Re: Management server not connected from SSVM
Thank tou Jithin! The management server IP is currect. I can ping to management server from SSVM, but can not to public IP of system VMs from management server. There is no route on the SSVM. Thanks again!! -Original Message- From: "Jithin Raju" To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"; Cc: Sent: 2023-10-03 (화) 14:04:53 (GMT+09:00) Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM Hi Jaejong, Could you verify whether the management server IP is correct in the global configuration parameter ‘host’? Is there a route on the SSVM to route the management server IP via eth1? Can you ping the management server IP from SSVM? -Jithin From: jaejong Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 9:35 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Management server not connected from SSVM I try tried install acs on rocky9.2, but I can't config network by nmcli for acs manuals. I have experience acs 4.17.2 on rocky 8.7 successsfully. So I try install acs 4.18.1 on rocky8.8. But I can ping system VMs. public ip status for system VMs are : * ip is allocated status. * stactic and source NAT is disabled. * virtual route is not exist. At management server, netstat -tulpn | grep LISTEN report 8080,8250,9090 port are listening, But 8443 not. I checked SSVM by sh ssvm-check.sh; First DNS server is 8.8.8.8 PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=115 time=27.206 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=26.872 ms --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 26.872/27.039/27.206/0.167 ms Good: Can ping DNS server Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org nfs is currently mounted Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7 Good: Can write to mount point Management server is 10.0.*. Checking connectivity. ssvm-check.sh: 143: Syntax error: redirection unexpected I want to add kubernetes ISO. How can i fix this? Thanks.
Re: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2
Hi Marty, I have a few questions to understand your scenario better. I hope you don’t mind answering. What is the guest OS? Are the test XCP and the XCP hosts managed by CS on the same version? Is the template information as per XAPI DB ( using xe commands) for the standalone and the CS managed VMs different? What is the CS version in use? -Jithin From: ma...@gonsource.com Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 12:29 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2 Hello all, I have a template I imported with the Citrix Management Agent installed from Xenserver.com. On my "test" XCP cluster (not connected to CS), the agent says it is there and the VM shows the Xenserver NIC, for example. When I export the disk and import it into CS, the agent does not show it is installed and the NIC is the Realtek NIC. Is there anything "special" that is being changed when CS deploys the template in a cluster with XCP-NG that would cause this? Thank you for the help.
Re: Management server not connected from SSVM
Hi Jaejong, Could you verify whether the management server IP is correct in the global configuration parameter ‘host’? Is there a route on the SSVM to route the management server IP via eth1? Can you ping the management server IP from SSVM? -Jithin From: jaejong Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 9:35 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Management server not connected from SSVM I try tried install acs on rocky9.2, but I can't config network by nmcli for acs manuals. I have experience acs 4.17.2 on rocky 8.7 successsfully. So I try install acs 4.18.1 on rocky8.8. But I can ping system VMs. public ip status for system VMs are : * ip is allocated status. * stactic and source NAT is disabled. * virtual route is not exist. At management server, netstat -tulpn | grep LISTEN report 8080,8250,9090 port are listening, But 8443 not. I checked SSVM by sh ssvm-check.sh; First DNS server is 8.8.8.8 PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=115 time=27.206 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=26.872 ms --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 26.872/27.039/27.206/0.167 ms Good: Can ping DNS server Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org nfs is currently mounted Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7 Good: Can write to mount point Management server is 10.0.*. Checking connectivity. ssvm-check.sh: 143: Syntax error: redirection unexpected I want to add kubernetes ISO. How can i fix this? Thanks.
Management server not connected from SSVM
I try tried install acs on rocky9.2, but I can't config network by nmcli for acs manuals. I have experience acs 4.17.2 on rocky 8.7 successsfully. So I try install acs 4.18.1 on rocky8.8. But I can ping system VMs. public ip status for system VMs are : * ip is allocated status. * stactic and source NAT is disabled. * virtual route is not exist. At management server, netstat -tulpn | grep LISTEN report 8080,8250,9090 port are listening, But 8443 not. I checked SSVM by sh ssvm-check.sh; First DNS server is 8.8.8.8 PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=115 time=27.206 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=26.872 ms --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 26.872/27.039/27.206/0.167 ms Good: Can ping DNS server Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org nfs is currently mounted Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7 Good: Can write to mount point Management server is 10.0.*. Checking connectivity. ssvm-check.sh: 143: Syntax error: redirection unexpected I want to add kubernetes ISO. How can i fix this? Thanks.
Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2
Hello all, I have a template I imported with the Citrix Management Agent installed from Xenserver.com. On my "test" XCP cluster (not connected to CS), the agent says it is there and the VM shows the Xenserver NIC, for example. When I export the disk and import it into CS, the agent does not show it is installed and the NIC is the Realtek NIC. Is there anything "special" that is being changed when CS deploys the template in a cluster with XCP-NG that would cause this? Thank you for the help.
RE: Project Limits
Thank you both for the answer. This is the way I read it, and thought it worked but wanted to be sure. Because of how we are structured, I may make the projects have a much larger limit set globally, and then let the individual MSP, if they want to change it, change it themselves. Regards, Marty -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2023 7:53 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Project Limits Hi Marty, In addition to what Pearl has advised, the limits are defined in global settings (search for max.project or max.account) which can be overriden on per domain/account/project levels. Regards. From: Pearl d'Silva Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2023 03:49 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Project Limits Hi Marty, If you have a project in a domain with resource limit set greater that what the domain offers, then the resource limits of the domain apply within a project; i.e., taking your example, since the domain has a CPU limit of 20, despite the project having 40 CPUs as the upper limit, it will prevent creation of compute nodes once the 20 CPU mark (of the domain) is exceeded. Regards, Pearl From: ma...@gonsource.com Sent: September 29, 2023 4:40 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Project Limits Hello, community, Quick question and clarification on my side. For projects, I know they have their own resource limit settings. But is this limit technically set by the domain? So, for example, if the domain has a limit of 20 CPUs, and the project, in that domain, has 40 CPUs as a limit, will it stop the creation of a compute node in the project if they hit the 20 limit or the 40 limit? Thank you for the help. Marty
Re: [DISCUSS] Block importing VMs without NIC
Henrique, Thanks for bringing this up/ I think both disallowing and creating a default nic on importing are acceptable behaviours. One could argue for either and operators will complain either way (I know I probably would ;). I think we can make disallowing the default and if we want to make this luxurious we can implement a setting that creates a default NIC if one is missing. €0,02 On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 8:30 AM Henrique Sato wrote: > Hello guys, > > As mentioned in PR #7859 [1], I'm opening this thread so we can discuss > whether ACS should allow importing VMs without NIC. > > Currently, ACS allows importing VMs without a NIC. However, when creating > new NICs for these VMs, it will not be possible to set them as default. > When using a VM without a default NIC, the gateway is not configured and > without a gateway the VM will not have external connection, which limits > the user to the local network. Although PR #7859 [1] solves this situation, > I do not think ACS should allow this kind of situation. In my opinion, this > behavior should be removed, as ACS does not allow creating VMs without NIC > nor removing the default NIC. > > What do you guys think about this scenario? Do you have other > perspectives/opinions on this matter? > > Best regards, > Henrique Sato (hsato03) > > [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7859 > -- Daan
[DISCUSS] Block importing VMs without NIC
Hello guys, As mentioned in PR #7859 [1], I'm opening this thread so we can discuss whether ACS should allow importing VMs without NIC. Currently, ACS allows importing VMs without a NIC. However, when creating new NICs for these VMs, it will not be possible to set them as default. When using a VM without a default NIC, the gateway is not configured and without a gateway the VM will not have external connection, which limits the user to the local network. Although PR #7859 [1] solves this situation, I do not think ACS should allow this kind of situation. In my opinion, this behavior should be removed, as ACS does not allow creating VMs without NIC nor removing the default NIC. What do you guys think about this scenario? Do you have other perspectives/opinions on this matter? Best regards, Henrique Sato (hsato03) [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7859
