Re: Upgrade CloudStack from 4.9.2.0 to 4.11.0

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Melanie and Stephan,

Thanks for logging and glad none of these are show stoppers for you. 

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 06/04/2018, 13:07, "Melanie Desaive"  wrote:

Hi Dag,

Stephan and I posted the issues we encountered after upgrading to 4.11
on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues.

Those are:

Admin Dashboard System Capacity broken with German Locale #2539
problem adding new shared network NIC to VM "A NIC with this MAC address
exits for network:" #2540
Add "Lets Encrypt CA" Certpath to SSVM Keystore (for cdimage.debian.org)
#2541
CloudStack-Usage Broken after Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.11 #2542
Web-UI creates all isolated Nets with IP range 10.1.1.0/24 #2533
Textbox "Account and projectId can't be specified together" #2543
Password Reset does not work with Isolated Networks with redundant
routers #2544

Still we are very happy with our shiny new 4.11 setup!

Thanks a lot for this great piece of software!

Greetings,

Melanie and Stephan

Am 04.04.2018 um 16:08 schrieb Dag Sonstebo:
> Hi Stephan,
> 
> Thanks for the summary – can you log these as new issues in the new 
issues tracker https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues  please (note not 
Jira).
> 
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
> 
> On 04/04/2018, 10:39, "Stephan Seitz"  wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> We're currently using XenServer instead of VMware, so I just don't 
know
> if you really need to build your own packages. Afaik shapeblue's 
public
> repository has been built with noredist.
> 
> Here's short list (sorry, we didn't report everything to the 
bugtracker
> by now) of caveats:
> 
> * There's a more precise dashboard (XX.XX% instead of XX%)
> -> Nice, but only works with locale set to EN or C or anything with
> decimalpoints instead of commas :) ... consequently the default
> language of the GUI will also be selected identical to your locale.
> 
> -> Ldap Authentication doesn't work. You need to apply 
https://github.c
> om/apache/cloudstack/pull/2517 to get this working.
> 
> -> Adding a NIC to a running VM (only tested in Advanced Zone,
> Xenserver, Shared Network to add) fails with an "duplicate 
MAC-address" 
> error. See my post on the ML yesterday.
> 
> -> cloudstack-usage doesn't start since (at least Ubuntu, deb 
packages)
> the update doesn't clean old libs from /usr/share/cloudstack-
> usage/libs. For us cleanup and reinstall fixed that.
> 
> -> SSVM's java keystore doesn't contain Let's Encrypt Root-CA (maybe
> others are also missing) so don't expect working downloads from
> cdimage.debian.org via https :)
> 
> -> A few nasty popups occur (but can be ignored) in the GUI e.g.
> selecting a project and viewing networks.
> 
> -> A minor documentation bug in the upgrade document: The apt-get.eu
> Repository doesn't contain 4.11 right now. download.cloudstack.org
> does.
> 
> 
> To us none of that problems was a stopper, but your mileage may vary.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> - Stephan
> 
> 
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Marc Poll Garcia:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > My current infrastructure is Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2 with VMware
> > hosts and
> > the management server on CentOS.
> > 
> > 
> > I'm planning to perform an upgrade from the actual 4.9.2 versión to
> > the
> > latest one.
> > 
> > I found this tutorial from Cloudstack website:
> > 
> > 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/e
> > n/4.11.0.0/upgrade/upgrade-4.9.html
> > 
> > But i don't know if any of you already did it, and had upgraded the
> > system?
> > I was wondering if anyone had any issues during the execution of the
> > process.
> > 
> > And also if someone can send more info, or another guide to follow 
or
> > best
> > practice?
> > 
> > We've check it out and found that we need to compile our own
> > cloudstack
> > software because we're using vmware hosts, is it true? any
> > suggestions?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > Kind regards.
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> 
> Heinlein Support GmbH
> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
> 
> http://www.heinlein-support.de
> 
> Tel: 030 / 405051-44

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Parth,

No problem, glad I could help. Let us know how you get on with the dummy 
interface bridge. 

With regards to your tagging question – yes this is quite a big and complicated 
topic. Suffice to summarise it as follows:
- Basic zones use a larger L3 network, and guest isolation is done by ACLs – in 
other words firewall rules which controls which VMs can speak to each other on 
the same network.
- Advanced zones use multiple isolated guest networks which are behind virtual 
routers, and each isolated network must be secured from eavesdropping from a 
neighbour network – to do this you need to put in place an isolation mechanism 
like layer 2 VLAN tags, or a layer 3 SDN solution – which uses a slightly 
different type of tagging to isolate networks.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue


dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On 06/04/2018, 13:34, "Parth Patel"  wrote:

Hi Dag,

Thank you for guiding me, i know it's a weird use case and probably would
never be required in a production environment. I will definitely try to
make a dummy interface and give it to the guest network target bridge. I
know it would be out of the scope of this email trail for you to explain me
tagged and untagged networking in L2 and L3 networks, but I would search
around the internet and ping this thread if I'm again stuck at some
specific issue after I reach my university's lab. Appreciate your help.

Thanks,
Parth Patel

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 17:06 Dag Sonstebo  wrote:

> Hi Parth,
>
> Take a look through the full email trail – I think we discussed this
> earlier on. In short the answer is no – by definition you can not run
> completely untagged isolated networks in an advanced zone – but “tagged”
> means different things for L2 and L3 isolation. The real answer - “it
> depends” – an advanced zone always relies on some sort of guest network
> isolation, which in it’s simplest form equates to L2 VLANs. If you were to
> invest time, effort and money into an SDN solution like Nuage or 
Nicira/NSX
> you could potentially get around it – but complexity and cost goes up. You
> could have a play with something like GRE tunnelling (L3) – but in my
> experience this doesn’t scale well, eats a ton of CPU cycles and may not 
be
> fit for purpose. Again you are looking at a more complex solution.
>
> Regarding the dummy network interface it looks to me like a simple module
> install and configuration – see e.g.
> 
https://www.question-defense.com/2012/11/26/linux-create-fake-ethernet-interface
> . Not my post and I can’t vouch for it’s validity – but the process seems
> straight forward:
>
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# lsmod | grep dummy
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# modprobe dummy
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# lsmod | grep dummy
> dummy   2714  0
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# ip link set name eth99 dev dummy0
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# ifconfig eth99
> eth99 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 92:BF:A6:30:20:3E
>   BROADCAST NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>   RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>   TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>   collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>   RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>
>
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> On 06/04/2018, 11:45, "Parth Patel"  wrote:
>
> Hi Dag,
>
> Thanks for the response. I am currently looking into VLANs and network
> configuration for my case. But I want to know one thing: are 
"untagged"
> VLAN networks sufficient for an advanced zone to function with two
> networks? I did not state I do not want to use VLANs for networking
> but I
> wanted to know if ACS advanced zone would function if VLANs are
> untagged?
> (The network router/switch did not support them). According to my
> knowledge
> I would have to dig much deeper into kernel files to provide a dummy
> interface as systemctl restart network would not function properly,
> still
> appreciate the advice. I will look into this more and see what I can 
do
> with it.
>
> Thanks,
> Parth Patel
>
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 13:59 Dag Sonstebo 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Parth,
> >
> > Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some
> > stumbling blocks before you get this to work.
> >
> > I suspect what you have to 

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

[Parth Patel]

Hi Dag,

Thank you for guiding me, i know it's a weird use case and probably would
never be required in a production environment. I will definitely try to
make a dummy interface and give it to the guest network target bridge. I
know it would be out of the scope of this email trail for you to explain me
tagged and untagged networking in L2 and L3 networks, but I would search
around the internet and ping this thread if I'm again stuck at some
specific issue after I reach my university's lab. Appreciate your help.

Thanks,
Parth Patel

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 17:06 Dag Sonstebo  wrote:

> Hi Parth,
>
> Take a look through the full email trail – I think we discussed this
> earlier on. In short the answer is no – by definition you can not run
> completely untagged isolated networks in an advanced zone – but “tagged”
> means different things for L2 and L3 isolation. The real answer - “it
> depends” – an advanced zone always relies on some sort of guest network
> isolation, which in it’s simplest form equates to L2 VLANs. If you were to
> invest time, effort and money into an SDN solution like Nuage or Nicira/NSX
> you could potentially get around it – but complexity and cost goes up. You
> could have a play with something like GRE tunnelling (L3) – but in my
> experience this doesn’t scale well, eats a ton of CPU cycles and may not be
> fit for purpose. Again you are looking at a more complex solution.
>
> Regarding the dummy network interface it looks to me like a simple module
> install and configuration – see e.g.
> https://www.question-defense.com/2012/11/26/linux-create-fake-ethernet-interface
> . Not my post and I can’t vouch for it’s validity – but the process seems
> straight forward:
>
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# lsmod | grep dummy
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# modprobe dummy
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# lsmod | grep dummy
> dummy   2714  0
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# ip link set name eth99 dev dummy0
> [root@kvm1 hooks]# ifconfig eth99
> eth99 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 92:BF:A6:30:20:3E
>   BROADCAST NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>   RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>   TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>   collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>   RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>
>
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
>
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> On 06/04/2018, 11:45, "Parth Patel"  wrote:
>
> Hi Dag,
>
> Thanks for the response. I am currently looking into VLANs and network
> configuration for my case. But I want to know one thing: are "untagged"
> VLAN networks sufficient for an advanced zone to function with two
> networks? I did not state I do not want to use VLANs for networking
> but I
> wanted to know if ACS advanced zone would function if VLANs are
> untagged?
> (The network router/switch did not support them). According to my
> knowledge
> I would have to dig much deeper into kernel files to provide a dummy
> interface as systemctl restart network would not function properly,
> still
> appreciate the advice. I will look into this more and see what I can do
> with it.
>
> Thanks,
> Parth Patel
>
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 13:59 Dag Sonstebo 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Parth,
> >
> > Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some
> > stumbling blocks before you get this to work.
> >
> > I suspect what you have to do is change cloudbr1 such that it is
> backed by
> > a fake or dummy ethernet interface. What seems to happen is the agent
> > script looks for the network device backing the bridge rather than
> the
> > bridge itself.
> > This would mean your setup is like this:
> >
> >  Physical eth0 -> cloudbr0 > handles management and public
> >  Dummy eth1 -> cloudbr1 > handles isolated guest traffic and allows
> for
> > isolated VLANs internally on the host
> >
> > Keep in mind the context here – you have stated you don’t want VLANs
> > traversing your physical network, hence we are trying to get this
> working
> > on a single host only. How you configure your IP ranges for
> management and
> > public is something you need to experiment with and see what works
> for you.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dag Sonstebo
> > Cloud Architect
> > ShapeBlue
> >
> > From: Parth Patel 
> > Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"  >
> > Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 07:30
> > To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> > Subject: Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?
> >
> > Hi Dag,
> >
> > When I tried your method and created a NIC-less bridge, following
> are the
> > contents of my 

Re: Upgrade CloudStack from 4.9.2.0 to 4.11.0

[Melanie Desaive]

Hi Dag,

Stephan and I posted the issues we encountered after upgrading to 4.11
on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues.

Those are:

Admin Dashboard System Capacity broken with German Locale #2539
problem adding new shared network NIC to VM "A NIC with this MAC address
exits for network:" #2540
Add "Lets Encrypt CA" Certpath to SSVM Keystore (for cdimage.debian.org)
#2541
CloudStack-Usage Broken after Upgrade from 4.9 to 4.11 #2542
Web-UI creates all isolated Nets with IP range 10.1.1.0/24 #2533
Textbox "Account and projectId can't be specified together" #2543
Password Reset does not work with Isolated Networks with redundant
routers #2544

Still we are very happy with our shiny new 4.11 setup!

Thanks a lot for this great piece of software!

Greetings,

Melanie and Stephan

Am 04.04.2018 um 16:08 schrieb Dag Sonstebo:
> Hi Stephan,
> 
> Thanks for the summary – can you log these as new issues in the new issues 
> tracker https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues  please (note not Jira).
> 
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
> 
> On 04/04/2018, 10:39, "Stephan Seitz"  wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> We're currently using XenServer instead of VMware, so I just don't know
> if you really need to build your own packages. Afaik shapeblue's public
> repository has been built with noredist.
> 
> Here's short list (sorry, we didn't report everything to the bugtracker
> by now) of caveats:
> 
> * There's a more precise dashboard (XX.XX% instead of XX%)
> -> Nice, but only works with locale set to EN or C or anything with
> decimalpoints instead of commas :) ... consequently the default
> language of the GUI will also be selected identical to your locale.
> 
> -> Ldap Authentication doesn't work. You need to apply https://github.c
> om/apache/cloudstack/pull/2517 to get this working.
> 
> -> Adding a NIC to a running VM (only tested in Advanced Zone,
> Xenserver, Shared Network to add) fails with an "duplicate MAC-address" 
> error. See my post on the ML yesterday.
> 
> -> cloudstack-usage doesn't start since (at least Ubuntu, deb packages)
> the update doesn't clean old libs from /usr/share/cloudstack-
> usage/libs. For us cleanup and reinstall fixed that.
> 
> -> SSVM's java keystore doesn't contain Let's Encrypt Root-CA (maybe
> others are also missing) so don't expect working downloads from
> cdimage.debian.org via https :)
> 
> -> A few nasty popups occur (but can be ignored) in the GUI e.g.
> selecting a project and viewing networks.
> 
> -> A minor documentation bug in the upgrade document: The apt-get.eu
> Repository doesn't contain 4.11 right now. download.cloudstack.org
> does.
> 
> 
> To us none of that problems was a stopper, but your mileage may vary.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> - Stephan
> 
> 
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Marc Poll Garcia:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > My current infrastructure is Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2 with VMware
> > hosts and
> > the management server on CentOS.
> > 
> > 
> > I'm planning to perform an upgrade from the actual 4.9.2 versión to
> > the
> > latest one.
> > 
> > I found this tutorial from Cloudstack website:
> > 
> > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/e
> > n/4.11.0.0/upgrade/upgrade-4.9.html
> > 
> > But i don't know if any of you already did it, and had upgraded the
> > system?
> > I was wondering if anyone had any issues during the execution of the
> > process.
> > 
> > And also if someone can send more info, or another guide to follow or
> > best
> > practice?
> > 
> > We've check it out and found that we need to compile our own
> > cloudstack
> > software because we're using vmware hosts, is it true? any
> > suggestions?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > Kind regards.
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> 
> Heinlein Support GmbH
> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
> 
> http://www.heinlein-support.de
> 
> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
> 
> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 

-- 
--

Heinlein Support GmbH
Linux: Akademie - Support - Hosting

http://www.heinlein-support.de
Tel: 030 / 40 50 51 - 0
Fax: 030 / 40 50 51 - 19

Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG:
HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg,
Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein  -- Sitz: Berlin

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Parth,

Take a look through the full email trail – I think we discussed this earlier 
on. In short the answer is no – by definition you can not run completely 
untagged isolated networks in an advanced zone – but “tagged” means different 
things for L2 and L3 isolation. The real answer - “it depends” – an advanced 
zone always relies on some sort of guest network isolation, which in it’s 
simplest form equates to L2 VLANs. If you were to invest time, effort and money 
into an SDN solution like Nuage or Nicira/NSX you could potentially get around 
it – but complexity and cost goes up. You could have a play with something like 
GRE tunnelling (L3) – but in my experience this doesn’t scale well, eats a ton 
of CPU cycles and may not be fit for purpose. Again you are looking at a more 
complex solution.

Regarding the dummy network interface it looks to me like a simple module 
install and configuration – see e.g. 
https://www.question-defense.com/2012/11/26/linux-create-fake-ethernet-interface
 . Not my post and I can’t vouch for it’s validity – but the process seems 
straight forward:

[root@kvm1 hooks]# lsmod | grep dummy
[root@kvm1 hooks]# modprobe dummy
[root@kvm1 hooks]# lsmod | grep dummy
dummy   2714  0
[root@kvm1 hooks]# ip link set name eth99 dev dummy0
[root@kvm1 hooks]# ifconfig eth99
eth99 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 92:BF:A6:30:20:3E
  BROADCAST NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)


Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue


dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On 06/04/2018, 11:45, "Parth Patel"  wrote:

Hi Dag,

Thanks for the response. I am currently looking into VLANs and network
configuration for my case. But I want to know one thing: are "untagged"
VLAN networks sufficient for an advanced zone to function with two
networks? I did not state I do not want to use VLANs for networking but I
wanted to know if ACS advanced zone would function if VLANs are untagged?
(The network router/switch did not support them). According to my knowledge
I would have to dig much deeper into kernel files to provide a dummy
interface as systemctl restart network would not function properly, still
appreciate the advice. I will look into this more and see what I can do
with it.

Thanks,
Parth Patel

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 13:59 Dag Sonstebo  wrote:

> Hi Parth,
>
> Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some
> stumbling blocks before you get this to work.
>
> I suspect what you have to do is change cloudbr1 such that it is backed by
> a fake or dummy ethernet interface. What seems to happen is the agent
> script looks for the network device backing the bridge rather than the
> bridge itself.
> This would mean your setup is like this:
>
>  Physical eth0 -> cloudbr0 > handles management and public
>  Dummy eth1 -> cloudbr1 > handles isolated guest traffic and allows for
> isolated VLANs internally on the host
>
> Keep in mind the context here – you have stated you don’t want VLANs
> traversing your physical network, hence we are trying to get this working
> on a single host only. How you configure your IP ranges for management and
> public is something you need to experiment with and see what works for 
you.
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> From: Parth Patel 
> Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 07:30
> To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> Subject: Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?
>
> Hi Dag,
>
> When I tried your method and created a NIC-less bridge, following are the
> contents of my ifcfg-* network files:
>
> ifcfg-cloudbr0:
> TYPE=Bridge
> PROXY_METHOD=none
> BROWSER_ONLY=no
> BOOTPROTO=none
> DEFROUTE=yes
> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
> NAME=cloudbr0
> UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
> DEVICE=cloudbr0
> ONBOOT=yes
> IPADDR=172.16.20.13
> PREFIX=16
> GATEWAY=172.16.0.1
> DNS1=8.8.8.8
> DNS2=172.16.0.1
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>
> ifcfg-cloudbr1:
> TYPE=Bridge
> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
> NAME=cloudbr1
> UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
> DEVICE=cloudbr1
> ONBOOT=yes
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>
> ifcfg-eno1:
> TYPE=Ethernet
> PROXY_METHOD=none
> BROWSER_ONLY=no
> BOOTPROTO=none
> DEFROUTE=yes
> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
> 

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

[Parth Patel]

Hi Dag,

Thanks for the response. I am currently looking into VLANs and network
configuration for my case. But I want to know one thing: are "untagged"
VLAN networks sufficient for an advanced zone to function with two
networks? I did not state I do not want to use VLANs for networking but I
wanted to know if ACS advanced zone would function if VLANs are untagged?
(The network router/switch did not support them). According to my knowledge
I would have to dig much deeper into kernel files to provide a dummy
interface as systemctl restart network would not function properly, still
appreciate the advice. I will look into this more and see what I can do
with it.

Thanks,
Parth Patel

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 at 13:59 Dag Sonstebo  wrote:

> Hi Parth,
>
> Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some
> stumbling blocks before you get this to work.
>
> I suspect what you have to do is change cloudbr1 such that it is backed by
> a fake or dummy ethernet interface. What seems to happen is the agent
> script looks for the network device backing the bridge rather than the
> bridge itself.
> This would mean your setup is like this:
>
>  Physical eth0 -> cloudbr0 > handles management and public
>  Dummy eth1 -> cloudbr1 > handles isolated guest traffic and allows for
> isolated VLANs internally on the host
>
> Keep in mind the context here – you have stated you don’t want VLANs
> traversing your physical network, hence we are trying to get this working
> on a single host only. How you configure your IP ranges for management and
> public is something you need to experiment with and see what works for you.
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> From: Parth Patel 
> Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 07:30
> To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> Subject: Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?
>
> Hi Dag,
>
> When I tried your method and created a NIC-less bridge, following are the
> contents of my ifcfg-* network files:
>
> ifcfg-cloudbr0:
> TYPE=Bridge
> PROXY_METHOD=none
> BROWSER_ONLY=no
> BOOTPROTO=none
> DEFROUTE=yes
> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
> NAME=cloudbr0
> UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
> DEVICE=cloudbr0
> ONBOOT=yes
> IPADDR=172.16.20.13
> PREFIX=16
> GATEWAY=172.16.0.1
> DNS1=8.8.8.8
> DNS2=172.16.0.1
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>
> ifcfg-cloudbr1:
> TYPE=Bridge
> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
> NAME=cloudbr1
> UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
> DEVICE=cloudbr1
> ONBOOT=yes
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>
> ifcfg-eno1:
> TYPE=Ethernet
> PROXY_METHOD=none
> BROWSER_ONLY=no
> BOOTPROTO=none
> DEFROUTE=yes
> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
> NAME=eno1
> UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
> DEVICE=eno1
> ONBOOT=yes
> IPADDR=172.16.20.13
> PREFIX=16
> GATEWAY=172.16.0.1
> DNS1=8.8.8.8
> DNS2=172.16.0.1
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
> BRIDGE=cloudbr0
>
> brctl show output:
> [root@srvr3 ~]# brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> cloud0 8000. no
> cloudbr0 8000.3464a92a09f3 no eno1
> cloudbr1 8000. no
> virbr0 8000.5254002dabdb yes virbr0-nic
>
>
>
> when adding a host in advanced zone it shows the following error: Could
> not find network 'cloudbr1'
>
> 2018-04-04 02:03:11,887 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.SSHCmdHelper]
> (qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Executing cmd:
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/util/keystore-cert-import
> /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties /etc/cloudstack/agent/
> 2018-04-04 02:03:15,686 DEBUG [c.c.h.k.d.LibvirtServerDiscoverer]
> (qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Succeeded to
> import certificate in the keystore for agent on the KVM host: 172.16.20.13.
> Agent secured and trusted.
> 2018-04-04 02:03:15,688 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.SSHCmdHelper]
> (qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Executing cmd:
> cloudstack-setup-agent  -m 172.16.20.13 -z 1 -p 1 -c 1 -g
> 1fd67886-c5d9-3464-ac73-46689258b34e -a --pubNic=cloudbr0 --prvNic=cloudbr0
> --guestNic=cloudbr1 --hypervisor=kvm
> 2018-04-04 02:03:19,674 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-af4b26a6) (logid:4c5c40d4) Begin cleanup
> expired async-jobs
> 2018-04-04 02:03:19,683 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-af4b26a6) (logid:4c5c40d4) End cleanup expired
> async-jobs
> 2018-04-04 02:03:20,022 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 routers to
> update status.
> 2018-04-04 02:03:20,025 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 VPC networks
> to update Redundant State.
> 2018-04-04 02:03:20,029 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 networks to
> update RvR status.
> 2018-04-04 

Re: Attached volume is not visible within the vm

[soundar rajan]

Thanks guys, got it fixed by installing the virto drivers from fedora site

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:56 PM, soundar rajan 
wrote:

> hypervisor deployed on KVM centos
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
> sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com> wrote:
>
>> What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sateesh
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: soundar rajan 
>> Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
>> Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 12:59 PM
>> To: "d...@cloudstack.apache.org" , "
>> users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
>> Subject: Re: Attached volume is not visible within the vm
>>
>> I am able to view the disk in linux vm centos. The same not working in
>> windows. Do i need to install any additional package in windows
>> server?
>>
>> I tried rebooting the windows vm didnt work.
>>
>> Please help!!
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:56 AM, soundar rajan <
>> bsoundara...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have created a 5 GB volume in the storage and attached the volume
>> to a
>> > vm status shows ready and success
>> >
>> > when i login to the vm and access the disk management i dont see
>> that disk
>> > inside the windows server.
>> >
>> > Tried rescan disk option no luck any idea?
>> >
>> > OS: Windows Server 2012 R2
>> >
>> > cloudstack : 4.11
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Shyam
>> >
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER
>> ==
>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
>> the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
>> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain,
>> copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
>> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any
>> liability for virus infected mails.
>>
>
>

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

[Dag Sonstebo]

Hi Parth,

Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some stumbling 
blocks before you get this to work.

I suspect what you have to do is change cloudbr1 such that it is backed by a 
fake or dummy ethernet interface. What seems to happen is the agent script 
looks for the network device backing the bridge rather than the bridge itself.
This would mean your setup is like this:

 Physical eth0 -> cloudbr0 > handles management and public
 Dummy eth1 -> cloudbr1 > handles isolated guest traffic and allows for 
isolated VLANs internally on the host

Keep in mind the context here – you have stated you don’t want VLANs traversing 
your physical network, hence we are trying to get this working on a single host 
only. How you configure your IP ranges for management and public is something 
you need to experiment with and see what works for you.

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

From: Parth Patel 
Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 07:30
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

Hi Dag,

When I tried your method and created a NIC-less bridge, following are the 
contents of my ifcfg-* network files:

ifcfg-cloudbr0:
TYPE=Bridge
PROXY_METHOD=none
BROWSER_ONLY=no
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=cloudbr0
UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
DEVICE=cloudbr0
ONBOOT=yes
IPADDR=172.16.20.13
PREFIX=16
GATEWAY=172.16.0.1
DNS1=8.8.8.8
DNS2=172.16.0.1
NM_CONTROLLED=no

ifcfg-cloudbr1:
TYPE=Bridge
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=cloudbr1
UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
DEVICE=cloudbr1
ONBOOT=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=no

ifcfg-eno1:
TYPE=Ethernet
PROXY_METHOD=none
BROWSER_ONLY=no
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=eno1
UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
DEVICE=eno1
ONBOOT=yes
IPADDR=172.16.20.13
PREFIX=16
GATEWAY=172.16.0.1
DNS1=8.8.8.8
DNS2=172.16.0.1
NM_CONTROLLED=no
BRIDGE=cloudbr0

brctl show output:
[root@srvr3 ~]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
cloud0 8000. no
cloudbr0 8000.3464a92a09f3 no eno1
cloudbr1 8000. no
virbr0 8000.5254002dabdb yes virbr0-nic



when adding a host in advanced zone it shows the following error: Could not 
find network 'cloudbr1'

2018-04-04 02:03:11,887 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.SSHCmdHelper] 
(qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Executing cmd: 
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/util/keystore-cert-import 
/etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties /etc/cloudstack/agent/
2018-04-04 02:03:15,686 DEBUG [c.c.h.k.d.LibvirtServerDiscoverer] 
(qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Succeeded to 
import certificate in the keystore for agent on the KVM host: 172.16.20.13. 
Agent secured and trusted.
2018-04-04 02:03:15,688 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.SSHCmdHelper] 
(qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Executing cmd: 
cloudstack-setup-agent  -m 172.16.20.13 -z 1 -p 1 -c 1 -g 
1fd67886-c5d9-3464-ac73-46689258b34e -a --pubNic=cloudbr0 --prvNic=cloudbr0 
--guestNic=cloudbr1 --hypervisor=kvm
2018-04-04 02:03:19,674 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-af4b26a6) (logid:4c5c40d4) Begin cleanup expired 
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:19,683 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-af4b26a6) (logid:4c5c40d4) End cleanup expired 
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:20,022 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 routers to update 
status.
2018-04-04 02:03:20,025 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 VPC networks to 
update Redundant State.
2018-04-04 02:03:20,029 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] 
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 networks to 
update RvR status.
2018-04-04 02:03:22,518 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] 
(consoleproxy-1:ctx-9d047585) (logid:3b4da034) Skip capacity scan as there is 
no Primary Storage in 'Up' state
2018-04-04 02:03:29,677 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-4378508d) (logid:9de3110e) Begin cleanup expired 
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:29,695 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-4378508d) (logid:9de3110e) End cleanup expired 
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:35,796 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-2:ctx-a6998a7a) (logid:174df0f0) AutoScaling Monitor is 
running...
2018-04-04 02:03:35,812 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-1:ctx-51d8b17f) (logid:8d7cca2e) HostStatsCollector is 
running...
2018-04-04 02:03:35,812 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-3:ctx-db3df7da) (logid:c38b9f19) StorageCollector is running...
2018-04-04 02:03:39,675 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 

Re: Attached volume is not visible within the vm

[soundar rajan]

hypervisor deployed on KVM centos

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com> wrote:

> What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?
>
> Regards,
> Sateesh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: soundar rajan 
> Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 12:59 PM
> To: "d...@cloudstack.apache.org" , "
> users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> Subject: Re: Attached volume is not visible within the vm
>
> I am able to view the disk in linux vm centos. The same not working in
> windows. Do i need to install any additional package in windows server?
>
> I tried rebooting the windows vm didnt work.
>
> Please help!!
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:56 AM, soundar rajan  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a 5 GB volume in the storage and attached the volume
> to a
> > vm status shows ready and success
> >
> > when i login to the vm and access the disk management i dont see
> that disk
> > inside the windows server.
> >
> > Tried rescan disk option no luck any idea?
> >
> > OS: Windows Server 2012 R2
> >
> > cloudstack : 4.11
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Shyam
> >
>
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain,
> copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any
> liability for virus infected mails.
>

Re: Attached volume is not visible within the vm

[Sateesh Chodapuneedi]

What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?

Regards,
Sateesh
 
-Original Message-
From: soundar rajan 
Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 12:59 PM
To: "d...@cloudstack.apache.org" , 
"users@cloudstack.apache.org" 
Subject: Re: Attached volume is not visible within the vm

I am able to view the disk in linux vm centos. The same not working in
windows. Do i need to install any additional package in windows server?

I tried rebooting the windows vm didnt work.

Please help!!

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:56 AM, soundar rajan 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a 5 GB volume in the storage and attached the volume to a
> vm status shows ready and success
>
> when i login to the vm and access the disk management i dont see that disk
> inside the windows server.
>
> Tried rescan disk option no luck any idea?
>
> OS: Windows Server 2012 R2
>
> cloudstack : 4.11
>
>
> Regards
> Shyam
>


DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

Re: Attached volume is not visible within the vm

[soundar rajan]

I am able to view the disk in linux vm centos. The same not working in
windows. Do i need to install any additional package in windows server?

I tried rebooting the windows vm didnt work.

Please help!!

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:56 AM, soundar rajan 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have created a 5 GB volume in the storage and attached the volume to a
> vm status shows ready and success
>
> when i login to the vm and access the disk management i dont see that disk
> inside the windows server.
>
> Tried rescan disk option no luck any idea?
>
> OS: Windows Server 2012 R2
>
> cloudstack : 4.11
>
>
> Regards
> Shyam
>

Re: Untagged Networking for Advanced Zone possible?

[Parth Patel]

Hi Dag,

When I tried your method and created a NIC-less bridge, following are the
contents of my ifcfg-* network files:

*ifcfg-cloudbr0:*
TYPE=Bridge
PROXY_METHOD=none
BROWSER_ONLY=no
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=cloudbr0
UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
DEVICE=cloudbr0
ONBOOT=yes
IPADDR=172.16.20.13
PREFIX=16
GATEWAY=172.16.0.1
DNS1=8.8.8.8
DNS2=172.16.0.1
NM_CONTROLLED=no

*ifcfg-cloudbr1:*
TYPE=Bridge
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=cloudbr1
UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
DEVICE=cloudbr1
ONBOOT=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=no

*ifcfg-eno1:*
TYPE=Ethernet
PROXY_METHOD=none
BROWSER_ONLY=no
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=eno1
UUID=25aabe73-8e11-408f-a4ec-c03b26d3aa6e
DEVICE=eno1
ONBOOT=yes
IPADDR=172.16.20.13
PREFIX=16
GATEWAY=172.16.0.1
DNS1=8.8.8.8
DNS2=172.16.0.1
NM_CONTROLLED=no
BRIDGE=cloudbr0

*brctl show output:*
[root@srvr3 ~]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
cloud0 8000. no
cloudbr0 8000.3464a92a09f3 no eno1
cloudbr1 8000. no
virbr0 8000.5254002dabdb yes virbr0-nic



*when adding a host in advanced zone it shows the following error: Could
not find network 'cloudbr1'*

2018-04-04 02:03:11,887 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.SSHCmdHelper]
(qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Executing cmd:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/util/keystore-cert-import
/etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties /etc/cloudstack/agent/
2018-04-04 02:03:15,686 DEBUG [c.c.h.k.d.LibvirtServerDiscoverer]
(qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Succeeded to
import certificate in the keystore for agent on the KVM host: 172.16.20.13.
Agent secured and trusted.
2018-04-04 02:03:15,688 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.SSHCmdHelper]
(qtp510113906-14:ctx-707b53e5 ctx-8d49ccb3) (logid:dff92f23) Executing cmd:
cloudstack-setup-agent  -m 172.16.20.13 -z 1 -p 1 -c 1 -g
1fd67886-c5d9-3464-ac73-46689258b34e -a --pubNic=cloudbr0 --prvNic=cloudbr0
--guestNic=cloudbr1 --hypervisor=kvm
2018-04-04 02:03:19,674 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-af4b26a6) (logid:4c5c40d4) Begin cleanup
expired async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:19,683 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-af4b26a6) (logid:4c5c40d4) End cleanup expired
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:20,022 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 routers to
update status.
2018-04-04 02:03:20,025 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 VPC networks
to update Redundant State.
2018-04-04 02:03:20,029 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-f1d46df0) (logid:a021b44c) Found 0 networks to
update RvR status.
2018-04-04 02:03:22,518 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
(consoleproxy-1:ctx-9d047585) (logid:3b4da034) Skip capacity scan as there
is no Primary Storage in 'Up' state
2018-04-04 02:03:29,677 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-4378508d) (logid:9de3110e) Begin cleanup
expired async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:29,695 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-4378508d) (logid:9de3110e) End cleanup expired
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:35,796 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-2:ctx-a6998a7a) (logid:174df0f0) AutoScaling Monitor is
running...
2018-04-04 02:03:35,812 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-1:ctx-51d8b17f) (logid:8d7cca2e) HostStatsCollector is
running...
2018-04-04 02:03:35,812 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector]
(StatsCollector-3:ctx-db3df7da) (logid:c38b9f19) StorageCollector is
running...
2018-04-04 02:03:39,675 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-26aea785) (logid:48c9a5ba) Begin cleanup
expired async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:39,686 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-26aea785) (logid:48c9a5ba) End cleanup expired
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:49,677 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-ec993f07) (logid:98d10d6c) Begin cleanup
expired async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:49,692 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(AsyncJobMgr-Heartbeat-1:ctx-ec993f07) (logid:98d10d6c) End cleanup expired
async-jobs
2018-04-04 02:03:50,021 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-592f1702) (logid:39d0b341) Found 0 routers to
update status.
2018-04-04 02:03:50,024 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-592f1702) (logid:39d0b341) Found 0 VPC networks
to update Redundant State.
2018-04-04 02:03:50,027 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-592f1702) (logid:39d0b341) Found 0 networks to
update RvR status.
2018-04-04 02:03:52,519 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
(consoleproxy-1:ctx-099c555a) (logid:1e1eb23a) Skip capacity scan as there
is no Primary Storage in 'Up' state
2018-04-04 

Attached volume is not visible within the vm

[soundar rajan]

Hi,

I have created a 5 GB volume in the storage and attached the volume to a vm
status shows ready and success

when i login to the vm and access the disk management i dont see that disk
inside the windows server.

Tried rescan disk option no luck any idea?

OS: Windows Server 2012 R2

cloudstack : 4.11


Regards
Shyam