Re: ConsoleProxy VM: Unable to post agent control request as link is not available
Hi, The fastest way to fix systemvm issues is, 1. destroy system vm 2. Wait cloudstack to recreate a new system vm Hope it solves your issue. -Wei On Tuesday, 24 January 2023, Leandro Ramos wrote: > Hi :) > > I'm running some VMs with sufficient resources now. But I can't access the > VM console due to an error: > > "2023-01-24 19:56:57,983 ERROR [resource.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyResource] > (Console Proxy GC Thread:null) Unable to send out load info due to Unable to > post agent control request as link is not available > > > com.cloud.exception.AgentControlChannelException: Unable to post agent > control request as link is not available" > > Anyone can show me a way to fix it? > > I am attaching output from cloud.log > > > Thank you. >
ConsoleProxy VM: Unable to post agent control request as link is not available
Hi :) I'm running some VMs with sufficient resources now. But I can't access the VM console due to an error: "2023-01-24 19:56:57,983 ERROR [resource.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyResource] (Console Proxy GC Thread:null) Unable to send out load info due to Unable to post agent control request as link is not available com.cloud.exception.AgentControlChannelException: Unable to post agent control request as link is not available" Anyone can show me a way to fix it? I am attaching output from cloud.log Thank you. 2023-01-24 19:56:55,184 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Lost connection to host: 192.168.122.2. Attempting reconnection while we still have 0 commands in progress. 2023-01-24 19:56:55,191 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Handler-1:null) NioClient connection closed 2023-01-24 19:56:57,983 INFO [utils.exception.CSExceptionErrorCode] (Console Proxy GC Thread:null) Could not find exception: com.cloud.exception.Agent ControlChannelException in error code list for exceptions 2023-01-24 19:56:57,983 ERROR [resource.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyResource] (Console Proxy GC Thread:null) Unable to send out load info due to Unable to post agent control request as link is not available com.cloud.exception.AgentControlChannelException: Unable to post agent control request as link is not available at com.cloud.agent.Agent.postRequest(Agent.java:961) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.postRequest(Agent.java:949) at com.cloud.agent.resource.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyResource.reportLoadInfo(ConsoleProxyResource.java:417) at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor9.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxy.reportLoadInfo(ConsoleProxy.java:222) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyGCThread.run(ConsoleProxyGCThread.java:104) 2023-01-24 19:57:00,191 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Reconnecting to host:192.168.122.2 2023-01-24 19:57:00,192 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Connecting to 192.168.122.2:8250 2023-01-24 19:57:00,192 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2023-01-24 19:57:05,212 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Reconnecting to host:192.168.122.2 2023-01-24 19:57:05,212 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Connecting to 192.168.122.2:8250 2023-01-24 19:57:05,214 WARN [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 2023-01-24 19:57:07,983 INFO [utils.exception.CSExceptionErrorCode] (Console Proxy GC Thread:null) Could not find exception: com.cloud.exception.Agent ControlChannelException in error code list for exceptions 2023-01-24 19:57:07,983 ERROR [resource.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyResource] (Console Proxy GC Thread:null) Unable to send out load info due to Unable to post agent control request as link is not available com.cloud.exception.AgentControlChannelException: Unable to post agent control request as link is not available at com.cloud.agent.Agent.postRequest(Agent.java:961) at com.cloud.agent.Agent.postRequest(Agent.java:949) at com.cloud.agent.resource.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyResource.reportLoadInfo(ConsoleProxyResource.java:417) at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor9.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxy.reportLoadInfo(ConsoleProxy.java:222) at com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyGCThread.run(ConsoleProxyGCThread.java:104) 2023-01-24 19:57:10,221 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Reconnecting to host:192.168.122.2 2023-01-24 19:57:10,221 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Connecting to 192.168.122.2:8250 2023-01-24 19:57:10,224 INFO [utils.nio.Link] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Conf file found: /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/conf/agent.properties 2023-01-24 19:57:10,403 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Handler-1:null) SSL: Handshake done 2023-01-24 19:57:10,404 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Connected to 192.168.122.2:8250 2023-01-24 19:57:10,459 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null) Process agent startup answer, agent id = 0 2023-01-24 19:57:10,460 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null) Set agent id 0 2023-01-24 19:57:10,460 INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null) Startup Response Received: agent id = 0 2023-01-24 19:57:10,651 INFO [resource.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyResource] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Invoke launchConsoleProxy() in responding to S tartConsoleProxyAgentHttpHan
RE: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief
+1 on that, and especially useful for Edge zones. -Original Message- From: Nux Sent: 24 January 2023 14:43 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Apache CloudStack Marketing Subject: Re: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief Thanks Ivet, this is amazing! ACS does need a new SDN story and Tungsten looks the real deal here, can't wait to try it! Also cheers to EWERK and ENA for their involvement to make this happen! Regards On 2023-01-24 11:31, Ivet Petrova wrote: > Hi all, > > I am happy to share a new solution brief we have developed together > with the team of Tungsten Fabric: > https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/apache-cloudstack-and-tungst > en-fabric If you are interested to learn more for SDN and how tungsten > integrates with CloudStack take a look. > > Kind regards,
Re: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief
This is great, many thanks Ivet! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Ivet Petrova Date: Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 08:31 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , d...@cloudstack.apache.org , Apache CloudStack Marketing Subject: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief Hi all, I am happy to share a new solution brief we have developed together with the team of Tungsten Fabric: https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/apache-cloudstack-and-tungsten-fabric If you are interested to learn more for SDN and how tungsten integrates with CloudStack take a look. Kind regards,
Re: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief
Thanks Ivet, this is amazing! ACS does need a new SDN story and Tungsten looks the real deal here, can't wait to try it! Also cheers to EWERK and ENA for their involvement to make this happen! Regards On 2023-01-24 11:31, Ivet Petrova wrote: Hi all, I am happy to share a new solution brief we have developed together with the team of Tungsten Fabric: https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/apache-cloudstack-and-tungsten-fabric If you are interested to learn more for SDN and how tungsten integrates with CloudStack take a look. Kind regards,
Re: List users in the same account
Hi Mevludin, As far as I know it’s not possible to list the other users in the same account for a user, however with that setting it is possible to list other user accounts that exist in the same domain Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Mevludin Blazevic Date: Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 09:41 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: List users in the same account Hi all, is there a way to allow users of a specific account to list the other users under the same account? The only setting I can find is allow.user.view.all.domain.accounts that does something similar.. Regards, Mevludin
List users in the same account
Hi all, is there a way to allow users of a specific account to list the other users under the same account? The only setting I can find is allow.user.view.all.domain.accounts that does something similar.. Regards, Mevludin
Re: KVM host UEFI allow guest UEFI Secure boot
Yes, I have tested and am able to run Windows Server 2016 and Server 2019 in secure mode with cloudstack as part of https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3638 pull request with cloudstack. With the recent version I haven't checked. Thanks & Regards, Pavan Aravapalli. Architect. https://www.linkedin.com/in/pavan-a-70995a27/ On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 16:18, Gary Dixon wrote: > Thanks Pavan > > Are you successfully running Windows Server VM's in uefi secure boot mode > in Cloudstack ? > > Gary Dixon > Senior Technical Consultant > T: +44 161 537 4990 > E: *v* <+44%207989717661>ms@quadris‑support.com > W: www.quadris.co.uk > The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be confidential > and privileged for the private use of the named recipient. The contents of > this e-mail may not necessarily represent the official views of Quadris. > If you have received this information in error you must not copy, > distribute or take any action or reliance on its contents. Please destroy > any hard copies and delete this message. > -Original Message- > From: pavan aravapalli > Sent: 24 January 2023 07:47 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: KVM host UEFI allow guest UEFI Secure boot > > Hi Gary, > > If you don't have any specific dependencies with Ubunut version try with > the latest Ubuntu 22.04, it has secure files. I verified and it supports > secure files. > > Thanks & Regards, > Pavan Aravapalli. > Architect. > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fpavan-a-70995a27%2F&data=05%7C01%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Cf26e2c788cae4190af3008dafddf2f3a%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C638101432282521311%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lorVxhzKY8skt0LMTiDaby63B%2BA7EpSJv02hHNvzZls%3D&reserved=0 > > > > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 23:08, Gary Dixon > > wrote: > > > Thanks Pavan > > > > Unfortunately, in the Ubuntu OVMF package it does not install a > > "OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd" file in the /usr/share/OVMF/ path This VARS > > file does not exist it appears on an ubuntu system. > > > > BR > > > > Gary > > > > Gary Dixon > > Senior Technical Consultant > > T: +44 161 537 4990 > > E: *v* <+44%207989717661>ms@quadris‑support.com > > W: > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.q > > uadris.co.uk%2F&data=05%7C01%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Cf26e2c788c > > ae4190af3008dafddf2f3a%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C63 > > 8101432282521311%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV > > 2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9sQKrpy2Xs > > 1yrXYliGQSfPtARsaafISJIJ17JTFhB4s%3D&reserved=0 > > The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be > > confidential and privileged for the private use of the named > > recipient. The contents of this e-mail may not necessarily represent the > official views of Quadris. > > If you have received this information in error you must not copy, > > distribute or take any action or reliance on its contents. Please > > destroy any hard copies and delete this message. > > -Original Message- > > From: pavan aravapalli > > Sent: 23 January 2023 11:48 > > To: gary.di...@quadris.co.uk.invalid > > Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: KVM host UEFI allow guest UEFI Secure boot > > > > I see wrong vars configured for secure VAR. * > template='/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd'> * > > > > It should be something like > > "/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd:/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd", > > or the file should be like path to the OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd inside > > uefi.properties on the Ubuntu Host. I hope this helps. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Pavan Aravapalli. > > Architect. > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. > > linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fpavan-a-70995a27%2F&data=05%7C01%7CGary.Dixon%40qu > > adris.co.uk%7Cf26e2c788cae4190af3008dafddf2f3a%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16d > > b0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C638101432282521311%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWI > > joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7 > > C%7C%7C&sdata=lorVxhzKY8skt0LMTiDaby63B%2BA7EpSJv02hHNvzZls%3D&reserve > > d=0 > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 16:01, Gary Dixon > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I think this is possibly a bug in CS 4.15.2 with KVM hypervisor on > > > Ubuntu > > > 20.04 > > > > > > > > > > > > I have evicted one of our hosts from the cloudstack cluster and > > > added the /etc/cloudstack/agent/uefi.properties file. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cleared out the keystore and set the libvirtd.conf file back to > > > listen_tls=0, listen_tcp=1 and re-added the host back in to the > > > cluster in Cloudstack > > > > > > > > > > > > In the agent logs I can see that it detects the uefi.properties file > > > and enumerates the paths. > > > > > > > > > > > > The host is added back into Cloudstack – but in
CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief
Hi all, I am happy to share a new solution brief we have developed together with the team of Tungsten Fabric: https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/apache-cloudstack-and-tungsten-fabric If you are interested to learn more for SDN and how tungsten integrates with CloudStack take a look. Kind regards,
RE: KVM host UEFI allow guest UEFI Secure boot
Thanks Pavan Are you successfully running Windows Server VM's in uefi secure boot mode in Cloudstack ? Gary Dixon Senior Technical Consultant T: +44 161 537 4990 E: v...@quadris-support.com W: www.quadris.co.uk The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be confidential and privileged for the private use of the named recipient. The contents of this e-mail may not necessarily represent the official views of Quadris. If you have received this information in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action or reliance on its contents. Please destroy any hard copies and delete this message. -Original Message- From: pavan aravapalli Sent: 24 January 2023 07:47 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: KVM host UEFI allow guest UEFI Secure boot Hi Gary, If you don't have any specific dependencies with Ubunut version try with the latest Ubuntu 22.04, it has secure files. I verified and it supports secure files. Thanks & Regards, Pavan Aravapalli. Architect. https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fpavan-a-70995a27%2F&data=05%7C01%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Cf26e2c788cae4190af3008dafddf2f3a%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C638101432282521311%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lorVxhzKY8skt0LMTiDaby63B%2BA7EpSJv02hHNvzZls%3D&reserved=0 On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 23:08, Gary Dixon wrote: > Thanks Pavan > > Unfortunately, in the Ubuntu OVMF package it does not install a > "OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd" file in the /usr/share/OVMF/ path This VARS > file does not exist it appears on an ubuntu system. > > BR > > Gary > > Gary Dixon > Senior Technical Consultant > T: +44 161 537 4990 > E: *v* <+44%207989717661>ms@quadris‑support.com > W: > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.q > uadris.co.uk%2F&data=05%7C01%7CGary.Dixon%40quadris.co.uk%7Cf26e2c788c > ae4190af3008dafddf2f3a%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16db0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C63 > 8101432282521311%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV > 2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9sQKrpy2Xs > 1yrXYliGQSfPtARsaafISJIJ17JTFhB4s%3D&reserved=0 > The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be > confidential and privileged for the private use of the named > recipient. The contents of this e-mail may not necessarily represent the > official views of Quadris. > If you have received this information in error you must not copy, > distribute or take any action or reliance on its contents. Please > destroy any hard copies and delete this message. > -Original Message- > From: pavan aravapalli > Sent: 23 January 2023 11:48 > To: gary.di...@quadris.co.uk.invalid > Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: KVM host UEFI allow guest UEFI Secure boot > > I see wrong vars configured for secure VAR. * template='/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd'> * > > It should be something like > "/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd:/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd", > or the file should be like path to the OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd inside > uefi.properties on the Ubuntu Host. I hope this helps. > > > Thanks & Regards, > Pavan Aravapalli. > Architect. > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww. > linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fpavan-a-70995a27%2F&data=05%7C01%7CGary.Dixon%40qu > adris.co.uk%7Cf26e2c788cae4190af3008dafddf2f3a%7Cf1d6abf3d3b44894ae16d > b0fb93a96a2%7C0%7C0%7C638101432282521311%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWI > joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7 > C%7C%7C&sdata=lorVxhzKY8skt0LMTiDaby63B%2BA7EpSJv02hHNvzZls%3D&reserve > d=0 > > > > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 16:01, Gary Dixon > > > wrote: > > > I think this is possibly a bug in CS 4.15.2 with KVM hypervisor on > > Ubuntu > > 20.04 > > > > > > > > I have evicted one of our hosts from the cloudstack cluster and > > added the /etc/cloudstack/agent/uefi.properties file. > > > > > > > > Cleared out the keystore and set the libvirtd.conf file back to > > listen_tls=0, listen_tcp=1 and re-added the host back in to the > > cluster in Cloudstack > > > > > > > > In the agent logs I can see that it detects the uefi.properties file > > and enumerates the paths. > > > > > > > > The host is added back into Cloudstack – but in the database in the > > “host_details” table I see the “host.uefi.enable” value is set to “false” > > for this host ? > > > > > > > > We then manually set “host.uefi.enable” to true in the database > > > > > > > > I then provision a new instance and use a Windows Server2016 ISO to > > provision the machine on this uefi enabled host. I set the adv > > settings to > > BIOS: UEFI BOOT MODE: Secure > > > > The VM starts but when I console on to it there is an error message > > on the console window saying “*Guest has not initialized the display > > (yet)”* > > > > So at this point it appears we are unable to create any VM’s with
