Harvester supported

[technologyrss.m...@gmail.com]

Hi,

Can I use Harvester for ACS production environment? is supported ACS 
officially?



--

*Thanks & Regards.*

*Support Admin*



*Facebook  | Twitter 
 | YouTube 
 | LinkedIn 
*


*Address : *63-B, D.I.T Road, Malibagh chowdhury para

(Ground floor of NCC bank)

Dhaka-1219, Bangladesh

*Mob :* +88 01716915504

*Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com

*Web :* www.technologyrss.com

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.17.2.0 release

[Rohit Yadav]

All,

Since there were so objections and no further critical/blocker issues proposed 
by the community, we've worked through the milestone. I'll cut the RC this week 
after the last remaining item is tested and merged: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/26


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 20:40
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.17.2.0 release

Thanks Nicolas, Daan.

Currently, the list is just three issues in this milestone: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/26

I see two new items at the bottom, I would triage and only include 
critical/blocker issues/PRs wherein no workaround is possible and it causes 
critical functional/lifecycle regression for general and core IaaS features in 
compute, network, storage that can't be handled without a code fix.


Regards.


From: Daan Hoogland 
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 19:37
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.17.2.0 release

Rohit, sorry for the late answer. I would agree to do that. Is the list
already established or do we need to do more work for that?

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:41 AM Nicolas Vazquez <
nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Thanks Rohit, +1 on the short 4.17.2.0 release approach
>
> Regards,
> Nicolas Vazquez
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Date: Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 11:24
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.17.2.0 release
> All,
>
> Based on our 4.18 RM's proposed release schedule in early Q1, we have a
> few issues that are critical or blocker issues for some users.
>
> Among the issues is one that reports regression in the VPC feature -
> wherein for new VPCs or existing VPC, VPC VR patching fails when it isn't
> on the direct network as the management server. A fix for this particular
> issue would require a new systemvmtemplate which can be either
> built/shipped separately or re-bundled in the existing 4.17.1.0 packages
> but could require some systemvmtemplate upgrade process for existing users.
> I'm leaning towards doing a short 4.17.2.0 which is 4.17.1.0 plus tightly
> scoped critical/blocker fixes -
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/26 if there are no
> objections.
>
> Please share if you've any other critical/blockers issues to report, or if
> you've any advice. Thanks.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Daan




 

Re: VM Volume Limit 1024 GB

[Harikrishna Patnala]

Hi Rafael,

You need to change this global setting “custom.diskoffering.size.max”. This is 
the setting which will be checked while using custom disk offerings.

Thanks,
Harikrishna

From: Rafael del Valle 
Date: Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 3:47 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: VM Volume Limit 1024 GB
Hi!

I ​cannot create an instance with 2000 GB data volume despite available 
resources in ACS 4.16.1.

I get a message:

VM Creation failed. Volume size: 2000GB is out of allowed range. Max: 1024 Min:1

The configuration parameter storage.max.volume.size is 2000



I cannot see any related account limit either.

The volume type is Local Storage.


Where is the limit coming from?


R.