vsNVd+m16TWhyyKIvj643llFDcEIiidihSfsV+689lny36spscmS4jYZZf/JteSy2Nx+Qkx9RUueMAHUX2Ecpk1oEG4Gs5z47Xjc7BdiHc39duUhLgSERCQ8CDyaBuItU38KzyZrzeR01fvXIlP+t+JQOpVqhs1tIrhJPaK9Oc4tlZq/l1z+P4PRdP6MDuzyH2if7LgEL4yYPe/O7EmJWzOj5sM4vZIfw==
cloud@hyperv.cloud.local[root@hyperv is]#

[root@hyperv is]# cat authorized_keys
ssh-rsa
B3NzaC1yc2EBIwAAAQEAzQUMQc5H2UwsFyLYMuy7vEtIqfhlhDLSZ8BcaitZvy47J+2rNrrJX/W/tL7gaEMlKh05IBiXSw+/KeT+bnnuMvarlqO/U60tWMUoBEPqiUC2PYKpVYVI/vsNVd+m16TWhyyKIvj643llFDcEIiidihSfsV+689lny36spscmS4jYZZf/JteSy2Nx+Qkx9RUueMAHUX2Ecpk1oEG4Gs5z47Xjc7BdiHc39duUhLgSERCQ8CDyaBuItU38KzyZrzeR01fvXIlP+t+JQOpVqhs1tIrhJPaK9Oc4tlZq/l1z+P4PRdP6MDuzyH2if7LgEL4yYPe/O7EmJWzOj5sM4vZIfw==
cloud@hyperv.cloud.local[root@hyperv is]#


Regards,
Tejas




On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Santhosh Edukulla <
santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Check this.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.devel/22230
>
> Santhosh
> 
> From: Tejas Gadaria [refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 8:06 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Unable to deploy Guest VM Cloudstack 4.3
>
> Hi,
>
> While creating Virtual router its giving below error,
>
>
> 2014-02-14 18:19:53,948 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
> (DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Use router's private IP for SSH control. IP :
> 10.129.151.89
> 2014-02-14 18:19:54,135 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
> (DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Failed to authentication SSH user root on
> host 10.129.151.89
> 2014-02-14 18:19:54,136 ERROR [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
> (DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) GetDomRVersionCmd failed due to
> java.lang.Exception: Failed to authentication SSH user root on host
> 10.129.151.89
> java.lang.Exception: Failed to authentication SSH user root on host
> 10.129.151.89
> at com.cloud.utils.ssh.SshHelper.sshExecute(SshHelper.java:144)
> at com.cloud.utils.ssh.SshHelper.sshExecute(SshHelper.java:37)
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.hyperv.resource.HypervDirectConnectResource.execute(HypervDirectConnectResource.java:1545)
> at
>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.hyperv.resource.HypervDirectConnectResource.executeRequest(HypervDirectConnectResource.java:411)
> at
>
> com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
> 2014-02-14 18:19:54,138 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
> (DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Seq 1-2053505129: Cancelling because one of
> the answers is false and it is stop on error.
> 2014-02-14 18:19:54,138 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
> (DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Seq 1-2053505129: Cancelling because one of
> the answers is false and it is stop on error.
>
>
> Regards,
> Tejas
>

[4.3-rc5] Unable to create virtual router (JSON unable to be deserialized)

[Tanner Danzey]

Hello all, I've decided to roll 4.3 since it appears to fix some issues
regarding KVM & S3 and snapshots. I've got everything set up properly up
until the point where I am going to actually create an instance, but the
instance creation hangs because the router VM will not start. Here's the
cloudstack agent log on the hypervisor:

http://pastebin.com/F2BqsjBV

Is this a programming error that I need to fill out a bug for or is there
something I can do to fix it myself?

-- 
*Tanner Danzey*
Systems Engineer
Northstar Technology Group
arkan...@gmail.com / tanner.dan...@northstar-tg.com
(701) 237-9096 x7122

RE: I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I would say we need the Compute Offering to define the disk performance, and 
take only the size from the disk offering.

Might be simpler to have a set of Disk Offerings specifically for this purpose, 
or use a Custom type offering where only the size is chosen.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Lennert den Teuling [mailto:lenn...@pcextreme.nl]
Sent: 14 February 2014 16:33
To: users
Subject: RE: I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1

Hi Geoff,

Thanks for your quick reply.

> Op 14 februari 2014 om 16:51 schreef Geoff Higginbottom
> :
>
>
> Lennert ,
>
> I would imagine it's because VMs created from Templates are using the
> settings in the Compute Offering for the Root Volume, but VMs created
> from ISOs are using the settings in the Disk Offering chosen for the Root 
> Volume.

Ok, if you put it this way it makes total sense.

> It is not very obvious which one should apply, and also confusing from
> a user perspective.

Indeed, if you would for example want to define the I/O limits based on the 
type of the offering this is not possible if you would allow people to use 
templates and ISOs at the same time.

For example: We have lower I/O rates for our 2 cheaper offerings. Now if you 
install from ISO you get a different I/O limit than you would if you install 
from template.

> I've not checked, but suggest you take a look and see if there are any
> bugs or feature request already logged, and if not get one logged.

I will have a look. Thinking more and more about this I’m not sure there is 
even a proper way to do this. Every way has his up and downsides as long as you 
are mixing templates with ISO installs.

The only way I could think (now) of is that the template automatically receives 
the closest disk offering (based on size), but doesn't sound very reliable 
either.

> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennert den Teuling [mailto:lenn...@pcextreme.nl]
> Sent: 14 February 2014 15:48
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1
>
> Hi All,
>
> We started using I/O Throttling a few days ago on our platform to
> fairly share the available disk writes between our customers and
> create a more reliable disk performance.
>
> It seems to work fine, expect i noticed that when you create a VM from
> ISO the I/O limit is not applied.
>
> We define the I/O write limit in the (VM)service offering, not the
> disk offering. It seems to work fine for templates, but for ISO
> installs it seems necessary to also define a limit in the disk offering.
>
> I would expect that when you define a limit in the (VM) service
> offering it's applied to all underlaying disks. And because templates
> officially don't have a disk offering, it's needed to apply in the
> service offering. We are now defining it twice, but it's not ideal.
>
> Is this normal behavior or a bug? Thanks!
>
> Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
>
> Lennert den Teuling
> Tel direct: +31 (0)118 700 210
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support
> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
>
> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>
> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1
> training
> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil.
> Classroom
> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led,
> On-line
> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
> On-line
> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led,
> On-line
> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
> On-line
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
> registered trademark.

Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,

Lennert den Teuling
Tel direct: +31 (0)118 700 210
This email 

RE: I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1

[Lennert den Teuling]

Hi Geoff,

Thanks for your quick reply.

> Op 14 februari 2014 om 16:51 schreef Geoff Higginbottom
> :
> 
> 
> Lennert ,
> 
> I would imagine it's because VMs created from Templates are using the settings
> in the Compute Offering for the Root Volume, but VMs created from ISOs are
> using the settings in the Disk Offering chosen for the Root Volume.

Ok, if you put it this way it makes total sense.

> It is not very obvious which one should apply, and also confusing from a user
> perspective.

Indeed, if you would for example want to define the I/O limits based on the type
of the offering this is not possible if you would allow people to use templates
and ISOs at the same time.

For example: We have lower I/O rates for our 2 cheaper offerings. Now if you
install from ISO you get a different I/O limit than you would if you install
from template.

> I've not checked, but suggest you take a look and see if there are any bugs or
> feature request already logged, and if not get one logged.

I will have a look. Thinking more and more about this I’m not sure there is even
a proper way to do this. Every way has his up and downsides as long as you are
mixing templates with ISO installs.

The only way I could think (now) of is that the template automatically receives
the closest disk offering (based on size), but doesn't sound very reliable
either.

> Regards
> 
> Geoff Higginbottom
> 
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> 
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennert den Teuling [mailto:lenn...@pcextreme.nl]
> Sent: 14 February 2014 15:48
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We started using I/O Throttling a few days ago on our platform to fairly share
> the available disk writes between our customers and create a more reliable
> disk performance.
> 
> It seems to work fine, expect i noticed that when you create a VM from ISO the
> I/O limit is not applied.
> 
> We define the I/O write limit in the (VM)service offering, not the disk
> offering. It seems to work fine for templates, but for ISO installs it seems
> necessary to also define a limit in the disk offering.
> 
> I would expect that when you define a limit in the (VM) service offering it's
> applied to all underlaying disks. And because templates officially don't have
> a disk offering, it's needed to apply in the service offering. We are now
> defining it twice, but it's not ideal.
> 
> Is this normal behavior or a bug? Thanks!
> 
> Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
> 
> Lennert den Teuling
> Tel direct: +31 (0)118 700 210
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support offers the
> best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
> 
> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
> 
> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training
> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil.
> Classroom
> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led,
> On-line
> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
> On-line
> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led,
> On-line
> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
> On-line
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape
> Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
> trademark.

Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,

Lennert den Teuling
Tel direct: +31 (0)118 700 210

RE: How can i access my VM from internet

[Santhosh Edukulla]

check this discussion:

http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/335623-unable-to-view-console-of-vms-through-internet/

Santhosh

From: Luis [luisantonio.marti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 8:04 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: How can i access my VM from internet

Hi, I have cloudstack 4.1, it works fine and i can use view console from
inside of my network but when i am outside like in my office, i have no
access to view console, i get an error about the realhostip, please suggest
how can i fix this, i wonder if i can use apache and proxy to redirect,
please let me know.



Thank you.

RE: Unable to deploy Guest VM Cloudstack 4.3

[Santhosh Edukulla]

Check this.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.devel/22230

Santhosh

From: Tejas Gadaria [refond.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 8:06 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to deploy Guest VM Cloudstack 4.3

Hi,

While creating Virtual router its giving below error,


2014-02-14 18:19:53,948 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Use router's private IP for SSH control. IP :
10.129.151.89
2014-02-14 18:19:54,135 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Failed to authentication SSH user root on
host 10.129.151.89
2014-02-14 18:19:54,136 ERROR [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) GetDomRVersionCmd failed due to
java.lang.Exception: Failed to authentication SSH user root on host
10.129.151.89
java.lang.Exception: Failed to authentication SSH user root on host
10.129.151.89
at com.cloud.utils.ssh.SshHelper.sshExecute(SshHelper.java:144)
at com.cloud.utils.ssh.SshHelper.sshExecute(SshHelper.java:37)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.hyperv.resource.HypervDirectConnectResource.execute(HypervDirectConnectResource.java:1545)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.hyperv.resource.HypervDirectConnectResource.executeRequest(HypervDirectConnectResource.java:411)
at
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
2014-02-14 18:19:54,138 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Seq 1-2053505129: Cancelling because one of
the answers is false and it is stop on error.
2014-02-14 18:19:54,138 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Seq 1-2053505129: Cancelling because one of
the answers is false and it is stop on error.


Regards,
Tejas

RE: I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Lennert ,

I would imagine it's because VMs created from Templates are using the settings 
in the Compute Offering for the Root Volume, but VMs created from ISOs are 
using the settings in the Disk Offering chosen for the Root Volume.

It is not very obvious which one should apply, and also confusing from a user 
perspective.

I've not checked, but suggest you take a look and see if there are any bugs or 
feature request already logged, and if not get one logged.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Lennert den Teuling [mailto:lenn...@pcextreme.nl]
Sent: 14 February 2014 15:48
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1

Hi All,

We started using I/O Throttling a few days ago on our platform to fairly share 
the available disk writes between our customers and create a more reliable disk 
performance.

It seems to work fine, expect i noticed that when you create a VM from ISO the 
I/O limit is not applied.

We define the I/O write limit in the (VM)service offering, not the disk 
offering. It seems to work fine for templates, but for ISO installs it seems 
necessary to also define a limit in the disk offering.

I would expect that when you define a limit in the (VM) service offering it's 
applied to all underlaying disks. And because templates officially don't have a 
disk offering, it's needed to apply in the service offering. We are now 
defining it twice, but it's not ideal.

Is this normal behavior or a bug? Thanks!

Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,

Lennert den Teuling
Tel direct: +31 (0)118 700 210
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

I/O Throttling in CS 4.2.1

[Lennert den Teuling]

Hi All,

We started using I/O Throttling a few days ago on our platform to fairly share
the available disk writes between our customers and create a more reliable disk
performance.

It seems to work fine, expect i noticed that when you create a VM from ISO the
I/O limit is not applied.

We define the I/O write limit in the (VM)service offering, not the disk
offering. It seems to work fine for templates, but for ISO installs it seems
necessary to also define a limit in the disk offering.

I would expect that when you define a limit in the (VM) service offering it's
applied to all underlaying disks. And because templates officially don't have a
disk offering, it's needed to apply in the service offering. We are now defining
it twice, but it's not ideal.

Is this normal behavior or a bug? Thanks!

Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,

Lennert den Teuling
Tel direct: +31 (0)118 700 210

How can i access my VM from internet

[Luis]

Hi, I have cloudstack 4.1, it works fine and i can use view console from
inside of my network but when i am outside like in my office, i have no
access to view console, i get an error about the realhostip, please suggest
how can i fix this, i wonder if i can use apache and proxy to redirect,
please let me know.



Thank you.

Unable to deploy Guest VM Cloudstack 4.3

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi,

While creating Virtual router its giving below error,


2014-02-14 18:19:53,948 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Use router's private IP for SSH control. IP :
10.129.151.89
2014-02-14 18:19:54,135 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Failed to authentication SSH user root on
host 10.129.151.89
2014-02-14 18:19:54,136 ERROR [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) GetDomRVersionCmd failed due to
java.lang.Exception: Failed to authentication SSH user root on host
10.129.151.89
java.lang.Exception: Failed to authentication SSH user root on host
10.129.151.89
at com.cloud.utils.ssh.SshHelper.sshExecute(SshHelper.java:144)
at com.cloud.utils.ssh.SshHelper.sshExecute(SshHelper.java:37)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.hyperv.resource.HypervDirectConnectResource.execute(HypervDirectConnectResource.java:1545)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.hyperv.resource.HypervDirectConnectResource.executeRequest(HypervDirectConnectResource.java:411)
at
com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:216)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
2014-02-14 18:19:54,138 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Seq 1-2053505129: Cancelling because one of
the answers is false and it is stop on error.
2014-02-14 18:19:54,138 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-50:ctx-3520609f) Seq 1-2053505129: Cancelling because one of
the answers is false and it is stop on error.


Regards,
Tejas

Cloudstack API list all VMs

[Rafael Weingartner]

Hi folks,
I was trying to find a way to list all VMs that are running on CS. I looked
the API Doc and it seemed to have a way to do that using isrecursive=true,
domainid=1 and listall=true. However, it does not list the VMs that are
assigned into a project.
Would there be any way to list all VMs including the one that were created
in project?

BTW: I was using the Admin account to run these commands.

-- 
Rafael Weingärtner