Re: Consoleproxy VM is no longer created
I now see that the certificates should be in Keystore table and all seems ok. Does anyone have any suggestion? It is becoming critical as we can not get to any vm consoles. Regards, Antoine Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. > On Dec 7, 2022, at 7:34 AM, Antoine Boucher wrote: > > We still have not found any resolution and still no console proxy. > > We had to change the ssl certificate at the same time. However, I was > looking at the database and I see that the sslcerts table is empty so are any > other tables with name containing the word “cert” are also empty. Is this > normal? > > Regards, > Antoine > >> On Dec 6, 2022, at 7:39 AM, Nux wrote: >> >> There could be a few reasons. >> Make sure your management and hypervisor logs are set to DEBUG when you are >> investigating. >> If nothing shows up on the management side, keep an eye on the hypervisor, >> see if a VM creation is even attempted, check libvirt (or whatever) logs etc. >> >> --- >> Nux >> www.nux.ro >> >> On 2022-12-06 04:37, Antoine Boucher wrote: >>> Hello, >>> We had a failure with a secondary storage that created several issues. >>> Nevertheless, after fixing the issues, we discovered that the system >>> consoleproxy and secondarystorage vm were hung. >>> We deleted both system VMs, the secondarystorage vm came back without >>> issues, but the consoleproxy vm is not being created. >>> We will investigate further, but we have found nothing out of the >>> ordinary in the management log file so far. >>> Has anyone had a similar issue before? >>> Regards, >>> Antoine >>> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended >>> only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and >>> may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are >>> hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard >>> copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any >>> attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and >>> delete this message and any attachments from your system. >
Re: Consoleproxy VM is no longer created
We still have not found any resolution and still no console proxy. We had to change the ssl certificate at the same time. However, I was looking at the database and I see that the sslcerts table is empty so are any other tables with name containing the word “cert” are also empty. Is this normal? Regards, Antoine > On Dec 6, 2022, at 7:39 AM, Nux wrote: > > There could be a few reasons. > Make sure your management and hypervisor logs are set to DEBUG when you are > investigating. > If nothing shows up on the management side, keep an eye on the hypervisor, > see if a VM creation is even attempted, check libvirt (or whatever) logs etc. > > --- > Nux > www.nux.ro > > On 2022-12-06 04:37, Antoine Boucher wrote: >> Hello, >> We had a failure with a secondary storage that created several issues. >> Nevertheless, after fixing the issues, we discovered that the system >> consoleproxy and secondarystorage vm were hung. >> We deleted both system VMs, the secondarystorage vm came back without >> issues, but the consoleproxy vm is not being created. >> We will investigate further, but we have found nothing out of the >> ordinary in the management log file so far. >> Has anyone had a similar issue before? >> Regards, >> Antoine >> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended >> only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and >> may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are >> hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard >> copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any >> attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and >> delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Re: VM Volume Limit 1024 GB
Check global setting custom.diskoffering.size.max as suggested previously by Slavka. --- Nux www.nux.ro On 2022-12-06 10:37, Rafael del Valle wrote: Domain limits I don't use, so they are all set as "-1", not sure if there is an implication here. In the user limits configuration I cannot find a volume size limit. This is very strange. On Tue, 2022-12-06 11:18 AM, Nux wrote: Check the user or domain limits. --- Nux http://www.nux.ro On 2022-12-06 10:15, Rafael del Valle wrote: > Hi! > > I cannot create an instance with 2000 GB data volume despite > available resources in ACS 4.16.1. > > I get a message: > > VM Creation failed. Volume size: 2000GB is out of allowed range. Max: > 1024 Min:1 > > The configuration parameter storage.max.volume.size is 2000 > > > > I cannot see any related account limit either. > > The volume type is Local Storage. > > > Where is the limit coming from? > > > R.
RE: VM Volume Limit 1024 GB
Which hypervisor is that? -Original Message- From: Rafael del Valle Sent: 06 December 2022 11:38 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Rafael del Valle Subject: Re: VM Volume Limit 1024 GB Domain limits I don't use, so they are all set as "-1", not sure if there is an implication here. In the user limits configuration I cannot find a volume size limit. This is very strange. On Tue, 2022-12-06 11:18 AM, Nux wrote: > Check the user or domain limits. > > --- > Nux > http://www.nux.ro > > On 2022-12-06 10:15, Rafael del Valle wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I cannot create an instance with 2000 GB data volume despite > > available resources in ACS 4.16.1. > > > > I get a message: > > > > VM Creation failed. Volume size: 2000GB is out of allowed range. Max: > > 1024 Min:1 > > > > The configuration parameter storage.max.volume.size is 2000 > > > > > > > > I cannot see any related account limit either. > > > > The volume type is Local Storage. > > > > > > Where is the limit coming from? > > > > > > R. >
Re: VM Volume Limit 1024 GB
Domain limits I don't use, so they are all set as "-1", not sure if there is an implication here. In the user limits configuration I cannot find a volume size limit. This is very strange. On Tue, 2022-12-06 11:18 AM, Nux wrote: > Check the user or domain limits. > > --- > Nux > http://www.nux.ro > > On 2022-12-06 10:15, Rafael del Valle wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I cannot create an instance with 2000 GB data volume despite > > available resources in ACS 4.16.1. > > > > I get a message: > > > > VM Creation failed. Volume size: 2000GB is out of allowed range. Max: > > 1024 Min:1 > > > > The configuration parameter storage.max.volume.size is 2000 > > > > > > > > I cannot see any related account limit either. > > > > The volume type is Local Storage. > > > > > > Where is the limit coming from? > > > > > > R. >
