RE: The IP is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding

[Sanjeev Neelarapu]

Hi Martin,

Are you trying to configure PF on SourceNAT IP address? If yes can you check 
whether the conserver mode is set to "Yes" in your network offering? 

-Sanjeev

-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:26 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: The IP is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding

Hi!

I created an isolated network (with GRE) on Cloudstack 4.4.1. Then I tried to 
configure a port forwarding rule for SSH to an instance. But I get an error 
message "is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding".
What am I doing wrong?

Thanks

Martin

Re: XenServer

[Nux!]

Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much 
better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.

Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory (you can 
do it with "virsh"), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot why.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Andrei Mikhailovsky" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 21:24:06
> Subject: Re: XenServer

> I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph support. I do
> prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit better.
> 
> It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create the whole 
> vm
> snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to bother
> snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
> 
> Andrei
> - Original Message -
> 
>> From: "motty cruz" 
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
>> Subject: Re: XenServer
> 
>> I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
>> XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines running
>> KVM,
>> ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
>> another
>> takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with "Balloon driver",
>> I am
>> traumatize using KVM.
> 
>> XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
>> integrated. I
>> am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
>> lingering
>> issues but thus far am a happy person.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Motty
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
>> 
>> wrote:
> 
>> > I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
>> > XenServer
>> > does it so much better!
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> >
>> > > From: "Vladimir Melnik" 
>> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > > Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
>> > > Subject: RE: XenServer
>> >
>> > > Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now
>> > > I
>> > > understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
>> > > have
>> > > a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good idea
>> > > to
>> > > bread such a zoo.
>> >
>> > > The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
>> > > configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I
>> > > know,
>> > > KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer features
>> > > don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
>> >
>> > > One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not to
>> > > do
>> > > something that I would regret.
>> >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > V.
>> >
> 
>> --
>> Thanks for your support,
> > Motty

Re: How change default System Offering For Software Router?

[Hollman Enciso R.]

I have CS 4.3. it's the same for this version ?

I found this manual http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX138049

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Andrija Panic 
wrote:

> There are some database changes needed - please check admin guide for ACS
> 4.2...
>
> On 30 October 2014 22:32, Hollman Enciso R. 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all, i'm trying to change the default system offering for software
> > routers with more ram and some tags for the storage. i create a new
> system
> > service offering for software router; Now i wanna set as default, how
> can i
> > do that ?
> >
> > I tried to delete the delete the System Offering For Software Router but
> i
> > obtain an error:  "Default service offerings cannot be deleted"
> >
> > any idea ?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > --
> > Hollman Eduardo Enciso R.
> > http://algolibre.com
> > @hollman
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
> --
>   http://admintweets.com
> --
>



-- 
Hollman Eduardo Enciso R.
http://algolibre.com
@hollman

Re: XenServer

[Andrija Panic]

+1 for that - KVM being nice and all that - but still missing complete
snapshoot capability - driving me nuts...

On 30 October 2014 22:24, Andrei Mikhailovsky  wrote:

> I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph support. I do
> prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit better.
>
> It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create the
> whole vm snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to
> bother snapshotting every volume and wait for ages.
>
> Andrei
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "motty cruz" 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: XenServer
>
> > I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
> > XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines running
> > KVM,
> > ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
> > another
> > takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with "Balloon driver",
> > I am
> > traumatize using KVM.
>
> > XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
> > integrated. I
> > am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
> > lingering
> > issues but thus far am a happy person.
>
> > Thanks,
> > -Motty
>
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
> > 
> > wrote:
>
> > > I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
> > > XenServer
> > > does it so much better!
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > >
> > > > From: "Vladimir Melnik" 
> > > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: XenServer
> > >
> > > > Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now
> > > > I
> > > > understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
> > > > have
> > > > a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good idea
> > > > to
> > > > bread such a zoo.
> > >
> > > > The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
> > > > configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I
> > > > know,
> > > > KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer features
> > > > don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
> > >
> > > > One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not to
> > > > do
> > > > something that I would regret.
> > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > V.
> > >
>
> > --
> > Thanks for your support,
> > Motty
>



-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--

Re: How change default System Offering For Software Router?

[Andrija Panic]

There are some database changes needed - please check admin guide for ACS
4.2...

On 30 October 2014 22:32, Hollman Enciso R. 
wrote:

> Hello all, i'm trying to change the default system offering for software
> routers with more ram and some tags for the storage. i create a new system
> service offering for software router; Now i wanna set as default, how can i
> do that ?
>
> I tried to delete the delete the System Offering For Software Router but i
> obtain an error:  "Default service offerings cannot be deleted"
>
> any idea ?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Hollman Eduardo Enciso R.
> http://algolibre.com
> @hollman
>



-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--

How change default System Offering For Software Router?

[Hollman Enciso R.]

Hello all, i'm trying to change the default system offering for software
routers with more ram and some tags for the storage. i create a new system
service offering for software router; Now i wanna set as default, how can i
do that ?

I tried to delete the delete the System Offering For Software Router but i
obtain an error:  "Default service offerings cannot be deleted"

any idea ?

thanks

-- 
Hollman Eduardo Enciso R.
http://algolibre.com
@hollman

Re: XenServer

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph support. I do 
prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit better. 

It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create the whole 
vm snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to bother 
snapshotting every volume and wait for ages. 

Andrei 
- Original Message -

> From: "motty cruz" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:43:32 PM
> Subject: Re: XenServer

> I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
> XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines running
> KVM,
> ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to
> another
> takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with "Balloon driver",
> I am
> traumatize using KVM.

> XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already
> integrated. I
> am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few
> lingering
> issues but thus far am a happy person.

> Thanks,
> -Motty

> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
> 
> wrote:

> > I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM.
> > XenServer
> > does it so much better!
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >
> > > From: "Vladimir Melnik" 
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
> > > Subject: RE: XenServer
> >
> > > Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now
> > > I
> > > understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already
> > > have
> > > a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good idea
> > > to
> > > bread such a zoo.
> >
> > > The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
> > > configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I
> > > know,
> > > KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer features
> > > don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
> >
> > > One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not to
> > > do
> > > something that I would regret.
> >
> > > Best regards,
> > > V.
> >

> --
> Thanks for your support,
> Motty

Re: XenServer

[motty cruz]

I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines running KVM,
ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to another
takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with "Balloon driver", I am
traumatize using KVM.

XenServer don't need to install cloudstack agent is already integrated. I
am very happy with XenServer. I still need to work out a few lingering
issues but thus far am a happy person.

Thanks,
-Motty

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky 
wrote:

> I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM. XenServer
> does it so much better!
>
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "Vladimir Melnik" 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
> > Subject: RE: XenServer
>
> > Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now I
> > understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already have
> > a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good idea to
> > bread such a zoo.
>
> > The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
> > configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I know,
> > KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer features
> > don't seem to be so exciting to me :)
>
> > One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not to do
> > something that I would regret.
>
> > Best regards,
> > V.
>



-- 
Thanks for your support,
Motty

Re: XenServer

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM. XenServer does 
it so much better! 

- Original Message -

> From: "Vladimir Melnik" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
> Subject: RE: XenServer

> Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now I
> understand that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already have
> a bunch of hosts running KVM and it really won't be a good idea to
> bread such a zoo.

> The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
> configuration of a virtual machine without restarting it. As I know,
> KVM doesn't support it yet, am I right? Other XenServer features
> don't seem to be so exciting to me :)

> One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not to do
> something that I would regret.

> Best regards,
> V.

RE: XenServer

[Vladimir Melnik]

Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now I understand 
that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already have a bunch of hosts 
running KVM and it really won't be a good idea to bread such a zoo.

The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change configuration of 
a virtual machine without restarting it. As I know, KVM doesn't support it yet, 
am I right? Other XenServer features don't seem to be so exciting to me :)

One more time - thanks to all who have helped me to decide not to do something 
that I would regret.

Best regards,
V.

Re: running pre and/or post scripts after instance creation/destroy

[Erik Weber]

Do you have ssh keys or any other means to access the servers automatically?

What I'm thinking is that you could deploy the rabbitmq event notification
message queue, and listen for create/destroy calls.

I don't think you would be able to intercept the create call and alter it's
runtime, but you could theoretically fire up a script that fetches the one
time password, ssh into the vm and issues whatever command you need to
register the vm with IPA.

How you enable event notification varies on your cloudstack version, but
this should be a pointer in the right direction:
http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/events.html

-- 
Erik

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Yiping Zhang  wrote:

> I envision to run these pre/post scripts on CS management server.  These
> scripts can be in any of languages such as shell/ruby/python/java.
>
> Here is our use case:
>
> We¹d like to automatically register new instances in RedHat IPA server
> (something like windows nodes auto joining an AD domain when it is
> provisioned), and unregister an instance when it is destroyed. So it seems
> the best way to achieve this is by using pre/post scripts at appropriate
> steps during an instance¹s life cycle.
>
> Here are roughly the steps of registering new instance to IPA:
> 1. User create a new instance in CS web UI
> 2. CS server (thru a pre-create script) tell IPA a new host is coming  and
> generate an one time password for that host (this one time password could
> be save d as user data and passed to instance)
> 3. CS server creates new instance
> 4. New Instance registers itself with IPS, using one time password
> generated in step 2)
>
> Here are roughly steps of unregister an instance from IPA:
> 1. User destroys an instance from CS web UI.
> 2. CS server destroys instance.
> 3. CS server (thru a post-destroy script) tells IPA to unregister the
> destroyed instance.
>
> Is this doable ?
>
> Yiping
>
> On 10/28/14, 9:31 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
>  wrote:
>
> >Hi Yiping,
> >
> >Can you please elaborate more about your requirement.
> >Where you want to run the script ? ... Inside the VM ?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Jayapal
> >On 29-Oct-2014, at 12:31 AM, Yiping Zhang  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, all:
> >>
> >> Does anyone know if CloudStack provide any mechanism to run a pre/post
> >>scripts after an instance is created or destroyed ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Yiping
> >
>
>

Re: running pre and/or post scripts after instance creation/destroy

[Yiping Zhang]

I envision to run these pre/post scripts on CS management server.  These
scripts can be in any of languages such as shell/ruby/python/java.

Here is our use case:

We¹d like to automatically register new instances in RedHat IPA server
(something like windows nodes auto joining an AD domain when it is
provisioned), and unregister an instance when it is destroyed. So it seems
the best way to achieve this is by using pre/post scripts at appropriate
steps during an instance¹s life cycle.

Here are roughly the steps of registering new instance to IPA:
1. User create a new instance in CS web UI
2. CS server (thru a pre-create script) tell IPA a new host is coming  and
generate an one time password for that host (this one time password could
be save d as user data and passed to instance)
3. CS server creates new instance
4. New Instance registers itself with IPS, using one time password
generated in step 2)

Here are roughly steps of unregister an instance from IPA:
1. User destroys an instance from CS web UI.
2. CS server destroys instance.
3. CS server (thru a post-destroy script) tells IPA to unregister the
destroyed instance.

Is this doable ?

Yiping

On 10/28/14, 9:31 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
 wrote:

>Hi Yiping,
>
>Can you please elaborate more about your requirement.
>Where you want to run the script ? ... Inside the VM ?
>
>Thanks,
>Jayapal
>On 29-Oct-2014, at 12:31 AM, Yiping Zhang  wrote:
>
>> Hi, all:
>> 
>> Does anyone know if CloudStack provide any mechanism to run a pre/post
>>scripts after an instance is created or destroyed ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Yiping
>

Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 -> 4.4.1 still broken ?

[motty cruz]

HI PL,
I upgrade my testing cluster for 3 times with bad results, until I manually
updated the DB as Andrija suggested in this email.

Thanks,
Celso

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion 
wrote:

> upgrading from 4.4.0 really required this manual db patch:
> ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT > NULL
> DEFAULT  '1'
>
> ?
> If so we will update the RN..
>
> PL
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, motty cruz  wrote:
>
> > Hi Vadim,
> > I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to Cloudstack
> > 4.4.1. I used this guider:
> >
> >
> http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
> >
> > Download System VMs from here:
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
> > I specifically used this:
> >
> >
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen.vhd.bz2
> >
> > instead of the one suggested in the guide.
> >
> > Also, I executed the following two command:
> > yum upgrade cloudstack-management
> > once that finished successfully
> > yum update (updates java)
> >
> > This also failed for me:
> >
> > nohup cloudstack-sysvmadm -d IPaddress -u cloud -p password -a >
> > sysvm.log 2>&1 &
> >
> > but I run that command any way:
> >
> > Also I log in to my database server:
> >
> > ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT > NULL
> > DEFAULT  '1'
> >
> > restarted management server and all worked.
> >
> > Hope this help you!
> > ThanksMotty
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
> > vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee> wrote:
> >
> > > I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence of
> > > actions is described here:
> > >
> >
> http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
> > >
> > > Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more than 5
> > > hrs.  The result of update is:
> > > -
> > > Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
> > > ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 25
> > >
> > > Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
> > >
> > > Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> > > ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 1
> > >
> > > Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
> > >
> > > Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
> > > 2
> > > Done restarting router(s).
> > > ---
> > >
> > > After restarting managment server workers are not querying status and
> > > resources anymore. The last lines at management server log are:
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,207 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin UcsManagerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin VpcVirtualRouterElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin BaremetalPxeManagerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin BaremetalManagerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin ManagementServerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin DedicatedResourceManagerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin InternalLoadBalancerElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin LdapManagerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin ApiRateLimitServiceImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin BaremetalDhcpManagerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,212 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin ContrailVpcElementImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin ContrailElementImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin MidoNetElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin NetscalerElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin NiciraNvpElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin OpenDaylightControllerResourceManagerImpl
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin OvsElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin PaloAltoExternalFirewallElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin VirtualRouterElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > > plugin SspElement
> > > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 D

Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 -> 4.4.1 still broken ?

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

upgrading from 4.4.0 really required this manual db patch:
ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT > NULL
DEFAULT  '1'

?
If so we will update the RN..

PL

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, motty cruz  wrote:

> Hi Vadim,
> I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to Cloudstack
> 4.4.1. I used this guider:
>
> http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
>
> Download System VMs from here: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
> I specifically used this:
>
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen.vhd.bz2
>
> instead of the one suggested in the guide.
>
> Also, I executed the following two command:
> yum upgrade cloudstack-management
> once that finished successfully
> yum update (updates java)
>
> This also failed for me:
>
> nohup cloudstack-sysvmadm -d IPaddress -u cloud -p password -a >
> sysvm.log 2>&1 &
>
> but I run that command any way:
>
> Also I log in to my database server:
>
> ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT > NULL
> DEFAULT  '1'
>
> restarted management server and all worked.
>
> Hope this help you!
> ThanksMotty
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee> wrote:
>
> > I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence of
> > actions is described here:
> >
> http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
> >
> > Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more than 5
> > hrs.  The result of update is:
> > -
> > Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
> > ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 25
> >
> > Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
> >
> > Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> > ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 1
> >
> > Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
> >
> > Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
> > 2
> > Done restarting router(s).
> > ---
> >
> > After restarting managment server workers are not querying status and
> > resources anymore. The last lines at management server log are:
> >
> > ---
> >
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,207 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin UcsManagerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin VpcVirtualRouterElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin BaremetalPxeManagerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin BaremetalManagerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin ManagementServerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin DedicatedResourceManagerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin InternalLoadBalancerElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin LdapManagerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin ApiRateLimitServiceImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin BaremetalDhcpManagerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,212 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin ContrailVpcElementImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin ContrailElementImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin MidoNetElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin NetscalerElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin NiciraNvpElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin OpenDaylightControllerResourceManagerImpl
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin OvsElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin PaloAltoExternalFirewallElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin VirtualRouterElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin SspElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> > plugin BigSwitchVnsElement
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,250 DEBUG
> [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> > (NetworkStatsUpdater-1:ctx-ca0c3513) Successfully updated aggregate
> network
> > stats
> > 2014-10-30 08:48:10,379 INFO  [c.c.a.ApiServer] (Thread-11:null)
> ApiServer
> > listening on port 8096
> > --
> >
> > Full log is here: http://pastebin.com/Wpe7w

Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 -> 4.4.1 still broken ?

[motty cruz]

Hi Vadim,
I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to Cloudstack
4.4.1. I used this guider:
http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html

Download System VMs from here: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
I specifically used this:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.1-xen.vhd.bz2

instead of the one suggested in the guide.

Also, I executed the following two command:
yum upgrade cloudstack-management
once that finished successfully
yum update (updates java)

This also failed for me:

nohup cloudstack-sysvmadm -d IPaddress -u cloud -p password -a >
sysvm.log 2>&1 &

but I run that command any way:

Also I log in to my database server:

ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD  `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT > NULL
DEFAULT  '1'

restarted management server and all worked.

Hope this help you!
ThanksMotty



On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee> wrote:

> I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence of
> actions is described here:
> http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
>
> Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more than 5
> hrs.  The result of update is:
> -
> Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
> ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 25
>
> Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)
>
> Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
> ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 1
>
> Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .
>
> Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
> 2
> Done restarting router(s).
> ---
>
> After restarting managment server workers are not querying status and
> resources anymore. The last lines at management server log are:
>
> ---
>
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,207 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin UcsManagerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin VpcVirtualRouterElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin BaremetalPxeManagerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin BaremetalManagerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin ManagementServerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin DedicatedResourceManagerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin InternalLoadBalancerElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin LdapManagerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin ApiRateLimitServiceImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin BaremetalDhcpManagerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,212 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin ContrailVpcElementImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin ContrailElementImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin MidoNetElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin NetscalerElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin NiciraNvpElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin OpenDaylightControllerResourceManagerImpl
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin OvsElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin PaloAltoExternalFirewallElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin VirtualRouterElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin SspElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered
> plugin BigSwitchVnsElement
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,250 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (NetworkStatsUpdater-1:ctx-ca0c3513) Successfully updated aggregate network
> stats
> 2014-10-30 08:48:10,379 INFO  [c.c.a.ApiServer] (Thread-11:null) ApiServer
> listening on port 8096
> --
>
> Full log is here: http://pastebin.com/Wpe7wsAV
>
> Log is not growing and changing. Cloudstack console is missing with 404
> error.  I thing VM update should not influence this. Any System VM in fact
> can be just re-created by "killing" from management GUI.
>
> Vadim.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:21 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 -> 4.4.1 still broken ?
>
> If

GRE isolated network: wrong interface?

[Martin Emrich]

Hi!

Hi!

I'm having more strange issues with my GRE-based isolated networks:

While investigating my other issues, I noticed this output from "ovs-vsctl 
show" on the xenservers:

   Bridge "xapi29"
fail_mode: standalone
Port "t1546-4-3"
Interface "t1546-4-3"
type: gre
options: {key="1546", remote_ip="10.33.2.6"}
Port "vif28.0"
Interface "vif28.0"
Port "xapi29"
Interface "xapi29"
type: internal

I wonder why this IP address for the GRE tunnel was chosen? The IP belongs to 
one of my iSCSI storage networks, and should never be used for guest or public 
traffic.
While thinking about it, I noticed that I never assigned IP addresses to the 
"correct" guest interfaces (neither via XenServer nor via cloudstack), as the 
documentation did not mention it... but of course GRE won't work without IP 
connectivity between the OpenVSwitch instances on the XenServers.

So I wonder why CloudStack (or XenServer?) chose one of the iSCSI networks for 
GRE traffic instead of e.g. printing an error message or chosing at least the 
management network...

I also see that the OVSTunnelXXX networks on the XenServer cluster are not 
removed when I remove a Network from CloudStack, so during my experiments some 
stale OVSTunnel interface pile up on the cluster.

Ciao

Martin

Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

[Stephan Seitz]

Hi Rohit,

I currently did some preflight checks, and noticed distro/release
incompatibilities against Wido's specific packages. (Something you
already mentioned in your mail)

At least package dependencies are problematic (e.g. mysql-client vs.
mysql-client-5.5 vs mariadb-client).

Anyway, thank's for offering your packages even if I currently can't use
them.

cheers,

- Stephan

Am Donnerstag, den 30.10.2014, 15:07 + schrieb Rohit Yadav: 
> Hi Stephan,
> 
> We recently made our CloudStack packages repositories. We use the default 
> process to build deb/rpms but we don’t build debs/rpms for specific 
> distro/release but as general APT/YUM repository. It’s recommended to test 
> run upgrades on a test setup using the new repository. You may read more here:
> http://shapeblue.com/apache-cloudstack/cloudstack-packages-repository/
> 
> > On 30-Oct-2014, at 8:05 pm, Stephan Seitz 
> >  wrote:
> >
> > Ian,
> >
> > thanks for your suggestion. I was not aware of shapeblue's repo.
> >
> > Since I'm a little short on spare-systems for testing and do not know
> > how well these repos mix, I think I'll wait for Wido's packages.
> >
> > If I'm getting impatient, I'll start an "off-site" side-project with
> > shapeblue's packages this weekend :)
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 30.10.2014, 14:01 + schrieb Ian Duffy:
> >> If you don't wish to wait you may use the ones generated by shapeblue.
> >>
> >> http://shapeblue.com/packages/
> >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4/
> >>
> >> On 30 October 2014 10:04, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
> >>>
> >>> Wido, can you create them?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
> >>>  wrote:
>  Hi!
> 
>  after reading the "4.4.0 -> 4.4.1"-thread on the list, I think I'm
>  prepared for an Update.
> 
>  Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
>  update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
>  I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
>  http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/
> 
>  Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?
> 
> 
>  cheers,
> 
>  - Stephan
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Daan
> >>>
> >
> >
> 
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> 
> 
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

[Wido den Hollander]

On 10/30/2014 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
> 
> Wido, can you create them?
> 

Yes. But currently my internet connection isn't the best where I am, so
it will take some time.

Wido

> 
> thanks,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
>  wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> after reading the "4.4.0 -> 4.4.1"-thread on the list, I think I'm
>> prepared for an Update.
>>
>> Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
>> update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
>> I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
>> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/
>>
>> Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> - Stephan
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Stephan,

We recently made our CloudStack packages repositories. We use the default 
process to build deb/rpms but we don’t build debs/rpms for specific 
distro/release but as general APT/YUM repository. It’s recommended to test run 
upgrades on a test setup using the new repository. You may read more here:
http://shapeblue.com/apache-cloudstack/cloudstack-packages-repository/

> On 30-Oct-2014, at 8:05 pm, Stephan Seitz 
>  wrote:
>
> Ian,
>
> thanks for your suggestion. I was not aware of shapeblue's repo.
>
> Since I'm a little short on spare-systems for testing and do not know
> how well these repos mix, I think I'll wait for Wido's packages.
>
> If I'm getting impatient, I'll start an "off-site" side-project with
> shapeblue's packages this weekend :)
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 30.10.2014, 14:01 + schrieb Ian Duffy:
>> If you don't wish to wait you may use the ones generated by shapeblue.
>>
>> http://shapeblue.com/packages/
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4/
>>
>> On 30 October 2014 10:04, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>>
>>> I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
>>>
>>> Wido, can you create them?
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
>>>  wrote:
 Hi!

 after reading the "4.4.0 -> 4.4.1"-thread on the list, I think I'm
 prepared for an Update.

 Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
 update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
 I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/

 Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?


 cheers,

 - Stephan


>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daan
>>>
>
>

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

[Stephan Seitz]

Ian,

thanks for your suggestion. I was not aware of shapeblue's repo.

Since I'm a little short on spare-systems for testing and do not know
how well these repos mix, I think I'll wait for Wido's packages.

If I'm getting impatient, I'll start an "off-site" side-project with
shapeblue's packages this weekend :)

Am Donnerstag, den 30.10.2014, 14:01 + schrieb Ian Duffy: 
> If you don't wish to wait you may use the ones generated by shapeblue.
> 
> http://shapeblue.com/packages/
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4/
> 
> On 30 October 2014 10:04, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
> 
> > I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
> >
> > Wido, can you create them?
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
> >  wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > after reading the "4.4.0 -> 4.4.1"-thread on the list, I think I'm
> > > prepared for an Update.
> > >
> > > Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
> > > update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
> > > I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
> > > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/
> > >
> > > Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > >
> > > - Stephan
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >

Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

[Ian Duffy]

If you don't wish to wait you may use the ones generated by shapeblue.

http://shapeblue.com/packages/
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4/

On 30 October 2014 10:04, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
>
> Wido, can you create them?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
>  wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > after reading the "4.4.0 -> 4.4.1"-thread on the list, I think I'm
> > prepared for an Update.
> >
> > Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
> > update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
> > I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
> > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/
> >
> > Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > - Stephan
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

RE: XenServer

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

I would also add a point about networking - hypervisors use different approach 
for traffic labelling. We tried to combine Xen and KVM within one zone of 
"advanced networking" and failed. KVM has to have different bridges for 
public/private networking while Xen uses one bridge per-physical NIC.  If you 
separate traffic types by physical NICs with different labels you probably can 
put both hypervisors in the same Zone. 

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:40 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer

Hi,

Performance between xs and kvm is similar, imho it should not be a reason to 
change, this goes for most other hypervisors. You will just make your setup 
even more complex and harder to maintain and troubleshoot.
Don't do it.

Just make sure in all cases you use paravirtual drivers in your guests and 
they'll run just fine (it's called virtio for KVM, most OSes support it - linux 
and the BSDs out of the box, windows requires drivers installed).

If I were to migrate to xs I'd do it for the feature set, like VM snapshot and 
live migration (without the need of shared storage that is); on the other hand 
you will lose the power of having a proper OS as your hypervisor with all that 
entails; hence you will also lose the ability to use 
GFS/CePH/Glusterfs/CLVM/anysharedmountpoint/etc, the same goes for memory 
deduplication (KSM).

My philosophy is pick one hypervisor and stick with it, test the hell out of it 
until your setup is solid and you can control it.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Vladimir Melnik" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 October, 2014 10:43:50
> Subject: XenServer

> Dear colleagues,
> 
> We're using KVM as a hypervisor in our cloud, but now I'm considering 
> to create one more cluster based on XenServer, because I've heard it 
> has much better performance than KVM. So, I'd like to ask a couple of 
> questions and your answers will be really appreciated.
> 
> 1. Does XenServer really shows better performance than KVM?
> 2. Are there other benefits that XenServer provides comparing to KVM?
> 3. I'm using shared mountpoint to GFS2 (accessible by iSCSI) as a 
> storage, what is better to use with XenServer?
> 
> Thank you so much.
> 
> V.

The IP is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding

[Martin Emrich]

Hi!

I created an isolated network (with GRE) on Cloudstack 4.4.1. Then I tried to 
configure a port forwarding rule for SSH to an instance. But I get an error 
message "is already used as SourceNat rather than PortForwarding".
What am I doing wrong?

Thanks

Martin

Re: XenServer

[Nux!]

Hi,

Performance between xs and kvm is similar, imho it should not be a reason to 
change, this goes for most other hypervisors. You will just make your setup 
even more complex and harder to maintain and troubleshoot.
Don't do it.

Just make sure in all cases you use paravirtual drivers in your guests and 
they'll run just fine (it's called virtio for KVM, most OSes support it - linux 
and the BSDs out of the box, windows requires drivers installed).

If I were to migrate to xs I'd do it for the feature set, like VM snapshot and 
live migration (without the need of shared storage that is); on the other hand 
you will lose the power of having a proper OS as your hypervisor with all that 
entails; hence you will also lose the ability to use 
GFS/CePH/Glusterfs/CLVM/anysharedmountpoint/etc, the same goes for memory 
deduplication (KSM).

My philosophy is pick one hypervisor and stick with it, test the hell out of it 
until your setup is solid and you can control it.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Vladimir Melnik" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 October, 2014 10:43:50
> Subject: XenServer

> Dear colleagues,
> 
> We're using KVM as a hypervisor in our cloud, but now I'm considering to
> create one more cluster based on XenServer, because I've heard it has much
> better performance than KVM. So, I'd like to ask a couple of questions and
> your answers will be really appreciated.
> 
> 1. Does XenServer really shows better performance than KVM?
> 2. Are there other benefits that XenServer provides comparing to KVM?
> 3. I'm using shared mountpoint to GFS2 (accessible by iSCSI) as a storage,
> what is better to use with XenServer?
> 
> Thank you so much.
> 
> V.

Re: Snapshotting broken on Centos 6.5

[Andrija Panic]

Thanks Nux.

On 30 October 2014 12:21, Nux!  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I haven't heard anything about any fixes, but I don't think it's worth
> spending too much time over it, there is a simple workaround.
>
>
> http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html
>
> CentOS 7 will not be affected by it whenever ACS will support it.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Andrija Panic" 
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org, d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 10:14:11
> > Subject: Snapshotting broken on Centos 6.5
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > snapshoting is broken on CentOS 6.5 - because RedHat removed the "-s"
> flag
> > within qemu-img tool in the 6.5 binaries - and this "-s" flag is still
> > being used in latest ACS 4.4.1.
> >
> > Is this going to be fixed any time soon, or what are the plan's for this
> ?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--

Re: Snapshotting broken on Centos 6.5

[Nux!]

Hi,

I haven't heard anything about any fixes, but I don't think it's worth spending 
too much time over it, there is a simple workaround.

http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html

CentOS 7 will not be affected by it whenever ACS will support it.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Andrija Panic" 
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org, d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 10:14:11
> Subject: Snapshotting broken on Centos 6.5

> Hi guys,
> 
> snapshoting is broken on CentOS 6.5 - because RedHat removed the "-s" flag
> within qemu-img tool in the 6.5 binaries - and this "-s" flag is still
> being used in latest ACS 4.4.1.
> 
> Is this going to be fixed any time soon, or what are the plan's for this ?
> 
> --
> 
> Andrija Panić

RE: Best practive for public cloud isolation method ?

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

No, we use only software VR.  Client "reserves" IP from the pool and assigns to 
VM it wants.  Cloudstack manages it well. I guess you may partition the public 
IP range for every client separately, but haven't tried to do it. 

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:50 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Best practive for public cloud isolation method ?

Hi Vadim,

how do you do SNAT - on hardware firewall I guess ? Manually for each VM that 
want's to be on public IP?

On 30 October 2014 11:36, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would also like to hear more about best practices for 
> network architecture, but so far have found only VLAN isolation 
> described more or less thoroughly.
> 1. We have recently set up VLANs and didn't fill the limit yet.
> :)  GRE is one of the options, but can't say how it works. Haven't 
> even tried yet. Would be interesting indeed.
> 2. We use VPC-s only. To enable guest VM  to be on public IP 
> we just do SNAT for those who need it. If guest is under "soft LB 
> network offer" then you  may need port forwarding, but not sure for 
> 100%. It is better probably to add another network offer go guest VM to 
> enable SNAT.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:40 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Best practive for public cloud isolation method ?
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm asking somewhat dump question and generic one, since I'm designing 
> new public cloud infrastructure:
>
> We are about to go with KVM, Advanced  zone vlan/vxlan/other isolation 
> method, ACS 4.4.1 or possibly revert back to 4.3. We plan on using VPC 
> extensively and still provide let's call it "VPS" style VMs if possible.
>
> So:
>
> 1.  Per your experience, what is the best isolation method to be used 
> for Guest traffic - I'm talking here about usability of the solution, 
> productional one:
> -- vlans - works fine, limited to theoretical maximum of 4095
> -- vxlan - don't really work fine for public cloud, since default MTU 
> of
> 1500 bytes is lowered on vxlan bridge/interface to be 1450 bytes so 
> the MTU inside VM must be also lowered...1450 bytes MTU is 
> default/hardcoded into iproute/cloudstack, with no option to choose 
> larger MTU on vxlan interface/bridge (and ask ADMIN to adjust MTU to a 
> larger one on physical
> network) - also this does not allow us to use jumbo frames, but would 
> be a really good thing to do.
> -- GRE - I'm just evaluating/researching this
>
>
> 2. Another quetion - since we want to go heavily with VPC, but still 
> want to be able to provide let's call it "VPS" style VMs - what is the 
> best aproach to do so?
> We already have Shared/Guest network with access to Internet - so this 
> is the way we acomplished single VM to be on a public IP network.
> Or is it better to really dump the VPS style, and just go with normal 
> VPC with port forwarding to internal VM - I'm just not so clear if/how 
> much CloudStack was designed to support this kind of "VPS" style VMs - 
> my understanding is that the focus is really cloud-like/VPC 
> functionality, and not VPS style, at least not on Advanced zone 
> together with VPCs - so any advice is really welcomed.
>
>
> My experience with vlans is that it works like charm, but has it's 
> limitations. Vxlans experience is fine if you can control MTU inside 
> VMs - not good for public cloud...
>
>
> Again, generic questions, but I'm looking into some hints if possible 
> and your experience that you are wiling to share
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--

Re: Best practive for public cloud isolation method ?

[Andrija Panic]

Hi Vadim,

how do you do SNAT - on hardware firewall I guess ? Manually for each VM
that want's to be on public IP?

On 30 October 2014 11:36, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would also like to hear more about best practices for network
> architecture, but so far have found only VLAN isolation described more or
> less thoroughly.
> 1. We have recently set up VLANs and didn't fill the limit yet.
> :)  GRE is one of the options, but can't say how it works. Haven't even
> tried yet. Would be interesting indeed.
> 2. We use VPC-s only. To enable guest VM  to be on public IP we
> just do SNAT for those who need it. If guest is under "soft LB network
> offer" then you  may need port forwarding, but not sure for 100%. It is
> better probably to add another network offer go guest VM to enable SNAT.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:40 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Best practive for public cloud isolation method ?
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm asking somewhat dump question and generic one, since I'm designing new
> public cloud infrastructure:
>
> We are about to go with KVM, Advanced  zone vlan/vxlan/other isolation
> method, ACS 4.4.1 or possibly revert back to 4.3. We plan on using VPC
> extensively and still provide let's call it "VPS" style VMs if possible.
>
> So:
>
> 1.  Per your experience, what is the best isolation method to be used for
> Guest traffic - I'm talking here about usability of the solution,
> productional one:
> -- vlans - works fine, limited to theoretical maximum of 4095
> -- vxlan - don't really work fine for public cloud, since default MTU of
> 1500 bytes is lowered on vxlan bridge/interface to be 1450 bytes so the
> MTU inside VM must be also lowered...1450 bytes MTU is default/hardcoded
> into iproute/cloudstack, with no option to choose larger MTU on vxlan
> interface/bridge (and ask ADMIN to adjust MTU to a larger one on physical
> network) - also this does not allow us to use jumbo frames, but would be a
> really good thing to do.
> -- GRE - I'm just evaluating/researching this
>
>
> 2. Another quetion - since we want to go heavily with VPC, but still want
> to be able to provide let's call it "VPS" style VMs - what is the best
> aproach to do so?
> We already have Shared/Guest network with access to Internet - so this is
> the way we acomplished single VM to be on a public IP network.
> Or is it better to really dump the VPS style, and just go with normal VPC
> with port forwarding to internal VM - I'm just not so clear if/how much
> CloudStack was designed to support this kind of "VPS" style VMs - my
> understanding is that the focus is really cloud-like/VPC functionality, and
> not VPS style, at least not on Advanced zone together with VPCs - so any
> advice is really welcomed.
>
>
> My experience with vlans is that it works like charm, but has it's
> limitations. Vxlans experience is fine if you can control MTU inside VMs -
> not good for public cloud...
>
>
> Again, generic questions, but I'm looking into some hints if possible and
> your experience that you are wiling to share
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--

RE: Best practive for public cloud isolation method ?

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Hi,

I would also like to hear more about best practices for network 
architecture, but so far have found only VLAN isolation described more or less 
thoroughly. 
1. We have recently set up VLANs and didn't fill the limit yet. :)  GRE 
is one of the options, but can't say how it works. Haven't even tried yet. 
Would be interesting indeed.
2. We use VPC-s only. To enable guest VM  to be on public IP we just do 
SNAT for those who need it. If guest is under "soft LB network offer" then you  
may need port forwarding, but not sure for 100%. It is better probably to add 
another network offer go guest VM to enable SNAT.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:40 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Best practive for public cloud isolation method ?

Hi guys,

I'm asking somewhat dump question and generic one, since I'm designing new 
public cloud infrastructure:

We are about to go with KVM, Advanced  zone vlan/vxlan/other isolation method, 
ACS 4.4.1 or possibly revert back to 4.3. We plan on using VPC extensively and 
still provide let's call it "VPS" style VMs if possible.

So:

1.  Per your experience, what is the best isolation method to be used for Guest 
traffic - I'm talking here about usability of the solution, productional one:
-- vlans - works fine, limited to theoretical maximum of 4095
-- vxlan - don't really work fine for public cloud, since default MTU of
1500 bytes is lowered on vxlan bridge/interface to be 1450 bytes so the MTU 
inside VM must be also lowered...1450 bytes MTU is default/hardcoded into 
iproute/cloudstack, with no option to choose larger MTU on vxlan 
interface/bridge (and ask ADMIN to adjust MTU to a larger one on physical
network) - also this does not allow us to use jumbo frames, but would be a 
really good thing to do.
-- GRE - I'm just evaluating/researching this


2. Another quetion - since we want to go heavily with VPC, but still want to be 
able to provide let's call it "VPS" style VMs - what is the best aproach to do 
so?
We already have Shared/Guest network with access to Internet - so this is the 
way we acomplished single VM to be on a public IP network.
Or is it better to really dump the VPS style, and just go with normal VPC with 
port forwarding to internal VM - I'm just not so clear if/how much CloudStack 
was designed to support this kind of "VPS" style VMs - my understanding is that 
the focus is really cloud-like/VPC functionality, and not VPS style, at least 
not on Advanced zone together with VPCs - so any advice is really welcomed.


My experience with vlans is that it works like charm, but has it's limitations. 
Vxlans experience is fine if you can control MTU inside VMs - not good for 
public cloud...


Again, generic questions, but I'm looking into some hints if possible and your 
experience that you are wiling to share

Thanks,

-- 

Andrija Panić

Snapshotting broken on Centos 6.5

[Andrija Panic]

Hi guys,

snapshoting is broken on CentOS 6.5 - because RedHat removed the "-s" flag
within qemu-img tool in the 6.5 binaries - and this "-s" flag is still
being used in latest ACS 4.4.1.

Is this going to be fixed any time soon, or what are the plan's for this ?

-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

[Daan Hoogland]

I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.

Wido, can you create them?


thanks,

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
 wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after reading the "4.4.0 -> 4.4.1"-thread on the list, I think I'm
> prepared for an Update.
>
> Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
> update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
> I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/
>
> Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?
>
>
> cheers,
>
> - Stephan
>
>



-- 
Daan

Re: [ACS43][MGMT Server][Load Balancing]

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

> On 30-Oct-2014, at 2:52 pm, benoit lair  wrote:
>
> So when doing a "cloudstack-setup-databases" with "-i 192.168.0.100" i have
> to specify the vip of the netscaler ? As well i am on the first node or on
> the second node or N node ?

The -i  is used as the host IP by CloudStack management server, among other 
things this is especially used by systemvms to connect to mgmt server. So, if 
you’re load balancing using netscaler, use the netscaler IP. Make sure to 
configure ports 8080, 8250 appropriately. Make sure all the ACS mgmt servers 
(primary/first one and others) can connect to mysql server from their 
respective IPs.

> Yes the management server was crashed, for the moment i don't have the
> access to this management server pool.
> As soon i'm getting back to this mgmt server pool, i give you more infos.
>
> I'm going to reinstall some fresh mgmt servers and give you more feedback.

Sure.

> Concerning the mgmt server log entries "Resp: Routing to peer", is it
> normal that the mgmt server is producing so much log entries with this
> message (seeing my mgmt log file growing very fast).

Since, both the management servers are loadbalancing internal calls, you’ll see 
these a lot. You may plan your log storage appropriately or configure log4j xml 
to not log INFO/DEBUG etc.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [ACS43][MGMT Server][Load Balancing]

[benoit lair]

Hello Rohit,

So when doing a "cloudstack-setup-databases" with "-i 192.168.0.100" i have
to specify the vip of the netscaler ? As well i am on the first node or on
the second node or N node ?

Yes the management server was crashed, for the moment i don't have the
access to this management server pool.
As soon i'm getting back to this mgmt server pool, i give you more infos.

I'm going to reinstall some fresh mgmt servers and give you more feedback.

Concerning the mgmt server log entries "Resp: Routing to peer", is it
normal that the mgmt server is producing so much log entries with this
message (seeing my mgmt log file growing very fast).

Thanks for your response.

Regards, Benoit.

2014-10-29 16:04 GMT+01:00 Rohit Yadav :

> Hi Benoit,
>
> Please see my reply in-line;
>
> > On 29-Oct-2014, at 7:56 pm, benoit lair  wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to redeploy my management nodes and retest my load balacning
> > confgiuration.
> >
> > Also concerning the commands i used in order to deploy the management
> > servers :
> >
> > "
> > For the first node (192.168.0.10) i've done :
> >
> > cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:password@192.168.0.200
> >  --deploy-as=root:mypassroot -e file -m
> > mypassphrase -k mypassphrase -i 192.168.0.100
> >
> > The second node (192.168.0.11) was deployed with
> > cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:password@192.168.0.200
> >  -e file -m mypassphrase -k mypassphrase
> -i
> > 192.168.0.100
> >
> > Is it alright, or is this what did a split brain scenario ?
> > "
> >
> > Was i in the right way ?
>
> This is correct. The first management server is deployed with —deploy-as
> which sets up your database. More management server nodes need to use the
> same script without the —deploy-as which only configures db options (host,
> port, ip, username and password) but this won’t redeploy your database.
> Just make sure to use the same password/ip and db as before, and make sure
> that the cloud user (or other username) can connect to the MySQL server
> from both the IPs. (do something like grant user@<% for host or 192.168.%
> etc.>).
>
> > Concerning my split brain scenario, i had a management server whom
> detected
> > (after being up for few minutes, deployed a zone, cluster, host and first
> > virtual machine) there was split brain and so it killed itself, if i
> tried
>
> When you say it killed itself, did the management server crash. What did
> the logs say?
>
> > to reup this management server, i got full entries in the logs like  :
> >
> > DEBUG [c.c.a.m.
> > ClusteredAgentManagerImpl] (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) Seq 1-289341441:
> > MgmtId 104425904713066: Resp: Routing to peer
>
> This is fine, this simply means it is load balancing requests (both
> api<->mgmt server and mgmt server<->systemvms).
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

Re: Public Network Question

[Osay Osman Yuuni]

Thanks Geoff.  I thought so myself.  I need to speak to the security chaps
to prepare a VLAN that isn't controlled by our edge FW.
Regards,

Osay

On 30 October 2014 11:00, Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Osay,
>
> Your Public Traffic needs to be exactly that, 'Public' - It is supposed to
> be Public IPs directly connected to the Internet without any Firewalls in
> the way.  The Virtual Router is the Firewall for each Isolated Guest
> Network.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Osay Osman Yuuni [mailto:oyu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 30 October 2014 08:52
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Public Network Question
>
> Hi,
> I'm setting up an advanced zone on ACS 4.3 but have hit a block with the
> public network.  Our setup is as follows:
>
> Internet --> FW->L2/L3 switch--->ACS
> management & XS62 hosts (192.168.44.x)
> 196.5.20.x/24|->Public
> network (192.168.77.x)
>
> |->Guest (192.168.33.x)
>
> My problem is that I our secrurity chaps say they can't NAT the 196.5.20.x
> IPs to the the 192.168.77.x network so that clients from the Internet can
> access their VMs.  How do I configure this in ACS so that clients can use
> one of the 196.5.20.x IPs to access VMs?
>
> Any ideas will be much welcome.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Osay
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

RE: Public Network Question

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Osay,

Your Public Traffic needs to be exactly that, 'Public' - It is supposed to be 
Public IPs directly connected to the Internet without any Firewalls in the way. 
 The Virtual Router is the Firewall for each Isolated Guest Network.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Osay Osman Yuuni [mailto:oyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 October 2014 08:52
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Public Network Question

Hi,
I'm setting up an advanced zone on ACS 4.3 but have hit a block with the public 
network.  Our setup is as follows:

Internet --> FW->L2/L3 switch--->ACS management & 
XS62 hosts (192.168.44.x)
196.5.20.x/24|->Public
network (192.168.77.x)

|->Guest (192.168.33.x)

My problem is that I our secrurity chaps say they can't NAT the 196.5.20.x IPs 
to the the 192.168.77.x network so that clients from the Internet can access 
their VMs.  How do I configure this in ACS so that clients can use one of the 
196.5.20.x IPs to access VMs?

Any ideas will be much welcome.

Kind regards,

Osay
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Public Network Question

[Osay Osman Yuuni]

Hi,
I'm setting up an advanced zone on ACS 4.3 but have hit a block with the
public network.  Our setup is as follows:

Internet --> FW->L2/L3 switch--->ACS management
& XS62 hosts (192.168.44.x)
196.5.20.x/24|->Public
network (192.168.77.x)

|->Guest (192.168.33.x)

My problem is that I our secrurity chaps say they can't NAT the 196.5.20.x
IPs to the the 192.168.77.x network so that clients from the Internet can
access their VMs.  How do I configure this in ACS so that clients can use
one of the 196.5.20.x IPs to access VMs?

Any ideas will be much welcome.

Kind regards,

Osay

ACS 4.4.1 DEB Packages not yet available?

[Stephan Seitz]

Hi!

after reading the "4.4.0 -> 4.4.1"-thread on the list, I think I'm
prepared for an Update.

Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.4/

Did I miss something? Or is it just not released yet?


cheers,

- Stephan




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: Status: update from 4.4.0 -> 4.4.1 still broken ?

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence of actions 
is described here: 
http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html

Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more than 5 hrs.  The 
result of update is:
-
Stopping and starting 1 secondary storage vm(s)...
ERROR: Failed to stop secondary storage vm with id 25

Done stopping and starting secondary storage vm(s)

Stopping and starting 1 console proxy vm(s)...
ERROR: Failed to stop console proxy vm with id 1

Done stopping and starting console proxy vm(s) .

Stopping and starting 1 running routing vm(s)...
2
Done restarting router(s).
---

After restarting managment server workers are not querying status and resources 
anymore. The last lines at management server log are:

---

2014-10-30 08:48:10,207 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
UcsManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
VpcVirtualRouterElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,208 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
BaremetalPxeManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
BaremetalManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,209 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
ManagementServerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
DedicatedResourceManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
InternalLoadBalancerElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
LdapManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
ApiRateLimitServiceImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,211 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
BaremetalDhcpManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,212 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
ContrailVpcElementImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
ContrailElementImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
MidoNetElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,215 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
NetscalerElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
NiciraNvpElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
OpenDaylightControllerResourceManagerImpl
2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
OvsElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,216 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
PaloAltoExternalFirewallElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
VirtualRouterElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
SspElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,217 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] (main:null) Discovered plugin 
BigSwitchVnsElement
2014-10-30 08:48:10,250 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(NetworkStatsUpdater-1:ctx-ca0c3513) Successfully updated aggregate network 
stats
2014-10-30 08:48:10,379 INFO  [c.c.a.ApiServer] (Thread-11:null) ApiServer 
listening on port 8096
--

Full log is here: http://pastebin.com/Wpe7wsAV

Log is not growing and changing. Cloudstack console is missing with 404 error.  
I thing VM update should not influence this. Any System VM in fact can be just 
re-created by "killing" from management GUI. 

Vadim.


-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:21 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Status: update from 4.4.0 -> 4.4.1 still broken ?

If it makes it any easier - it failed for me, but with no error simply got 
"transaction revoked..." error, no description, nothing...

On 28 October 2014 23:19, motty cruz  wrote:

> Thanks Andrija,
> but that did not fixed for me:
> mysql> describe snapshot_policy;
> +---+-+--+-+-++
> | Field | Type| Null | Key | Default | Extra  |
> +---+-+--+-+-++
> | id| bigint(20) unsigned | NO   | PRI | NULL| auto_increment |
> | uuid  | varchar(40) | YES  | UNI | NULL||
> | volume_id | bigint(20) unsigned | NO   | MUL | NULL||
> | schedule  | varchar(100)| NO   | | NULL||
> | timezone  | varchar(100)| NO   | | NULL||
> | interval  | int(4)  | NO   | | 4   ||
> | max_snaps | int(8)  | NO   | | 0   ||
> | active| tinyint(1) unsigned | NO   | | NULL||
> |