Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Bharat Bhushan Saini]

Hi Jayanth,

The major part is the ISO uploads and template registration.

When RFC 1918 IP range uses with the nfs server as well, cloudstack unable to 
create the system vm’s.
I also use wireguard to make communication between MS and KVM but it is also 
not working.
I simple words with RFC 1918 IP range uses then I unable to launch a instance 
because of no ISO and templates are present in cloudstack with ready status.

I need guide in the network part of cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_4097201430]

From: Jayanth Reddy 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 7:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hello Bharat,
Please let me know if your question is only on ISO uploads and template 
registrations.

Template registration of an external QCOW2 or any compatible ones need only 
SNAT to work towards the destination (where your QCOW2s are hosted). Please 
note that secondary storage VM is responsible for this, and specifically the 
"Public IP address" interface assigned and it doesn't matter if it is actual 
Public address or as part of RFC 1918. As long as you've got reachability to 
the external HTTP server where QCOW2 or similar are hosted, this will just work.

I don't think DNAT works for the system VMs as the URLs during template uploads 
only point to "Public IP address" assigned to Secondary Storage VM. Please 
check this out on the Cloudstack Web UI. If this address is part of RFC 1918, 
then your client will attempt to make a connection to this only, and not the 
DNAT address which you'd have externally configured. IIUC, there is no option 
to set the DNAT address on Cloudstack.

Please also note the same for template or ISO copies across zones. The ACLs on 
Apache htaccess file will be put as the "Public IP Address" on the secondary 
storage VMs, however this can be manually edited to include the SNAT IP of your 
secondary storage VM.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,
Jayanth


From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 5:43:13 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment

Hi Jithin,

I can use the RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT but it has to be configured in the 
system itself.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_2404564422]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 5:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

Can’t you use an RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT for cloudstack public traffic?

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin,

That is the major requirement as I am lacking to have the IP range. So that’s 
why I consider the create virtual network and that network NATing with the one 
interface and one IP.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_495948912]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:51 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the 

Re: Unable To Delete Secondary Storage

[Bryan Tiang]

Morning All,

Just to update, we managed to resolve the issue, but it had to be done manually 
from the db.

Manually alter DB to remove templates from old zone

Successfully removed old templates > Old Secondary Storage > Old Zone

Changed "state" to "inactive" and added date & time to "removed"


Regards,
Bryan
On 16 Jan 2024 at 12:53 PM +0800, Bryan Tiang , wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> We're trying to remove secondary storage but we need to delete the existing 
> templates first
> However, we're receiving this error Failed to delete template
>
> Error message from management server
> Jan 16 11:23:49 N2NCLOUDMY1MG01 java[87629]: ERROR 
> [o.a.c.s.i.BaseImageStoreDriverImpl] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-259f8594 
> job-9377 ctx-9f923096) (logid:c104e949) No remote endpoint to send command, 
> check if host or ssvm is down?
>
> Ultimately we're trying to remove the zone, therefore we've also removed 
> hosts associated to this zone
>
> 
>
> Regards,
> Bryan

Re: GRE tunnel between user VM and a outside server not working after KVM host reboot

[Wei ZHOU]

Hi,

Can you add a security group rule with protocol number 47 (GRE) ?

-Wei

On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 00:30, Fariborz Navidan 
wrote:

> Hi Friends,
>
> We have a client who is running two VMs on our cloud. They are running GRE
> tunnel between their VMs and a server outside our network. After last
> reboot of KVM hosts, their GRE tunnel stopped working. The GRE tunnel is
> established and private IPs are assigned to both peers buy peers are not
> able to reach each other using their private IP addresses.
>
> We have already added all protocols and CIDRs (0.0.0.0/0) into the
> security
> groups belonging to the VMs.
>
> Should we do something on hosts to allow GRE tunneling?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Kind Regards.
>

Fwd: GRE tunnel between user VM and a outside server not working after KVM host reboot

[Fariborz Navidan]

-- Forwarded message -
From: Fariborz Navidan 
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024, 02:59
Subject: GRE tunnel between user VM and a outside server not working after
KVM host reboot
To: 


Hi Friends,

We have a client who is running two VMs on our cloud. They are running GRE
tunnel between their VMs and a server outside our network. After last
reboot of KVM hosts, their GRE tunnel stopped working. The GRE tunnel is
established and private IPs are assigned to both peers buy peers are not
able to reach each other using their private IP addresses.

We have already added all protocols and CIDRs (0.0.0.0/0) into the security
groups belonging to the VMs.

Should we do something on hosts to allow GRE tunneling?

Please advise.

Kind Regards.

Re: Issues migrating primary storage

[Jeremy Hansen]

Extending these timeouts in the “wait” configs seems to have helped. One of my 
1TB volumes is finally migrating.

WHat’s I’ve noticed is if I allocate a new 1TB volume, I can migrate this 
between NFS and Ceph and it takes only about a 1 minute. I assume this is 
because it’s “thin provisioned” and there’s no actual data on the volume.

But these other volumes I’m trying to move are also “thin provisioned” but 
they’re a part of a LVM group. Does making a thin provisioned device part of a 
LVM group defeat the thin provisioning? I know these volumes weren’t full, but 
I thought perhaps there’s a chance that since it’s a pv in a LVM config, that 
maybe that defeats the thin provisioning and it counts it as a full 1TB volume? 
I’m just spitballing but I’m trying to understand how this works so we can do 
the right thing when provisioning additional volumes.

Also, the behavior I’m seeing is it takes a very long time before I see the 
block image show up on the Ceph side. Perhaps it preallocated a image before 
copying the data? But it seemed strange that I wouldn’t immidiately see the 
image appear on the Ceph side after initiating a migration. It’s hard to see 
what’s actually going on from the logs and the interface.

Thanks
-jeremy

> On Tuesday, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:29 PM, Jeremy Hansen  (mailto:jer...@skidrow.la)> wrote:
> I changed copy.volume.wait to 72000
>
> But I just noticed:
>
> kvm.storage.online.migration.wait and kvm.storage.offline.migration.wait. 
> Worth changing this?
>
> Thanks
> -jeremy
>
>
> > On Tuesday, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:01 PM, Jithin Raju 
> > mailto:jithin.r...@shapeblue.com)> wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > Have you checked the ‘wait’ parameter? Used as wait * 2 timeout.
> >
> > -Jithin
> >
> > From: Jeremy Hansen 
> > Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 12:14 PM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: Issues migrating primary storage
> > Unfortunately the upgrade didn’t help:
> >
> > Resource [StoragePool:3] is unreachable: Volume 
> > [{"name”:”bigdisk","uuid":"8f24b8a6-229a-4311-9ddc-d6c6acb89aca"}] 
> > migration failed due to [com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: 
> > Failed to copy 
> > /mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/8f24b8a6-229a-4311-9ddc-d6c6acb89aca
> >  to 5837f4e6-9307-43a9-a50c-8c9c885f25e8.qcow2].
> >
> >
> >
> > Anything else I can try? I’m trying to move away from NFS completely.
> >
> > -jeremy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:06 AM, Suresh Kumar Anaparti 
> > mailto:sureshkumar.anapa...@gmail.com>> 
> > wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > Can you extend with the config 'migratewait' and check.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Suresh
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 1:45 PM Jeremy Hansen 
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have some large volumes I’m trying to migrate from NFS to Ceph/RBD. 1TB
> > volumes. These inevitably times out. I extended these configs:
> >
> > copy.volume.wait=72000
> > job.cancel.threshold.minutes=480
> > job.expire.minutes=1440
> >
> > This helped with smaller volumes but large once still eventually fail.
> >
> > 2024-01-16 07:50:25,929 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> > (AgentManager-Handler-8:null) (logid:) Seq 1-5583619113009291196:
> > Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 20558852646968, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> > [{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"result":"false","details":"com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
> > Failed to copy
> > /mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e
> > to
> > b7acadc8-34a1-4d7a-8040-26368dafc21d.qcow2","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
> > }
> >
> > 2024-01-16 07:50:26,698 DEBUG [c.c.s.VolumeApiServiceImpl]
> > (Work-Job-Executor-41:ctx-e5baf6dc job-1175/job-1176 ctx-bc7b188b)
> > (logid:d7d98b81) Failed to migrate volume
> > com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:3]
> > is unreachable: Volume
> > [{"name":"sequencingdata","uuid":"861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e"}]
> > migration failed due to [com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
> > Failed to copy
> > /mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e
> > to b7acadc8-34a1-4d7a-8040-26368dafc21d.qcow2].
> > at
> > org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.migrateVolume(VolumeOrchestrator.java:1348)
> > at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor672.invoke(Unknown
> > Source)
> > at
> > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> > at
> > org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
> > at
> > org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
> > at
> > org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
> > at
> > 

new website design

[Daan Hoogland]

devs and users,

back in august we had a small discussion about a new website design,
led by Ivet [1]. In the meanwhile Rohit had investigated using
docusaurus as a publishing mechanism for the site. After the last few
weeks I have been working on integrating the two. The result so far
can be viewed on the staging site [2]

Please all have a look and give me any feedback you may have, so we
can move this forward.

[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/fopjc3r4hjkp9nbkj9xzoxv406rowkso
[2] https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/

-- 
Daan

Upload ISO from local using SSL Offloading

[W. Verleger - proIO GmbH]

Hi,
 
Is there anyone using SSL offloading and able to use "Images" `a "upload ISO 
from local" in CS 4.18.1.0 ?
 
I receive the following error message in CS:
 
Network Error
Unable to reach the management server or a browser extension may be blocking 
the network request.
 
And MGMT server log:
 
024-01-17 17:27:01,611 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] 
(Upload-Monitor-1:ctx-87ab24ff) (logid:2ed291e7) Coudn't find ssvm for 
urlhttp://my.domain.com/upload/f63853e9-d9bc-46aa-b04c-6de181a939c2
 
(my.domain.com as placeholder)
 
Can anyone help how to achieve ISO upload from local?
Thank  you!
 
 
Best regards,
Wilken


- proIO GmbH -
Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main

USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239

Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. 
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten 
haben, 
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. 
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht 
gestattet. 

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) 
please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.  
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this 
e-mail is strictly forbidden. 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC2

[Wei ZHOU]

Hi Daan,

multipath is not used in our environments at all.
The tests for PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524 look ok
until now. Let's wait for the test results.

-Wei

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 15:16, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> Wei, is this with a VM/Volume not using multipath itself? If it is it
> is definitely a reason to create a new RC, if it isn't I think we can
> manage a known issue for a new feature.
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:50 PM Wei ZHOU  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ahbishek, and everyone tested or is testing RC2.
> >
> > I ran some tests on a ubuntu22 environment , and got the following
> > exception when stopping VMs.
> >
> > 2024-01-17 12:56:26,053 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> > (AgentManager-Handler-17:null) (logid:) Seq 2-8295911988593164342:
> > Processing:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 32989056598488, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> >
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":"false","details":"java.lang.NullPointerException
> > at com.cloud.utils.script.Script.getExitValue(Script.java:74)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.runScript(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:476)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:226)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.KVMStoragePoolManager.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(KVMStoragePoolManager.java:205)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.cleanupDisk(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3335)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:101)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:49)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtRequestWrapper.execute(LibvirtRequestWrapper.java:78)
> > at
> >
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1903)
> >
> > The workaround is
> > chmod +x /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/multipath/*.sh
> > The PR to fix it : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524
> >
> >
> > Please note, this is not a -1 on the RC2. If we think this is not a
> > critical issue, we need to update the upgrade instruction for it.
> >
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 13:04, Abhishek Kumar 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
> for
> > > a vote:
> > >
> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20240115T1418
> > > Commit: 38bd4fd72bdae354c4b0f615a4861fc84d67b29a
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using
> 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >
> > > For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to:
> > > http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC2/
> > >
> > > Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory
> > > before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed:
> > > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate
> > > "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Abhishek
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

[cristian.c]

Update:

  After I updated the mgmt._server_id for all the hosts, looks like the tasks 
are running now.   I still have some issues with some system vms, I will 
recreate and see if everything is ok.


Regards,
Cristian

-Original Message-
From: cristian.c@istream.today  
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 5:03 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 
11: Link is closed

Hi Wei,

   Please see :

root@acs-apac:/etc/cloudstack/management# hostname -f acs-apac

One thing I saw right now in table hosts, the mgmt._server_id is still 
corresponding to previous server  

Right now, all the nodes are with state Up but with a timeout in logs. I 
changed the mgmt._server_id for one host to the new id, current server, and the 
state was updated to Disconnected. Now I'm a bit confused; should not all hosts 
have the new mgmt._server_id, or is this updated over time?

For clarification, the hosts are up and reachable from cloudstack and vice 
versa.  

Regards,
Cristian



-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU 
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 4:56 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 
11: Link is closed

The msid should be same after restart.

Can you check if "hostname -f" works?


在 2024年1月17日星期三，  写道：

> I already have a headache. Anyone here who can provide support for 
> this (not for a fee)? I need to restore this CloudStack, but it is 
> impossible on this version.
>
>
> Now any task I execute I see repetitive :
>
> 2024-01-17 14:41:20,892 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentAttache]
> (AgentManager-Handler-9:null) (logid:) Seq 6-5811613844144914446:
> Forwarding Seq 6-5811613844144914446:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050149016, via:
> 6, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.
> RebootCommand":{"vmName":"s-24960-VM","executeInSequence":
> "true","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}] } to 52239141482
>
> So, I only see this in the log, one after another. Here I just tried 
> to reboot a secondary storage to see if it works. No matter what I 
> try, I see a similar repetitive event in the log, and it will not stop 
> until I restart the cloudstack-management.
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cristian.c@istream.today 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:46 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable:
> Host 11: Link is closed
>
> Hi Wei,
>
>   I just did this, now I set this for both entries :
>
> |id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
>   |state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update
> |removed|alert_count|
> |---|---|-||
> |-||-|--
> --|---|---|---|
> |1  |52,239,141,482 
> |1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down
> |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17
> 12:36:18|0  |
> |2  |345,050,133,919|1,705,475,667,602|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-
> 8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Down |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090
>  |2024-01-17 07:20:02|2024-01-17 12:36:23|0  |
>
>
> And after start I see this :
>
> |id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
>   |state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update
> |removed|alert_count|
> |---|---|-||
> |-||-|--
> --|---|---|---|
> |1  |52,239,141,482 
> |1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down
> |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17
> 12:36:18|0  |
> |2
> ||345,050,133,919|1,705,487,986,668|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-f
> |a11327ebe29|Up
>  |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-17 10:41:05|
>  |0  |
>
>
> This is what I have in mshost status :
>
> |id |ms_id   |last_jvm_start
>  |last_jvm_stop  |last_system_boot   |os_distribution
>  |java_name|java_version   |updated
> |created|removed|
> |---||--
> -|---|---|--
> |-|---|-
> --|---|---|
> |2  |bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|2024-01-10
> |08:23:25|2024-01-10
> 08:16:12|2024-01-10 08:23:15|Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS|Ubuntu
>  |11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04|2024-01-16 07:59:59|2022-09-30
> 07:40:52|   |
> |3  |5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|2024-01-17
> |07:14:16|2024-01-17
> 07:14:14|2024-01-16 21:34:09|Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS|Ubuntu
>  |11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04|2024-01-17 07:19:46|2024-01-16
> 11:53:18|   

Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli

[Vladimir Petrov]

Congratulations, Alex!

Best wishes,
Vladi

From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 17 January 2024 12:44
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli

Congratulations Alex!


Regards.


From: João Jandre Paraquetti 
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 18:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli

Congrats, Alexandre!

Best regards,
João Jandre

On 1/10/24 19:27, Nux wrote:
> All,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Alexandre Mattioli to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Alex has been instrumental in many features present today in
> Cloudstack, with a focus on networking and VMWare:
> - IPv6 static routing
> - Edge Zones
> - Autoscaling with VR
> - VNF appliances
> - VMWare NSX support
> - Tungsten Fabric / OpenSDN
> - Backup & recovery framework
> - VLAN trunking and security policies in ESX
> and so on.
>
>
> Please join me in congratulating Alex!
>




 

RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

[cristian.c]

Hi Wei,

   Please see :

root@acs-apac:/etc/cloudstack/management# hostname -f
acs-apac

One thing I saw right now in table hosts, the mgmt._server_id is still 
corresponding to previous server  

Right now, all the nodes are with state Up but with a timeout in logs. I 
changed the mgmt._server_id for one host to the new id, current server, and the 
state was updated to Disconnected. Now I'm a bit confused; should not all hosts 
have the new mgmt._server_id, or is this updated over time?

For clarification, the hosts are up and reachable from cloudstack and vice 
versa.  

Regards,
Cristian



-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU  
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 4:56 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 
11: Link is closed

The msid should be same after restart.

Can you check if "hostname -f" works?


在 2024年1月17日星期三，  写道：

> I already have a headache. Anyone here who can provide support for 
> this (not for a fee)? I need to restore this CloudStack, but it is 
> impossible on this version.
>
>
> Now any task I execute I see repetitive :
>
> 2024-01-17 14:41:20,892 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentAttache]
> (AgentManager-Handler-9:null) (logid:) Seq 6-5811613844144914446:
> Forwarding Seq 6-5811613844144914446:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050149016, via:
> 6, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.
> RebootCommand":{"vmName":"s-24960-VM","executeInSequence":
> "true","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}] } to 52239141482
>
> So, I only see this in the log, one after another. Here I just tried 
> to reboot a secondary storage to see if it works. No matter what I 
> try, I see a similar repetitive event in the log, and it will not stop 
> until I restart the cloudstack-management.
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cristian.c@istream.today 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:46 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable:
> Host 11: Link is closed
>
> Hi Wei,
>
>   I just did this, now I set this for both entries :
>
> |id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
>   |state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update
> |removed|alert_count|
> |---|---|-||
> |-||-|--
> --|---|---|---|
> |1  |52,239,141,482 
> |1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down
> |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17
> 12:36:18|0  |
> |2  |345,050,133,919|1,705,475,667,602|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-
> 8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Down |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090
>  |2024-01-17 07:20:02|2024-01-17 12:36:23|0  |
>
>
> And after start I see this :
>
> |id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
>   |state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update
> |removed|alert_count|
> |---|---|-||
> |-||-|--
> --|---|---|---|
> |1  |52,239,141,482 
> |1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down
> |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17
> 12:36:18|0  |
> |2  
> ||345,050,133,919|1,705,487,986,668|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-f
> |a11327ebe29|Up
>  |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-17 10:41:05|
>  |0  |
>
>
> This is what I have in mshost status :
>
> |id |ms_id   |last_jvm_start
>  |last_jvm_stop  |last_system_boot   |os_distribution
>  |java_name|java_version   |updated
> |created|removed|
> |---||--
> -|---|---|--
> |-|---|-
> --|---|---|
> |2  |bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|2024-01-10 
> |08:23:25|2024-01-10
> 08:16:12|2024-01-10 08:23:15|Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS|Ubuntu
>  |11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04|2024-01-16 07:59:59|2022-09-30
> 07:40:52|   |
> |3  |5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|2024-01-17 
> |07:14:16|2024-01-17
> 07:14:14|2024-01-16 21:34:09|Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS|Ubuntu
>  |11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04|2024-01-17 07:19:46|2024-01-16
> 11:53:18|   |
>
> And I have the same issue, host timeout.
>
> I'm out of ideas.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Cristian
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei ZHOU 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:19 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable:
> Host 11: Link is closed
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you mark the mgmt server as Down (or set "removed" to "now()") in 
> the "mshost" table , and 

Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

[Wei ZHOU]

The msid should be same after restart.

Can you check if "hostname -f" works?


在 2024年1月17日星期三，  写道：

> I already have a headache. Anyone here who can provide support for this
> (not for a fee)? I need to restore this CloudStack, but it is impossible on
> this version.
>
>
> Now any task I execute I see repetitive :
>
> 2024-01-17 14:41:20,892 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentAttache]
> (AgentManager-Handler-9:null) (logid:) Seq 6-5811613844144914446:
> Forwarding Seq 6-5811613844144914446:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050149016, via:
> 6, Ver: v1, Flags: 100111, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.
> RebootCommand":{"vmName":"s-24960-VM","executeInSequence":
> "true","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}] } to 52239141482
>
> So, I only see this in the log, one after another. Here I just tried to
> reboot a secondary storage to see if it works. No matter what I try, I see
> a similar repetitive event in the log, and it will not stop until I restart
> the cloudstack-management.
>
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cristian.c@istream.today 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:46 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable:
> Host 11: Link is closed
>
> Hi Wei,
>
>   I just did this, now I set this for both entries :
>
> |id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
>   |state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update
> |removed|alert_count|
> |---|---|-||
> |-||-|--
> --|---|---|---|
> |1  |52,239,141,482 
> |1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down
> |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17
> 12:36:18|0  |
> |2  |345,050,133,919|1,705,475,667,602|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-
> 8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Down |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090
>  |2024-01-17 07:20:02|2024-01-17 12:36:23|0  |
>
>
> And after start I see this :
>
> |id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
>   |state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update
> |removed|alert_count|
> |---|---|-||
> |-||-|--
> --|---|---|---|
> |1  |52,239,141,482 
> |1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down
> |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17
> 12:36:18|0  |
> |2  
> |345,050,133,919|1,705,487,986,668|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Up
>  |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-17 10:41:05|
>  |0  |
>
>
> This is what I have in mshost status :
>
> |id |ms_id   |last_jvm_start
>  |last_jvm_stop  |last_system_boot   |os_distribution
>  |java_name|java_version   |updated
> |created|removed|
> |---||--
> -|---|---|--
> |-|---|-
> --|---|---|
> |2  |bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|2024-01-10 08:23:25|2024-01-10
> 08:16:12|2024-01-10 08:23:15|Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS|Ubuntu
>  |11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04|2024-01-16 07:59:59|2022-09-30
> 07:40:52|   |
> |3  |5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|2024-01-17 07:14:16|2024-01-17
> 07:14:14|2024-01-16 21:34:09|Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS|Ubuntu
>  |11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04|2024-01-17 07:19:46|2024-01-16
> 11:53:18|   |
>
> And I have the same issue, host timeout.
>
> I'm out of ideas.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Cristian
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei ZHOU 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:19 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable:
> Host 11: Link is closed
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you mark the mgmt server as Down (or set "removed" to "now()") in the
> "mshost" table , and retry?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 10:29,  wrote:
>
> > Looks like restoring on the exact same OS version is not fixing the
> > issue... at starting the cloudstack I get this error :
> >
> > 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:)
> > System
> > resource:
> > file:/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> > 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:)
> > Absolute path =
> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> > 2024-01-17 09:26:26,068 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (main:null)
> > (logid:) Executing: /bin/bash
> > /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> > /var/lib/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa
> > 2024-01-17 09:26:26,070 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> > (main:null)
> > 

RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

[cristian.c]

I already have a headache. Anyone here who can provide support for this (not 
for a fee)? I need to restore this CloudStack, but it is impossible on this 
version.


Now any task I execute I see repetitive :

2024-01-17 14:41:20,892 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentAttache] 
(AgentManager-Handler-9:null) (logid:) Seq 6-5811613844144914446: Forwarding 
Seq 6-5811613844144914446:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 345050149016, via: 6, Ver: v1, 
Flags: 100111, 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.RebootCommand":{"vmName":"s-24960-VM","executeInSequence":"true","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
 } to 52239141482

So, I only see this in the log, one after another. Here I just tried to reboot 
a secondary storage to see if it works. No matter what I try, I see a similar 
repetitive event in the log, and it will not stop until I restart the 
cloudstack-management.


Regards,
Cristian 




-Original Message-
From: cristian.c@istream.today  
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:46 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 
11: Link is closed

Hi Wei,

  I just did this, now I set this for both entries :

|id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
|state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update|removed  
  |alert_count|
|---|---|-|||-||-||---|---|---|
|1  |52,239,141,482 
|1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down 
|4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17 12:36:18|0  
|
|2  
|345,050,133,919|1,705,475,667,602|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Down
 |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-17 07:20:02|2024-01-17 12:36:23|0 
 |


And after start I see this :

|id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
|state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update|removed  
  |alert_count|
|---|---|-|||-||-||---|---|---|
|1  |52,239,141,482 
|1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down 
|4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17 12:36:18|0  
|
|2  
|345,050,133,919|1,705,487,986,668|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Up
   |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-17 10:41:05|   
|0  |


This is what I have in mshost status :

|id |ms_id   |last_jvm_start |last_jvm_stop 
 |last_system_boot   |os_distribution   |java_name|java_version 
  |updated|created|removed|
|---||---|---|---|--|-|---|---|---|---|
|2  |bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|2024-01-10 08:23:25|2024-01-10 
08:16:12|2024-01-10 08:23:15|Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS|Ubuntu   
|11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04|2024-01-16 07:59:59|2022-09-30 07:40:52|   
|
|3  |5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|2024-01-17 07:14:16|2024-01-17 
07:14:14|2024-01-16 21:34:09|Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS|Ubuntu   
|11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04|2024-01-17 07:19:46|2024-01-16 11:53:18|   
|

And I have the same issue, host timeout.  

I'm out of ideas.


Thank you,
Cristian


-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU 
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:19 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 
11: Link is closed

Hi,

Can you mark the mgmt server as Down (or set "removed" to "now()") in the 
"mshost" table , and retry?

-Wei

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 10:29,  wrote:

> Looks like restoring on the exact same OS version is not fixing the 
> issue... at starting the cloudstack I get this error :
>
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) 
> System
> resource:
> file:/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) 
> Absolute path = 
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,068 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> (main:null)
> (logid:) Executing: /bin/bash
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> /var/lib/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,070 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> (main:null)
> (logid:) Executing while with timeout : 360
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,078 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl]
> (main:null)
> (logid:) Execution is successful.
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,083 INFO  

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC2

[Daan Hoogland]

Wei, is this with a VM/Volume not using multipath itself? If it is it
is definitely a reason to create a new RC, if it isn't I think we can
manage a known issue for a new feature.

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:50 PM Wei ZHOU  wrote:
>
> Thanks Ahbishek, and everyone tested or is testing RC2.
>
> I ran some tests on a ubuntu22 environment , and got the following
> exception when stopping VMs.
>
> 2024-01-17 12:56:26,053 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
> (AgentManager-Handler-17:null) (logid:) Seq 2-8295911988593164342:
> Processing:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 32989056598488, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":"false","details":"java.lang.NullPointerException
> at com.cloud.utils.script.Script.getExitValue(Script.java:74)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.runScript(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:476)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:226)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.KVMStoragePoolManager.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(KVMStoragePoolManager.java:205)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.cleanupDisk(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3335)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:101)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:49)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtRequestWrapper.execute(LibvirtRequestWrapper.java:78)
> at
> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1903)
>
> The workaround is
> chmod +x /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/multipath/*.sh
> The PR to fix it : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524
>
>
> Please note, this is not a -1 on the RC2. If we think this is not a
> critical issue, we need to update the upgrade instruction for it.
>
>
> -Wei
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 13:04, Abhishek Kumar  wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
> > a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20240115T1418
> > Commit: 38bd4fd72bdae354c4b0f615a4861fc84d67b29a
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to:
> > http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC2/
> >
> > Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory
> > before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed:
> > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Abhishek
> >



-- 
Daan

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Jayanth Reddy]

Hello Bharat,
Please let me know if your question is only on ISO uploads and template 
registrations.

Template registration of an external QCOW2 or any compatible ones need only 
SNAT to work towards the destination (where your QCOW2s are hosted). Please 
note that secondary storage VM is responsible for this, and specifically the 
"Public IP address" interface assigned and it doesn't matter if it is actual 
Public address or as part of RFC 1918. As long as you've got reachability to 
the external HTTP server where QCOW2 or similar are hosted, this will just work.

I don't think DNAT works for the system VMs as the URLs during template uploads 
only point to "Public IP address" assigned to Secondary Storage VM. Please 
check this out on the Cloudstack Web UI. If this address is part of RFC 1918, 
then your client will attempt to make a connection to this only, and not the 
DNAT address which you'd have externally configured. IIUC, there is no option 
to set the DNAT address on Cloudstack.

Please also note the same for template or ISO copies across zones. The ACLs on 
Apache htaccess file will be put as the "Public IP Address" on the secondary 
storage VMs, however this can be manually edited to include the SNAT IP of your 
secondary storage VM.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,
Jayanth


From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 5:43:13 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment

Hi Jithin,

I can use the RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT but it has to be configured in the 
system itself.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_2404564422]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 5:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

Can’t you use an RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT for cloudstack public traffic?

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin,

That is the major requirement as I am lacking to have the IP range. So that’s 
why I consider the create virtual network and that network NATing with the one 
interface and one IP.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_495948912]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:51 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC2

[Wei ZHOU]

Thanks Ahbishek, and everyone tested or is testing RC2.

I ran some tests on a ubuntu22 environment , and got the following
exception when stopping VMs.

2024-01-17 12:56:26,053 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-17:null) (logid:) Seq 2-8295911988593164342:
Processing:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 32989056598488, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":"false","details":"java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.cloud.utils.script.Script.getExitValue(Script.java:74)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.runScript(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:476)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(MultipathSCSIAdapterBase.java:226)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.storage.KVMStoragePoolManager.disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath(KVMStoragePoolManager.java:205)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.cleanupDisk(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3335)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:101)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.execute(LibvirtStopCommandWrapper.java:49)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.wrapper.LibvirtRequestWrapper.execute(LibvirtRequestWrapper.java:78)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1903)

The workaround is
chmod +x /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/multipath/*.sh
The PR to fix it : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8524


Please note, this is not a -1 on the RC2. If we think this is not a
critical issue, we need to update the upgrade instruction for it.


-Wei

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 13:04, Abhishek Kumar  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
> a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20240115T1418
> Commit: 38bd4fd72bdae354c4b0f615a4861fc84d67b29a
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to:
> http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC2/
>
> Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory
> before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed:
> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Bharat Bhushan Saini]

Hi Jithin,

I can use the RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT but it has to be configured in the 
system itself.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_2404564422]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 5:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

Can’t you use an RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT for cloudstack public traffic?

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin,

That is the major requirement as I am lacking to have the IP range. So that’s 
why I consider the create virtual network and that network NATing with the one 
interface and one IP.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_495948912]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:51 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of 

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Jithin Raju]

Hi Bharat,

Can’t you use an RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT for cloudstack public traffic?

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin,

That is the major requirement as I am lacking to have the IP range. So that’s 
why I consider the create virtual network and that network NATing with the one 
interface and one IP.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_495948912]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:51 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 

Specify Primary Storage location for snapshots

[Granwille Strauss]

Good Day

When making snapshots, the snapshot first stores the file in primary 
storage and then transports it to secondary storage and afterwards 
deletes it from primary leaving the copy on secondary storage. We 
currently use local kvm server as the primary storage for our VM 
instances. This means that the KVM host has limited disk space left to 
temporarily save that snapshot. Is it possible for us to specify a 
primary path where snapshot can temporarily store snapshots before 
moving it to secondary storage? We have an extra NFS server, which we 
cant to use as primary, because it has enough space for this purpose. 
Please let me know?


--
Regards / Groete

 Granwille Strauss  // Senior Systems Admin

*e:* granwi...@namhost.com
*m:* +264 81 323 1260 
*w:* www.namhost.com 





Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd,

24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA



The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by 
mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It 
is forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this 
message to anyone without our explicit consent. The integrity and 
security of this email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. 
Therefore, the sender will not be held liable for any damage caused by 
the message. For our full privacy policy and disclaimers, please go to 
https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy


Powered by AdSigner 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Bharat Bhushan Saini]

Hi Jithin,

That is the major requirement as I am lacking to have the IP range. So that’s 
why I consider the create virtual network and that network NATing with the one 
interface and one IP.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_495948912]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:51 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.



--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Jithin Raju]

Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Bharat Bhushan Saini]

Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.



--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Suresh Kumar Anaparti]

Hi Bharat,

Check this, it might help.

https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx

Regards,
Suresh

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 4:00 PM Bharat Bhushan Saini
 wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server
> on a single system.
>
> System config –
>
> RAM – 64GB
>
> HDD – 1 TB
>
> CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen
>
>
>
> Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will
> communicate with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and
> don’t have the IP range to give in zone.
>
> I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on
> a single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most
> important role in cloudstack.
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Bharat Saini
>
>
>
> [image: signature_251517]
>
> --- Disclaimer: --
> This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated
> addressee and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email
> is meant exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals
> other than the addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of
> Kloudspot's proprietary rights. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please return this email to the sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the
> security or error-free transmission of e-mail communications. Information
> could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
> incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot shall not be liable
> for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.
>

Re: Cloudstack Deployment

[Jithin Raju]

Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 

RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

[cristian.c]

Hi Wei,

  I just did this, now I set this for both entries :

|id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
|state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update|removed  
  |alert_count|
|---|---|-|||-||-||---|---|---|
|1  |52,239,141,482 
|1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down 
|4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17 12:36:18|0  
|
|2  
|345,050,133,919|1,705,475,667,602|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Down
 |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-17 07:20:02|2024-01-17 12:36:23|0 
 |


And after start I see this :

|id |msid   |runid|name|uuid
|state|version |service_ip   |service_port|last_update|removed  
  |alert_count|
|---|---|-|||-||-||---|---|---|
|1  |52,239,141,482 
|1,704,875,017,724|acs-apac|bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|Down 
|4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-16 08:00:01|2024-01-17 12:36:18|0  
|
|2  
|345,050,133,919|1,705,487,986,668|acs-apac|5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|Up
   |4.18.1.0|181.41.xxx.12|9,090   |2024-01-17 10:41:05|   
|0  |


This is what I have in mshost status :

|id |ms_id   |last_jvm_start |last_jvm_stop 
 |last_system_boot   |os_distribution   |java_name|java_version 
  |updated|created|removed|
|---||---|---|---|--|-|---|---|---|---|
|2  |bd77b0ae-66d4-4783-bc17-5c3707cc1e49|2024-01-10 08:23:25|2024-01-10 
08:16:12|2024-01-10 08:23:15|Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS|Ubuntu   
|11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04|2024-01-16 07:59:59|2022-09-30 07:40:52|   
|
|3  |5fd7fd16-8134-4408-b5b7-fa11327ebe29|2024-01-17 07:14:16|2024-01-17 
07:14:14|2024-01-16 21:34:09|Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS|Ubuntu   
|11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu122.04|2024-01-17 07:19:46|2024-01-16 11:53:18|   
|

And I have the same issue, host timeout.  

I'm out of ideas.


Thank you,
Cristian


-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU  
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:19 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 
11: Link is closed

Hi,

Can you mark the mgmt server as Down (or set "removed" to "now()") in the 
"mshost" table , and retry?

-Wei

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 10:29,  wrote:

> Looks like restoring on the exact same OS version is not fixing the 
> issue... at starting the cloudstack I get this error :
>
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) 
> System
> resource:
> file:/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) 
> Absolute path = 
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,068 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] 
> (main:null)
> (logid:) Executing: /bin/bash
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> /var/lib/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,070 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] 
> (main:null)
> (logid:) Executing while with timeout : 360
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,078 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] 
> (main:null)
> (logid:) Execution is successful.
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,083 INFO  [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] 
> (main:null)
> (logid:) The script injectkeys.sh was run with result : null
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,106 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DbProperties] (main:null) 
> (logid:) DB properties were already loaded
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,106 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (main:null) (logid:) Start AsyncJobManager API executor thread pool in 
> size
> 125
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,107 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (main:null) (logid:) Start AsyncJobManager Work executor thread pool 
> in size 166
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,108 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Start configuring cluster manager : ClusterManagerImpl
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,108 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DbProperties] (main:null) 
> (logid:) DB properties were already loaded
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,109 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Cluster node IP : 10.60.0.2
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,122 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Trying to connect to 10.60.0.2
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,133 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Unable to ping management server at 

Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli

[Rohit Yadav]

Congratulations Alex!


Regards.


From: João Jandre Paraquetti 
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 18:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli

Congrats, Alexandre!

Best regards,
João Jandre

On 1/10/24 19:27, Nux wrote:
> All,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has invited Alexandre Mattioli to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Alex has been instrumental in many features present today in
> Cloudstack, with a focus on networking and VMWare:
> - IPv6 static routing
> - Edge Zones
> - Autoscaling with VR
> - VNF appliances
> - VMWare NSX support
> - Tungsten Fabric / OpenSDN
> - Backup & recovery framework
> - VLAN trunking and security policies in ESX
> and so on.
>
>
> Please join me in congratulating Alex!
>

 

Cloudstack Deployment

[Bharat Bhushan Saini]

Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

[Wei ZHOU]

Hi,

Can you mark the mgmt server as Down (or set "removed" to "now()") in the
"mshost" table , and retry?

-Wei

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 10:29,  wrote:

> Looks like restoring on the exact same OS version is not fixing the
> issue... at starting the cloudstack I get this error :
>
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) System
> resource:
> file:/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:)
> Absolute path =
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,068 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Executing: /bin/bash
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
> /var/lib/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,070 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Executing while with timeout : 360
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,078 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Execution is successful.
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,083 INFO  [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) The script injectkeys.sh was run with result : null
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,106 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DbProperties] (main:null) (logid:)
> DB properties were already loaded
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,106 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (main:null) (logid:) Start AsyncJobManager API executor thread pool in size
> 125
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,107 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
> (main:null) (logid:) Start AsyncJobManager Work executor thread pool in
> size 166
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,108 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Start configuring cluster manager : ClusterManagerImpl
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,108 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DbProperties] (main:null) (logid:)
> DB properties were already loaded
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,109 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Cluster node IP : 10.60.0.2
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,122 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Trying to connect to 10.60.0.2
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,133 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Unable to ping management server at 10.60.0.2:9090 due to
> ConnectException
> 2024-01-17 09:26:26,134 DEBUG [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null)
> (logid:) Unable to ping management server at 10.60.0.2:9090 due to
> ConnectException
> java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
> at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
> at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:483)
> at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:472)
> at java.base/sun.nio.ch
> .SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:692)
> at
> com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.pingManagementNode(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1190)
> at
> com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.pingManagementNode(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1159)
> at
> com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.checkConflicts(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1240)
> at
> com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.configure(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1115)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle$3.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:114)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.configure(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:110)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
> at
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:178)
> at
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:54)
> at
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:356)
> at java.base/java.lang.Iterable.forEach(Iterable.java:75)
> at
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:155)
> at
> org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:123)
> at
> org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.finishRefresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:937)
> at
> org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:586)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:144)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:121)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:244)
> at
> 

RE: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

[cristian.c]

Looks like restoring on the exact same OS version is not fixing the issue... at 
starting the cloudstack I get this error :

2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) System 
resource: file:/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
2024-01-17 09:26:26,067 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) (logid:) Absolute 
path =  /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh
2024-01-17 09:26:26,068 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) 
(logid:) Executing: /bin/bash 
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh 
/var/lib/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa
2024-01-17 09:26:26,070 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) 
(logid:) Executing while with timeout : 360
2024-01-17 09:26:26,078 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) 
(logid:) Execution is successful.
2024-01-17 09:26:26,083 INFO  [c.c.s.ConfigurationServerImpl] (main:null) 
(logid:) The script injectkeys.sh was run with result : null
2024-01-17 09:26:26,106 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DbProperties] (main:null) (logid:) DB 
properties were already loaded
2024-01-17 09:26:26,106 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (main:null) 
(logid:) Start AsyncJobManager API executor thread pool in size 125
2024-01-17 09:26:26,107 INFO  [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (main:null) 
(logid:) Start AsyncJobManager Work executor thread pool in size 166
2024-01-17 09:26:26,108 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Start configuring cluster manager : ClusterManagerImpl
2024-01-17 09:26:26,108 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.DbProperties] (main:null) (logid:) DB 
properties were already loaded
2024-01-17 09:26:26,109 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Cluster node IP : 10.60.0.2
2024-01-17 09:26:26,122 INFO  [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Trying to connect to 10.60.0.2
2024-01-17 09:26:26,133 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Unable to ping management server at 10.60.0.2:9090 due to ConnectException
2024-01-17 09:26:26,134 DEBUG [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Unable to ping management server at 10.60.0.2:9090 due to ConnectException
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:483)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:472)
at 
java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:692)
at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.pingManagementNode(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1190)
at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.pingManagementNode(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1159)
at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.checkConflicts(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1240)
at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.configure(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1115)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle$3.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:114)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:153)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.configure(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:110)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:178)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:54)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:356)
at java.base/java.lang.Iterable.forEach(Iterable.java:75)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:155)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:123)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.finishRefresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:937)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:586)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:144)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:121)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:244)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:249)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:249)
at 

Unable to Setup Private Gateway

[Bryan Tiang]

Hi All,

We're setting up Private Gateway on VPC but not able to get the connection
to work. The connection is successful from switch to Private Gateway IP
using VLAN 995.

However when Private Gateway is created in VPC, the connection failed when
tested from Virtual Router.

Physical Network 3 is also used for Management & Public Network

Is there any other config that we could have missed?
[image: WhatsApp Image 2024-01-17 at 4.30.14 PM.jpeg]
Regards,
Hunter

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC2

[Daan Hoogland]

+1 (binding)

both signatures checked, otherwise as I was heavily involved I am
trusting in all testing done along the way.

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 1:04 PM Abhishek Kumar  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for
> a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20240115T1418
> Commit: 38bd4fd72bdae354c4b0f615a4861fc84d67b29a
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to:
> http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC2/
>
> Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory
> before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed:
> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek



-- 
Daan