Unable to Start VM SR failure

[Jeremy Peterson]

Ok so I am back at the users again.

I had 1 VM lock up today and was forced to issue a restart as the OS was non 
responsive.

After powering off the VM bounced around between hosts and ultimately stopped 
and failed with an insufficient resources error.

I looked around in XenServer and found the ROOT volume on one of the SCSI 
LUNS's 100GB great.

I tried to download the volume in CS failed. I tried to create template from 
volume failed.

Went to start the Volume again and this is the error log.

https://pastebin.com/VAR4KRrL

What is jumping out at me is

errorInfo: [SR_BACKEND_FAILURE, non-zero exit, , Traceback (most recent call 
last):

After that error I get a ton of /opt/xensource/sm  failure messages.


1.  2017-07-13 16:01:59,983 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] 
(DirectAgent-380:ctx-0f865755) Unable to clean up VBD due to
2.  You gave an invalid object reference.  The object may have recently been 
deleted.  The class parameter gives the type of reference given, and the handle 
parameter echoes the bad value given.


http://prntscr.com/fvdv41

You can see ROOT-277 is on my storage.

http://prntscr.com/fvdvi1

The "dev" server has the Volumes of ROOT-277

Ideas ?

Jeremy

Re: DISCUSS : Vmware to Cloudstack migration support

[Will Stevens]

If you are going from VMware to CloudStack Managed VMware, this is
something I have done quite a bit.  I even built a tool to do this:
https://github.com/swill/migrate2cs

This is not a polished product.  Well, it is pretty polished once you get
it setup, but the setup is a bit complicated to get started.

If you would like to use it, let me know and I will do what I can to get
you setup.

*Will Stevens*
CTO



On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Shreya Nair  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> *An update to the migration task:*
>
> We have installed Cloudstack onto a vm on VMware to work around the
> cross-hypervisor migration issue. Now the underlying hypervisor would be
> the ESXi server for both setups (VMware and Cloudstack).
>
> Currently, we create the corresponding equivalent infrastructure on
> CloudStack wrt vmware setup.  We create a zone, pod, cluster and host set
> up with the underlying network infrastructure. However, while setting up
> the storage (Primary storage at cluster-wide scope and Secondary storage at
> zone-wide) the documentation mentions the following warnings:
>
>
>- *Primary storage warning:*
>   - When using preallocated storage for primary storage, be sure there
>   is nothing on the storage (ex. you have an empty SAN volume or
> an empty NFS
>   share). Adding the storage to CloudStack will destroy any existing
> data.
>- *Secondary storage warning:*
>   - Ensure that nothing is stored on the server. Adding the server to
>   CloudStack will destroy any existing data.
>
>
> We have obtained the mysql dump of the datastore of the source VM on
> VMware. The datastore, as you may be aware, is a logical container that
> holds virtual machine files and other files necessary for VM operations. As
> such, it may be logically mapped to the Secondary storage setup in the
> CloudStack infrastructure.
>
> Would it be possible to use the mysql dump from source to update the
> Secondary storage?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Shreya
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Paul Angus 
> wrote:
>
> > Maybe you should try qemu-img instead.
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Paul Angus
> >
> >
> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Shreya Nair [mailto:shreya.n...@opcito.com]
> > Sent: 07 July 2017 11:30
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Vinay Patil ; Siddheshwar More <
> > siddheshwar.m...@opcito.com>
> > Subject: Re: DISCUSS : Vmware to Cloudstack migration support
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> > We explored the XenConvert solution. The XenConvert utility has been
> > retired from XenServer 6.2 and upward. So the only solution would be
> using
> > an old copy or trial version of Xen Conversion Manager.
> >
> > Instead of the qemu-img utility, we used the VirtualBox VBoxManage.exe to
> > support conversion of *.VMDK file to VHD. This VHD file was used to
> create
> > a CS template and create an instance. However, the VM was unable to mount
> > the drives as it was unable to find xvdXX partitions
> >
> >
> > I get the following error on CS instance on boot:
> > [Inline image 2]
> >
> > and the logs shows us this:
> >
> > You might have to change the root from /dev/hd[a-d] to /dev/xvd[a-d]
> >
> >
> >
> > However, on using lsblk command on the source vmware instance, we
> realized
> > that the partitions on SCSI storage devices (Used by vmware) are named as
> > /dev/sdXX while Xen supports /dev/xvdXX.
> > [Inline image 1]
> >
> > Note: VMware tools has been removed from VM prior to migration
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> >
> > Shreya
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Paul Angus  > mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
> > There used to be a XenConvert utility that you do that conversion for
> > you.  I'm not sure that its about anymore, but a bit of googling might
> dig
> > up a copy.
> >
> > Alternatively there are linux and Windows versions of qemu-img convert ,
> > which usually does a pretty good job of disk image conversions
> >
> > Otherwise you could use a P2V backup/recovery tool with an agent that
> runs
> > inside your VMs
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Paul Angus
> >
> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shreya Nair [mailto:shreya.n...@opcito.com > shreya.n...@opcito.com>]
> > Sent: 05 July 2017 09:22
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: DISCUSS : Vmware to Cloudstack migration support
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> > We are trying to migrate the vSphere environment to cloudstack (based on
> > XenServer) due to some internal product dependency which can be addressed
> > by the CloudStack environment.
> >
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> >
> > Shreya
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 4,

Re: DISCUSS : Vmware to Cloudstack migration support

[Shreya Nair]

Hello,

*An update to the migration task:*

We have installed Cloudstack onto a vm on VMware to work around the
cross-hypervisor migration issue. Now the underlying hypervisor would be
the ESXi server for both setups (VMware and Cloudstack).

Currently, we create the corresponding equivalent infrastructure on
CloudStack wrt vmware setup.  We create a zone, pod, cluster and host set
up with the underlying network infrastructure. However, while setting up
the storage (Primary storage at cluster-wide scope and Secondary storage at
zone-wide) the documentation mentions the following warnings:


   - *Primary storage warning:*
  - When using preallocated storage for primary storage, be sure there
  is nothing on the storage (ex. you have an empty SAN volume or
an empty NFS
  share). Adding the storage to CloudStack will destroy any existing data.
   - *Secondary storage warning:*
  - Ensure that nothing is stored on the server. Adding the server to
  CloudStack will destroy any existing data.


We have obtained the mysql dump of the datastore of the source VM on
VMware. The datastore, as you may be aware, is a logical container that
holds virtual machine files and other files necessary for VM operations. As
such, it may be logically mapped to the Secondary storage setup in the
CloudStack infrastructure.

Would it be possible to use the mysql dump from source to update the
Secondary storage?

Thanks & Regards,

Shreya

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Paul Angus  wrote:

> Maybe you should try qemu-img instead.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> From: Shreya Nair [mailto:shreya.n...@opcito.com]
> Sent: 07 July 2017 11:30
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Vinay Patil ; Siddheshwar More <
> siddheshwar.m...@opcito.com>
> Subject: Re: DISCUSS : Vmware to Cloudstack migration support
>
> Hi Paul,
> We explored the XenConvert solution. The XenConvert utility has been
> retired from XenServer 6.2 and upward. So the only solution would be using
> an old copy or trial version of Xen Conversion Manager.
>
> Instead of the qemu-img utility, we used the VirtualBox VBoxManage.exe to
> support conversion of *.VMDK file to VHD. This VHD file was used to create
> a CS template and create an instance. However, the VM was unable to mount
> the drives as it was unable to find xvdXX partitions
>
>
> I get the following error on CS instance on boot:
> [Inline image 2]
>
> and the logs shows us this:
>
> You might have to change the root from /dev/hd[a-d] to /dev/xvd[a-d]
>
>
>
> However, on using lsblk command on the source vmware instance, we realized
> that the partitions on SCSI storage devices (Used by vmware) are named as
> /dev/sdXX while Xen supports /dev/xvdXX.
> [Inline image 1]
>
> Note: VMware tools has been removed from VM prior to migration
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Shreya
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Paul Angus  mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
> There used to be a XenConvert utility that you do that conversion for
> you.  I'm not sure that its about anymore, but a bit of googling might dig
> up a copy.
>
> Alternatively there are linux and Windows versions of qemu-img convert ,
> which usually does a pretty good job of disk image conversions
>
> Otherwise you could use a P2V backup/recovery tool with an agent that runs
> inside your VMs
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shreya Nair [mailto:shreya.n...@opcito.com shreya.n...@opcito.com>]
> Sent: 05 July 2017 09:22
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DISCUSS : Vmware to Cloudstack migration support
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
> We are trying to migrate the vSphere environment to cloudstack (based on
> XenServer) due to some internal product dependency which can be addressed
> by the CloudStack environment.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Shreya
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Oliver Dzombic  mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > just our of intrest:
> >
> > Why do you want to go away from vmware ?
> >
> > And why do you prefere xen and not kvm ( which is as you already
> > experienced much more tricky compared to kvm ) ?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
> >
> > Oliver Dzombic
> > IP-Interactive
> >
> > mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de
> >
> > Anschrift:
> >
> > IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) Zum Sonnenberg 1-3
> > 63571 Gelnhausen
> >
> > HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau
> > Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic
> >
> > Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1
> > UST ID: DE274086107
> >
> >
> > Am 04.07.2017 um 13:22 schrieb Shreya Nair:
> > > Hello,

RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Lotic Lists]

Hi Rohit.

I would suggest the 1829 [1]

It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM 
(HVM)

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829 


-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze 
the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release 
plan as soon as next week.


- Rohit


From: Wido den Hollander 
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Sean Lair 
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very 
> easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs 
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of 
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work 
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the 
> next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans 
> or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather 
> list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS release 
> 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
> reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> I started backporting some 
> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: CloudStack-UI New Release is Out - 1.0.4

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Ivan,


Thanks for sharing, awesome stuff.


- Rohit


From: Ivan Kudryavtsev 
Sent: 12 July 2017 10:09:04
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack-UI New Release is Out - 1.0.4

Hello, community.

We are happy to announce the next release of the CloudStack-UI — 1.0.5.
The release includes a lot of bug fixes and usability improvements. We have
spend two months improving the code, implementing new features and fixing
bugs found after the initial release. We missed the announces about 1.0.1 —
1.0.4 releases waiting while the most of the found bugs to be fixed. The
code was switched to Angular 4 to support the latest stack.

Links:

The release can be found at GitHub releases (
https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/releases/tag/1.0.5)
Prepared Docker image is available at Dockerhub (
https://hub.docker.com/r/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/). You can pull it with: docker
pull bwsw/cloudstack-ui:1.0.5
The project changelog is here:
https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/wiki/Changelog
Deployment guide and project info can be found at GitHub pages:
https://bwsw.github.io/cloudstack-ui/

Close Plans:

We are quite close for the development of our first two plugins which will
be presented at the CloudStack European User Group meetup in London, 17
aug.
The first plugin is clientless SSH console to VM, based on the code:
https://github.com/bwsw/webshell

The second plugin is charting plugin which is purposed to display
"realtime" CPU/RAM/NETIO/DISKIO stats for KVM VMs and based on the code:
https://github.com/bwsw/cs-pulse-sensor
https://github.com/bwsw/cs-pulse-server


All questions, considerations and notes are welcomed.
PS: If someone is willing to share the information about the project,
please just do it)

--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Rubens,


For LTS minor releases, we cannot consider features to limit the scope to only 
bugfixes and security fixes. Kindly consider installing/upgrading to ACS 
4.10.0.0 once it's is announced.


- Rohit


From: Rubens Malheiro 
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:27:50
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

What would be very interesting would be to enable the KVM snapshot feature
live

Maybe this would be a barrier to breaking over the limitation of PODS KVM
vs. XEN

And it would be a resource of immediate impact.

Sorry my english via translate

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Outback Dingo 
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav 
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> >
> > Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can
> freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a
> release plan as soon as next week.
> >
> >
>
> Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice
>
>
> > - Rohit
> >
> > 
> > From: Wido den Hollander 
> > Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> > To: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
> >
> > Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> >> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav  >:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Sean,
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for sharing.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> 
> >> From: Sean Lair 
> >> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> >> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >>
> >> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all
> of these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all
> very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
> >>
> >> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sean
> >>
> >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> >> @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> >> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >>
> >> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion
> around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a
> timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the
> community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider
> for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that
> are new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major
> bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any
> already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
> >>
> >>
> >> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git
> log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider
> reverting:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
> >>
> >>
> >> I started
> backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following
> PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or
> revert:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
> >>
> >>
> >> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider
> reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
> >>
> >>
> >> - Rohit
> >>
> >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> >> www.shapeblue.com
> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

[Rohit Yadav]

Outback,


I think there exists some initial support for XenServer 7.1 in 4.9.2.0, 
4.9/branch however consider installing/upgrading to 4.10.0.0 (once it is 
announced) which should have the support.


- Rohit


From: Outback Dingo 
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:22:53
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can 
> freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a 
> release plan as soon as next week.
>
>

Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice


> - Rohit
>
> 
> From: Wido den Hollander 
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
>
> Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
>
> Wido
>
>> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>>
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> 
>> From: Sean Lair 
>> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
>> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of 
>> these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes are all 
>> very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>>
>> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled 
>> and run twice on mgmt servers)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of S2S 
>> VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work after 
>> vRouter reboot)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sean
>>
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
>> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around 
>> the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, 
>> plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to 
>> gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for the next LTS 
>> release 4.9.3.0.
>>
>>
>> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are 
>> new feature, or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes 
>> and security related fixes, and we can consider reverting any already 
>> committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed since 4.9.2.0).
>>
>>
>> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 
>> 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should consider 
>> reverting:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>>
>>
>> I started backporting some 
>> fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise 
>> objections on changes/commits that we should not backport or revert:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>>
>>
>> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging 
>> on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>>
>>
>> - Rohit
>>
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>