Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

[Vladimir Petrov]

Hi all,

Voting +1

I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using different 
hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2, 4.16.0). I also 
tested main workflows and basic operations and haven't found a single issue.

Best wishes,
Vladi


Suresh Anaparti wrote:


Hi All,

I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for 
testing and a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.1.0-RC20220225T1901
Commit: cad9332082a1f85eedc30cf547ae28224be170c2

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.1.0/

PGP release keys (signed using D6E0581ECF8A2FBE3FF6B3C9D7CEAE3A9E71D0AA):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open until 2nd March 2022.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and
4.16.1 systemvm templates are available here:
https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.16.1.0-RC2/
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/

Documentation is not published yet, but the following may be referenced for 
upgrade related tests:
(there's a new 4.16.1 systemvm template to be registered prior to upgrade)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.16/source/upgrading/upgrade

NOTES on the issues fixed in this RC2 release:

(these do *NOT* require a full retest if you were testing RC1 already -
just if you were affected by these issues):
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6017 (regression in register 
template form
when select/unselect check boxes using space in keyboard)
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6026 (affects volumes on managed 
storages when
stopping or migrating a VM)
- https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6038 (regression in SSVM scaling 
down behavior,
new config 'secstorage.vm.auto.scale.down' added to control scaling down)


Regards,
Suresh





 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

[Gabriel Bräscher]

+1 on continuing with RC2 Vote.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Voting +1
>
> I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using
> different hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2,
> 4.16.0). I also tested main workflows and basic operations and haven't
> found a single issue.
>
> Best wishes,
> Vladi
>
>
> Suresh Anaparti wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
> for testing and a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SHA:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.1.0-RC20220225T1901
> Commit: cad9332082a1f85eedc30cf547ae28224be170c2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D6E0581ECF8A2FBE3FF6B3C9D7CEAE3A9E71D0AA):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open until 2nd March 2022.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and
> 4.16.1 systemvm templates are available here:
> https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.16.1.0-RC2/
> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/
>
> Documentation is not published yet, but the following may be referenced
> for upgrade related tests:
> (there's a new 4.16.1 systemvm template to be registered prior to upgrade)
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.16/source/upgrading/upgrade
>
> NOTES on the issues fixed in this RC2 release:
>
> (these do *NOT* require a full retest if you were testing RC1 already -
> just if you were affected by these issues):
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6017 (regression in
> register template form
> when select/unselect check boxes using space in keyboard)
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6026 (affects volumes on
> managed storages when
> stopping or migrating a VM)
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6038 (regression in SSVM
> scaling down behavior,
> new config 'secstorage.vm.auto.scale.down' added to control scaling down)
>
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (binding)

Regards.

From: Gabriel Br?scher 
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:41:25 PM
To: dev 
Cc: users 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

+1 on continuing with RC2 Vote.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Voting +1
>
> I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using
> different hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2,
> 4.16.0). I also tested main workflows and basic operations and haven't
> found a single issue.
>
> Best wishes,
> Vladi
>
>
> Suresh Anaparti wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
> for testing and a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SHA:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.1.0-RC20220225T1901
> Commit: cad9332082a1f85eedc30cf547ae28224be170c2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D6E0581ECF8A2FBE3FF6B3C9D7CEAE3A9E71D0AA):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open until 2nd March 2022.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and
> 4.16.1 systemvm templates are available here:
> https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.16.1.0-RC2/
> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/
>
> Documentation is not published yet, but the following may be referenced
> for upgrade related tests:
> (there's a new 4.16.1 systemvm template to be registered prior to upgrade)
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.16/source/upgrading/upgrade
>
> NOTES on the issues fixed in this RC2 release:
>
> (these do *NOT* require a full retest if you were testing RC1 already -
> just if you were affected by these issues):
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6017 (regression in
> register template form
> when select/unselect check boxes using space in keyboard)
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6026 (affects volumes on
> managed storages when
> stopping or migrating a VM)
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6038 (regression in SSVM
> scaling down behavior,
> new config 'secstorage.vm.auto.scale.down' added to control scaling down)
>
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 

Procedure to remove management server

[Ricardo Pertuz]

Hi,

What is the best option to remove management servers from webui not longer used?

Thanks!

Regards

Virtual router issue on multiple hosts

[jcapagcuan .]

Hi,

I have 2 hosts (XCP-NG hosts) in my cloudstack. Whenever I launch an instance 
that is in a different host as the virtual routers, the instance cannot 
retrieve proper IP (internal, private) configuration and is not accessible even 
from the virtual router it is attached. But if the virtual router and the 
instance are on the same host, everything works fine. Why is that? I’m using 
4.16.0 btw.

Thanks,
Irvin

Multiple primary storage issue

[jcapagcuan .]

Hi,

I have created 2 primary storage for my Cloudstack (4.16.0). Whenever I launch 
an instance from a template, it randomizes from the 2 primary storage on where 
it will put the root disk. Is there a way to restrict the root disk to a 
specific storage?

Thanks,
Irvin

Re: Cannot mount NFS share as a primary storage

[jcapagcuan .]

Yes I was able to fix this by allowing NFSv3 on my server.

Thanks,
Irvin

> On Feb 28, 2022, at 1:39 AM, Antoine Boucher  wrote:
> 
> Hi Irvin,
> 
> Have you solved your problem?  We are having same problem with TrueNAS Core 
> for primary NFS storage.  We have tried about everything.  
> 
> However, TureNAS as a secondary storage works well. 
> 
> Regards,
> Antoine
> 
> 
> 
> Antoine Boucher
> antoi...@haltondc.com 
> [o] +1-226-505-9734
> www.haltondc.com 
> 
> “Data security made simple and affordable”
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only 
> for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be 
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, 
> circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly 
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
> immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments 
> from your system.
> 
> 
>> On Jan 27, 2022, at 10:43 PM, jcapagcuan . > > wrote:
>> 
>> Configuration is all good. I tried mounting it on the same server manually 
>> and it’s fine. I just can’t mount it using Cloudstack. Btw, I’m using XCP-NG 
>> 8.2 as a host.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Irvin
>> 
>>> On Jan 28, 2022, at 10:58 AM, pradeep pal >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Please check the shared folder permissions over the NFS server and 
>>> configuration file.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Pradeep
>>> 
>>> Get Outlook for iOS>
>>> 
>>> From: SVI mailto:jcapagc...@svi.com.ph>>
>>> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 8:02:08 AM
>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org  
>>> mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>>> Subject: Cannot mount NFS share as a primary storage
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I’m using 4.16.0.0 installed on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. I was adding a NFS 
>>> storage but is receiving errors. The NFS server is on a Debian server. I 
>>> tried manually mounting the nfs path in the management server and it’s 
>>> working fine, but when I try via cloudstack, I’m receiving errors. Below 
>>> are the errors I’m receiving:
>>> 
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:06,919 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
>>> (StatsCollector-5:ctx-ba68a5a0) (logid:11777161) Seq 1-2134143273420193900: 
>>> Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 52229674989, via: 1(gpu01.nwhtc.com 
>>> ), Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { GetGPUStatsAnswer } }
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:08,034 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] 
>>> (qtp515715487-297:ctx-d758f8d6) (logid:1cb64509) ===START===  10.10.1.4 -- 
>>> POST  command=createStoragePool&response=json
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:08,054 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer] 
>>> (qtp515715487-297:ctx-d758f8d6 ctx-10b23d47) (logid:1cb64509) CIDRs from 
>>> which account 'Acct[9d7347a9-62f1-11ec-98f8-000c29b2b4c8-admin] -- Account 
>>> {"id": 2, "name": "admin", "uuid": "9d7347a9-62f1-11ec-98f8-000c29b2b4c8"}' 
>>> is allowed to perform API calls: 0.0.0.0/0,::/0
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:08,066 DEBUG 
>>> [o.a.c.s.d.l.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl] 
>>> (qtp515715487-297:ctx-d758f8d6 ctx-10b23d47) (logid:1cb64509) createPool 
>>> Params @ scheme - nfs storageHost - 10.1.1.188 hostPath - 
>>> /cloudstack/primary port - -1
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:08,076 DEBUG 
>>> [o.a.c.s.d.l.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl] 
>>> (qtp515715487-297:ctx-d758f8d6 ctx-10b23d47) (logid:1cb64509) creating pool 
>>> primaary-hdd on  host 1
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:08,080 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
>>> (qtp515715487-297:ctx-d758f8d6 ctx-10b23d47) (logid:1cb64509) Seq 
>>> 1-2134143273420193901: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 52229674989, via: 
>>> 1(gpu01.nwhtc.com ), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, 
>>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.CreateStoragePoolCommand":{"_createDatastore":"false","add":"true","pool":{"id":"6","uuid":"bd47fcce-63a4-3e5a-8153-ca212681c34b","host":"10.1.1.188","path":"/cloudstack/primary","port":"2049","type":"NetworkFilesystem"},"localPath":"/mnt//bd47fcce-63a4-3e5a-8153-ca212681c34b","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
>>>  }
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:08,081 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
>>> (qtp515715487-297:ctx-d758f8d6 ctx-10b23d47) (logid:1cb64509) Seq 
>>> 1-2134143273420193901: Executing:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 52229674989, via: 
>>> 1(gpu01.nwhtc.com ), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, 
>>> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.CreateStoragePoolCommand":{"_createDatastore":"false","add":"true","pool":{"id":"6","uuid":"bd47fcce-63a4-3e5a-8153-ca212681c34b","host":"10.1.1.188","path":"/cloudstack/primary","port":"2049","type":"NetworkFilesystem"},"localPath":"/mnt//bd47fcce-63a4-3e5a-8153-ca212681c34b","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
>>>  }
>>> 2022-01-27 18:29:08,083 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgent

Re: Virtual router issue on multiple hosts

[Antoine Boucher]

Hi Irvin,

We are also running xcp-ng clusters. I find xen much easier to diagnose with 
XenCenter or xen orchestra. 

If all the network creation seem right on the hosts with vlans, I would check 
the host firewall setting and the switch setting. 

Regards,
Antoine

Antoine Boucher
antoi...@haltondc.com
[o] +1-226-505-9734
www.haltondc.com

“Data security made simple and affordable”





Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for 
the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, 
retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of 
this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
delete this message and any attachments from your system.

On Mar 1, 2022, at 19:01, jcapagcuan .  wrote:

Hi,

I have 2 hosts (XCP-NG hosts) in my cloudstack. Whenever I launch an instance 
that is in a different host as the virtual routers, the instance cannot 
retrieve proper IP (internal, private) configuration and is not accessible even 
from the virtual router it is attached. But if the virtual router and the 
instance are on the same host, everything works fine. Why is that? I’m using 
4.16.0 btw.

Thanks,
Irvin

Re: Multiple primary storage issue

[Antoine Boucher]

Use tags on storage and on templates, compute offering or instance creation. 

Antoine Boucher
antoi...@haltondc.com


Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for 
the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, 
retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of 
this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and 
delete this message and any attachments from your system.

On Mar 1, 2022, at 19:02, jcapagcuan .  wrote:

Hi,

I have created 2 primary storage for my Cloudstack (4.16.0). Whenever I launch 
an instance from a template, it randomizes from the 2 primary storage on where 
it will put the root disk. Is there a way to restrict the root disk to a 
specific storage?

Thanks,
Irvin

Corruption on SSVM

[Jeremy Hansen]

I’m seeing what looks like some file system corruption or block device 
corruption on the secondary storage system vm:

Rebooting seems to fix it temporarily but the issues pop up within 24 hours. 
What’s the best way to fix this?

-jeremy



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Virtual router issue on multiple hosts

[jcapagcuan .]

Hi Antoine,

Firewall seems ok. Actually if I view the console of my VM, it can’t resolve 
networking on boot. Then network resolution will fail and the VM will not have 
the correct IP when I check it.

Thanks,
Irvin

> On Mar 2, 2022, at 10:01 AM, Antoine Boucher  wrote:
> 
> Hi Irvin,
> 
> We are also running xcp-ng clusters. I find xen much easier to diagnose with 
> XenCenter or xen orchestra. 
> 
> If all the network creation seem right on the hosts with vlans, I would check 
> the host firewall setting and the switch setting. 
> 
> Regards,
> Antoine
> 
> Antoine Boucher
> antoi...@haltondc.com
> [o] +1-226-505-9734
> www.haltondc.com
> 
> “Data security made simple and affordable”
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only 
> for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be 
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, 
> circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly 
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
> immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments 
> from your system.
> 
> On Mar 1, 2022, at 19:01, jcapagcuan .  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have 2 hosts (XCP-NG hosts) in my cloudstack. Whenever I launch an instance 
> that is in a different host as the virtual routers, the instance cannot 
> retrieve proper IP (internal, private) configuration and is not accessible 
> even from the virtual router it is attached. But if the virtual router and 
> the instance are on the same host, everything works fine. Why is that? I’m 
> using 4.16.0 btw.
> 
> Thanks,
> Irvin
> 

Re: Multiple primary storage issue

[jcapagcuan .]

Hi Antoine,

Yes, I’m using tags whenever i add data disk and that works fine. My issue is 
for the root disk when I launch from a template, that’s when it randomizes 
where to put the root disk to the 2 primary storage.

Thanks,
Irvin

> On Mar 2, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Antoine Boucher  wrote:
> 
> Use tags on storage and on templates, compute offering or instance creation. 
> 
> Antoine Boucher
> antoi...@haltondc.com
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only 
> for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be 
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, 
> circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly 
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
> immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments 
> from your system.
> 
> On Mar 1, 2022, at 19:02, jcapagcuan .  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have created 2 primary storage for my Cloudstack (4.16.0). Whenever I 
> launch an instance from a template, it randomizes from the 2 primary storage 
> on where it will put the root disk. Is there a way to restrict the root disk 
> to a specific storage?
> 
> Thanks,
> Irvin
> 

Re: Virtual router issue on multiple hosts

[Wei ZHOU]

Hi,

This is a typical issue caused by vlan/port misconfiguration on switches.

-Wei

On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 01:01, jcapagcuan .  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have 2 hosts (XCP-NG hosts) in my cloudstack. Whenever I launch an
> instance that is in a different host as the virtual routers, the instance
> cannot retrieve proper IP (internal, private) configuration and is not
> accessible even from the virtual router it is attached. But if the virtual
> router and the instance are on the same host, everything works fine. Why is
> that? I’m using 4.16.0 btw.
>
> Thanks,
> Irvin
>
>

Re: Multiple primary storage issue

[Slavka Peleva]

Hi Irvin,

You have to add the same storage tags of your primary storage to the
compute offering that you're using while deploying a VM. If this does not
work, can you share more information about the two primary storage
(Zone-wide or Cluster-wide), their tags and the compute offering tags?

Best regards,
Slavka

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:17 AM jcapagcuan .  wrote:

> Hi Antoine,
>
> Yes, I’m using tags whenever i add data disk and that works fine. My issue
> is for the root disk when I launch from a template, that’s when it
> randomizes where to put the root disk to the 2 primary storage.
>
> Thanks,
> Irvin
>
> > On Mar 2, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Antoine Boucher 
> wrote:
> >
> > Use tags on storage and on templates, compute offering or instance
> creation.
> >
> > Antoine Boucher
> > antoi...@haltondc.com
> >
> >
> > Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended
> only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying,
> circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments
> from your system.
> >
> > On Mar 1, 2022, at 19:02, jcapagcuan .  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created 2 primary storage for my Cloudstack (4.16.0). Whenever I
> launch an instance from a template, it randomizes from the 2 primary
> storage on where it will put the root disk. Is there a way to restrict the
> root disk to a specific storage?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Irvin
> >
>
>

Re: Multiple primary storage issue

[jcapagcuan .]

Ohh, I missed the storage tags in the compute offering. I only configured it in 
the disk offering. Got it working now correctly. Thanks Slavka.

Thanks,
Irvin

> On Mar 2, 2022, at 2:46 PM, Slavka Peleva  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Irvin,
> 
> You have to add the same storage tags of your primary storage to the
> compute offering that you're using while deploying a VM. If this does not
> work, can you share more information about the two primary storage
> (Zone-wide or Cluster-wide), their tags and the compute offering tags?
> 
> Best regards,
> Slavka
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:17 AM jcapagcuan .  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Antoine,
>> 
>> Yes, I’m using tags whenever i add data disk and that works fine. My issue
>> is for the root disk when I launch from a template, that’s when it
>> randomizes where to put the root disk to the 2 primary storage.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Irvin
>> 
>>> On Mar 2, 2022, at 10:05 AM, Antoine Boucher 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Use tags on storage and on templates, compute offering or instance
>> creation.
>>> 
>>> Antoine Boucher
>>> antoi...@haltondc.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended
>> only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be
>> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying,
>> circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly
>> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
>> immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments
>> from your system.
>>> 
>>> On Mar 1, 2022, at 19:02, jcapagcuan .  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I have created 2 primary storage for my Cloudstack (4.16.0). Whenever I
>> launch an instance from a template, it randomizes from the 2 primary
>> storage on where it will put the root disk. Is there a way to restrict the
>> root disk to a specific storage?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Irvin
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

[Harikrishna Patnala]

+1

Tested on a VMware environment with VM and volume operations on NFS and 
Datastore Cluster storage types and a few network operations.

Thanks,
Harikrishna

From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 1:20 AM
To: dev 
Cc: users 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding)

Regards.

From: Gabriel Br?scher 
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:41:25 PM
To: dev 
Cc: users 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)

+1 on continuing with RC2 Vote.

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Voting +1
>
> I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using
> different hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2,
> 4.16.0). I also tested main workflows and basic operations and haven't
> found a single issue.
>
> Best wishes,
> Vladi
>
>
> Suresh Anaparti wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
> for testing and a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SHA:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.1.0-RC20220225T1901
> Commit: cad9332082a1f85eedc30cf547ae28224be170c2
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D6E0581ECF8A2FBE3FF6B3C9D7CEAE3A9E71D0AA):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open until 2nd March 2022.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and
> 4.16.1 systemvm templates are available here:
> https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.16.1.0-RC2/
> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/
>
> Documentation is not published yet, but the following may be referenced
> for upgrade related tests:
> (there's a new 4.16.1 systemvm template to be registered prior to upgrade)
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.16/source/upgrading/upgrade
>
> NOTES on the issues fixed in this RC2 release:
>
> (these do *NOT* require a full retest if you were testing RC1 already -
> just if you were affected by these issues):
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6017 (regression in
> register template form
> when select/unselect check boxes using space in keyboard)
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6026 (affects volumes on
> managed storages when
> stopping or migrating a VM)
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6038 (regression in SSVM
> scaling down behavior,
> new config 'secstorage.vm.auto.scale.down' added to control scaling down)
>
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




 

Re: Procedure to remove management server

[Suresh Anaparti]

Hi Ricardo,

The management server remove option is currently not available from webui.

You can manually remove by updating cloud.mshost table (using below sql) for 
that management server host.
UPDATE cloud.mshost SET state='Down', removed=NOW() WHERE id=
 
Regards,
Suresh

On 02/03/22, 4:26 AM, "Ricardo Pertuz"  wrote:

Hi,

What is the best option to remove management servers from webui not longer 
used?

Thanks!

Regards