Re: Fix Policy Based Routing for private gateway static routes
Hi Vivek, Could you please configure an ACL list (e.g. default_allow) on the private gateway ? -Wei On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 04:29, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Hey Wei, > > No PG doesn’t have any ACS rules. > > > Vivek Kumar > Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps > IndiQus Technologies > 24*7 O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 7503460090 > www.indiqus.com > > > > On 09-Jan-2022, at 6:20 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > > Hi Vivek, > > > > Does the private gateway have any ACL rule ? > > > > -Wei > > > > On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 at 07:07, Vivek Kumar .invalid> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello Folks, > >> > >> Below issue was supposed to be fixed after 4.13 but looks like it’s > still > >> there is current release. I have faced this issue in 4.15.2 > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3604 < > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3604> > >> > >> > >> > >> Vivek Kumar > >> Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps > >> IndiQus Technologies > >> 24*7 O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 7503460090 > >> www.indiqus.com > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > >> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > >> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the > >> original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are > >> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > >> communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has > been > >> obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in > >> error, > >> please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep > >> e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are > >> virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result > >> of > >> viruses. > >> > > > -- > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the > original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been > obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in > error, > please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep > e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are > virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result > of > viruses. >
Re: Fix Policy Based Routing for private gateway static routes
Hey Wei, No PG doesn’t have any ACS rules. Vivek Kumar Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps IndiQus Technologies 24*7 O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 7503460090 www.indiqus.com > On 09-Jan-2022, at 6:20 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > Hi Vivek, > > Does the private gateway have any ACL rule ? > > -Wei > > On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 at 07:07, Vivek Kumar > wrote: > >> Hello Folks, >> >> Below issue was supposed to be fixed after 4.13 but looks like it’s still >> there is current release. I have faced this issue in 4.15.2 >> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3604 < >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3604> >> >> >> >> Vivek Kumar >> Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps >> IndiQus Technologies >> 24*7 O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 7503460090 >> www.indiqus.com >> >> >> >> -- >> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the >> original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are >> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this >> communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been >> obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in >> error, >> please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep >> e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are >> virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result >> of >> viruses. >> -- This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.
Re: Fix Policy Based Routing for private gateway static routes
Hi Vivek, Does the private gateway have any ACL rule ? -Wei On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 at 07:07, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Hello Folks, > > Below issue was supposed to be fixed after 4.13 but looks like it’s still > there is current release. I have faced this issue in 4.15.2 > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3604 < > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3604> > > > > Vivek Kumar > Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps > IndiQus Technologies > 24*7 O +91 11 4055 1411 | M +91 7503460090 > www.indiqus.com > > > > -- > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the > original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been > obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in > error, > please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep > e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are > virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result > of > viruses. >
