??????????????cloudstack??????
eth010.23.0.18cloudbr0??eth0vlan 300??eth0.300cloudvirbr300ip172.16.1.1??gw=172.16.1.1,mask=255.255.255.0 ??cloudstakc??kvm??cloudbr0cloudvirbr300running172.16.1.10??172.16.1.20172.16.1.1??ping??
????: ??????????????cloudstack??????
??vlan ???0?2?0?2Adagio ???0?22014-04-22?0?220:14?0?2users-cn???0?2??cloudstack??eth010.23.0.18cloudbr0??eth0vlan 300??eth0.300cloudvirbr300ip172.16.1.1??gw=172.16.1.1,mask=255.255.255.0 ??cloudstakc??kvm??cloudbr0cloudvirbr300running172.16.1.10??172.16.1.20172.16.1.1??ping?? ?0?2 ?0?2
????: ?????? ??????????????cloudstack??????
??vlan ID??vlan??KVM??baidu?? agent ?? ?0?2?0?2Adagio ???0?22014-04-22?0?221:18?0?2users-cn???0?2?? ??cloudstack?? ?0?2 ?0?2 1 2??vlan172.16.1.0/24?? 3??vlan 300??eth0.300??cloudvirbr300??ip??172.16.1.1??cloudvirbr300??Ip ?0?2 ?0?2 8250??9090 ?0?2 ?0?2 virsh??attach-interface??cloudvirbr300console??ipv4ping?? ?0?2 ?0?2 eth0,eth1??eth0??eth1172.16 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?? ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 -- -- ??: tanthalas;tanthalas...@hotmail.com; : 2014??4??22??(??) 9:01 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; ?0?2 : : ??cloudstack?? ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2 ??vlan ?? Adagio ?? 2014-04-22 20:14 users-cn?? ??cloudstack??eth010.23.0.18cloudbr0??eth0vlan 300??eth0.300cloudvirbr300ip172.16.1.1??gw=172.16.1.1,mask=255.255.255.0 ??cloudstakc??kvm??cloudbr0cloudvirbr300running172.16.1.10??172.16.1.20172.16.1.1??ping??
希望在深圳或广州与各位社区的朋友见面！
在深圳、广州及周边的朋友们！ 我会在4-27到5-9这段时间在深圳出差，很希望能和各位在深圳的朋友见面聊天。如果见面的朋友少，就找一天晚上吃顿饭，喝喝茶，谈谈关于CloudStack，关于商业上的想法，海阔天空的聊聊，总会有所收获；如果人数多，那就把小聚会升级成正式活动，大家一起办个专场，分享技术心得，在CloudStack上的疑惑，或者使用经验，更多的技术和想法！我想，五一里找一天来做，会是个不错的选择。 我知道很多在广州的朋友也希望能办场活动，就看哪边的人数多了，你们觉得咋样？有兴趣的请举手！ 如果一起见面聊天，你们想听、想交流什么话题，也都在本邮件中回复。我尽可能的和大家一起分享更多的CloudStack的技术或者更多！ 刘宇超
cloudstack能否接受已格式化的EXT3 ISCSI存储空间
HI ALL 目前想需要备份CS的ISCSI的数据，由于使用XENserver,免费版本， 1.什么办法可以备份xenserver主机内的虚拟机？ 2. cloudstack能否接受已格式化的EXT3 ISCSI存储空间？
Re: Including packer support for CloudStack: Fwd: Re: [packer] Initial support for a Cloudstack builder (#922)
Is it limited in terms of networking, e.g. does it work with advanced networking? If so, we could possibly grant access to our environment. -- Erik Weber On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: Support for CloudStack was merged last night into packer's repository. This work was contributed by Peter [1] on the packer list. Would be nice if anyone can spare resources for testing the implementation. Please reach out to the packer project on github [2] if you would like to help. [1] https://github.com/mindjiver [2] https://github.com/mitchellh/packer/issues/922 -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com -- Forwarded message -- From: Mitchell Hashimoto notificati...@github.com To: mitchellh/packer pac...@noreply.github.com Cc: Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:58:52 -0700 Subject: Re: [packer] Initial support for a Cloudstack builder (#922) This looks decent. Unfortunately, I don't want to merge this without having access to a CloudStack installation that I can use for testing. Do you know any vendors that would be willing to provide a free account for basic testing of this builder? Until then, please make this a plugin, it would work great! I'll work on vendors as well. Let me know if you can get me access. I'm going to close for now, but will reopen when/if I can get access. Waah! — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/mitchellh/packer/pull/922#issuecomment-41001759 .
RE: Storage agent or storage VM disconnected
Looks like the cloud agent inside ssvm is down. Can you destroy the ssvm (s-1-vm). It will get recreated. It should solve the issue. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: sandeep khandekar [mailto:cloudstack.sand...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 4:21 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Storage agent or storage VM disconnected Changed the following parameter in my cloudstack getting the following error in my centos template Storage agent or storage VM disconnected how to solve these? In my previous mail I told you that My centos template didnt got loaded so I used the log file and mounted the secondary storage manually sudo mount -t nfs 10.4.6.17:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3/ /mnt/53d355b8-a8c7-33a2-b9fd-e6d68ff7eec0/ I made the following changes to solve my template problem by making the changes in my global settings secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to my IP address(10.4.6.17) and I restarted my management server now I am getting the following error Storage agent or storage VM disconnected Any help??? -- SANDEEP KHANDEKAR Assistant Professor Department of Computer science and engineering Sreenidhi Institute of science and Technology Hyderabad
https certificate on load balancer?
Hi all, is it possible to place the https certificate on to the load balancer directly instead of installing them on each webserver? I could easily do that manually but my changes will get lost on the next rebuild of the LB. Is there a way to have CloudStack doing that? Thanks and regards, Ingo -- This email was Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com
RE: https certificate on load balancer?
Yes, I do that with with my ssl cert installed on my haproxy LB... From: ingo.joc...@bautzen-it.de To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: https certificate on load balancer? Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:10:32 + Hi all, is it possible to place the https certificate on to the load balancer directly instead of installing them on each webserver? I could easily do that manually but my changes will get lost on the next rebuild of the LB. Is there a way to have CloudStack doing that? Thanks and regards, Ingo -- This email was Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com
AW: https certificate on load balancer?
Hi Michael, As I just found out this is build in into 4.3. I'm running 4.2. Thanks for your reply. Regards, Ingo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. April 2014 09:13 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff: RE: https certificate on load balancer? Yes, I do that with with my ssl cert installed on my haproxy LB... From: ingo.joc...@bautzen-it.de To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: https certificate on load balancer? Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:10:32 + Hi all, is it possible to place the https certificate on to the load balancer directly instead of installing them on each webserver? I could easily do that manually but my changes will get lost on the next rebuild of the LB. Is there a way to have CloudStack doing that? Thanks and regards, Ingo -- This email was Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com -- This email was Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com
Re: affinity group not work
Two things here. You say you dedicated a host to an account which has access to a project, this means this host is now unavailable to the project, and can only be used by that account directly. Secondly the error message is highlighting a problem with affinity groups. If you are using an Anti-Affinity group and wish to create 3 VMs, you will need at least 3 hosts which are available to the Project (obviously excluding the one you dedicated to the account) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguruhttps://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 22 Apr 2014, at 06:34, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.commailto:gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: I created a project and Project resources are: Max. templates5 Max. snapshots5 Max. volumes 5 Max. public IPs 5 Max. networks 5 Max. user VMs 5 Max. VPCs 5 Max. CPU cores 40 Max. primary (GiB) 200 Max. secondary (GiB)400 Max. memory (MiB) 40960 Then I dedicated my host to my account that belongs to the project I mentioned above. I created two instances that have 0.5ghz CPU, 1GB ram, 5gb hard disk ... I thought that I can create up to 5 instance but after creating two instance I can't create third one. The error is: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|xxx19], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them Please help... Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classrommhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: affinity group not work
I can only choose anti-affinity group as type. No other options seem. 2014-04-22 10:37 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Two things here. You say you dedicated a host to an account which has access to a project, this means this host is now unavailable to the project, and can only be used by that account directly. Secondly the error message is highlighting a problem with affinity groups. If you are using an Anti-Affinity group and wish to create 3 VMs, you will need at least 3 hosts which are available to the Project (obviously excluding the one you dedicated to the account) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 22 Apr 2014, at 06:34, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.commailto: gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: I created a project and Project resources are: Max. templates5 Max. snapshots5 Max. volumes 5 Max. public IPs 5 Max. networks 5 Max. user VMs 5 Max. VPCs 5 Max. CPU cores 40 Max. primary (GiB) 200 Max. secondary (GiB)400 Max. memory (MiB) 40960 Then I dedicated my host to my account that belongs to the project I mentioned above. I created two instances that have 0.5ghz CPU, 1GB ram, 5gb hard disk ... I thought that I can create up to 5 instance but after creating two instance I can't create third one. The error is: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|xxx19], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them Please help... Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classromm http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
RE: affinity group not work
Affinity Groups are optional, If you have limited Hosts, simply do not select an affinity group when deploying a VM Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work I can only choose anti-affinity group as type. No other options seem. 2014-04-22 10:37 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Two things here. You say you dedicated a host to an account which has access to a project, this means this host is now unavailable to the project, and can only be used by that account directly. Secondly the error message is highlighting a problem with affinity groups. If you are using an Anti-Affinity group and wish to create 3 VMs, you will need at least 3 hosts which are available to the Project (obviously excluding the one you dedicated to the account) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue.c om | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 22 Apr 2014, at 06:34, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.commailto: gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: I created a project and Project resources are: Max. templates5 Max. snapshots5 Max. volumes 5 Max. public IPs 5 Max. networks 5 Max. user VMs 5 Max. VPCs 5 Max. CPU cores 40 Max. primary (GiB) 200 Max. secondary (GiB)400 Max. memory (MiB) 40960 Then I dedicated my host to my account that belongs to the project I mentioned above. I created two instances that have 0.5ghz CPU, 1GB ram, 5gb hard disk ... I thought that I can create up to 5 instance but after creating two instance I can't create third one. The error is: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|xxx19], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them Please help... Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classromm http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is
Re: affinity group not work
But I want to use specific vms for specific hosts. For example I want to create instance-1 to host-1. Not host-2 2014-04-22 11:17 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Affinity Groups are optional, If you have limited Hosts, simply do not select an affinity group when deploying a VM Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work I can only choose anti-affinity group as type. No other options seem. 2014-04-22 10:37 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Two things here. You say you dedicated a host to an account which has access to a project, this means this host is now unavailable to the project, and can only be used by that account directly. Secondly the error message is highlighting a problem with affinity groups. If you are using an Anti-Affinity group and wish to create 3 VMs, you will need at least 3 hosts which are available to the Project (obviously excluding the one you dedicated to the account) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue.c om | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 22 Apr 2014, at 06:34, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.commailto: gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: I created a project and Project resources are: Max. templates5 Max. snapshots5 Max. volumes 5 Max. public IPs 5 Max. networks 5 Max. user VMs 5 Max. VPCs 5 Max. CPU cores 40 Max. primary (GiB) 200 Max. secondary (GiB)400 Max. memory (MiB) 40960 Then I dedicated my host to my account that belongs to the project I mentioned above. I created two instances that have 0.5ghz CPU, 1GB ram, 5gb hard disk ... I thought that I can create up to 5 instance but after creating two instance I can't create third one. The error is: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|xxx19], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them Please help... Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classromm http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
RE: affinity group not work
Then affinity groups are not what you need. You need to setup Compute Offerings with Host Tags and then set the same Tags on the Hosts. e.g. Tag Host 1 with 'host1', Host 2 with 'host2' etc, then create a compute offering using Host Tag 'host1', and another with Host Tag 'host2' then simply use these to deploy your VMs. Bear in mind that you may lose HA functionality with this configuration. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:24 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work But I want to use specific vms for specific hosts. For example I want to create instance-1 to host-1. Not host-2 2014-04-22 11:17 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Affinity Groups are optional, If you have limited Hosts, simply do not select an affinity group when deploying a VM Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work I can only choose anti-affinity group as type. No other options seem. 2014-04-22 10:37 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Two things here. You say you dedicated a host to an account which has access to a project, this means this host is now unavailable to the project, and can only be used by that account directly. Secondly the error message is highlighting a problem with affinity groups. If you are using an Anti-Affinity group and wish to create 3 VMs, you will need at least 3 hosts which are available to the Project (obviously excluding the one you dedicated to the account) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue .c om | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 22 Apr 2014, at 06:34, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.commailto: gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: I created a project and Project resources are: Max. templates5 Max. snapshots5 Max. volumes 5 Max. public IPs 5 Max. networks 5 Max. user VMs 5 Max. VPCs 5 Max. CPU cores 40 Max. primary (GiB) 200 Max. secondary (GiB)400 Max. memory (MiB) 40960 Then I dedicated my host to my account that belongs to the project I mentioned above. I created two instances that have 0.5ghz CPU, 1GB ram, 5gb hard disk ... I thought that I can create up to 5 instance but after creating two instance I can't create third one. The error is: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|xxx19], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them Please help... Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classromm http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
Re: Dynamic Scaling of VM
Thanks Likitha, I will check it out. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Likitha Shetty likitha.she...@citrix.comwrote: Tejas, you must be running into this error because Clone_VM vCenter task is taking more than 20 minutes to complete. To avoid this error use global configuration 'vmware.vcenter.session.timeout' to increase the default timeout value. In vCenter under Tasks and Events, check how long the CloneVM task takes to complete and increase the timeout value accordingly (refer - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5069). Thanks, Likitha -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:45 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Dynamic Scaling of VM Hi Nitin, you are right, I changed to *enable.dynamic.scale.vm = false* Created another centos template without dynamic scaling, still facing same issue. On management server it displaying same logs as above. I am using vCenter 5.5 and Esxi host 5.1 Regards, Tejas On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: Error doesn't seem to be coming from dynamic scaling. Change the config below to false and see if you still hit the issue. *enable.dynamic.scale.vm* = false On 19/04/14 8:48 PM, Tejas Gadaria refond.g...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to test dynamic scaling of vm on vmware with CS 4.3. I have CentOS 6.3 template with vmware tools installed. In global setting *enable.dynamic.scale.vm* = *true, * *mem.overprovisioning.factor =2 * while trying to deploy template, it's giving below error.. 2014-04-20 09:06:31,808 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.u.VmwareClient] (DirectAgent-27:ctx-80068c4c 10.129.151.67) Cancelling vCenter task because task failed with java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out 2014-04-20 09:06:32,354 ERROR [c.c.s.r.VmwareStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-27:ctx-80068c4c 10.129.151.67) clone volume from base image failed due to Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException Message: vCenter task failed due to java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out java.lang.RuntimeException: vCenter task failed due to java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.util.VmwareClient.waitForTask(VmwareClien t.jav a:341) at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.mo.VirtualMachineMO.createFullClone(Virtu alMac hineMO.java:619) at com.cloud.storage.resource.VmwareStorageProcessor.createVMFullClone(V mware StorageProcessor.java:266) at com.cloud.storage.resource.VmwareStorageProcessor.cloneVolumeFromBase Templ ate(VmwareStorageProcessor.java:338) at com.cloud.storage.resource.StorageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.execute (Stor ageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.java:78) at com.cloud.storage.resource.VmwareStorageSubsystemCommandHandler.execu te(Vm wareStorageSubsystemCommandHandler.java:171) at com.cloud.storage.resource.StorageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.handleS torag eCommands(StorageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.java:50) at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.resource.VmwareResource.executeRequest(Vm wareR esource.java:571) at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAg entAt tache.java:216) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(Ma naged ContextRunnable.java:49) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.ca ll(De faultManagedContext.java:56) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.call WithC ontext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runW ithCo ntext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53) at org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(Mana gedCo ntextRunnable.java:46) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. acces s$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask. run(S cheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java: 1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor .java :603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679) 2014-04-20 09:06:32,355 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-27:ctx-80068c4c) Seq 1-585564250: Response Received: 2014-04-20 09:06:32,355 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-27:ctx-80068c4c) Seq 1-585564250: Response Received: 2014-04-20
RE: affinity group not work
Actually Affinity group of type Explicit Dedication can be of some help. You dedicate the host to the account. While deploying VM if you chose the affinity group 'ExplicitDedication', CloudStack will place the vm on host dedicated to the account. If the affinity group is not chosen, the VM will be deployed on shared host(non dedicated). However afaik affinity groups are not supported in projects (CLOUDSTACK-6237) You can also try using Implicit dedication planner in strict mode while creating the service offering. CS will try to place the VMs deployed from this service offering on implicitly dedicated host. Please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+-+Private+zone,+pod,+cluster,+host+Functional+Spec Thanks, Saksham -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:57 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Then affinity groups are not what you need. You need to setup Compute Offerings with Host Tags and then set the same Tags on the Hosts. e.g. Tag Host 1 with 'host1', Host 2 with 'host2' etc, then create a compute offering using Host Tag 'host1', and another with Host Tag 'host2' then simply use these to deploy your VMs. Bear in mind that you may lose HA functionality with this configuration. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:24 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work But I want to use specific vms for specific hosts. For example I want to create instance-1 to host-1. Not host-2 2014-04-22 11:17 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Affinity Groups are optional, If you have limited Hosts, simply do not select an affinity group when deploying a VM Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work I can only choose anti-affinity group as type. No other options seem. 2014-04-22 10:37 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Two things here. You say you dedicated a host to an account which has access to a project, this means this host is now unavailable to the project, and can only be used by that account directly. Secondly the error message is highlighting a problem with affinity groups. If you are using an Anti-Affinity group and wish to create 3 VMs, you will need at least 3 hosts which are available to the Project (obviously excluding the one you dedicated to the account) Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue .c om | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 22 Apr 2014, at 06:34, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.commailto: gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: I created a project and Project resources are: Max. templates5 Max. snapshots5 Max. volumes 5 Max. public IPs 5 Max. networks 5 Max. user VMs 5 Max. VPCs 5 Max. CPU cores 40 Max. primary (GiB) 200 Max. secondary (GiB)400 Max. memory (MiB) 40960 Then I dedicated my host to my account that belongs to the project I mentioned above. I created two instances that have 0.5ghz CPU, 1GB ram, 5gb hard disk ... I thought that I can create up to 5 instance but after creating two instance I can't create third one. The error is: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|xxx19], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them Please help... Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classromm http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 15th-20th September 2014,
Re: Insufficient capacity exception
Hi, From the below logs the hosts are in avoid set. VM created failed because of no suitable host found. Can you please check the MS logs for errors/exception while starting vm deployment ? (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host2, hostId: 4 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host1, hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0 suitable hosts Thanks, Jayapal On 22-Apr-2014, at 1:32 PM, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have enough resources on my hosts (ram,cpu ...) But I got error while try to create vm. Log is: 2014-04-22 10:58:50,555 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Successfully transitioned to start state for VM[User|yuyu] reservation id = c93b30c1-3cfa-4bbe-86cc-bd21eee7d62e 2014-04-22 10:58:50,603 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 1 and podId: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,603 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [1, 4] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,607 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [1, 4] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner@21a24ed3 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:1,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: 536870912 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Searching resources only under specified Pod: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Pod: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,610 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,613 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,613 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,614 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 2 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-4-Routing], Host[-1-Routing]] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 2 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-4-Routing], Host[-1-Routing]] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=512 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host2, hostId: 4 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host1, hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0 suitable hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) No suitable hosts found 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) No suitable hosts found under this Cluster: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,617 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Could not find suitable Deployment Destination for this VM under any clusters, returning. 2014-04-22 10:58:50,617 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4
RE: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
Hi Tejas, For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only works with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a mixed set of other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver, kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have to register a secondary storage of type SMB. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server Hi I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server. 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary secondary storage, it was working fine. 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately hyperv Centos template download started. 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster. 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says , 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for network id 206 as a part of router startup in Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-- Pool(Id))] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT-- Pool(2))] 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv] com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not been completely downloaded to zone 1 at com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan agerImpl.java:1745) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to secondary storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available. Regards, Tejas
Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
Hi Devdeep, Thanks for clarification about hyperv, If I undo all the changes I made for hyperv setup and go ahead to deploy vmware on existing xen setup, Do I need to upload vmware systemvm or it won't be necessary. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.comwrote: Hi Tejas, For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only works with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a mixed set of other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver, kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have to register a secondary storage of type SMB. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server Hi I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server. 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary secondary storage, it was working fine. 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately hyperv Centos template download started. 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster. 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says , 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for network id 206 as a part of router startup in Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-- Pool(Id))] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT-- Pool(2))] 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv] com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not been completely downloaded to zone 1 at com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan agerImpl.java:1745) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to secondary storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available. Regards, Tejas
Re: Cloudstack with PCI compliance
Hi there, That would be interesting for me as well Kind Regards Uwe 2014-04-21 19:31 GMT+02:00 Upendra Moturi upendra.mot...@sungardas.com: Hello Team, Has anyone worked on making cloudstack PCI compliant. Can you please point me some documentation.
RE: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
Hi Tejas, It should work but I would recommend that you seed the vmware systemvm template too on the secondary storage. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:05 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server Hi Devdeep, Thanks for clarification about hyperv, If I undo all the changes I made for hyperv setup and go ahead to deploy vmware on existing xen setup, Do I need to upload vmware systemvm or it won't be necessary. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.comwrote: Hi Tejas, For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only works with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a mixed set of other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver, kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have to register a secondary storage of type SMB. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server Hi I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server. 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary secondary storage, it was working fine. 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately hyperv Centos template download started. 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster. 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says , 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for network id 206 as a part of router startup in Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-- Pool(Id))] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT-- Pool(2))] 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv] com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not been completely downloaded to zone 1 at com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan agerImpl.java:1745) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to secondary storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available. Regards, Tejas
Re: SSVM cannot ping DNS
Hi Ameen, NOTE: Reply is addressed to the users@ list. On 21-Apr-2014, at 11:49 pm, Ameen Ali rootam...@gmail.commailto:rootam...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your reply Mr. Balan Let me clearify a few things about my setup. 1. All my setup is happening inside vMware Workstation. That includes my management server and my hosts. I am not familiar with a vmware workstation environment. 2. My setup was a basic zone not an advanced zone, but I can switch if nessecary, No, lets get basic working first. 3. My Xen host had 1 interface only (eth0 although when I ifconfig it I have xenbr0 as well). I tried adding another interface but it doesn't show up on the console. xenbr0 is the bridge to eth0. 4. I tried adding the traffic labels, I am not entirely sure if I did them the right way or not: a) First, I added the labels in the zone. b) I used the command: xe network-list on my XenServer host, I took the uuid of xenbr0 and set it to cloud-public using the command xe network-param-set and adding the uuid and label. Then I added xenapi add cloud-private but after I ran the cloud and I got the ssvm to run I had something new called xapi1 as link local network so I switched cloud-private to it. 5. Since I'm using vMware's network. I had the following setup in my zone: Guest CIDR: 172.16.96.0/24http://172.16.96.0/24 cloud-private traffic type Management: 172.16.96.150-200 cloud-public: 172.16.96.120-140 I am not familiar with vmWare workstation so I cant offer any specific solutions. However, in order for nested VMs to work correctly, you might require the networks settings on the vmware/virtualbox platform to allow promiscous mode. Can you find such an option (or similar) option? Allowing promiscous mode might just get the network working. Regards. -- @shankerbalan M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.commailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, Bangalore - 560 055 Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. Classrommhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Cloud Agent Error
Have you tried to restart cloudstack-management? Also, are you sure the browser url was http://ip:8080/client ? Le dimanche 20 avril 2014, Mo m...@daoenix.com a écrit : I am attempting to assist myself in this, but I am not quite finding out what I should do. I suspect this is exactly why I am getting a 404 error for the CS UI: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2xsrwj931hi4948/Screenshot%202014-04-20%2010.33.46.png 2014-04-20 10:31:25,965 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:31:30,967 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:31:30,969 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:31:35,970 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:31:35,972 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:31:40,973 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:31:40,974 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:31:45,975 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:31:45,977 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:31:50,978 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:31:50,980 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:31:55,981 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:31:55,983 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:32:00,984 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:32:00,985 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:32:05,987 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:32:05,988 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:32:10,989 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:32:10,991 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2014-04-20 10:32:15,992 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to localhost:8250 2014-04-20 10:32:15,993 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 Any assistance would be great! - Mo -- Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 - - - *CloudOps*420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
RE: affinity group not work
Hi Saksham, Interesting points, however the 'ExplicitDedication' approach may not meet Gokhans requirements. Gokhan wants to place specific VMs on Specific Hosts. If you use the dedicated resources feature you are suggesting, and dedicate Host 1 and Host 2 to an Account, they belong to a common Affinity Group which will be labelled 'DedicatedGrp-[account name]' There will be no Affinity Group called 'ExplicitDedication' which could confuse readers of this thread. Further, as the two Hosts will belong to the same Affinity Group, the user will have no control over which Host each VM is allocated to as the VMs will be allocated to any Host in the Group. Also, as you rightly point out, Affinity Groups are not supported for Projects. Your second suggestion of using the 'Deployment Planner' feature within the Service Offering set to ' ImplicitDedicationPlanner' will also not work as this will try and place the VMs on Hosts with only VMs belonging to the same account. Again this requires Hosts to be dedicated to the Project (not supported) and will also potentially place the VMs on the same Host. An alternative approach to using Hosts Tags which are very specific, would be to use the 'Deployment Planner' feature within the Service Offering, but set to 'UserDispersingPlanner' with the 'Planner Mode' set to 'Strict'. This should disperse the VMs across different Hosts, and if it's not able to place them on unique Hosts, it will throw an error. There is a 'but' - it appears that setting the 'strict' option for the Planner Mode when using 'UserDispersingPlanner' does not apply to the service offering when creating it via the UI, however manually updating the 'service_offering_details' table afterwards does create the required behaviour. I need to look into this more to see if it is a bug in the UI or API. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:56 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Actually Affinity group of type Explicit Dedication can be of some help. You dedicate the host to the account. While deploying VM if you chose the affinity group 'ExplicitDedication', CloudStack will place the vm on host dedicated to the account. If the affinity group is not chosen, the VM will be deployed on shared host(non dedicated). However afaik affinity groups are not supported in projects (CLOUDSTACK-6237) You can also try using Implicit dedication planner in strict mode while creating the service offering. CS will try to place the VMs deployed from this service offering on implicitly dedicated host. Please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+-+Private+zone,+pod,+cluster,+host+Functional+Spec Thanks, Saksham -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:57 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Then affinity groups are not what you need. You need to setup Compute Offerings with Host Tags and then set the same Tags on the Hosts. e.g. Tag Host 1 with 'host1', Host 2 with 'host2' etc, then create a compute offering using Host Tag 'host1', and another with Host Tag 'host2' then simply use these to deploy your VMs. Bear in mind that you may lose HA functionality with this configuration. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:24 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work But I want to use specific vms for specific hosts. For example I want to create instance-1 to host-1. Not host-2 2014-04-22 11:17 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Affinity Groups are optional, If you have limited Hosts, simply do not select an affinity group when deploying a VM Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman [mailto:gokhank...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:00 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: affinity group not work I can only choose anti-affinity group as type. No other options seem. 2014-04-22 10:37 GMT+03:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Two things here. You say you dedicated a host to an account which has access to a project, this means this host is now unavailable to the project, and can only be used by that account directly. Secondly the error message is highlighting a problem with affinity groups. If you are using an Anti-Affinity group and wish to create 3 VMs, you will
RE: affinity group not work
Geoff, thanks for the detailed analysis. Comments inline. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:26 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Hi Saksham, Interesting points, however the 'ExplicitDedication' approach may not meet Gokhans requirements. Gokhan wants to place specific VMs on Specific Hosts. If you use the dedicated resources feature you are suggesting, and dedicate Host 1 and Host 2 to an Account, they belong to a common Affinity Group which will be labelled 'DedicatedGrp-[account name]' There will be no Affinity Group called 'ExplicitDedication' which could confuse readers of this thread. Further, as the two Hosts will belong to the same Affinity Group, the user will have no control over which Host each VM is allocated to as the VMs will be allocated to any Host in the Group. [Saksham] Yes there will be a single affinity group for the account irrespective of the hosts dedicated to it. Thanks for pointing it out. This approach will specifically work if the requirement is a single host and vms from the account need to be placed only on it. Also, as you rightly point out, Affinity Groups are not supported for Projects. Your second suggestion of using the 'Deployment Planner' feature within the Service Offering set to ' ImplicitDedicationPlanner' will also not work as this will try and place the VMs on Hosts with only VMs belonging to the same account. Again this requires Hosts to be dedicated to the Project (not supported) and will also potentially place the VMs on the same Host. [Saksham] Implicit dedication is a post dedication feature. It is very different from Explicit Dedication. When a vm using Implicit Dedication Planner SO is deployed, CS will search for an empty host. In case it finds it. The first vm is deployed on it. Subsequent vm deployments using the same SO will be tried on the same host. So the host is kind-of dedicated. It doesn’t require affinity groups at all. But may not be very helpful for the case in hand. An alternative approach to using Hosts Tags which are very specific, would be to use the 'Deployment Planner' feature within the Service Offering, but set to 'UserDispersingPlanner' with the 'Planner Mode' set to 'Strict'. This should disperse the VMs across different Hosts, and if it's not able to place them on unique Hosts, it will throw an error. [Saksham] I agree, given the specific case we have, the best way is to use tags, hands down. There is a 'but' - it appears that setting the 'strict' option for the Planner Mode when using 'UserDispersingPlanner' does not apply to the service offering when creating it via the UI, however manually updating the 'service_offering_details' table afterwards does create the required behaviour. I need to look into this more to see if it is a bug in the UI or API. [Saksham] Seems like a UI bug. I remember modes were introduced for Implicit Dedication planner. Not sure if they were also extended to other Planners also. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:56 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Actually Affinity group of type Explicit Dedication can be of some help. You dedicate the host to the account. While deploying VM if you chose the affinity group 'ExplicitDedication', CloudStack will place the vm on host dedicated to the account. If the affinity group is not chosen, the VM will be deployed on shared host(non dedicated). However afaik affinity groups are not supported in projects (CLOUDSTACK-6237) You can also try using Implicit dedication planner in strict mode while creating the service offering. CS will try to place the VMs deployed from this service offering on implicitly dedicated host. Please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+-+Private+zone,+pod,+cluster,+host+Functional+Spec Thanks, Saksham -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:57 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Then affinity groups are not what you need. You need to setup Compute Offerings with Host Tags and then set the same Tags on the Hosts. e.g. Tag Host 1 with 'host1', Host 2 with 'host2' etc, then create a compute offering using Host Tag 'host1', and another with Host Tag 'host2' then simply use these to deploy your VMs. Bear in mind that you may lose HA functionality with this configuration. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: gokhan kocaman
Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
Thanks Devdeep, Regards, Tejas
Re: KVM - Migration of CLVM volumes to another primary storage fail
Thanks! :-) I suppose there isn't much people running different CLVM pools in the same zone... S. 2014-04-20 15:26 GMT+02:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro: On 20.04.2014 13:24, Salvatore Sciacco wrote: 2014-04-20 12:31 GMT+02:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro: It looks like a bug, qemu-img convert should be used instead of cp -f, among others. I suppose that some code was added to do a simple copy when format is the same, this wasn't the case with 4.1.1 version. Do you mind opening an issue in https://issues.apache.org/jira ? Already did :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6462 Thanks S. Cool, I'll try to find out after the holidays if the problem exists in 4.3 as well and if yes, bug some people about it. Happy Easter :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
vms' network limitation
Hi guys! We are finishing deployment of private cloud based on CS4.2.1 + XenServer 6.2 But I got stuck with the following problem - My VM's network speed is limited by approximately 2MB/s, both Windows and Linux ones Speed between different vms and between vm and mgmt. server seems to be normal, at least close enough to my physical limitations I checked compute offering, and tried to create new with 1 GBit/s, I checked network offerings - 200Mbit\s , I checked global settings: network.throttling.rate vm.network.throttling.rate are set to 200 so, how can i make bandwidths equal to my physical limitations? Regards, Ivan Derbenev
CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup
Hi there, I just installed CloudStack 4.3 on a single host (all-in-one). My host's setup: – Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit – 6 1GbE NICs (3 in use and 3 not in use) – Primary storage on NFSv4 – Secondary storage on NFSv4 – KVM hypervisor only – Management server installed directly on this host (not on VM) My physical network setup: – 1 L2 switch with 3 different VLANs – VLAN 2 for NAS (Primary storage on NFSv4) – VLAN 10 for guests public traffic (there lives public IP addresses) – VLAN 100 for management traffic – VLAN 200 for guests traffic (there lives private IP addresses, so guests from different clusters can interact with each other) cat /etc/network/interfaces: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface # CloudStack Primary storage traffic auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 10.10.10.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.10.0 broadcast 10.10.10.255 # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if installed dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 dns-search cloud.example.com # CloudStack Management traffic auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 10.10.12.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.12.0 broadcast 10.10.12.255 gateway 10.10.12.1 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet manual # CloudStack Public traffic auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports eth2.10 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # CloudStack Guest traffic auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports eth2.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 auto eth3 iface eth3 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down auto eth4 iface eth4 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down auto eth5 iface eth5 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down The approximate network setup schema is depicted here: http://cl.ly/image/3z2D0w370H1M/o While setting up the first zone in administrator's UI I've faced with difficulties in setting up my advanced network correctly. (For ex. I've got this error Creating primary storage Something went wrong; please correct the following: zone wide storage pool is not supported for hypervisor type undefined, and so on) As I'm newbie to CloudStack and virtualization I'm not clear enough for me how CloudStack network should be setup in case I use multiple NICs and multiple VLANs on L2 physical switch. Could someone point me how should be setup my network for Zone1 with respect to network schema as I showed above? For education purposes, lets say we will use these networks: – 77.12.34.0/24 (for Public) – 10.10.10.0/24 (for zone's NAS – primary secondary storage) – 10.1.1.0/24 (for Guests VMs) – 10.10.12.0/24 (for management, if it required to be different subnet) As an answer to my question it would be awesome to get two things: 1) Content of /etc/network/interfaces (bridges and VLANs config in particular) 2) What should be entered on Step 3 – Setup Network (and substeps) in CloudStack Administrator's UI? Thanks in advance for helping! -- Vlad
Upgrading system vm template after previous upgrade
Hi, I have an installation that's been upgraded from 4.2.1 to 4.3. In light of the heartbleed exploit, I have the need to upgrade the system vm template. As part of the upgrade process from 4.2.1 to 4.3, I registered and downloaded a new system vm template, named systemvm-xenserver-4.3. Now when I want a newer systemvm template, what is the proper way of doing it? - should I add another template named systemvm-xenserver-4.3 - should I remove the old systemvm-xenserver-4.3 template and register a new? - something else? -- Erik Weber
RE: affinity group not work
Yes, using tags will be the easiest way to achieve the usecase Gokhan wants. Saksham, The planner mode applies to ImplicitPlanner only - it has not been extended to any other planner. So this seems a bug to me. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 6:16 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Geoff, thanks for the detailed analysis. Comments inline. -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:26 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Hi Saksham, Interesting points, however the 'ExplicitDedication' approach may not meet Gokhans requirements. Gokhan wants to place specific VMs on Specific Hosts. If you use the dedicated resources feature you are suggesting, and dedicate Host 1 and Host 2 to an Account, they belong to a common Affinity Group which will be labelled 'DedicatedGrp-[account name]' There will be no Affinity Group called 'ExplicitDedication' which could confuse readers of this thread. Further, as the two Hosts will belong to the same Affinity Group, the user will have no control over which Host each VM is allocated to as the VMs will be allocated to any Host in the Group. [Saksham] Yes there will be a single affinity group for the account irrespective of the hosts dedicated to it. Thanks for pointing it out. This approach will specifically work if the requirement is a single host and vms from the account need to be placed only on it. Also, as you rightly point out, Affinity Groups are not supported for Projects. Your second suggestion of using the 'Deployment Planner' feature within the Service Offering set to ' ImplicitDedicationPlanner' will also not work as this will try and place the VMs on Hosts with only VMs belonging to the same account. Again this requires Hosts to be dedicated to the Project (not supported) and will also potentially place the VMs on the same Host. [Saksham] Implicit dedication is a post dedication feature. It is very different from Explicit Dedication. When a vm using Implicit Dedication Planner SO is deployed, CS will search for an empty host. In case it finds it. The first vm is deployed on it. Subsequent vm deployments using the same SO will be tried on the same host. So the host is kind-of dedicated. It doesn’t require affinity groups at all. But may not be very helpful for the case in hand. An alternative approach to using Hosts Tags which are very specific, would be to use the 'Deployment Planner' feature within the Service Offering, but set to 'UserDispersingPlanner' with the 'Planner Mode' set to 'Strict'. This should disperse the VMs across different Hosts, and if it's not able to place them on unique Hosts, it will throw an error. [Saksham] I agree, given the specific case we have, the best way is to use tags, hands down. There is a 'but' - it appears that setting the 'strict' option for the Planner Mode when using 'UserDispersingPlanner' does not apply to the service offering when creating it via the UI, however manually updating the 'service_offering_details' table afterwards does create the required behaviour. I need to look into this more to see if it is a bug in the UI or API. [Saksham] Seems like a UI bug. I remember modes were introduced for Implicit Dedication planner. Not sure if they were also extended to other Planners also. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com] Sent: 22 April 2014 09:56 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Actually Affinity group of type Explicit Dedication can be of some help. You dedicate the host to the account. While deploying VM if you chose the affinity group 'ExplicitDedication', CloudStack will place the vm on host dedicated to the account. If the affinity group is not chosen, the VM will be deployed on shared host(non dedicated). However afaik affinity groups are not supported in projects (CLOUDSTACK-6237) You can also try using Implicit dedication planner in strict mode while creating the service offering. CS will try to place the VMs deployed from this service offering on implicitly dedicated host. Please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dedicated+Resources+-+Private+zone,+pod,+cluster,+host+Functional+Spec Thanks, Saksham -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:57 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: affinity group not work Then affinity groups are not what you need. You need to setup Compute Offerings with Host Tags and then set the same Tags on the Hosts. e.g. Tag Host 1 with
RE: Insufficient capacity exception
Hi Gokhan, You need to trace the logs prior to this to see why the hosts were put in avoid set. There should be some error that caused the deployment to fail on these hosts, causing CloudStack to flag them as 'should be avoided'. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:00 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Insufficient capacity exception Hi, From the below logs the hosts are in avoid set. VM created failed because of no suitable host found. Can you please check the MS logs for errors/exception while starting vm deployment ? (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host2, hostId: 4 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host1, hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0 suitable hosts Thanks, Jayapal On 22-Apr-2014, at 1:32 PM, gokhan kocaman gokhank...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have enough resources on my hosts (ram,cpu ...) But I got error while try to create vm. Log is: 2014-04-22 10:58:50,555 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Successfully transitioned to start state for VM[User|yuyu] reservation id = c93b30c1-3cfa-4bbe-86cc-bd21eee7d62e 2014-04-22 10:58:50,603 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Trying to deploy VM, vm has dcId: 1 and podId: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,603 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [1, 4] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,607 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [1, 4] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: com.cloud.deploy.FirstFitPlanner@21a24ed3 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:1,cluster:null, requested cpu: 500, requested ram: 536870912 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Searching resources only under specified Pod: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,608 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that have (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Pod: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,610 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from avoid set: [] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,613 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69) Checking resources in Cluster: 1 under Pod: 1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,613 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for hosts in dc: 1 pod:1 cluster:1 2014-04-22 10:58:50,614 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) FirstFitAllocator has 2 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-4-Routing], Host[-1-Routing]] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Found 2 hosts for allocation after prioritization: [Host[-4-Routing], Host[-1-Routing]] 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=500Mhz, Ram=512 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host2, hostId: 4 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: host1, hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and trying other available hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4 ctx-86395c69 FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host Allocator returning 0 suitable hosts 2014-04-22 10:58:50,616 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-51:ctx-4325fdf4
Email functionality.
Hi folks, I was wondering that it would be awesome if through the CS UI we could contact users, sending them emails(messages about maintenance and etc). Imagine that we have a maintenance coming and/or some users could be affected, or some problem happened that caused some downtime, it would be very interesting (at least for me) if I could through the CS we send email to those users. Since, we already fill out a form that contains the user’s email. This way we could give a real meaning to that email that we have to fill in when creating a user. Is there any feature request for something like that? -- Rafael Weingärtner
RE: CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup
Hello, I am not sure if 14.04 LTS is supported check out the installation link, I propose to use it with LTS 12.04 very easy link is enclosed. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/installation.html http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/cloudstack-single-server-on-ubuntu-with-kvm.html Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Владислав Старков [mailto:vladislav.star...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2014 1:26 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup Hi there, I just installed CloudStack 4.3 on a single host (all-in-one). My host's setup: – Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit – 6 1GbE NICs (3 in use and 3 not in use) – Primary storage on NFSv4 – Secondary storage on NFSv4 – KVM hypervisor only – Management server installed directly on this host (not on VM) My physical network setup: – 1 L2 switch with 3 different VLANs – VLAN 2 for NAS (Primary storage on NFSv4) – VLAN 10 for guests public traffic (there lives public IP addresses) – VLAN 100 for management traffic – VLAN 200 for guests traffic (there lives private IP addresses, so guests from different clusters can interact with each other) cat /etc/network/interfaces: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface # CloudStack Primary storage traffic auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 10.10.10.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.10.0 broadcast 10.10.10.255 # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if installed dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 dns-search cloud.example.com # CloudStack Management traffic auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 10.10.12.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.10.12.0 broadcast 10.10.12.255 gateway 10.10.12.1 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet manual # CloudStack Public traffic auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports eth2.10 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # CloudStack Guest traffic auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports eth2.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 auto eth3 iface eth3 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down auto eth4 iface eth4 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down auto eth5 iface eth5 inet manual up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up down ifconfig $IFACE down The approximate network setup schema is depicted here: http://cl.ly/image/3z2D0w370H1M/o While setting up the first zone in administrator's UI I've faced with difficulties in setting up my advanced network correctly. (For ex. I've got this error Creating primary storage Something went wrong; please correct the following: zone wide storage pool is not supported for hypervisor type undefined, and so on) As I'm newbie to CloudStack and virtualization I'm not clear enough for me how CloudStack network should be setup in case I use multiple NICs and multiple VLANs on L2 physical switch. Could someone point me how should be setup my network for Zone1 with respect to network schema as I showed above? For education purposes, lets say we will use these networks: – 77.12.34.0/24 (for Public) – 10.10.10.0/24 (for zone's NAS – primary secondary storage) – 10.1.1.0/24 (for Guests VMs) – 10.10.12.0/24 (for management, if it required to be different subnet) As an answer to my question it would be awesome to get two things: 1) Content of /etc/network/interfaces (bridges and VLANs config in particular) 2) What should be entered on Step 3 – Setup Network (and substeps) in CloudStack Administrator's UI? Thanks in advance for helping! -- Vlad
Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server
Thanks Mike, I will go ahead try this. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah, that should work just fine. I regularly run XenServer and VMware in the same zone with only having the XenServer system template seeded. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Tejas, It should work but I would recommend that you seed the vmware systemvm template too on the secondary storage. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:05 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple hypervisor through single management server Hi Devdeep, Thanks for clarification about hyperv, If I undo all the changes I made for hyperv setup and go ahead to deploy vmware on existing xen setup, Do I need to upload vmware systemvm or it won't be necessary. Regards, Tejas On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.comwrote: Hi Tejas, For Hyper-V you need to create a zone in which Hyper-V is the only hypervisor type. Reason being, currently in cloudstack Hyper-V only works with SMB as a secondary storage. You can have a zone where a mixed set of other hypervisors are present, for example, xenserver, kvm etc, but for hyper-v you'll have to create a separate zone in which hyper-v is the only hypervisor. For a hyper-v zone; you'll have to register a secondary storage of type SMB. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 2:22 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Multiple hypervisor through single management server Hi I am trying manage multiple hypervisor through Management server. 1 ) I have installed Xenserver 6.2 on CS 4.3 with nfs as primary secondary storage, it was working fine. 2) Created new cluster for hyperv and added hyperv host. Immediately hyperv Centos template download started. 3) Added SMB/CIFS as primary storage local to hyperv cluster. 4) while trying to create instance from ISO, log says , 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Lock is released for network id 206 as a part of router startup in Dest[Zone(Id)-Pod(Id)-Cluster(Id)-Host(Id)-Storage(Volume(Id|Type-- Pool(Id))] : Dest[Zone(1)-Pod(1)-Cluster(2)-Host(4)-Storage(Volume(9|ROOT-- Pool(2))] 2014-04-22 13:57:57,701 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-4:ctx-d714df36 ctx-a482309d) Failed to start instance VM[User|CentOS65-x64-Hyperv] com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Template 9 has not been completely downloaded to zone 1 at com.cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl.getTemplateSize(TemplateMan agerImpl.java:1745) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) Don't understand how to upload hyperv systemvm template to secondary storage where already one systemvm template for xen is available. Regards, Tejas -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
Re: Storage agent or storage VM disconnected
Dear Rajesh, Can you tell how to destroy SSvm, I have studied only installation docs and tried to install cloud stack, I have not seen anywhere in the apache cloudstack doc how to destroy ssvm. Today morning when I came my cloudstack centos templates shows 18% downloaded and my secstorage is full. Screenshots of my Dashboard to get better Idea http://imgur.com/a/cEHKP#11 http://imgur.com/a/cEHKP#10 Thank you On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.comwrote: Looks like the cloud agent inside ssvm is down. Can you destroy the ssvm (s-1-vm). It will get recreated. It should solve the issue. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: sandeep khandekar [mailto:cloudstack.sand...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 4:21 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Storage agent or storage VM disconnected Changed the following parameter in my cloudstack getting the following error in my centos template Storage agent or storage VM disconnected how to solve these? In my previous mail I told you that My centos template didnt got loaded so I used the log file and mounted the secondary storage manually sudo mount -t nfs 10.4.6.17:/export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3/ /mnt/53d355b8-a8c7-33a2-b9fd-e6d68ff7eec0/ I made the following changes to solve my template problem by making the changes in my global settings secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to my IP address(10.4.6.17) and I restarted my management server now I am getting the following error Storage agent or storage VM disconnected Any help??? -- SANDEEP KHANDEKAR Assistant Professor Department of Computer science and engineering Sreenidhi Institute of science and Technology Hyderabad -- SANDEEP KHANDEKAR Assistant Professor Department of Computer science and engineering Sreenidhi Institute of science and Technology Hyderabad
